User blog comment:Obi the LEGO Fan/Some issues/@comment-4910132-20130703012618/@comment-4845243-20130703044319

Time for a lecture.

So this is what I said (in categorical form):

All P {Brickipedian users who are not familiar with the rules} is {should be} S {users who are cut some slack}

Or as a hypotetical:

If a Brickipedian user is unfamiliar with the rules, then he/she should be cut some slack.

Then you said "I have to disagree". If you say a universal affirmative is false, than its contrary must be true. Thus the statement "Some Brickipedians who are unfamiliar with the rules should not be cut some slack" is what you are directly advocating.

That notwithstanding, you bring up something else entirely: that you don't think such a group uses chat. In fact, the rest of your post does not appear to actually disagree with mine at all. In fact you agree with me: "In the beginning"...

I'm not talking about old users who know our policy, I'm talking about others who do not.