Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-30683785-20160924021631/@comment-26163340-20160925165045

Riolu777 wrote: I would feel better about the whole idea if there was a set limit of, say, three weeks of not logging on counting as "inactive." Then there's no chance of confusion or argument over the validity of a vote. But then if someone logs on every week simply to subvert that, then what do we do? And say someone edits once a week or hops on chat every two weeks, what then? There are too many circumstances that render this blanket "common sense" prohibition to nothing more than a game where someone avoids being labled "inactive" but can still have their votes count without having to interact with the wiki, in my opinion. There is a problem with that. According to the user list I haven't logged in since April 2016 so...