LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Chat Moderator

This is LMBW's requests for chat moderator page. If you wish to request moderator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here. Moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat when they are being disruptive.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 20 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Users voting on a request must give a valid reason for their support or oppose. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for moderator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 4 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

SkySSundee
Hi all. You're probably thinking right now "Tad going for mod? No, to innaorpriate." Well, I understand that. But I think I could be a good mod providing I try. I can be mature and responsible enough for this, but I don't mind if you say I'm not. And I'm on chat a lot, sometimes 24 hours, sometimes less, so I can be moding for ages, keeping chat... Clean... And I have never been banned, so I'm not too inappropriate to be mod. And I'm a responsible patroller not abusing those rights, so I won't abuse these. And I'm usually on when no mods are on (except Neh or Goggs usually) so thats another thing to point out.

Have a nice day. ---SkySSundee The Patroller 

Support

 * 1) I think your mature enough by what I've seen.... just needs a bit of work. :P But over all that... yeah. SquashBrain (talk) 06:43, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't that make your vote neutral, then? Green-kool-aid-man.jpg LCF  (talk! ) Purple-kool-aid-man.jpg 06:47, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * No I said "over all that... yeah." :P SquashBrain (talk) 06:55, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * In that case, it's not a valid reason for supporting... - Fortress of the Night
 * I guess I didn't word that right. I mean't that IMO and by what I've seen since joining on Oct. 17 (or somewhere around there) I think he would be a good mod. When I said "a  bit  of work" I mean that I've only seen a few times where he's done anything wrong... and I don't even remember what they were TBH. It may just be that I haven't been on and seen much, but I support. Sorry if my first original post thing was a bit confusing, I've been noticing my statements have been misinterpreted lately, and that's probably because my brain is fried and I'm super busy irl. XP Sorry again... SquashBrain (talk) 05:49, November 26, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

 * Haven't seen too much from you, although I might change to support in the future. --Green-kool-aid-man.jpg LCF  (talk! ) Purple-kool-aid-man.jpg 06:10, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * Per Lcf.
 * I'm not opposing, but I'm not going to support either. We have a lot of mods yes, but I'll still vote for more, if that is, they'll be more strict (aka cracking down on things a little more swiftly, or upholding the policy better then some)  then some we have now. And from my view, you'd neither be strict or too loose.  L • S  • B
 * Agreed with above --NetbagReborn (talk) 16:41, November 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * You haven't done much anything wrong recently as far as I have seen; in fact, you're reputation is around the middle. However, I haven't seen you do much either to help with situations. It's just that I'd prefer to see a little bit more from you . Codyn329 (talk) 17:41, November 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * I haven't seen you do anything so I can't pass judgement. Aravis (talk)

Oppose

 * 1) No, to innaorpriate. ...But really, I find you're immature and it doesn't help that since you got Patroller (just a few weeks ago, may I note) you've been acting like a psuedo-mod on chat. The way you've tried to police chat recently doesn't feel right to me. Sorry, I just wouldn't trust you with these rights. - Fortress of the Night
 * 2) No. We don't need more mods at the moment and you don't strike me as somebody that would make a good mod. No offence. - User:LinkCelestrial

Comments

 * Just feel like asking why people often say things like "I haven't really seen much of you doing anything to help in situations" when minimodding is basically against the rules and is frowned upon in chat? Lone Lionheart 17:51, November 26, 2014 (UTC)

LinkCelestrial
Drew1200 Maybe you should apply for bureaucrat, Link.

LinkCelestrial Are you being serious, Drew? xD

Drew1200 Yes, you're inactive enough to be crat.

This conversation with Drew1200 has inspired me to begin an attempt to become bureaucrat. This is the first stepping stone on that path. For those of you that know me, you know that I only interfere with chat when there's an actual issue. I'm mature when needed and fun and laid back otherwise. I've helped this wiki deal with trolls and other issues from the past, even going so far as to track down and gather evidence from culprits directly. While I may not be the most active mod in the world, I do think that I'll make a good one. Besides, all my ex-friends are mods now! LinkCelestrial (talk) 18:36, November 26, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Not completely sure how sincere you are on this.... --NetbagReborn (talk) 18:38, November 26, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

 * In case I forget to, move this so support after I get five more edits. I almost have enough to vote :3 Wouldn't burn the world down, good with the rights :3 - Packachoo