LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Chat Moderator

This is LMBW's requests for chat moderator page. If you wish to request moderator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here. Moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat when they are being disruptive.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 20 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Users voting on a request must give a valid reason for their support or oppose. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time. At least 96 hours must pass before a request can be closed.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for moderator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 4 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

Romaniandude12
I have been on the Wiki for over a year and a half. When I first joined, I was nothing short of a spammer and a bit of a troll. I regret those times, and I have matured greatly since then. When I'm online most, there are only one or two CMs. A lot of times one or both of them are afk and it can be hard to ping them if there's an incident. I would like to have moderator rights so that I could be of use in these situations instead of not being able to do anything with the problem. I really would respect the rights. Thank you for your time. Romaniandude12 (talk) 00:24, July 21, 2016 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) He's been here for a while, has a good understanding of the rules, and has legitimate reasons to support him (other than the fact that I'm always there [jk]). I think he'd make a fine CM. ~Hype (Message me) 00:28, July 21, 2016 (UTC)

Neutral
1. As of right now I have no opinion and could go either way. LegoWebby101

Oppose

 * 1) Seems rather immature and isn't online consistently enough for the position. - Monocle Man
 * 2) Per AP. NG (talk) 00:34, July 21, 2016 (UTC)