Category talk:Candidates for deletion

'''Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion. List the Articles with delete tags under the articles, and media with the delete tag under media. Any other talk goes under "Category Talk". To say what you think on an article/media, put a number under either keep or delete where the article/media is listed, and then sign by putting "[[User: (your username here)" and end it with another 2 brackets. Alternatively, just sign it. 3-4 votes are required for voting to end.'''

Admin
If you look on the LEGO.com Moderators List, you will see that there is no Mod who has the name Admin.

Keep

1.     12:26, September 10, 2011 (UTC) Just because he's not on that list doesn't mean much of anything. His job was to start the Lego Message Boards.

2. Wiktorsz. I have proof he exists. And LS has a good point too.

3.Legocat4611

Delete _ My proof? I promised I would never go on there anymore. You can meet me on chat, and I might show it to you. But I don't like breaking promises, and this one was to the Mods.
 * 1) ŁßĶ 19:30, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) And where is your "proof"?GhoBlogTalk 14:59, September 13, 2011 (UTC)

Conclusion
Voting ended for Flex217. 5-1 votes, article deleted.

Voting ended for List of Forums for the Improvement drive. 4-0 votes, article deleted.

Voting ended for Category:Lu. 5-0 votes, category deleted.

Voting ended for Category:Rank-X. 5-1 votes, category deleted.

Voting ended for BOT. 6-2 votes, article deleted.

Voting ended for Rank Y. 9-7 votes, article deleted.

Voting ended for Rednax88. 4-1 votes, article deleted.

Voting ended for Category:Semi-inactive. 4-0 votes, category deleted.

Voting ended for Category:Song. 4-0 votes, category deleted.

ŁßĶ 20:58, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Category:Wiki Contributors
What is this for.

Delete

1. GhoBlogTalk 03:43, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

2. ŁßĶ 20:58, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Keep

1.It's for people who know the wiki exists.

Click for epic userpage Need something? Click me 14:13, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Roddy15
He is only a craftsman.

Keep

1. ModFan1 14:12, September 17, 2011 (UTC) He has been a member for a long time and was active when he was around.

2. If he was a famous user back when he was active, I think he should he kept.

3. Yes, definitely. I don't see the point of deleting userpages just because someone prefers quality over quantity. \/\/ |  |(

4.Most of the time I would say to delete below Artisans, but I think this should be kept. ŁßĶ 18:39, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Keep it. Good headstart when we make Craftsman pages. :P

Riolu777, the Coolest Pokemon EVAH. :P 20:27, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Delete

1. GhoBlogTalk 14:10, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

2.  DB6702  20:39, September 18, 2011 (UTC)

SpitfireMad
Keep

1. I know him pretty well and see his posts occasionally. I'm sure other users do, too, so I think we should keep it.  DB6702  15:44, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

2. Good poster. 18:35, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

3. Same as above.  18:50, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

4. I'm sure he'll become famous. --Adamlenton1 18:47, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

5. Keep im I've heard of him before. He's well pretty well known. ==Genralaustin

Delete