LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Administrator

( This is LMBW's requests for administrator page. If you wish to request administrator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page made are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 25 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has requested administrator rights before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for administrator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 8 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

Madkatmaximus
I think we need more fully active admins(ATM I believe we only have 4). I edit mainspace frequently, and am on chat quite often. As for maturity concerns, I don't really think I'm immature anymore like I was a year ago, I just tend to say random things sometimes. If anyone has any criticism of me I'd like it if you tell me so I can improve in whatever it is you have to criticize. I'd love it if you's support me, or at the very least, give a good reason not to. Thank you. :3

Support

 * 1) Yes plz. -The Commander
 * 2) Edits. Doesn't break policies (Okay, this might be a stretch. ) Would also be an interesting addition to the admin team.  - White  Shadows  23:19, July 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) 13legoskull
 * 4) Green-kool-aid-man.jpg LCF  (talk! ) Purple-kool-aid-man.jpg 23:22, July 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) Heck YES. -Lelouch vi Britannia
 * 6) OFC
 * 7) Sure, improved behaviour. Think he could handle it. - MC1
 * 8) Marcel77799
 * 9) Benboy
 * 10) He's a very interactive user. I've never had any problems with him. MsD  talk 23:55, July 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * 11) On second thoughts... - Twisted
 * 12) In the name of serious fun, and why not. araivs (talk) 14:38, July 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * 13) 100% YES. User:Chihiya Kisaragi
 * 14) Why not? Plus I think we need an Admin who can actually have fun. c: - Div
 * 15) Sure, if he lets me have a picture of himself :3 - Tannericus
 * 16) Of course. He's insane, like all of our admins. He'll fit in well. Bgirlabby
 * 17) User:Oreh-Wen
 * 18) Per Div. The ultimate mastermind OF DOOOOOOOM! (talk) 06:05, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * 19) Avalair 17:19, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * 20) I will win your love, one way or another! -Klint
 * 21) Sure, he's cool. -Cakedude222
 * 22) Honestly, this one is kinda hard. It's interesting to see all the admins are opposing/neutral. But...I think Mad is a good edition. He's not like the other admins much at all, which is good. It's diverse. Having a near unimind all in charge is not exactly something I can take comfort in, which is why I liked Ire as an admin, Yess, Mad has a questionable past, but honestly, he's done a lot better especially on wiki, and nobody is exactly giving him tips on how to be better. It's a decision you have to think about, but I think he's ready. -Nehpets700
 * 23) Yeeeeeppp. Definetely yep. - LMP (also, how the heck does this new editor work i dont like ew)
 * 24) for the kek of it GuacamoleCCXR (talk) 21:22, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * 25) Super Smash Marth (talk) 22:44, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * 26) Pingu
 * 27) Chipika123 - is a broom 00:28, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * 28) Sure, why not. -- LEGOSuperDKong My Wall 14:53, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * 29) Codyn329 (talk) 16:12, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * 30) Vegeta's Fangirl 05:21, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Vegeta's Fangirl 05:21, July 24, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) I don't have a reason to oppose you really, but I'm not going to support because, while I don't doubt modding abilities, you're still very new. You meet the requirement to run for admin, but still. It's preferable to have at least 6 months or so moderating experience. Maybe down the road I'd be willing to support, but not ATM. -Ireithien
 * 2) Sorry, not gonna get into this one. --Netbag (talk) 23:30, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) What Irethien and Alemas said along with number 3. Also i believe you may not be entirely ready for it, 40 of me wants to support 40 of me wants to oppose the 10 percent is neutral, so yeah. I believe with a bit more experience, a tad less unstability when it comes to seriousness and nonseriousness, a tad more being un biasedness. An example would be: "one of your friends wants you to kick or ban or block another user, you should say no, because unless this user has done something that warrents a kick or ban or block respectively, you cannot do anything. If those change, i would support 100%
 * 4) *....I've never kicked or banned someone because a friend of mine told me to. I only kick or ban when I have good reason to. Anyway, I thank you for your comment.
 * 5) *I know you have not. But several people across wikia have done so, so i am just stating it. But i thank you for not getting angry.
 * 6) *If you know he hasn't, then why did you say he did? -Lelouch vi Britannia
 * 7) *I never said he did. I was openly stating that i dislike it.
 * 8) thinking about it Codyn329 (talk) 06:01, July 22, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) I don't see you as a good Admin because of your maturity. Even when you're not on chat, you don't set the best example.  L • S  • B
 * 2) You still strike me as incredibly immature. Sorry. Impulse
 * 3) Basically, what the rest of the opposition has said. :P Dinosaur Office RAWR!
 * 4) Sorry, I'm moving to oppose. I think that you're still rather immature. A5637 (talk) 20:10, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) *I'd like to point out that he made this decision based on seeing me 45 minutes on chat making jokes.
 * 6) **wow
 * 7) I was actually considering going neutral on this one, only because I've been amazed at how well of a mod you've turned out to be. However, after seeing your responses to the opposing votes, I am firmly opposing. I'd say the worst of these responses was what you said to LSB - "off wiki doesn't count." It may not count for blocks, but when evaluating whether or not you trust a person to what is the highest authority on the wiki, off wiki is every bit as important as on the wiki. If a person can't control himself off the wiki, I wouldn't trust him to be in such a high position no matter how well he behaves here. One of the most important aspects of being an admin is your responses to things. If you actually believed that was a reasonable response, then I cannot do anything other than oppose you for admin. But please do keep working at it; like I said, you've impressed me greatly in the past, and I'm sure you'll do so again in the future. Drewlzoo
 * 8) *The only reason I said that about off wiki was because of Nash. I don't act worse on any other wikis, and Nash is a thing of the past which I won't do again. I didn't intend for that comment to come across as rude or disrespectful. About A5, I was just a bit frustrated because I got on chat and was being silly because that was just the atmosphere of the time, and he opposes based on that. I just didn't think that was at all fair to me.
 * 9) I'm with Drew completely.
 * 10) I don't think you're mature enough for these rights, sorry. Also, per the rest of the opposition. Peregrin Took (talk)
 * 11) Completely with Drew on this, Sorry Mad.
 * 12) Sorry, but I don't feel you are ready to make the decisions associated with Admin, and setting disputes between CMs and the like.
 * Eh, I don't think you're really ready for this yet... Mel
 * 1) I know it will not affect things by much, but I'll move to oppose for the record. He's too "un-admin-like", I'm afraid. He also "corrected" my "realised" to "realized" in a petition (not a Wiki article), something I wouldn't want an admin to do. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 15:39, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) *...Alemas. I changed spellings one time, something I never do, and you feel that's a valid reason to oppose? And also, what exactly am I biased on?

