Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5643582-20150722164433/@comment-5436475-20150723222416

ZXSpidermanXZ wrote: ToneTyphoon wrote: ZXSpidermanXZ wrote: ToneTyphoon wrote: B. What the heck was wrong with just submitting a complaint to the admins? Plus what if there's some sort of personal thing is involved? As Da Weirdo said, both have downsides, but I trust the admins more then I trust the other users here.

If you didn't trust them to make at least SOME good decisions, why the heck did you vote for them again?

While we're at it, someone make a vote to remove admins all together. You're clearly trying to make them completely obsolete.

Oh, and B in case this thing passes. It's not that I don't trust admins to demote who needs it, but the big issue is it can take months for the admins to go through the whole process of demotion. Additionally I know for a fact some admins have been known to vote with personal biases. No this process wouldn't be perfect, not process concerning demotions or promotions will ever be perfect, but I feel it's necessary for the community.


 * Points out that since Admins would be creating the vote that could probably take months as well*

With all the drama here, do you really think making this kind of thing public is going to help anyone in the long run? Seriously think about that Spidey. The long run is exactly what I have in mind. In order to form a perfect democracy demotions should be chosen by the users here. I understand it's a touchy subject, but I find it necessary for this wiki. And all we need is one admin to make the vote, it won't take months it will only take a group of complaints to an admin. I understand and respect your opinion on this, but my opinion still stays the same.

Ok, I was just going to leave this at that, but this just continues to boggle my mind. Can you seriously say with a straight face that you expect public votes for demotions to be somehow less explosive then the current way of doing it?