Thread:Keplers/@comment-25595629-20170324005345

I know I'm inactive as a Chat Moderator and Rollback Patroller, but I'm trying to come back in the next few months. I was scrolling through Recent Activity when I noticed an edit by you that seemed questionable.

http://legomessageboards.wikia.com/wiki/LEGO_Message_Boards_Wiki:Requests_for_Rights/Administrator?diff=850188&oldid=850186

Your reason was as follows: "This was supposed to have been edited already and I'm doing what an admin apparently failed to do.)"

First, why would it be the job of a normal user just because an Admin hasn't done it? Non-Admins like me and you don't vote on Admin votes or block users just because it's something "an admin apparently failed to do." Assuming this is in fact an Admin's job, what makes this any different?

What concerns me more, and which is probably more important, is that you were editing a vote by someone else to change the way it read, presumably without their permission. Perhaps I was wrong and man.city1 asked you to edit the comment, in which case I'll happily retract this thread...but why wouldn't he edit it himself? Maybe it's just me, but I don't understand why it would be right for even an Admin to do this. Votes are part of the democratic process on this Wiki, and people have their own reasons for voting the way they do. If you believe a reason for an oppose is false or out of line, the comment section is where people debate those reasons, not the user's own vote in question.

Veralenn is my friend. I really don't know what to think of this situation going on right now, and I'm trying hard not to take sides. But the last thing anyone needs is an otherwise outstanding user putting words in other people's mouths by editing the vote reasons of people he disagrees with. Please reconsider this. 