LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Chat Moderator

This is LMBW's requests for chat moderator page. If you wish to request moderator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here. Moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat when they are being disruptive.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 20 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Users voting on a request must give a valid reason for their support or oppose. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for moderator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 4 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

Harold89 (2)
Hi, my name is Harold89. I used to be a chat moderator here, but last December I asked for a demotion. I was very wrong for requesting a demotion and I made a large mistake (more about that here).

I think I would be a good mod (again) because I can help solve arguments on chat by just communicating on an emotional, person-to-person level without any kicking or banning. And I'm proud that I have the ability to do that. Also, I like chat being fun 'cause I mean we can have rules and stuff but what is chat without some good fun as well am i right. Finally, we are in need of more trustworthy moderators, and I think I am the best man in town for the job. thanks for any votes, whether they be support, oppose, or neutral. =) Harold89 (talk) 20:06, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Mature user, excellent former mod, great choice.
 * 2) Full support, Harry is one of the best guys around here. A5637 (talk) 20:08, March 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Slicer Vorzakh (talk) 20:09, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

Slicer_Vorzakh
Recently, there have been many situations on chat that require CM attention. Many of these times, there have been no mods on, especially at night. I believe that I could be the needed CM in these situations, along with others. I've had my account here for a little over a year, with over 500 edits. I've never been banned and have only been kicked once for a typo. Also, because of where I live, I can stay up relatively late. I am also an admin on the BCC wiki, so I have experience. If you oppose, please leave a valid reason why. Thanks! Slicer Vorzakh (talk) 04:40, March 27, 2015 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Sure, why not Nightfall395 (talk) 04:42, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) good user, on chat often and at night. Doesn't get hot headed during fights on chat
 * 3) Very mature, has never disrupted chat that I can remember, is often on at night.
 * 4) Per above - Fortress of the Night
 * 5) He's nice and friendly and has self-control. Also, he can hold his night chat fairly well. --Neko
 * 6) Absolutely. Very mature and on at times when more mods are needed. And plus, we really need more mods. >---Avalair---> (Talk to meh) 18:08, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * 7) Per the above. - Packachoo
 * 8) Level-headed and mature. Would make a good CM. Colonel Roy Mustang  (talk) 21:54, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, he is friendly and well behaved; would be a very good Chat Moderator. -Raven
 * 1) Level-headed chap, knows what's up. Perfect choice for moderator.
 * 2) I've seen you behave in chat. I may not see enough of you for a proper evaluation, but I'm trusting the word of my friends and taking a chance here. User:Starrocks923
 * 3) Slize is level-headed, doesn't take crap, and he already has experience as a mod which I've seen firsthand. Plus, let's face it. He's one of the most mature people here.  ToneTyphoon

Neutral

 * Neutral for now.  L • S  • B  11:58, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm hopeful, and could change to support depending on what I see in the next few days Lone Lionheart 15:09, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Can't recall when you've done anything against the rules. Leaning toward support, I just need to examine how you do these next few days. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
 * Not quite sure yet. Marcel77799 (talk) 19:23, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Per Rio.
 * Per Lone and rio -Harold89 (talk)
 * Per above. 18:28, March 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * I have a bad feeling about this, but I'm not sure about it yet, so just a neutral. Aravis (talk)

Packachoo
After a comment that Guac made yesterday, I've decided to request chat moderator. His comment was about how far I've come since joining a few months ago. I've been on this wiki's chat with multiple accounts, multiple times, before joining with Packachoo. That was my Miley Cyrus avatar stage. Before that I was inactive, and before that I was a chat moderator at Brickimedia, and even before that, I was a chat moderator at Brickipedia. I've been thinking these last few months, and finally made my decision today, that if I am going to be a part of this wiki and come here to chat, I might as well do something productive. I haven't been kicked or banned in a long while, and I've been a chat moderator before - I have an understanding of chat policy. If you don't want me to be a chat moderator, don't just oppose, but leave me a reason on why. -Packachoo


 * Edit - my previous accounts were LazerzSoH at Brickipedia and then Nightshade at Brickimedia

Support

 * 1) Honestly, I dont think any harm could come from supporting you. You are behaved and haven't caused any problems in chat from what I have seen. >---Avalair---> (Talk to meh) 16:50, March 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) You're level-headed, and lately not many CMs have been active, I think it would be good to add a few more. Colonel Roy Mustang  (talk) 18:29, March 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Same as other supports, I think Pack could be trusted with these rights. Mel

Neutral

 * 1) No preference. Haven't witnessed enough of your activity here, and you haven't been active as a chat moderator (or member in general) at Bricki(p|m)edia in quite a while. --Bourgeoisie (talk) 20:48, March 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Like Bour, I have not witnessed enough of your activity – I'm not saying that you are not active, I just personally have not seen/been around you enough to make a decision. -Harold89 (talk)
 * 3) 3nuu5meh Slicer Vorzakh (talk) 23:25, March 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) I don't see you much. maybe try being more active/talking to more people so we can see what you're like
 * 5) I haven't seen you active so i wouldn't know. User:Legoanimals750
 * 6) Per everyone else. Carchathol Arodan (talk) 02:14, March 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * 7) Tentative, per the above. I have nothing against you, but not sure on supporting, I may change my mind.
 * 8) I don't know whether you are of CM-material or not due to not seeing you in any 'hot' discussions on chat.
 * 9) Per everyone else, I can't really decide. You're too quiet. User:Starrocks923
 * 10) Per the above. Nightfall395 (talk) 16:49, March 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * 11) Per above. Marcel77799 (talk) 19:24, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * 12) From what I've seen, you're a nice and responsible person. But I rarely see you talking in chat at all, so I'll have to be neutral. 18:29, March 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) From what I've seen, you're a nice and responsible person. But I rarely see you talking in chat at all, so I'll have to be neutral. 18:29, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Per the neutrals - Fortress of the Night