Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5052737-20161209092454/@comment-5052737-20161209123135

Veralann wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

Veralann wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

Veralann wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

Veralann wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

Veralann wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

KnightoftheLight wrote: Meh, neutral. I'd rather the vote was a little more concrete. :P It doesn't get more concrete than this. It would be more concrete without the statement of "Ambiguous symbols/imagery/figures will be decided on by the admins. " hanging over the vote Feels pretty concrete to me. What's more concrete than admins deciding on stuff? Don't you trust us anymore? It's not necessarily about trust, more certainity. When you say "tbd" that means we can't be certain about that category of things. But you can be certain once the decision is taken...?

I don't see the problem here. The problem is that we won't be certain until a specific answer on what will and won't be allowed is given, and that wouldn't happen until after this vote passed, if it passes If the vote fails you'd never get an answer, you'd never get any certainty. Which may be, in some users' opinions, better than voting on a vote that doesn't completely cover the matter at the time of voting. What's the problem with going on a case-by-case basis for these things?!

That's currently what we're doing, from what I can tell. This vote was supposedly to give one concrete and specific answer to all of them, was it not? No, most of them?

Blatantly obvious stuff like swastikas, KKK images, Nazi propaganda, etc. will definitely be blocked.

It's just that there are bound to be images that may or may not be considered offensive, like the "baba booey" thing, which I've been told is slightly dodgy. For that sort of thing, the admins can take care of it.

Again, I don't see a problem.