Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-30683785-20160924021631/@comment-5052737-20160930174015

HyperFlash Studios wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

HyperFlash Studios wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote: ...so what's the decision?

Oh wait, there can be no formal decision, this isn't a vote.

This is why I dislike these "community discussions", they achieve nothing concrete. A vote's far more decisive and clearer.

You could have integrated this part of the vote into the original one, and saved a lot of time. That would have just clogged up the vote with a bunch of discussion (more so than was already there). This lets everyone voice their opinion without being regulated to voting for two options on a very specific policy that they might not agree with

And if you really "dislike" community discussions so much that you feel the need to state this in literally every one, why don't you just make a CV to get rid of them? Frankly, between discussion here and discussion on a vote, I would have preferred discussion on a vote, at least you get a proper decision in the end. And the "Other" field exists.

I know a vote like that would never pass, so why bother? If 20 people vote "other" but they vote something different then you have to make a discussion anyway so its pointless

Then can you stop complaining about it because that's pointless, also Not really, whichever option gets the most votes wins, as with all CVs.

...er, what. Can't I voice any disapproval unless it can win a CV or what...? Don't get your logic here.