Thread:Madkatmaximus/@comment-25625534-20150602104025/@comment-26047195-20150605032542

Obi the LEGO Fan wrote:

Luke McSwagger99 wrote:

Marshmallow matey wrote: -Nebulous- wrote: "As for ignorance/detest toward LGBT* people...again, the religious right definitely does not exclude this by principle. People on the religious right perpetuate the myth that people choose to be queer, and the myth that "conversion" therapy can work — two falsehoods that have been very harmful to LGBT* people." I don't want to get involved in writing essays back and forth with you guys, but I'd just like to point out that there is no conclusive evidence that this is biological, so you should probably refrain from calling an opinion fact unless you wanna get burned. :P ah yes, thousands of LGBT+ youth just thought "yknow, i think ill be queer just so i can be bullied and harassed by my own community and my parents. that'd be an ideal lifestyle for me. maybe i'll be driven into a corner where suicide is the only way out. or yknow, ill just be flat out murdered"

thats not how it works sorry lol Sorry that you have to face such oppression for rebelling against life's natural sexual nature. Please don't be rude. This is crossing the line for our personal attack policy, TBH. ..I wasn't trying to be rude in that statement. Sorry if the layout of it came across as sarcastic, I probably should have worded it differently.

1) I stated I was sorry that the sort of oppression he made mention of has to exist. I legitimately feel that way and wish it wasn't so. We should treat all people with love as Christ loved us, not hate on them as people because they do things we don't agree with.

2) The second half of my sentence contained my view on the matter. I didn't know certain viewpoints weren't allowed, even ones like mine that don't directly attack people but simply hold an opinion against an action.