Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-25995065-20150317063943/@comment-25995065-20150317231049

Nehpets7000 wrote: Bourgeoisie wrote:

Nehpets7000 wrote:

Ajraddatz wrote: Support to cancel out Alemas' oppose. Naturally an admin convinced that he can do whatever he wants by nature of his "powerful" position on a site on the internet would dislike this.

If the community changes so much that they support widespread use of the F word, for example, then a few tenured admins shouldn't be able to prevent that. That's actually exactly why admins need more power than the community, to keep crap like that from happening. -_- As much as it lacks it, this community does have enough common sense not to allow such things to happen. Users like you and everyone else who clearly has a problem with swearing here would at no time turn around and all support a proposal to allow the F word for example. There'd be no need for admins to have to veto it, because the community wouldn't vote for something that clearly negatively impacts it. I wouldn't be so sure. The community is changing all the time and it's not out of the question to be left with mostly people who just want the word unblocked. Also keep in mind, with any proposed change, the community needs to see a benefit of applying said change. If someone started a forum to allow the F word, unless they could come up with some reason that positively impacts the community, then there would be no reason for anyone to support it.