Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5052737-20170327113345/@comment-5510093-20170329174219

TheShadowAssassin wrote: Loney 97 wrote: I'm with Keplers but voting BBB - the main reason for those requirements are just so a user who's running knows what's expected of them and has the knowledge of this community and the way these tools are used. It shouldn't matter when they did or if they currently still maintain the position. Generally, I'd consider a user's having of rights to mean that they are in good standing on the wiki, and if they don't have rights, maybe there's a reason? I don't think it's a good gauge to depend on though - someone could not have rights simply because they were inactive, and someone could still have rights but be pretty crappy admin-wise. I don't consider this a loophole, and I think Alemas was a little biased in the wording here.