Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5052737-20160506164326/@comment-28103456-20160507093614

Plurky of House Targaryen wrote: Peridot Dreemurr wrote: Plurky of House Targaryen wrote: Peridot Dreemurr wrote: Plurky of House Targaryen wrote: Peridot Dreemurr wrote: Supitsnotkira wrote: Is this seriously a thing. Why dont we remove all of his comments on every blog while we are at it.

B unless they're comments that could be used as evidence against him, why not? Because he was here. While non of us are happy that he was here, the fact is he was. Removing everything, or even removing everything that doesn't mark him as a pedophile, is destroying history. We should not erase parts of it, we should face the whole thing, and leave it as it is. And to all people who are like "jeez, we aren't destroying history, only a few entries in a blog": see how quickly people start suggesting we remove more and more of his stuff? THAT is what worries me. golly you must find his fake, completely unfunny typos pretty funny to think of them as "history" How so? Does history have to be funny? It happend, therefor it is history. My subjective view of the level of funny-ness of the typos does not matter in the least. you keep saying it's history but you've said nothing about why it's useful to the wiki usefull to the wiki? USEFULL to the wiki? Since when has that been a criterea for anything? If where to judge things here by their usefullness, we have to delete around 90% of the wiki. i have absolutely no problems with that