Thread:Madkatmaximus/@comment-26929881-20140728183146/@comment-5311834-20140728185114

LegoSuperBowser wrote: Edward Nigma wrote:

LegoSuperBowser wrote: " Opposers must provide reasons for opposing"

He GAVE a reason. A couple of reasons.

"Maturity concerns" counts, but Alemas can't tell people he doesn't want a Admin because of a, and b? They're incredibly bad reasons. I. Don't.Care. It doesn't say: "Opposers most give a very good reason for Opposing."

It says a 'reason. '

User's can't even have a opinion when voting. Theoretically, if you were running for CM, would you consider "He shouldn't be CM because he sometimes makes typos." a valid reason?