Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5052737-20140730105707/@comment-5311834-20140730172501

BrickfilmNut wrote: LegoSuperBowser wrote: .White-Shadows. wrote:

BrickfilmNut wrote:

LegoSuperBowser wrote: Madkatmaximus wrote:

LegoSuperBowser wrote:

GuacamoleCCXR wrote: WHAT THE HECK IS WRONG WITH YOU, HONEST TO GOD THIS IS THE MOST RETARDED COMMUNITY VOTE OF ALL FREAKING TIME.

What difference does it make if it sounds similar? If I say 'what the fudge' or 'what the funk', everyone knows what I mean either way, despite me replacing more letters. It makes no freaking sense, do you not realise that the usage of one word or another does not alter the meaning of the phrase? I can insult someone without using swears, but I can use a substitute for a swear in friendly sentences.

Go rethink your freakin life or something, for Pete's sake. Guac, I try to keep my cool, and not let my fingers do the talking for me. That being said, I might get a little bit rude here.

2. First off: 'All bad language is unacceptable. The bad language will be defined by the administrators/moderators, not by the user using the language. If you are unsure if a word is bad, then just do not use it. '

Fallowing that up, it's clear that the "F" word is forbidding. Period. Just like the "S" word. That includes using it in a non-offensive way. Thus, if someone is using a different word such as "buck" or "duck" or whatever, for a substitute for those words, or as you said; "replace more letters" then  user's should be able to notice that you are indeed substituting different words, or more letters for banned/blocked words. And you can't use a substitute for a swear in a friendly sentence, because "All bad language is unacceptable". If you don't get that, then you shouldn't be a chat mod.

Going back to number 1., I think you should just go to the Fanon wiki chat, or another chat on the 'Net. There are millions of chats you can use, and you can swear all you want. That being in a friendly way, or a mean way. But don't start saying that we suck, (See, good context) because you can't even use a swear. And don't start giving me the "oh, but it's only partial swear" stuff. if you meant it to be other then what the word in its self, and it sounds like a swear, yeah, it's a swear. And I think you need to rethink your words from now on. How bad can it be to "adjust" to the wiki, for what it is ''now? ''

For all the other CMs that didn't do anything about Guac using "what the funk" and etc, all I can say is: Do you want to go by the rules, or use your own judgement like Guac?

L • S  • B  non-CM If we blocked all swear replacements, we'd have to block heck, darn, dang, shoot, slag, freak, frick, frag, etc.... I didn't say we had to block them. Just do what's right and punish the person who is using them as swears. How hard is that? So... punish people demonstrating emotion while going out of their way to avoid the offensive stuff? Yeah, they deserve it... ^, really. They're making sure they're not violating the policies... It's not about the "offensive" stuff, it's about the policy. LFY, they are sneaking by the policy, which is not right. Sneaking by the policy would be using a loophole. Using words that aren't swears to convey somewhat-similar emotion is just a way of abiding by it... ^This