LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Chat Moderator

This is LMBW's requests for chat moderator page. If you wish to request moderator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here. Moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat when they are being disruptive.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 20 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Users voting on a request must give a valid reason for their support or oppose. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time. At least 96 hours must pass before a request can be closed.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for moderator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 4 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

Wolfasa
Yes, I would understand that many of you would want to oppose after the stunt I pulled prior, but please hear me out.

I am saying, from here on out, I will quit doing things such as that. I want to become once again a mature and respected member of the community. Over the years, I have actually been a nice, kind, and helpful user quite often. However, on LMBW, to many that does not seem to fit my desription. I want CM so I can once again be the user that I once was, a person people looked up to and many were good friends with.

From here on out I promise I will stop any "dirty" behavior I may have once condoned, and become the person I once was. I think chat at the moment lacks a good number of helpful, active CMs and Admins. I hope I can affect that by being active and being a good part of the community. I have a lot of experience with most all of you, and I believe I can do that.

If my maturity comes into question, I fully admit that you are right in that regard. And for that, I promise that if you give me a second chance at being a nice user, I will not take it lightly, and if anyone takes offense to my actions, I shall resign.

All I ask is that you give me a second chance, that I can prove to you that I can actually be a mature and kind person. You can adress any concerns you may have to me, and I will do my best to either apologize for whatever I may have done, or tell you how I shall improve.

Thanks, - Wolfy Wolfasa (talk) 02:34, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Neutral untill he proves he can be mature most of the time.  L • S  • B  02:47, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) not typing this out a fourth time -slice
 * 2) I stand by my remarks about your imflamitory nature. Try again in a few months and perhaps that will change.  The Double Devil (talk) 02:43, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Far too argumentative and provocative to be a CM, at least right now, not to mention the fact you've said yourself that you're here to troll at least some of the time. If you're really improving your behaviour, then I'd like to see that over time rather than just having you prove it after the fact.
 * 4) Per the above ~Psycho ~
 * 5) Per above SOE | Dameron  02:45, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * 6) Per Above.

Comments

 * Dear wolf. Please stop with the cancer  The Double Devil (talk) 02:36, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay yea I hear yall. I'll use this RFR as a template for how I should improve, and hopefully in a few months time I'll have convinced you that I'm sincere. -Wolfy (Im done with this editing crap, as you guys on the chat know all too well at this point)

NXTein1996
I can certainly be active whenever it is required as I am on my computer a lot and have mobile access. I feel like I have a strong enough sense of judgement to act accordingly and rightly in various disputes and issues that arise. Plus I respect all of you as people. I may not be too funny or talkative but I try my best to be genuine and really I think that is a strong quality.

Support

 * 1) NXT's an alright chap. Mature and level headed. Would make a fine CM. SOE | Dameron  02:43, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Just haven't seen you around enough to judge, I suppose  The Double Devil (talk) 02:31, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Same ~Psycho ~
 * 1) Same ~Psycho ~

Coggsworth Motors
I have been here for years and have had experience getting to know the community. I get along fairly well, and I think people may find me suitable to use these tools and I guess I just kind of agree.

Support
02:15, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Coggs is a really friendly user, which is, in my opinion, vital for a chat mod. He's also good under pressure, and doesn't get into heated debates. Yes, his activity can be sporadic, but he has also been more active within the past few weeks, so perhaps he will continue being active.Legofrodo12
 * 1) Per Frodo.

Neutral

 * 1) Neutral because activity. And yes, I know we can argue "what does it matter?", but we can also argue "what is the point?" x3  The Double Devil (talk) 02:01, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Is a good user, but doesnt really have any mod qualities. -Slice
 * 3) Basically per Slice.
 * 4) Per Izzy ~Psycho ~

Comments

 * First of all, idk if im allowed to vote with a ban that ends in less than a day, even though i might not even vote on these things anymore. And I also feel Coggs would be one of those mods that are like "The word butt is not allowed" and "Dont talk about gayness" or something. Another thing is we have what, 4 new requests for mod now? Why don't we just keep addng mods, right. Hey why don't we just give everyone rights so everyone is equal and nobody can kick each other. And a lot of them are simply "Im active. Im not a bad person." and then the wiki is like "Yes, yes, we agree. You would make nicely."
 * you can vote with a ban -slice

