User blog comment:Obi the LEGO Fan/LMBW Committee/@comment-3444778-20130708142650/@comment-4845243-20130710142228

Well, I do not understand what you mean by requirement of the structure. Could you elucidate? My confusion isn't, of course, over the meaning of the word itself, but the context. You contrasted it directly with the word "encouragement". This insinuated an image of some sort of mandatory requirement. How does the structure require something in a way ultimately different than just a form of encouragement?

I know that it wasn't in the political sense. It seems you have misinterpreted me, because I was merely saying that because it's not that kind of freedom, it is not a virtue in of itself, and requires further argument to justify. I was actually stating that it isn't the political type of freedom, and I am asking you to show that the other kind of freedom (which you are talking about) is actually beneficial to the community.

Everyone being allowed to do so would prevent disagreements from arising in the future, and frankly, no one cares that it will take a few extra days to make a decision about something.

I disagree. I think there would be more disagreements, not less. And some of us do care...