Comments

 * Madkat, I believe you put in the request on July 11th, and it's now been 11 days. You have 17 supporters, and 7 opposes. As long with 5 neutrals. My question is; when does the voting end? Just wondering,  L • S  • B  01:40, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * IIRC 15 days.
 * "Most requests last for around a week" *Cough* -Impulse
 * And only bureaucrats can take down requests for administrator.
 * @Imp admin requests are up typically longer than a week, much longer.
 * @Kat: "The duration of a request may not exceed 10 days, and should usually last at least 5 days. A request must have a clear consensus in order to be closed prior to 10 days."
 * I'd never seen that before. And I was under that impression because A5's was up around 3 weeks.
 * LMBW:RFRP, and A5's was up because none of the bureaucrats were paying attention to the RFR.
 * So are you going to close it tonight, Spy?  L • S  • B
 * And only bureaucrats can take down requests for administrator. - White  Shadows  22:07, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ugh. ** <span class="LSB-Sig" style="background: saddlebrown;text-shadow: 0 0 5px #4D4DFF;color:white;padding:0em 0.5em;border: solid 3px wheat;"> <font style="color: red;">L • <font style="color: white;">S  • <font style="color: blue;">B
 * Sooo...this request failed automatically because he didn't receive 25 votes in 10 days...right? -Impulse09
 * Nope. Anyone can vote until a bureaucrat closes it. :) - White Shadows  00:23, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * * Mega Facepalm* -Impulse
 * Sorry, I had thought it was 14 days. Either way, I'm not going to close it now. It's at 73% support, with a 75% requirement. I wouldn't say that's a clear consensus, so we'll wait until there's more votes. Drewlzoo 12:57, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * * Mega Facewall* -Impulse
 * Imp, no need to injure your head.
 * Even though I opposed, I'm happy you got it in spite of myself. Does that make sense? Of course not. I don't care. Happy admin-ing. A5637 (talk) 13:38, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * It makes sense in a weird sort of way. And thanks. >^-^<
 * I'm not happy, because this wasnt a legitimate vote. :c It should have been closed after 10 days. :c