Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-25995065-20150317063943/@comment-3978541-20150318195859

Bourgeoisie wrote: Eagleeyedan wrote: Oppose. I can tell you right now there is little we admins unanimously agree on unless it is something particularly drastic. Our agreement was a lot easier when there were only three of us, but because we allowed the community to vote in adminship, there are many more of us and we rarely agree perfectly now. Under this system, you are now saying that if the community votes to delete the wiki, we would be forced to do so. I realize that will probably never happen, but it is an example of how easily a rabble rousing troll with support could cause serious damage. Wake up sheeple. ▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░Eagleeyedan▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂ But people don't vote for things that they don't see a benefit for their community in.

With the right lighting, a dead carcass can seem like a meal. With the right makeup, anyone can look like anyone else. With the With the right wording, anyone can look like a great leader. Case in point, the Nazis party garnered popular support for quite some time as did Robespierre, as did the Prohibition bill and countless other examples. People thought banning alcohol would benefit the community, but it sparked a war. ▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░Eagleeyedan▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