Thread:Brick425/@comment-30683785-20161013202136/@comment-26944420-20161013230539

Roddy15 wrote: Riolu777 wrote: Brick425 wrote: Riolu777 wrote: I'm wondering since when has he been the "admin's pet"? I've never witnessed that being the case. Well here it is, Rio. '''Someone's block being undone because there is no policy in place that warrants such a block doesn't indicate that they are our "pet." In fact, I roundly condemn his conduct with the image, and we made it clear that such conduct wasn't befitting of a Content Moderator in the apology blog.''' I do wish that there had been discussion before your ban was enacted, as well as warnings, but I've also seen the logs, and your behavior toward Ben in them is not commendable. Again, if we punish for personal attacks, don't turn that back on us and say that we're doing it because Ben is our "best friend." I would think that would be following our policy on personal attacks... So the real question you've got to answer then is what sort of reprimand or punishment Benboy getting? THANK YOU. He abused his power, and that's why I'm saying he's the admins' pet. Not because I got banned.