Thread:Packachoo/@comment-5052737-20160921143047/@comment-5052737-20160921193427

GuacamoleCCXR wrote: Alemas2005 wrote: GuacamoleCCXR wrote: Alemas2005 wrote: The "blatant disregard" was because I was protecting the privacy of a user. If you recall, I avoided questions on one user, but gave you answers on Rio and Jude. Why would you want to know the private matters about a user? What you were asking were quite private questions, so I elected to not answer them. I think it was fully within my rights to do so. as much as i don't want to get involved in this, i'm aware of this situation and i can confirm that his response to the solicitation of direct personal information was not only fully adequate by common sense, but also congruent with our policy. To me, it didn't seem as if asking such questions was common sense. I tend to be quite careful with handling sensitive information. mate i was referring to your response, not his questions; i'm supporting your case here jesus christ Oh I thought you were referring to Pack's questioning, sorry.