LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Bureaucrat

This is LMBW's requests for bureaucrat page. If you wish to request bureaucrat rights, please read this paragraph first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here.

To file a request, press the button below and fill out the requested field(s).

Requests made on this page made are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 25 supporting votes and 80% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Users voting on a request must give a valid reason for their support or oppose. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has requested bureaucrat rights before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for bureaucrat fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 8 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

=Current requests=

AmazingPythor
Salutations, my name is AmazingPythor and I am running for bureaucrat. After almost half a year of consistent activity as an administrator (and much longer as a moderator), having a semi-constant presence on chat almost comparable to Alemas, I believe that achieving this position would be helpful for the wiki as a whole. Although the abilities gained from advancing to bureaucrat from admin are rather minor, and the website has been in a period of relative inactivity, I believe increasing the amount of active bureaucrat presence on the wiki in general would be helpful for running it more efficiently. I am generally known as an administrator for my ability to act under pressure, proficiency at reasoning and negotiating, as well as my semi-competent editing skills (though, as some are keen to point out, my coding knowledge is rather lacking beyond the basic stuff). For these reasons, I believe that the promotion of me to bureaucrat would be a helpful, albeit minor, addition to the wiki. ~ Monocle Man   ( wall  •  contribs ) 01:07, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) You're active and mature enough to be a bureo, so I support. LegoWebby101
 * 2) It's a resounding yes for me. Ape's been consistently active for eons now, and I'm not sure why Hyper seems to think that you need to be a 3+ year veteran of the wiki to hold crat rights. In the 6 month's AP's had admin rights, he's proven himself a competent admin. He's handled almost everything thrown his way quite admirably - sure, he may have made a few mistakes back in 2016, but he's only human. When has an admin here ever been perfect? From what I can tell, AP entirely deserves these rights as he's obviously an active, capable admin who's well liked by the community and can be trusted with responsibility. Giving him a few extra tools doesn't change much - we're not voting on promotion to "god emperor" here. - benboy
 * AP, you're a trustworthy member that people seem to fear. You're cut out for this position. ~Bubsey
 * 1) per benpai, love you apey <3 NG (talk) 04:28, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) apey es j sys nd i lurv him and 'is masif abbbbbbbbility to maturely and sensibly moderate and administrate on this Wiki, giving him these rights make total sense. -Skule
 * 3) Mature, active, very reasonable fellow. Thoroughly deserves having these rights. Also, his promotion would mean that If I wanted to, I could finally leave this place knowing it would be in good hands. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 09:19, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, because we'll need another buro when I leave for college. Might as well get that going now. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån

Neutral

 * 1) I don't personally think we need more Buros but if we were to have one I feel that you're Active enough - Koren8000

Oppose

 * 1) I'm sorry but I honestly can't trust you with these rights. I feel that you're way too quick to act and don't take the time to think things through. You've also shown strong bias in the past and you don't really seem to take criticism very well. You just aren't level headed enough for the highest level of rights on a wiki, and I really don't think you've been an administrator long enough either to warrant deserving the rights on that alone. Alemas and Rio are both very consistently active and have both been here for a long time, and they are enough considering the circumstances. ~ Vera  ( Message me )
 * 2) I don't think we need more buros? Ale already does a great job and is highly active. You're a good admin I just don't think it's necessary for you to have buro, not yet anyway. ~ eoe

Comments

 * Ben: I didn't say he had to be a 3+ year veteran, all I said was that his time on the wiki was not something that stuck out to me as a personal reason for supporting. ~ Vera ( Message me )