Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5111283-20151015033647/@comment-5111283-20151015224754

FortressOfNight wrote: I'd be leaning toward support if "more strict" had any kind of definition attached to it apart from the weak example of "would make a good X" vs "would make a good X because is good in situation Y". So for now, no vote.

I'm talking about like a user shouldn't be able to just say "X would be bad with right Y", rather they should say why that user would be bad with right Y. Essentially that's what I'm saying.