User blog comment:Alemas2005/SauceBot Busted! - Chat Blog/@comment-24057825-20120825090111/@comment-3003185-20120828180116

1: Might be too complex unless it's "programmer" wants to implement an overly complex feature for something that could be solved a lot easier with a "simple roulette wheel." I'm no programmer, but I know when to save effort, with the same end result.

2: It has corrected its (and other peoples') mistakes before. It's highly inconsistent; I've never met any bot like that. Even so, it would NOT have responded to Alemas like that; if it was a robot, it wouldn't have said it in response to Alemas, as if answering his "invisible question". You're just trying to avoid the problem.

3: Not in that way, no; not a conversation bot. If you read previous account of a SauceBot encounter, including ones in comments, you'll see that:

a: The story doesn't match up; it says that it learns from users (like CleverBot), but it doesn't need to, if what you're saying is true, unless it's not what you're saying it is.

b: Responds specifically to humans. I don't get what you're not understanding about the capabilities of robots to learn and respond to humans; go on CleverBot and you'll see how imperfect the technology currently is.