Board Thread:Message Boards/@comment-30973528-20170106235447/@comment-4964341-20170107020439

Karateduo1 wrote: Keplers wrote:

Smasherfan88 wrote: Again, we realize this, but kelps had stated to us his was going to be archiving only, and at the beginning to allow conversation, then close it off, while ours is more based on communication, kelps could have changed his mind without us knowing, but we already set ours up before this information got to us (aka we set this up about 2-3 days ago) I mean it in the best way possible that I'd put more trust in a site whose admins know how to create basic sentences.

Let's calm down, this conversation coming off pretty aggressive, not something we want for either of our communities. Also if you wanted us to join, definitely telling us how inferior ours is to get us to join is the wrong way of going at it. I ain't one of the developers of the site, but I know em, and I also know that you telling them how, "inferior" their site is will not get them to join you, in fact it will probably do the exact opposite. But I can't say, I'm not them.

Anyways, I can't make a decision of our whole group, but I know they are not wanting to go and join you. I can't say I would join you either, but I can also say I think the, "competition" is not a good way of describing the two. I know that my group is full of hot-heads, I know they will not back down, but I also know you won't either.

In light of that, as a whole we are not interested in discussing who's is, "better" or which one is, "gonna get the people". We both started with the same mindset, let us not get off-track from that. This inter-bickering will not serve any purpose other to cause divide in a divided community. We need not speak on these matters unless one side can bring something constructive and/or new to the table. Agreed in full. I would like to point out that they claimed that our site was less developed, and I was simply pointing out to them that this is not actually the case.