User blog comment:Keplers/I'm so Sick of This I'll Make a Blog/@comment-4964341-20130801223536

"Well unless they used the exact same words, surely they were banned for different things. If they both said the exact same words, it would be unfair to have different bans. If they said different things, then it makes sense there may be a discrepancy depending on what was said/attitude/amount of times etc"

CJC, although seemingly highly against my unban/shortening, just made an excellent point in my defense.

Meiko said the words "damn" and "hell." He was told to stop swearing, to which I replied that they were religious terms (stupid as it was, that broke no rules at all).

He said swears and was unbanned, yet I use them as examples and still serve a three-month ban.

It does make sense that there would be discrepancy depending on attitude/what was said/amount of times. Watch this:

Meiko's trolled this place a dozen times. This is a first-time offense for me, and we all understand why I happened and won't happen again (or at least I do).

Meiko's attitude was much worse than mine, with nasty comments everywhere about every aspect of LMBW. I didn't make any statements, I merely agreed.

What Meiko said far outweighs anything I said. I don't understand why you (the admins and offense (prosecution doesn't seem the right words - in Obi's words, "Don't even get me started on 'legally'.") seem to believe otherwise.

But I do have a guess: whether it was a conscious decision or not, showing more tolerance to Meiko may make relations between LMBW/Brickipedia stable. Showing zero tolerance to me will result in nothing from any wikis.