Thread:Bourgeoisie/@comment-4552817-20150216091843/@comment-25995065-20150218003511

So let me get this straight. Since you were too busy to take proper action early on in the situation, such as a kick if anything was indeed kick-worthy (which I'm doubting), but instead, I have to receive an elevated action being a 1 week ban? Just because the "argument" persisted over a long time, you did nothing to aid that. More than a vague warning, a kick, etc. But I received none of that. Straight to a one week ban because you were too busy to step in. More of a reason that my ban should be lifted. You being too busy to provide sufficient warnings or kicks does not mean you let a situation that you should be moderating escalate and to then make a more extreme action later. If the situation got to the point where a 1 week ban was deserved, that's on you because you took no steps to prevent it from getting to that point. You could have provided a clear warning (more than a general "keep it civil" message), or even kicked. After a new conversation was brought up in chat, I changed topics almost immediately. That's all it would have taken you to prevent the situation from escalating. But as Ajraddatz put it, this is just unnecessary punishment to implement a ban after the fact like this.

You wanted to talk it over with me in PM so you could get perspective? You could have PMed me next time I came online (which would have been in the morning). But instead you jump straight to a ban without hearing my perspective (which you obviously had wanted to get)? That's utter nonsense.

So once again, I would like to appeal this ban for the original reason and the fact that the moderator who banned me did not take sufficient actions to prevent the situation that could have easily been solved earlier with a warning or a kick. I was not defiant at all, therefore if BusyCityGirl had taken the time to make such a warning I'd have easily listened and the situation would have decompressed before any bans took place.