Thread:Bourgeoisie/@comment-4552817-20150216091843/@comment-1693968-20150217154344

I'll just stop by to leave my usual comment. Ajr, I want to remind you the BCGirl was the one in this situation who had the authority to interpret and enforce the policy. Just because you don't understand her reasoning does not invalidate her warnings or ban. If you think the ban was unjustified, you can bring it up in a thread like you have here. However, saying that you don't care about the warnings is not going to get you very far.

In all honesty, when a moderator gives a user several warnings for something that may or may not have been a policy violation, and the user ends up ignoring all of the warnings and getting banned, I'm naturally inclined to side with the moderator. Even if the policy wasn't violated, it's just pure stupidity to ignore a moderator's warnings and expect to not be banned. So even if you disagree with a warning, please don't just say "I kind of don't care". If you'd like, you can have a civil conversation with that moderator in a private message, but responding to a warning by saying "I don't care" lacks any form of common sense.

(and if it really comes down to it, just accept the warnings because of this rule: "If a user requests that you stop doing something, then you are required to stop unless there is a good reason you should continue.")