Thread:Benboy755/@comment-25625534-20150131124729/@comment-25625534-20150201114318

Alemas2005 wrote: FortressOfNight wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

FortressOfNight wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

FortressOfNight wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

FortressOfNight wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

FortressOfNight wrote:

Benboy755 wrote:

Jdude420 wrote: lel, dat article and yet none of us fix it ur teh edit god pls do et There's nothing to fix... its like someone's using it as a personal blog omg

thats not what this wikis for Who cares, let us have at least one "different" article... what

doesn't that go against the entire effort to standardize the 3,800 pages on this wiki Consider it an "Easter Egg" of sorts, c'mon. that doesnt make any sense

when they make cars they dont put a bomb in one that detonates on engine startup and call it an easter egg do they That article's not a bomb.

Can't you accept having ONE article that's different from all the rest? what reason is there to have it

it kind of advises turning your user article into a blog detailing every detail of everything you do/like/whatever on the mbs

thats what your userpage, or if you feel particularly egotistical, your blogs, are for. Alright, I'll discuss it with the other admins and see their points of view. is it really worth it

its just an issue of blatantly disregard for article standards and encouraging misuse of articles