Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-5643582-20160304182106/@comment-4257955-20160307183255

Alemas2005 wrote: ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:

Riolu777 wrote: Can't a policy just be "if an admin is abusing rights and violating policy, it is within the other admins' purview to deal with the offender promptly and with no bureaucratic obstruction"? That sounds good to me What does "bureaucratic obstruction" in our case even mean? That there needn't be a 10 step process as Spider alluded to and we don't need a full admin consensus and thus a delay in the case of outright and blatant abuse coming from another admin.