Board Thread:Block/Unblock Users/@comment-30683785-20160807010255/@comment-30683785-20160807161728

LlamaMinister wrote: HyperFlash Studios wrote:

LlamaMinister wrote:

HyperFlash Studios wrote:

LlamaMinister wrote:

HyperFlash Studios wrote:

LlamaMinister wrote:

HyperFlash Studios wrote:

LlamaMinister wrote:

HyperFlash Studios wrote:

EtherealSpirit wrote: Well, I oppose. I don't think making petitions to ban users is fair (now please, don't create another argument on this.) If you'd like to oppose, please use a different reason, this one idn't valid for the matter at hand. They most likely have an actual reason, but being as it has most likely already been said, repeating it is pointless. They are also giving another thought of theirs. I still cannot count her vote unless it's changed. Well, I would suggest reviewing the transcripts of those conversations, since nya wasn't the one instigating the arguments. Often, other people would say things seemingly in an effort to upset nya. Often, nya was just targeted as the instigator for correcting it in a way she preferred. She isn't "trolling." She is genuinely doing what she believes in, and not in an effort to upset people. She's only disobeying chat mods because she was being targeted. The other people who were correcting her, or arguing with her, or starting arguments, they aren't being held accountable for what they did. It's only nya who is. All in all, this whole thing is being blown out of proportion. It isn't something that should warrant this. If anything, the Chat Mods should be respecting the opinions and preferences of their members, not asking them to do something they don't like that isn't a real problem. She should never have started all these problems over a letter in her name in the first place. She has confirmed to users that she's been trolling us, shr's caused arguments, she's gotten other users punished for doing something she didn't agree with. this is something that needs taking care of, imo Can you provide any proof that she confirmed any of that? Talk to a couple users, they'll find you I'm sure. As for the arguments and punishment, just look at the chat logs above. Other users can't verify unless they are fully trustworthy users who would honestly be unbiased. So you're going to ignore evidence, then? Evidence isn't evidence if it can't be trusted. Again, nobody can be truly unbiased. It's impossible.