LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Chat Moderator

This is LMBW's requests for chat moderator page. If you wish to request moderator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here. Moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat when they are being disruptive.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 20 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Users voting on a request must give a valid reason for their support or oppose. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for moderator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 4 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

MeltE2
Hello there. I'm asking for these rights because the wiki doesn't seem to have many CMs active during early evenings and nights. I've been on the wiki for quite some time and have seen my share of situations on chat and I think I can help handle any future ones. If you do oppose, I'd like to know what ways I can improve. Thanks, Mel.

Support

 * 1) I honestly can't find a reason not to support, is definitely mature and capable from what I've seen.
 * 2) Melt has been here for quite awhile, always mature, and following the rules. It would be nice if activity were a bit better, but I think CM rights will help with that. -Nehpets7000
 * 3) Would likely be better than me at modding, I'm sure.  Loney Said This 15:39, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Melt is a mature user who would do well with these rights. Sam (talk)
 * 5) Capable. Mature, i believe would be a good Moderator. And per the rest of the Support Youngjusticeforever
 * 6) You've always been very highly respected in my book, and also others I assume from the past as well. Even if you aren't on late at night, when we're low on CMs, I'd still vote for you. Very good judgement, and a all around great user. Activity isn't a major problem, as long as you are still on from time to time.  L  • S  • B
 * 7) I have never seen Melt break any rules, be involved in iffy situations, etc. Of course I support, just more activity and involvement would be lovely. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
 * 8) Everyone gave great reasons for supporting, per them. - Drewlzoo  18:05, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * 9) Per Ben and Nep.
 * 10) What everyone else said. Aravis (talk)
 * 11) Per Supports 1-10
 * 12) I don't think I've ever seen you acting a way I didn't like. I support 100%
 * 13) I think you'd make a good CM, I've never seen you act overly immature or start arguments. Lilac Neko (talk) 02:43, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * 14) Per other supports.
 * 15) Probably the nicest person on all of LMBW. Definitely deserves CM. :3 GuacamoleCCXR (talk) 20:14, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 16) He/she is a good person, and I think that he/she deserves a CM status. Satoshi2 (talk) 22:32, October 27, 2014 (UTC)Satoshi2

Neutral

 * I haven't seen too much from you, but I don't want to oppose. Green-kool-aid-man.jpg LCF  (talk! ) Purple-kool-aid-man.jpg 21:04, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * Per Ed
 * I see you on chat but I'm not sure I can see you as a mod... I definitely have no reason to oppose, but I'm not sure about supporting just yet.
 * Same as others; no reason to oppose but I haven't seen enough of you to support.--Skully Of House Lannister (talk) 00:59, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * ^ - Scorch, RC-1262
 * I dunno, I just have a funny feel I'd regret supporting you.. -Impulse09
 * Per Skul. Sky Info Me Random SSundee
 * Don't really know you well enough, sorry. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 20:18, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Not sure ATM, I might come to a decision later. Marcel77799 (talk)

Oppose

 * 1) You simply aren't on enough at nights. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
 * 2) Per Kep - LazerzSoH Not qualified to vote

Worldracer99
Something I've been noticed something that happens often is when a user violates is that none of the mods have pings on to kick. This happens a lot in the midday, which is a time i'm usually on chat.

So. I think I'd have a shot at being chatmod.

Please support, I guess. IDK what else to put.

Thank you so much.

Drace

Neutral

 * Not sure.
 * Man, I would've, but after harassing newbs you might have less of a chance than I do. :P --Skully Of House Lannister (talk) 22:10, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * meh
 * No reason to oppose, I haven't seen enough of you.  Sky SSundee  '  Message wall  '  Blogs  '  1000+ edits!  '  Sky SSundee  

Oppose

 * 1) No. Should I even explain why? Green-kool-aid-man.jpg LCF  (talk! ) Purple-kool-aid-man.jpg 22:04, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Starting an RfR after basically harassing a user and getting kicked isn't that clever. More general: Maturity concerns. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 22:05, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Alemas with more giggles Loney Said This 22:06, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Nowhere near mature enough, never seen him try to handle a situation in chat. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
 * TBH, I don't think that he has the maturity to be a good unbiased CM. I can easily see him kicking people like YJF for no real reason besides seeing his face, or using it to distill a religious conversation (without linking images of booty cream). To reiterate my statement, I don't think that World is ready yet.
 * 1) I don't think he'd make a very good mod. He's not mature enough. Sam (talk)
 * 2) I have to agree with Ale on that. In general he might have a chance but not now. Marcel77799 (talk)
 * 3) I want someone who will be very sound as a C/\/\ right now, as we (IMO) have fewer than other C/\/\s. Not someone will be hesitant kick/ban on some instances, or be involved in some mildly-subjective inappropriate or cutting edge conversations, in which you've been in, in the past. I can't name a specific one, or pull up a chat log, but my recollection of you on chat isn't always positive, and sometimes immature. So I see you being somewhat infantile as a C/\/\. You have been better lately, and if you keep it up, I might vote for you down the road.  L • S  • B  23:53, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) General maturity concerns.

Comments
But seriously- does anybody else think it's suspicious that a user comes out of nowhere two days ago, claims to be friends with YJF, and then proceeds to weave a YJF-style overblown story with holes in it that multiple users managed to pick out? ~WR99~
 * @Ale: Because a tongue smiley is definitely the appropriate emote to use in this context.
 * I changed it to a . Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 22:13, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Still completely inappropriate given the context. Also I love how everybody focuses on the one time I start questioning a user under legitimately suspicious circumstances instead of my other qualifications.
 * Edited the reason. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 22:17, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * "Maturity concerns" So you were any better for mocking his RFR on chat?
 * Either way, WR shouldn't have expected much given his timing with this. Lone Lionheart 22:25, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * @Sato's and Keps' comment: Honestly, I try to disperse religious/political arguments on chat. Not as soon as they start, but once they become heated. ...and I nearly forgot about that incident, Sato. I swear never to post awkwardly-named diaper ointment again. ~WR99~