LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Administrator

This is LMBW's requests for administrator page. If you wish to request administrator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here.

To file a request, press the button below and fill out the requested field(s).

Requests made on this page made are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 25 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Users voting on a request must give a valid reason for their support or oppose. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has requested administrator rights before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for administrator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 8 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

=Current requests=

Veralann (3)
Hello everyone, I'm Veralann (previously known as HyperFlash Studios) though a lot of you know me quite well at this point. I'm running for administrator mainly because we only have three active at the time, and I'm on during most of the gaps that administrators aren't. Some of our current admins have also stated they might be leaving some time in the visible future, which means we would have even less active admins than we do now. I have a strong editing record, I've been a moderator for a while now, I have some technical knowlege that the admin team currently does not, and most importantly I'm active. I feel I can bring some needed variety to the wiki administration. I also feel I've matured since my last two attempts at running, but I'll let all of you be the judge of that. Thank you for your time. --~ Vera ( Message me ) 00:18, March 2, 2017 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Actually cares about the wiki. Brick425 (talk) 00:21, March 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) Per BrickLive long and prosper (talk) 00:22, March 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * 3) We legitimately need another admin, and this guy edits regularly, is on chat everyday, and has a mature and sensible sense of direction. He will remain the only person I support having as an admin until he's promoted to that position. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
 * 4) I think Hyper would make a good admin and per above. LegoWebby101
 * 5) Hype has had his ups and he has his downs, but he always consistently cares about the wiki and how its run. Furthermore he knows a lot of code, we need another admin, and is overall very sensible. I think he will make a fine sysop. Romaniandude12 (talk) 00:31, March 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * 6) Had to mull it over a bit, but I definitely think at this point Hype would do well in this position, per above. Monocle Man   ( wall  •  contribs ) 00:33, March 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * 7) Per the above, would be a great Admin. -Sam
 * 8) can we get this over with and promote him per above w/e 00:43, March 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * 9) Very present to the wiki, and good character overall. Vera is very capable of being an administrator. - Nartles
 * Yes, simply to nullify Alemas's inevitable "no" :P (Just joking. I'm voting yes because I concur with the previous statements, don't remove my vote >.> ) ~Mizutsune

Neutral

 * 1) idk rom told me to vote but i dont really care. i dont see much of your moderating because i dont pay attention. are you happy rom. you got your vote. pls lease me alone. - Kira