User blog comment:LegoI3rickI3uilder/So.../@comment-4257955-20150414224045/@comment-4257955-20150415171955

I don't see it as an attack. It's really no longer a read than your response anyway, so I simply cannot grasp why it's such a big issue to you.

1st: My view on innuendo is that I don't mind it overall but too much of it is intolerable to me and stinginess regarding it is also intolerable. However, my views on it don't matter that much when I'm called by the rules to enforce a rather strict prohibition on it, and my views on innuendo don't inhibit my ability to enforce said rule.

2nd: No, I'm talking about the "Rebellion" that an anonymous addendum to EED's recent blog post referred to. The "Rebellion" that wants LMBW to remain the same as it was three years ago.

LMBW = LMBs? I'm sorry, but they're not the same.

Our demographic of users is still vastly different than that of the MBs. Albeit, the sheer size of the LMBs affects this, but it's still true.

But there have been a lot of disagreements among the admins as of late! It's primarily been the remaining admins of old clashing with some of the newer admins.

3rd: So it sounds to me that you're taking progression on a decision as a personal snub and you're retaliating by being overly passive-aggressive? I can hardly gauge what side you're on as you keep jumping in and out of heavy sarcasm and grave cynicism, I'm sorry. I don't think you're insane. :p

Angry? I'm not at all angry. It's not worth being angry over any facet of this debate. Thanks for your, uh, concern, though?