User blog comment:Alemas2005/Administrator Performance Ratings - Two Years-2 months Later (with non-RfA Admins)/@comment-4257955-20160220013752

Loney posted one so I assume I can as well. And as he said, be completely honest with me in your evaluations as well, I'm always seeking feedback.

Alemas: Four. You're always productive and seeking to get things done, but sometimes at the expense of the wiki and/or others. I think you need to watch out for that, but that's the only reason I have for you not being a five.

Eagleeyedan: Three. I don't see you on much, but I know you still participate in the admin site discussions, so you're a Three due to the lack of activity I notice on chat and most wiki discussions. Otherwise I don't have any other qualms, but nothing comes to mind to specificaly praise either.

Goggles: Four. You're a great social admin, but again I don't see you on all too often.

Jdude: Five. You're exceptional at mediating discussions on chat and threads/blogs as well as a consistent help in admin affairs.

Madkat: Four. Very much in-step with the community, and does a good job maintaining chat. I don't know if you're a Five but a very high Four, for sure.

Loney: Four. I think you've improved a lot since you've regained admin, and I've seen you pitching in on chat more and more often. I still feel like there's a certain something you have yet to tap into, but I'm not sure what that is, so take this with a grain of salt lol.

Melt: Five. Great at all of our technical issues. He helps out in chat as well, so that only adds to his performance.

Riolu777: One. Simply the worst.

Spider: Five. Extremely helpful on chat and with bringing things to the rest of the team, ensuring admin effectiveness for the community. Such marked improvement over the past few months.

I think Spider performs his job the best out of the admins.