Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5643582-20150722164433

OK so, I know this is a SUPER touchy subject, even to people with no rights. :P But I feel it's entirely necessary for us as a community to be able to not only choose who gains rights, but also choose who loses them. I came up with an idea though so we won't have people constantly putting up demotion requests. Only an admin can suggest the demotion and put the vote up. That way, it won't be overdone. Additionally, I propose instead of a 75% support for demotion causing the demotion, it should be a vote that lasts a week and majority rules. (I mean if half the community thinks you're not doing your job well there's something wrong.) Wouldn't you all like to choose who gets demoted? I know many of you have been disappointed, both by the time it takes for the admins to agree on a demotion, and the result they come up with. So why not give the power to the community as a whole. There will be two votes here, first to decide whether or not we should have a demotion vote at all, and the second to decide exactly what a demotion would require in a vote.

Do you think we should form some type of democratic demotion, most likely similar to RFRs?

A: Yes

B: No

C: Neutral

If you voted A. What requirements do you think the demotions should have? (You can still vote if you voted A or C in the last vote. :P ):

A: Only an admin can create the vote. Lasts for 1 week. Majority rules.

B: Only an admin can create the vote. Same requirements the Request for Rights has. (Has to have %75 support and 20 supports for CMs and admins, 15 for FMs.)

C: Your suggestions?

Thanks for your time!   Colonel Roy Mustang    (talk) 16:44, July 22, 2015 (UTC) 