AmazingPythor
Over the past five months or so, possibly longer, there's been a period of relative calm on the wiki, and there have been times during the day in which over half of the users on chat were mods or admins. Because of this, I felt that there was no real reason for anyone to run for chat moderator, as for a while there was basically no point in time where there were no CMs online, and there was a relatively long period of inactivity on the wiki. For these reasons, I really never considered running for CM until recently. Personally, I feel like an additional mod would be helpful due to the resurgence of activity that seems to be taking place on chat, especially from around 8-11 EST, a period of time in which I am consistently online. Yes, for the most part there are mods online during this time frame, but over the past few weeks I have witnessed multiple instances of certain users causing trouble on chat (innuendo, some personal attacking, even one instance of chat flooding), who have gotten away with their antics simply because all of the CMs were afk at the time. Because of this, I believe an extra CM would help maintain order during that time frame, and consider myself suitable for the job. Although I have been here for little over a year, I have been pretty consistently active (and thus know the policies of the wiki well) and have matured significantly since joining. For these reasons I believe that I would make a quality chat moderator, and that if I were to fulfill the position I would be able to calm the aforementioned users down in the case of a disruption during night chat. AmazingPythor (talk) 02:03, February 7, 2016 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Total support, Apey is very mature and hasn't been involved in a major incident and is on during times with few mods. -Slice
 * 2) Ermehgawrd my apeface is running to be a modeh :') Apey is mature and he always keeps lil' skully in line but deep inside we all knwo apey wuvses lil skuly <3 Per Slice on dah rest <3 -Skule
 * 3) Yeah, never seen him get in trouble or anything so I see him being a great mod.
 * 4) AP is someone who I believe would be a great moderator, as well as being someone who can accurately use the Use Common Sense policy which unfortunately isn't used well by much of the moderation.   Colonel Roy Mustang    (talk) 03:18, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * 5) MB Mod? No. But I find no reason for him to not be a CM. As Slice said, he hasn't been involved in any major incidents, and as Spidey said, he employs common sense (hint to wannabe mods: always a plus to me). --<span style="font-family:copprplgoth bt,courier new;color:gray;">Grandpa Weirdo  <span style="font-family:copprplgoth bt,courier new;color:gray;">(yell at me)  03:50, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * 6) We need active mods, and AP is decent enough, so I support. <font color="black" size="5" face="Edwardian Script ITC"> The Double Devil (talk) 04:10, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * 7) AP is a mature and responsible user, and i believe he'll make a great CM, in a time where we most definitely need more. - Wolfasa
 * 8) mature and calm...good mod potential - mc
 * 9) Strong support. Has shown significant improvement in virtually every way. I'm not going to per anyone here because I have dozens of other reasons to support him that aren't even mentioned above.
 * 10) Seems to be mature. He doesn't get in controversial arguments, and handles situations properly. <span class="LSB-Sig" style="background: saddlebrown;text-shadow: 0 0 5px #4D4DFF;color:green;padding:0em 0.5em;border: solid 3px red;"> <font style="color: yellow;">L • <font style="color: yellow;">S  • <font style="color: yellow;">B
 * 11) Pyth has displayed increasing amounts of maturity and level-headedness ever since he joined, and he would be a very viable mod during times when there aren't many others on. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
 * 12) I have a feeling he'll do well. Doesn't cause trouble, is mature... yeah, should be good. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 20:46, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
 * 13) Per the above. -~π~ (talk) 00:27, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * 14) Per above. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 00:55, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * 15) AP is a great guy, definitely capable for the position. User:NXTein1996
 * 16) All of the above opinions describe AP very well in my opinion. I think he would be great in this position. ~(kingwja)~
 * 17) Nice and friendly. I think he can be a great mod. Yada   Dark  07:47, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * 18) AP will make a great moderator! I want to see him active again and how diligent he'll be. - T-007Bond 6:48PM, February 8, 2016 (UTC +08:00)
 * 19) Per above LegoWebby101
 * 20) per above <font color="#000000" size="4" face="Verdana">SOE <font color="#000000" size="4" face="Verdana">| <font color="#DF7401" size="4" face="Star Jedi">Dameron  15:25, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
 * 21) Perfect position, should also be MB mod. -DexterityPro 5:12 PM, February 8, 2016 (UTC +08:00 Pacific Time) not enough edits, invalid reason
 * 22) Per the above.

Neutral

 * Not sure. Legofrodo12 03:37, February 7, 2016 (UTC)


 * IDK ~Psycho ~
 * Not sure, leaning on support though.
 * Per above

Comments
dang it