Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5643582-20150330172420/@comment-5052737-20150330181350

ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote: CMs can always put it through ViewPure when asked for approval of the video, and then post it themselves. Just saying. Still unnecessary and inconvenient tho. :p But we'd take the inconvenience out of it. The CMs could do it.

I'd certainly do it. But there's really no point. If you have a reason why the Viewpure rule should stay, I'd be all ears. But if your just saying that the CMs can take on the inconvenience, that doesn't solve the problem. It still takes time whether it's a CM doing it or the one who wants it linked. Also if someone examines the video they're linking like most people do, they don't even PM an CM. So then they'd PM an CM to get it purified? I don't see how that helps much at all. The current policy states "All YouTube links or videos from other hosting services must be approved by a moderator before being posted publicly in chat". The CM can purify the video himself while approving the video.