Thread:Drew1200/@comment-5052737-20130821185252/@comment-238068-20130823194723

RePeat wrote: Obi the LEGO Fan wrote:

RePeat wrote: Obi, what I'm getting from your first reply is that I'm trying to take something good away from everyone and I shluldn't take anything from you, yes?

If you could just talk like you're under the age of 21 that'd be great. Okay, so let's try and make it simple.

1. Alemas has a plan

2. You agree with plan

3. I point out the problem with his plan in the form of a question to you. The problem being that it will result in the loss of valuable people from the admin team, which is bad, not good.

Savvy?

Also, Peat, I am talking like I'm under 21. Alemas has a plan, I agree, and you say we lose people, okay. Why didn't you say that in the first place?

And I now argue that they cannot be that valuable if they aren't responsible enough for the position given to them.

You didn't sound like it before. Your argument assumes administrator is a responsibility - that administrators owe the community something. The fact that if an admin has something in their life which prevents them being here means important decisions being made is not the admins fault but a fault in the system.