Thread:Madkatmaximus/@comment-25625534-20150602104025/@comment-26436937-20150605050004

-Nebulous- wrote: Obi the LEGO Fan wrote:

Marshmallow matey wrote: ohohohoho boy

u might want to invest in a time machine so u can go back to 1600s england where religion was still relevant in government idk what else to tell you

ill be here letting my "morality decrease" and ignoring ur petty "traditional family values" As much as I sympathize with your viewpoint, let's not get started with calling people's beliefs "petty." Even if true it doesn't help things. >Throws around insults from on top of high horse

>Can't bother to spell out "your"

Doesn't make your side look too good, I must say. Also, I wouldn't be too quick to tell him he isn't helping things by calling someone's beliefs petty if you're then going to sneak "even if true" into your comment. These discussions never stay civil for long, do they? I can have impeccable grammar if I so desire. However, given the origin of this argument and my usual typing habits, I elected not to as I thought it would make me seem rather conceited and overly formal.

Additionally, if you want a discussion to remain "civil", you should probably not try and argue with actually members of the LGBT+ community regarding their identites. I would assume that you are straight, and if that is the case, then you have no business attempting to tell us that our sexuality was a choice nor that it goes against your moral values. This is not your place.