User blog comment:Obi the LEGO Fan/Regulating "Admin Talk"/@comment-4091019-20150307003642/@comment-4091019-20150307012114

As I said, I don't say disrespectful things anywhere close to that. Even if I had said "This user has trouble respecting his fellow community members" or something, that user would feel offended. There is no need for him to hear me say that until we decide as a collective group of admins that he needs to hear it. In that case, we would formally explain to him how to correct his actions.

Once again, you don't understand decisions apparently. Smaller group of 2 sided arguments = less time arguing. It's plain and simple. The process you described is the SAME thing we do as admins, but on a smaller scale. If you have 1/3 of the wiki vs another 1/3 (assuming 1/3 is neutral or has no comment) that is a much longer argument that has way more repetetive opinions. The point of having several admins is to provide that 2 sided argument but in a clean and efficient manner.