User blog comment:Alemas2005/Administrator Performance Ratings - Dupe-proof Edition/@comment-5510093-20140919160753

Watevs, here you go:

Spy - 5 Alemas - 5 Drew - 4 Jedil -4 Jdude - 3 MADD - 3

No, I didn't vote like that just to make a pattern, it just turned out like that.

Which of our Administrators currently performs his job the best? Spy; he's basically always on, really helpful, and not overly professional.

Do our Administrators individually act how a person of responsibility entrusted with keeping watch over the Wiki and its users should act? I'm going to say all of them do, actually. MADD could be a bit better but that's just how he is, and I'm not going to criticize him for being himself.

Could the Administrative body as a whole use some improvement? Possibly.

Should we have more Administrators, or maybe fewer? The current amount is sufficient; Like MADD said, there's almost always someone on.