Board Thread:Block/Unblock Users/@comment-30683785-20160807010255/@comment-13855718-20160807172320

HyperFlash Studios wrote:

Plurky of House Targaryen wrote:

HyperFlash Studios wrote:

Plurky of House Targaryen wrote: Hype,

Your main reason to defend a block instead of a regular chat ban is that her activities go "beyond chat". Yet the only thing I've seen mentioned is spamming to get to vote - something that lots of peeps have done, and that was even supported by the community, seeing how edits where quite the useless measurement for involvement in the wiki. Therefor I see no reason to discuss even the possibilty of a block, seeing as what she is accused of limits itself to chat. Spamming to get edits is technically against the rules but alas, that's besides the point. My point is from what she has done off of chat, nothing's stopping her from doing more. But if the majority believes a chat ban is in order, then I suppose a chat ban will be arranged. If she continues this behavior off chat, then a block is warranted. Nothing stopping her from doing more? perhaps. Nothing suggesting she'll do more either. Nor do I feel a chat ban is in order. True, it's just that her behavior hasn't suggested any kind of improvement. Do you feel that anything should be done about the situation at all? I'd say that this "petition", which is not raised far above a collective personal attack and shaming,  should in itself suffice as a clear message. Action should be taken against her, if she does not listen to these warnings. But it seems no more then logical to me that such action should not be in the form of a public show-trial where, I fear, emotions cloud rational judgement.