Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-24718406-20160929032831/@comment-30683785-20160930031043

Eagleeyedan wrote: @Kep, no, not al-queda, but high-level trolls like Nigma and Meiko and their associates who would see this place torn apart and torn down much in the same way al-queda would see the middle east torn apart and torn down.

Per your second rebuttal, it is not an excuse but a reason. While yes, things are talked about, it is in a sensitive, censored, moderated manner. Also, usually as announcements by the mods not really detailed discussions about an incident or the specifics of what happened.

To your third comment, what do you mean by "things that pertain to us"? We only talk about users who break the rules and are problematic, ban length time and actions to take if bad behaviour persists, and potentially dangerous situations. We no longer discuss rule adjustments that affect the community there, that was already moved to the community voting system.

▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░Eagleeyedan▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂ Not to be too know-it-all-ish but Wikia has far greater and stronger defenses and tools to use against trolls and spammers, and I have very, very strong reason to believe that Meiko has stopped trolling, and we've dealt with any Nigma attacks rather swiftly lately.

Honestly I don't see why this is completely necessary, I don't think that Wikia is nor was ever meant to be ran in a manner such as this. And in order to moderate efficiently it helps to have all the information (I can recall several instances where an admin has refused to share details with me while I was trying to deal with a dupe)

Everything that has to do with the wiki's community kinda pertains to the wiki's community.