Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-30683785-20161020152524/@comment-30683785-20161022042742

AmazingPythor wrote: HyperFlash Studios wrote: So really, for what I want, it all boils down to this:

If one mod decides a ban, let them manage it

If multiple mods handle a ban, then those same mods should all manage it

If mods/admins or just admins decide a ban, let them manage it with their respective groups

is that acceptable? Obviously admin votes will still exist but generally those should be used for extreme/very special circumstances Isn't this already the case? Keep in mind that admins should maintain some degree of authority over CMs, so they should be allowed to alter their decisions /if necessary/. Am I saying the admins should review each ban extensively? No, the instance of the admins voting on changing a ban should be very rare, which, frankly, it is. The "Keps/Brick scenario" was a special case involving the admins coming to a final decision in order to resolve a disagreement without a distinct majority, and something that I very rarely see happen. I'm not saying the admins shouldn't have any authority but they certsinly shouldn't have too much, as that would ruin the entire point of cms