Thread:Bourgeoisie/@comment-4552817-20150216091843/@comment-25995065-20150217170753

Drew1200 wrote: Just because you don't understand her reasoning does not invalidate her warnings or ban. BCGirl gave one warning: "Be civil". Nobody in chat knew who this was directed at and none of us knew what was uncivil. Everything was under control and only one person (neither me nor Ajraddatz) was throwing around insults. So there's no reason we could comply with such a warning, and after no clarification on that warning from BCGirl, the only thing we could do is invalidate it.

Drew1200 wrote: In all honesty, when a moderator gives a user several warnings for something that may or may not have been a policy violation, and the user ends up ignoring all of the warnings and getting banned, I'm naturally inclined to side with the moderator. There were not several warnings. There was one terribly vague warning, no clarification on it, and no explanation of a policy violation at any time.