Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-26908198-20150727013747/@comment-5643582-20150727020718

LilCaSh15 wrote: Slicer Vorzakh wrote: LilCaSh15 wrote: ZXSpidermanXZ wrote: LilCaSh15 wrote: ZXSpidermanXZ wrote: I'd agree but I'd say since many of them have already been voted in it should be by majority vote. Well, not necessarily. The RfRs were based on how well people thought they would do as a chat moderator. Now that they have the rights, if they're doing their job well they should easily get the 75% support from RfRs, because this would be judging on how well they have done their job already. Do you get what I'm saying? :P The problem is though, there are usually a handful of users that are biased against a moderator because that moderator kicked/banned them :P If anything maybe the admins should reevaluate each moderator and see if they're doing their jobs and perhaps PM members for information. That's true, maybe there should be a criteria on what is required in the reason for your vote? They'll just make up some sob story just to get the mod off the team. That's very true. Possibly evidence of your reason should be required? Such as a log with a link or a thread or something along the lines of that. This would be ideal but then we'll still get people linking chat logs from a year ago :P I think an idea like this would be good I'm just worried that we're gonna end up with like 2 CMs and then we're screwed :p