Thread:Daniel.gormley.77/@comment-24898716-20140518011652/@comment-24150879-20140518023122

Edward Nigma wrote: Randomized wrote: Edward Nigma wrote: TwistedAlpha wrote: Edward Nigma wrote: TwistedAlpha wrote: Edward Nigma wrote: TwistedAlpha wrote: Edward Nigma wrote: TwistedAlpha wrote: Edward Nigma wrote: Randomized wrote: Edward Nigma wrote: Randomized wrote: Yeah, no joke. @LSB

He changed mine to 2 hours, but I'm still unsure of why I and BM are banned at all. Yours was shortened because you didn't start THIS one. I didn't start /anything/. Which is why I'm still curious to why I am banned. Since you didn't start this roleplay of sorts, your ban was shortened. Though you did start the thing between you and Jediliam, which started the thing with Daniel. Then it ended, and BM started the thing with Daniel again. And here we are. I didn't start the roleplay thing, either.

It started when Daniel decided to smack me in the face spontaneously, to which I, Klint and Chip responded and it went from there. He then tried to place the blame on me/us twice during the RP and pretended to stop before attacking again during the course of it. True, Daniel started the roleplay, but you provoked him first. Explain? Oh fine. I looked through it. He started it and the roleplay. So, what legitimate reasons are there for me to be banned? And for three days? You chose to continue. So, you participated. Though, Spy banned you for three for starting it. Maybe you could negotiate it with him, since you didn't start it either. By that logic, Chip and Klint should be banned as well, for the same amount of time as I, because they participated as well. Also by that logic, every single person who's ever been in a remotely violent Rp should be banned for the same amount of time.

See where I'm going here? You clearly stopped reading halfway through. I said that since you didn't start it, your ban should be shortened. And since lodging axes into people's heads doesn't bother anyone since it's typical Chip, she doesn't need to be banned at all. That is literally the most biased comment I've seen in a long time. The best part is that it's true. The best part is that Klint is completely right; you're saying "regularity makes it fine". So if Daniel were to continue to perform horrific RP moves, after a while, it'd be fine?

Not saying Chip should be banned; unless you think the point you made in the first two sentences still stands.