Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-26067066-20170106204258

So recently multiple users have complained to me that the 96 hours requirement for Requests for Rights, which prohibits RfRs from being closed until they have been up for four days, is more of a nuisance than an equitable policy. Because the other RfR requirements seem to be effective in making position advancement difficult on their own, and the 96 hours wait seems to serve as nothing besides a redundant roadblock, I suppose it would make sense to remove it.

Should we remove the 96 Hours Requirement from Requests for Rights?

A: Yes

B: No 