User blog comment:Obi the LEGO Fan/Clarification of UCS/@comment-30952134-20161220175959

How many of these blogs have to be made before people realise that UCS doesn't cover certain policies and rules? But I do have to beg the question, why does UCS even exist on this wiki? It's not like it's used for content-related situations, but rather for social interactions. It doesn't make any sense for it to exist. It can't be used to determine whether it's okay or not okay to say something (presumably something offencive). There are no blocked words that are okay to use in any situation (and as such, not a chance to UCS). If you say offencive things, it's already against the rules to do that in the first place. The rules are clearly detailed and there is no reason for UCS to exist in this case.

Project:PA says: "Moderators and administrators should employ common sense when enforcing this policy. If no one is offended or hurt by something that might be a personal attack, and no disruption is caused by it, no action is necessary. This policy should never be used merely as an excuse to ban or block someone, nor should it be used to cause a problem where none exists."

That goes entirely against what is said in this blog. It clearly says that you can directly say something offencive to anyone, and if the recipient is not offended, then no action has to take place. I'd suggest that the UCS for PAs be changed, because if it isn't changed, then I'm sorry, the rules are already clearly detailed. This blog would be (or is) nothing more than a single inactive administrator's opinion on how things should be done.