User blog comment:Riolu777/The Future of the Wiki/@comment-4257955-20170106054316

Okay, we can scratch out renaming the wiki, as some have suggested. The name we have should continue to serve us. There's no need to talk about curators and whatnot yet, but thank you for the offer regarding that, Bud. I certainly think you and other oldies would be apt for such positions, we just aren't at that point yet.

We can also scratch deleting content at any point ever. Doesn't seem worth it, and serves as nostalgia fuel in the future.

To BNR's "don't ask, don't tell" ... that's probably going to be end up being the assumed rule. As Obi pointed out, we can't be in the business of soliciting ages. I still think it's a good idea to make it clear that we're 13+, but if it already tells new users this, then perhaps we don't have much responsibility in proclaiming it afterward. For what you say, Alemas, if we get a bigger influx than what we're currently receiving, and we establish some sort of relationship with off-site forums, then that should be on our front page, I agree.

For a new MBs ... Keps has already gone ahead with linking a replacement forum on a different blog, but we admins are still going to be deliberating about whether or not we officially partner with that forum and therefore point displaced MBers to it or not. Seeing that those new MBs have leaders that don't go on this wiki, it might end up serving both of our sites best if we don't directly affect each other, sort of like how this wiki is with the actual MBs. But this is still up for discussion. As others here have pointed out, establishing replacement forums on the wiki doesn't sound like the most viable of plans.

Anyway, that's a general response to what I've gathered in the comments. Feel free to continue discussing more, thank you for the input so far.