User blog comment:AmazingPythor/Important: Demotion of Veralann/@comment-26425232-20170309144727/@comment-26944420-20170310000317

Per Roddy.

Also Apple, you can't just say, "We don't know he wasn't going to leak information!" as an argument. That goes for everyone. That is literally what your side of the argument is saying when it comes down to it.

That logic works like this:

Person A: "An elephant walked through my house today."

Person B: "Your house looks fine to me. No traces of an elephant at all."

Person A: "Well you can't prove he wasn't here!"

See what I mean? Any claim, no matter how preposterous, can be "proven" (Or at least deny the counterclaim in some way) by that sort of logic.

I understand that the stuff on the admin site is very sensitive info, and I respect that, certainly, but the truth is that there's just no reasonable argument that would lead to a reasonable assumption that Hype would leak any of it just based on a statement that wasn't even completely serious.