LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Chat Moderator

This is LMBW's requests for chat moderator page. If you wish to request moderator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here. Moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat when they are being disruptive.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 20 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Users voting on a request must give a valid reason for their support or oppose. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time. At least 96 hours must pass before a request can be closed.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for moderator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 4 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

AmazingPythor
Over the past five months or so, possibly longer, there's been a period of relative calm on the wiki, and there have been times during the day in which over half of the users on chat were mods or admins. Because of this, I felt that there was no real reason for anyone to run for chat moderator, as for a while there was basically no point in time where there were no CMs online, and there was a relatively long period of inactivity on the wiki. For these reasons, I really never considered running for CM until recently. Personally, I feel like an additional mod would be helpful due to the resurgence of activity that seems to be taking place on chat, especially from around 8-11 EST, a period of time in which I am consistently online. Yes, for the most part there are mods online during this time frame, but over the past few weeks I have witnessed multiple instances of certain users causing trouble on chat (innuendo, some personal attacking, even one instance of chat flooding), who have gotten away with their antics simply because all of the CMs were afk at the time. Because of this, I believe an extra CM would help maintain order during that time frame, and consider myself suitable for the job. Although I have been here for little over a year, I have been pretty consistently active (and thus know the policies of the wiki well) and have matured significantly since joining. For these reasons I believe that I would make a quality chat moderator, and that if I were to fulfill the position I would be able to calm the aforementioned users down in the case of a disruption during night chat. AmazingPythor (talk) 02:03, February 7, 2016 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Total support, Apey is very mature and hasn't been involved in a major incident and is on during times with few mods. -Slice
 * 2) Ermehgawrd my apeface is running to be a modeh :') Apey is mature and he always keeps lil' skully in line but deep inside we all knwo apey wuvses lil skuly <3 Per Slice on dah rest <3 -Skule
 * 3) Yeah, never seen him get in trouble or anything so I see him being a great mod.
 * 4) AP is someone who I believe would be a great moderator, as well as being someone who can accurately use the Use Common Sense policy which unfortunately isn't used well by much of the moderation.   Colonel Roy Mustang    (talk) 03:18, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * 5) MB Mod? No. But I find no reason for him to not be a CM. As Slice said, he hasn't been involved in any major incidents, and as Spidey said, he employs common sense (hint to wannabe mods: always a plus to me). --Grandpa Weirdo  (yell at me)  03:50, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * 6) We need active mods, and AP is decent enough, so I support.  The Double Devil (talk) 04:10, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * 7) AP is a mature and responsible user, and i believe he'll make a great CM, in a time where we most definitely need more. - Wolfasa
 * 8) mature and calm...good mod potential - mc
 * 9) Strong support. Has shown significant improvement in virtually every way. I'm not going to per anyone here because I have dozens of other reasons to support him that aren't even mentioned above.
 * 10) Seems to be mature. He doesn't get in controversial arguments, and handles situations properly.  L • S  • B
 * 11) Pyth has displayed increasing amounts of maturity and level-headedness ever since he joined, and he would be a very viable mod during times when there aren't many others on. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
 * 12) I have a feeling he'll do well. Doesn't cause trouble, is mature... yeah, should be good. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 20:46, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * 13) Per the above. -~π~ (talk) 00:27, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * 14) Per above. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 00:55, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * 15) AP is a great guy, definitely capable for the position. User:NXTein1996
 * 16) All of the above opinions describe AP very well in my opinion. I think he would be great in this position. ~(kingwja)~
 * 17) Nice and friendly. I think he can be a great mod. Yada   Dark  07:47, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * 18) AP will make a great moderator! I want to see him active again and how diligent he'll be. - T-007Bond 6:48PM, February 8, 2016 (UTC +08:00)

Neutral

 * Not sure. Legofrodo12 03:37, February 7, 2016 (UTC)


 * IDK ~Psycho ~
 * Not sure, leaning on support though.