LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Chat Moderator

This is LMBW's requests for chat moderator page. If you wish to request moderator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here. Moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat when they are being disruptive.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 20 supporting votes and 75% support overall, then their request will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add  to the end of the topic header. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Current requests
Meh. It's not that I want to be a CM, or whatever. It's that this wiki is in need of actual CMs who will do their jobs, and use their abilities if needed. Too many times have I seen mods watch users spam, cuss, or etc until an actual mod who does his/her job handle the situation. If not me, please actually nominate good users. Not saying that they aren't all good, some are quite good. But there are not enough. Here's to hoping that the recently promoted users will actually do their jobs. And in terms of edits and time on the wiki, collectively, I have been around for years and made hundreds of edits.Doc (K-)Flux(7) (talk) 01:28, February 5, 2014 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) He'd make a good CM with his wise judgment. Ace Aviator of the Antares Squadron (talk)
 * 2) I think flux would do well as a Chat Moderator.

Neutral

 * If he just came back, I don't see a need yet.  James Mars     (wall)    01:49, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * I think you should wait a little while until you've been around again for enough situations to see how/if the way things are handled have changed since you've been gone. (now that Kelly Clarkson song is going to be stuck in my head) Cay (talk) 02:09, February 5, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Just came back to the wiki after a 6+ month break. I'd rather him wait a while to actually prove he's staying. -Randomized
 * 2) "I have nothing against Kiff but considering his past actions and if he might be helpful to the LMBW community, I'd recommend he not be choosen to be a Chat Moderator. The reasons why is because in the past Kiff had broken rules, and also created many dupes. How will we be sure he wont try and do these things again? Though, I do forgive and forget his actions, the past still counts for something. Though, for him to fully convince me to see him fit as a Chat Moderator, I would like to see him to be more involved in the community with what he can do now, and to regain his credibility again. ~EvilAuthorityMod

Comments

 * Wait, do we count old accounts' edits? If we do not, then Kiff doesn't meet requirements, unfortunately.
 * I mentioned that in the paragraph. If the mods are smart and generous, then yes, I should be accepted.  But, they probably won't allow it, I've never quite been on the good side of some of them.
 * @LBB: "Dupes?" When has Kiff abused multiple accounts?
 * I didn't say anything about him abusing dupes. I just said he "created many". ~EvilAuthorityMod
 * There is actually nothing wrong with having multiple accounts. I don't see why having multiple, legal accounts is basis to oppose his request for chat mod.
 * What is a good reason to have many accounts when you can have one to do everything you need? One is if your data was lost from your old account, that's it. And again, I am not accusing him that he is a Duper he can't be CM. Though in a way it does, give me less trust in being a CM considering the reputation of anything surrounding dupes. Do you not agree with that claim? ~EvilAuthorityMod
 * There actually is nothing wrong with owning dupes, as long as you aren't using them in a wrong way. Here read this.