Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5225143-20150224145000/@comment-5238714-20150225001517

LegoI3rickI3uilder wrote: Benboy755 wrote: LegoI3rickI3uilder wrote: Benboy755 wrote: LegoI3rickI3uilder wrote: Bourgeoisie wrote:

LegoI3rickI3uilder wrote:

Bourgeoisie wrote:

LegoI3rickI3uilder wrote: No. I'd rather have "human beings" than robots watch over chat. This doesn't replace moderators, and a chat bot doesn't enforce chat. It provides consistent and accurate logs as well as some other features in chat. Unlike the current system where we have multiple users logging chat in different places at different times of days, this isn't consistent, accurate, or reliable. Having a chat bot such as this solves that problem. Sorry, I see what your point is, but my answer is still no. How come? Didn't see this till now. :P I'm used to the old ways. I'm not much into the tech that can replace well, action. I'm used to action, doing something about problems happening right now and stopping it before it becomes something big. I don't know, I'm an oldie. I don't believe that even the bot is just there saving every last word and breath on chat, that it's the same as a person. That's just me. If we can't have mods and/or loggers on 24/7, this is the best option IMO. Logs only log, what do you do after a problem have been done? Do you leave it or deal with it? Just a question to think about. Well, if said problem didn't bother anyone, I don't see how it even merits being called a problem. However, if someone reports a problem, the logs are an effective way of checking the legitimacy of the person's claim. Just rephrasing, Ok so if someone reports the problem, then you deal with it. I can see that working out. And then have legit chat logs to prove it. Yeah, I guess that'll do. Though what if there's a real serious issue that happened but no one reported it? Deal with it or no? If no one reported it, was it really that serious?