Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-10112739-20160102070335/@comment-5052737-20160102175646

Madkatmaximus wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote: Ah, ok, so what I said above refers to Meiko. Which means that the following statement, "you [...] have as of yet done nothing about another formerly permablocked user being here", is untrue, as I have informed the admins about his presence. I'm just waiting for them to give their opinions. And, FYI, the admins voted on letting T-007 back. So I'm not quite sure what you're complaining about. I'm aware of that thread - you're still letting a permablocked user roam free while you decide.

Alemas, I'm aware you voted on it. That was my original point. Reread if you must. Well, if he breaks policy, I won't be afraid to permablock him again and automatically close the case.

The difference between Fort and T-007 is that the latter has displayed regret, has explained his dupes, and 4-6 months had passed since his trolling/swearing/what have you. The former, instead, hasn't yet issued an apology, and little more than a month has passed since the block. Before you say "he's IP-blocked", he can give a message to a friend who can post it here, or he can create a new account, get someone to direct an admin to another Wiki's chat, and discuss things from there.

Alemas2005 wrote: ...sorry, what? Your contributions at the time say the opposite. Fort was blocked on November 28, and you announced your retirement on November 25, but you continued being active after that. Indeed, you became inactive just a few hours before Fort got blocked. At around that time (November 25-28) I must have asked you whether you still wanted access to admin chat, and you said yes. So you could have mentioned your concerns at the time. And in any case, you must have already voted on the issue before that, as we always wait until every admin casts their vote. So you must have definitely known about Fort's block. ...So because I was active on the wiki means I was for sure active on admin chat and most definitely saw that vote. Alright! Thanks for telling me what I did.

You must have seen it. Sorry. FYI, the topic got posted with every probability before you retired. So, at the very, very least, you should have seen the thread. At least seen it.