Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-25101892-20150426202408

OK, this just came up on chat and we had a discussion about it and I got thinking about it. There really needs to be a consensus among CMs, or users in general, about how interchangable kicks and warnings are in the context of how many before a ban. Since there were users debating this on chat, there obviously isn't consensus. So, yeah.

Rule 1: Excluding extreme cases*, the order of warn/kick/ban should be just that: 1 or 2 warnings,  a kick, then a ban if behaviour continues.

A) Yes to the rule, 1 warn, 1 kick, then ban.

B) Yes to the rule, 2 warns, 1 kick, then ban.

C) No, please specify.

Rule 2: (Kind of linked but I want to see what people think) A warning should not be interchangable with a kick.

A) They shouldn't be interchangeable.

B) They should be interchangeable.


 * Extreme cases being textwall spamming, RED-X usage, excessive personal attacks or innuendo, etc. Basically anything that is insta-banned for anyway. :P 