LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Administrator

( This is LMBW's requests for administrator page. If you wish to request administrator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page made are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 25 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has requested administrator rights before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for administrator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 8 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

Madkatmaximus
I think we need more fully active admins(ATM I believe we only have 4). I edit mainspace frequently, and am on chat quite often. As for maturity concerns, I don't really think I'm immature anymore like I was a year ago, I just tend to say random things sometimes. If anyone has any criticism of me I'd like it if you tell me so I can improve in whatever it is you have to criticize. I'd love it if you's support me, or at the very least, give a good reason not to. Thank you. :3

Support

 * 1) Yes plz. -The Commander
 * 2) Edits. Doesn't break policies (Okay, this might be a stretch. ) Would also be an interesting addition to the admin team.  - White  Shadows  23:19, July 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) 13legoskull
 * 4) Green-kool-aid-man.jpg LCF  (talk! ) Purple-kool-aid-man.jpg 23:22, July 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) Heck YES. -Lelouch vi Britannia
 * 6) OFC
 * 7) Sure, improved behaviour. Think he could handle it. - MC1
 * 8) Marcel77799
 * 9) Benboy
 * 10) He's a very interactive user. I've never had any problems with him. MsD  talk 23:55, July 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * 11) On second thoughts... - Twisted
 * 12) In the name of serious fun, and why not. araivs (talk) 14:38, July 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * 13) 100% YES. User:Chihiya Kisaragi
 * 14) Why not? Plus I think we need an Admin who can actually have fun. c: - Div
 * 15) Sure, if he lets me have a picture of himself :3 - Tannericus
 * 16) Of course. He's insane, like all of our admins. He'll fit in well. Bgirlabby
 * 17) User:Oreh-Wen
 * 1) User:Oreh-Wen

Neutral

 * 1) I don't have a reason to oppose you really, but I'm not going to support because, while I don't doubt modding abilities, you're still very new. You meet the requirement to run for admin, but still. It's preferable to have at least 6 months or so moderating experience. Maybe down the road I'd be willing to support, but not ATM. -Ireithien
 * 2) Not entirely convinced he would be ready for it. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 10:25, July 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) I don't think you are ready.
 * 4) Sorry, not gonna get into this one. --Netbag (talk) 23:30, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) What Irethien and Alemas said along with number 3. Also i believe you may not be entirely ready for it, 40 of me wants to support 40 of me wants to oppose the 10 percent is neutral, so yeah. I believe with a bit more experience, a tad less unstability when it comes to seriousness and nonseriousness, a tad more being un biasedness. An example would be: "one of your friends wants you to kick or ban or block another user, you should say no, because unless this user has done something that warrents a kick or ban or block respectively, you cannot do anything. If those change, i would support 100%
 * 6) *....I've never kicked or banned someone because a friend of mine told me to. I only kick or ban when I have good reason to. Anyway, I thank you for your comment.
 * 7) *I know you have not. But several people across wikia have done so, so i am just stating it. But i thank you for not getting angry.
 * 8) *If you know he hasn't, then why did you say he did? -Lelouch vi Britannia

Oppose

 * 1) I don't see you as a good Admin because of your maturity. Even when you're not on chat, you don't set the best example.  L • S  • B
 * 2) You still strike me as incredibly immature. Sorry. Impulse
 * 3) Basically, what the rest of the opposition has said. :P Dinosaur Office RAWR!
 * 4) Sorry, I'm moving to oppose. I think that you're still rather immature. A5637 (talk) 20:10, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) *I'd like to point out that he made this decision based on seeing me 45 minutes on chat making jokes.
 * 6) **wow
 * 7) I was actually considering going neutral on this one, only because I've been amazed at how well of a mod you've turned out to be. However, after seeing your responses to the opposing votes, I am firmly opposing. I'd say the worst of these responses was what you said to LSB - "off wiki doesn't count." It may not count for blocks, but when evaluating whether or not you trust a person to what is the highest authority on the wiki, off wiki is every bit as important as on the wiki. If a person can't control himself off the wiki, I wouldn't trust him to be in such a high position no matter how well he behaves here. One of the most important aspects of being an admin is your responses to things. If you actually believed that was a reasonable response, then I cannot do anything other than oppose you for admin. But please do keep working at it; like I said, you've impressed me greatly in the past, and I'm sure you'll do so again in the future. Drewlzoo
 * 8) *The only reason I said that about off wiki was because of Nash. I don't act worse on any other wikis, and Nash is a thing of the past which I won't do again. I didn't intend for that comment to come across as rude or disrespectful. About A5, I was just a bit frustrated because I got on chat and was being silly because that was just the atmosphere of the time, and he opposes based on that. I just didn't think that was at all fair to me.
 * 9) I'm with Drew completely.
 * 10) I don't think you're mature enough for these rights, sorry. Also, per the rest of the opposition. Peregrin Took (talk)
 * 11) Completely with Drew on this, Sorry Mad.

Comments
Serious question to any opposers, does it have anything to do with nash?
 * @Imp immature how? I'm generally non-serious on chat, but I can be serious when I need to be.
 * @LSB, if you are referring to Nash, that was in the past and I've moved on.


 * Madkat, I believe you put in the request on July 11th, and it's now been 11 days. You have 17 supporters, and 7 opposes. As long with 5 neutrals. My question is; when does the voting end? Just wondering,  L • S  • B  01:40, July 22, 2014 (UTC)