Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-26080047-20170303033658/@comment-4964341-20170303045126

TheShadowAssassin wrote:

Benboy755 wrote: it would be nice to include what rank they had before the first req change, after the first req change, and after the second req change if possible Also per this, but looking for a more simple and less time-consuming solution, I vote  B. I don't think it's fair to attribute an accomplishment to people who did not meet the requirements to earn it. I feel like it completely undermines the whole idea of "working to obtain something" and to me would be a slap in the face to those who want to be remembered for having actually obtained the rank through lots of time and hard work. Nobody validly obtained any rank achieved in late February. We should leave ranks unchanged if we want to recognize "hard work."