User blog comment:LegoI3rickI3uilder/ LOTR-Lord of the Rule/@comment-3444778-20121228014632

1.1: "Jerk" and "idiot" don't deserved to be blocked.

1.2: Agreed.

1.3: Agreed.

1.4: Real-life weapons? C'mon. "Hey, I went shooting clay pigeons at the range today with my Dad's new rifle!" *ban* Bit a extreme, needs to be more carefully worded. Also, no ID's on other websites? "Hey, who are you on the MBs?" *ban* "Hey, do you have Steam? What's your name there?" *ban* Again, needs to be reworded. ALSO of note: full names.

1.5: First names are fine, not against the MB rules as pointed out above. Age isn't a problem either. "I'm a teenager." *ban*

1.6: That's stupid. "Hey, check out this concerto movement I found, really nice, gotta fly. *link*" *ban* I think the whole rule is stupid. If the link's wrong, the person will be banned for it; in the mean time, mods can't control the content of any other site. Welcome to the internet.

1.7: I have received at least ten warnings from this rule by itself. It's just stupid and ineffective. Politics and religion aren't problems. If troublesome users make them problems, the troublesome users will be banned. Simple as that. The PM part cracked me up, who cares if people are arguing in PM!? So you can't have a Republican and a Democrat calmly discuss politics in PM!? Not only is that wrong, but it can't possibly be enforced.

1.8: More than twice in the same hour, lol. You crack me up once more. Busy chat, link every twenty minutes, deal with it. Not an issue.

1.9: Chatmods are not gods. They are normal users with the ability to kick. People don't need to disagree with them any less than they do normal users. A case of someone arguing with a chatmod doesn't deserve more attention then a user arguing with another user. Period.