Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5052737-20161011165047/@comment-26944420-20161014220903

HyperFlash Studios wrote:

BusyCityGirl wrote:

Slicer Vorzakh wrote:

BusyCityGirl wrote:

Slicer Vorzakh wrote:

BusyCityGirl wrote: Bleh popularity contests. :| (P.s. seriously sooo many votes now that are allowed to pass even though they are against policy... O.o)

K K K K K D K D K how are they against policy Well Slice, there have been a number of them now, three maybe? Four? That have directly violated policy. Once again, this vote does the same. "A community vote cannot be used to directly demote rights from a user, however, a petition to the Admins can be made that a user be demoted" well yes this technically is a petition, but the admins woild be pretty scummy to turn it down especially with this big a majority for most of them. Technically, this is a vote. There is nothing scummy about doing a job properly. Big majority nothing. It should be done right. It should have been corrected before the other vote even passed. This is most definitely not an isolated case either and not the only section of policy recently violated. Actually, BCgirl, a vote was held prior to this in order to allow it to bypass policy. The policy was kept in mind this time, and everything was kept strictly legitimate. Per