Thread:TheShadowAssassin/@comment-26067066-20161030005240/@comment-5381241-20161030193630

AmazingPythor wrote: ~snip~ " Firstly, here was the issue with your situation (@TSA). The interpretation of your remarks as attacking and sexist was primarily based on the fact that you went out of your way to post them on her wall  even after they were removed from the original thread.  This implies that you were actually knowledgeable of your remarks being against the rules, as they were removed by a Discussions Moderator, and yet despite this made an effort to reiterate them on her message wall. If not for that incident, which made evident a disregard for this wiki’s policy, we likely would not be having this conversation. If you merely reposted them because you found their removal unfair, then the best way to deal with that would be by  contacting another staff member, not through this seemingly aggressive attack on her message wall."

Are you serious? First of all, I specifically stated that I never once went out of my way already, so stop saying that.

Secondly, my comments were removed because Bubbles found them "rude and sarcastic" because, and only because, I was calling her out on something completely legitimate, and she knew that. The removal of the comment on the original thread was not so much her being offended as it was her trying to cover it up, otherwise, why is my comment about her period still up and not removed with the rest? That is why I restated them on her wall. I knew what she was doing and why, and I wanted to make sure that I was clear. I wasn't harassing her. I wasn't "going out of my way". I wasn't doing it to intentionally provoke her or be mean; I was calling her out on her actions. I shouldn't have to contact another staff member, period. Also, I think you're "misconstruing" my message on her wall; it wasn't an attack, it was a direct message notifying her that I find her comments rude, self-righteous, condescending, and offensive (and I'm not alone)!!!

" Now, on to the issue with Bubbles’ misconstrued remarks. Before I begin, I’d like to emphasize that this is in reference to  this ,  this  and  this, not the derogatory comments towards Ben and NG, which I agree were out of line. Frankly, to the average person, her handling of these threads should appear completely professional, and I am unbeknownst as to how one is able to feel “offended” by these. This is where the common sense policy applies. I believe that those viewing these as snarky and condescending are, intentionally or unintentionally,  over-analyzing  the comments in an attempt to undermine her authority (one may view this as paranoid, but some of the people who considered these “self-righteous” have previously brought up completely insignificant occurrences and labeled them as unprofessional behavior, so I find it difficult to trust that this is not the product of some personal grudge, at least on the behalf of some of you). I do not like jumping to conclusions, so I will inquire with more neutral sources to ensure that this is not the result of me being a blind fool who is unable to see condescending behavior. If, it turns out, those whose opinions are sure to be unbiased interpret her comments on threads as “self-righteous,” I will heed your recommendations and personally apologize. However, I doubt that this will be the case, and inquiry will likely only prove my point that you are trying to see things that aren’t there, which is where UCS applies and nullifies the “intent vs. result” clause. "

Your first sentence tells me that you, still, clearly have not been listening, but whatever, I'll amuse you with a response.

So you admit that her (multiple [as opposed to my two lol]) comments to Ben and NG were out of line, yet.. no warning? Go ahead though, go inquire. I mean it's not like you're going to get any biased answers, right? Now, if we're talking about those threads (and you can forget about this one because I was never referring to that one), I have found several comments that I, personally, found self-righteous, condescending, hypocritical, and generally unprofessional:

" I don’t answer to you, and I don’t need to bring my ideas before you. "

" And I will end this by saying, I’m not sure why you have some sort of fixation with me, and constantly bring up every little thing I do with staff, even completely legitimate things. But I would like you to stop, because it borders on stalking, thanks! "

" If you wish to insult me, by all means, but please do so publicly and don't leave me to find out about all the jabs you make second hand. Thank you. "

" I would also appreciate if you wouldn't use that emote when responding to me. I take what I'm saying very seriously, and I don't think you're being very serious at all. And  that  is unprofessional. "

" In order for us to get along I expect two things[...] "

This obviously goes without mentioning the numerous other remarks made towards Ben and NG on chat recently that NG had specifically quoted earlier (as well as who knows how many others that we've missed). Also, that metaphor sucks.

I'm not responding to the rest because it's often impossible to get somebody to see their own bias.