Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-24839249-20160216191404/@comment-26838085-20160218150948

Vonness11` wrote: Mishkaiel wrote: CptSteveRogers wrote: So if boobs aren't supposed to be sexualized and there's nothing wrong with saying the word what would be wrong with posting female topless pictures in chat? If some are saying the word shouldn't be sexualized then doesn't that mean we shouod be looking at them in a non sexual manner? Thus there shouldn't be any commotion over topless pictures?

Im not saying i agree with the above theory im just throwing it out there to get clearity as this would be alittle confusing for some people id imagine.

Also shouldn't we unblock the other word for vagina since since we can use it in a non sexual way jusr like breasts? This makes sense too. I mean, if you guys can talk about it in a non-sexual matter, surely we can post pictures if we mean them in a non-sexual matter. One allows the other.

You people keep saying "well we should be able to talk about *fill in the blank* so we can warn others of how bad it is." Well, a picture is worth a thousand words, so why not give them a picture of a topless female if you're telling them what boobs are? What about videos? Hm?

Makes perfect sense, amiright?

=l As long as the videos aren't pornographic in nature, I see absoluterly no issue with this. They're organs for feeding babies and it's really silly that they're so oversexualized. A shirtless man in a non sexual matter is absolutely no worse.

Also LSB, you mean the c word? Well, seeing as that's also a harsh insult, unlike "boobs", I don't see a particular reason to unblock it. However, if you want to make a community vote on that, it's not really my place to warn or stop you from posting that. They are personal. Not everyone needs to see shirtless pictures. How would the guys like it if us girls start posting pictures of guys without pants and keep talking about that? It's rude, gross, and unnesasarry.