Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-26908198-20150727013747/@comment-26127871-20150727100031

I&#039;mDivergent wrote:

ShadowOfOblivion7119 wrote:

Luke McSwagger99 wrote: ShadowOfOblivion7119 wrote: ShadowOfOblivion7119 wrote: I'd say bit of both,

They need to be evaluated on their chat skills, so IDK, have some people evaluate how they moderate, but we don't tell the CM who is evaluating them, so they don't act different. Then they judge and report it to the Admins or something, that way we can have actual examples and stuff. Plus, that's my thought on how an Evaluation goes :P

And then, at the end of the three day evaluation period, all info is put together, and then people vote.

Ello? I'm not sure i entirely understand what you mean there. Could you try rephrasing it a little bit? No problem. What I'm saying is, if someone is to be re-evaluated, we pick a user to watch them for 3 days, and judge their CM abilities, then they report to the Admins. But, the CM who is being evaluated doesn't know WHO is watching him/her. Then, at the end of the 3 day evaluation period, all evidence is put together and then a vote is made if they should be demoted or no. But that user could have bias against the cm they are watching which the admins might not know.

Indeed. Perhaps there were 2 evaluators?