Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5052737-20150803182956/@comment-4041224-20150806165544

Harold89 wrote: Other/none.

I think the phrase "currently active" in the policy, though subjective, should remain. In my opinion it should be up to the voters in a request to decide whether the person running for bureau is active or not – a possible lack of activity could and should be used as a legitimate reason for someone to oppose. In other words, there should be no finite definition of "currently active," but rather, the voters should decide the activity of a person running and can use that when making their vote. Actually, yeah, this.