Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-5052737-20150705194317/@comment-4825926-20150706081900

While I don't understand the attraction of the flag, and I think it's stupid and pointless to have it as an avatar, and I'd rather no one have it, I do not agree with punishing users who wish to have it. I don't want to warn ban/block someone merely for implications that the basic colored pattern in their avatar may represent, even if that person is perfectly nice and loving to everyone, and not spreading any hate whatsoever. I really think that is overstepping our rights as simple caretakers of a Wikia. Plus I think the reasoning is fairly weak. Used by the kkk? I don't think the actions of a couple idiots changes the meaning of something. I mean the flag of ISIS isn't banned in my country (& many other countries). I guess because it's still a legitimate flag that holds historical and educational benefits to people of that culture...? Even though heinous acts are being done in the name of that flag, daily. (As is probably the case with many other flags.) So why must we disallow this one? I don't understand that at all. So unless someone can properly explain the logic there to me, I guess I'm voting A.

P.S. If the countries where LMBW users were from, in future, outlawed the flag altogether, that would change my mind completely.