User:Alemas2005/Chat/Logs/18 March 2016

 [12:42]  o/ [12:42]  \o [01:02]  :3 I need food o/ [01:09]  ...what... [01:10]  "Worker dies after falling 53 storeys at Los Angeles building site" [01:10]  "Officials from the construction company said the man was not supposed to be above the third floor and had removed his hard hat." [01:10]  "and had removed his hard hat" [01:10]  "removed his hard hat" [01:10]  ...as if having a hard hat would have saved him from that fall... [01:11]  hardhats are surprisingly capable [01:11]  mine had protection against voltages up to &amp;kV [01:11]  *6kV [01:11]  though admittedly, yeah [01:11]  he was probably falling with terminal velocity at that point [01:12]  I bet that little statement will go a long way in insurance claims... [01:13] <GuacamoleCCXR> it's more of a company politics sort of thing [01:13] <GuacamoleCCXR> especially in the US, where the primary safety concept is BBS [01:14] <GuacamoleCCXR> in Europe it wouldn't have mattered much, but in the US it does [01:22] <Alemas2005> ...BBS? :P [01:39] <GuacamoleCCXR> behaviour based safety [01:40] <GuacamoleCCXR> essentially, in Europe, the company would ensure to mechanically prevent any accidents from happening in order to guarantee safety; in the US, proving that the worker who was involved in the accident violated rules is enough to ditch any responsibility