User blog comment:Obi the LEGO Fan/Regulating "Admin Talk"/@comment-4091019-20150307003642/@comment-25995065-20150307004615

Transparency- Why shouldn't the community know the truth about your opinions? If you have an honest opinion about a user, why should they not know that? If you have a problem with them or something they do, if they don't know that, how do they improve? And why should people not know why you don't agree with them? They can't form better ideas or contribute any better if they don't know the issues people have with their current ideas and contributions.

Efficiency- Wikipedia's hundreds of thousands of users manage just fine to collectively make community decisions. The admins there do nothing more in the decision making process than any other user. You can't tell me the 20-40 users who speak in community decisions on this wiki need admins to decide for them, when the several thousand active users at Wikipedia manage to do it just fine. And even on a smaller scale, Brickipedia's managed to have its decisions made by the community for years, without the need for admins acting as politicians.

Education- Per my comment about transparency. Hopefully nothing you say about other users warrants harassment to/from either party...