Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5052737-20161011165047/@comment-30683785-20161013171256

Roddy15 wrote: HyperFlash Studios wrote:

Roddy15 wrote:

MeltE2 wrote: Keep all honestly, I don't see any harm in keeping them, it's part of our history and all that. If they come back and cause a ruckus, we can demote them then. "Part of our history", why are people here so sentimental over name tags and user rights?? Because to some people who were actually a large part of this community for a very long time, it actually means something to them because they care about this place and its community, and that people worked hard to get to where they are. It's a bit more than name tags and user rights. Feel like you are trying to heavily imply something but I'll ignore my cynical side this time.

It doesn't matter though what they did previously if they aren't here to perform admin duties they aren't doing their job. It's the exact same argument for the CMs, DMs, etc. You can be the King of Nigeria for all I care but if you aren't turning up to duty you aren't doing your job so why should you keep it?

Voting to keep inactive admins is like keeping that terrible chef who long ago used to be good but for one reason or another is not turning up and their food isn't up to standard. Do you keep them because "Oh but they cooked good years ago!"?

If these admins care about this place then where are they? If you were the king of Nigeria then it would make sense to stick around since there's only one king. There is a literally unlimited amount of administrator positions so in the end it really doesn't matter whether or not they have the rights because it's literally not going to affect anyone anywhere