Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-5374144-20161222055559/@comment-5374144-20161230191834

TheShadowAssassin wrote: Loney 97 wrote:

BraveNewRoyalty wrote:

Loney 97 wrote: I don't know how much of this was in complete rational thought judging from the tone, but I cannot simply trust the admin/cm team. They are just too inconsistent, (which is what this is for, consistency) and I'm not the only one here who thinks that. I can speak confidently for other users like Keplers, Sat, Brick, Rome, and I can suspect anyone who voted A without just saying "why not" as their reasoning all feel the same. We're not trying to gain leverage, influence, whatever, we just want to know where the boundaries are. Once we know exactly what you all want from us, then we may all be less hamfisted together. I don't really get this reasoning though. It's not that hard to be inoffensive, it's not hard to move something to PM if you think it could be offensive. It's how this wiki's chat has functioned since we started. It's about pushing boundaries and being as testy as possible. Gives the person a rush, don'tcha know. I'm not "pushing" any boundary. I already explicitly stated many times that the rules have been modified in such a way that it is, a good part of it, now solely interpretive, and that we should have a way to make the rules clear to everybody.