Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-5311834-20150428024139/@comment-5643582-20150429161845

Eagleeyedan wrote: ZXSpidermanXZ wrote: EED: I haven’t seen EED in any situations in chat or on the wiki itself where he’s needed to use his admin powers, so I can’t judge him fairly in that aspect, but it seems like he wants the wiki to be a complete dictatorship, which makes me weary.

A dictatorship? No, that would imply a single person making all the rules as he goes. I am merely standing firm on the rules we set up in the first place. We set up the rules as they were for a reason (well depending on the rule, multiple reasons many of which I layed out in my blog), and I have yet to hear a reason better than "The wiki needs to change" as to why it needs to change. It's going to take more than circular resasoning to change my mind. Trust me, I'm just as weary from trying to explain my position. I appreciate the honest feedback though, and I hope you can equally appreciate my honest rebuttal. ▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░Eagleeyedan▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂ Understandable. I still think for a community based wiki like this one, a democracy is best, but I do see your points. Remember most of us are fairly sane individuals, even if this place becomes a total democracy we're not just gonna out the rules. There may be a couple users here who would like to be able to use innuendo, but there are twice as many that find it disgusting.