Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-4845243-20150405002440/@comment-5111283-20150406015942

FortressOfNight wrote:

Jdude420 wrote:

FortressOfNight wrote:

Jdude420 wrote:

FortressOfNight wrote: This just seems like a more complicated version of the original proposition. But, it puts in a place a safe guard that if 75% of the Admins are against something it won't be proposed as a Yes/No vote, and it would make sure than no volatile discussions take place in the voting process here. Having a debate about a topic is not a volatile discussion, nor harmful. It's generally healthy for people to discuss an idea or proposal. If it does start to get out of hand, which it very rarely does, then people can step in and warn those doing the wrong thing. I don't see why so many people want to completely avoid discussion of any decision-making. I agree 100% about discussion things, except blocked words - I just can't see any virtue or benefit in discussion them.

Why not? Discussing the context in which they can be used and the severity of their use is constructive and helpful. Honestly, now that I think about it if my proposals would go through I'd be perfectly happy to let words go through a process like that. :P