LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Chat Moderator

This is LMBW's requests for chat moderator page. If you wish to request moderator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here. Moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat when they are being disruptive.

To file a request, press the button below and fill out the requested field(s).

Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 20 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Users voting on a request must give a valid reason for their support or oppose. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for moderator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 4 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

=Current requests=

Tuvok95
Hello, I am Tuvok, with this account I have been here for over two months, I had an old account, but I lost the password. I've always been mature in chat and I have knowledge of the regulations. We could always use more Chat Mods as chat is quite active. I have plenty of time to be a CM as well --Live long and prosper (talk) 13:05, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Haven't seen anything too bad from him, so I don't see why not (cut down on the dabs though). ~ Vera  ( Message me )
 * 2) Yes. We need more people like Tuvok in charge. Dumbledore115

Neutral

 * 1) Don't know you well enough and haven't paid attention to you enough Lilac Neko (talk) 16:14, March 7, 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) I think you could be a pretty good CM in time, and you are on chat quite a lot. But I think you should've waited a little bit to get to know the community better. ~LegoWebby101
 * 3) Don't know you enough yet so can't really make an informed decision either way so neutral. ~ Roddy
 * 4) You're the type of person I would trust as a CM, but I'm not sure you've been active/in chat long enough. Maybe you should just wait a little longer. If you ran again in two months (and haven't drastically changed since then), I'd definitely support. By the way, what were your previous accounts? -Sam
 * 5) You certainly seem like a pretty nice guy, but I don't think Chat Moderator is something you need just yet. Give it a few more weeks/a month and try again and we'll see then. Otherwise, you're a good community member and you understand the rules and where you belong, so I could see you as a future Chat Moderator, just keep it up. ~Mizutsune
 * 6) You'd be a good chat mod, but I honestly think you should gain some more experience first. ~

Oppose

 * 1) I still don't think you have the experience to be a mod. I'm open to changing my mind once I see you in chat more. Brick425 (talk) 17:53, March 7, 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) I think you're a great person, and would make a great CM, but get to know the community a bit better first. ~maj
 * 3) You seem like a nice chap, but I really don't think two months of activity is enough for the position; I'd prefer more time to ensure that you have the qualities needed for it. Monocle Man   ( wall  •  contribs ) 20:55, March 7, 2017 (UTC)
 * 4) Can't help but agree with the above. I believe you could make a really good moderator, but I agree 2 months isnt enough time. --rom
 * 5) Neither you or chat is active enough for another CM. I don't believe you're required. --Navy Bravey with some Gravey (talk) 23:15, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

 * What exactly does "Get to know the community better" mean? It seems rather vague and could be taken several different ways, in my opinion. ~ Vera ( Message me )
 * Per Vera, I'm not sure I realy get what you guys mean. @Sam I'll post links on my Profile.Live long and prosper (talk) 21:38, March 7, 2017 (UTC)