Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5052737-20161209092454/@comment-5052737-20161209134916

Romaniandude12 wrote: Alemas2005 wrote: Romaniandude12 wrote: I personally feel the chat moderaters can more than decide when something becomes inappropriate by theirselves without needing to have the entire conepts blocked completely. If someone is offended by what is said or shown then it needs to stop. Otherwise, "hate" symbols are hardly EVER used to promote actual hate here and shown more ironically than anything. I don't see this as something that needs to be blocked. So though I don't personally condone hate symbols by any means, I don't think they should be banned altogether if someone uses them ironically. This is why I am going to vote B).  The whole point of the vote is because hate symbols shouldn't be used ironically in the first place. Yeah, I meant that there are already warnings for when irony is used with them. I don't get the point of this vote. Racism is banned, using hate symbols unironically is blocked, using them ironically is at least warned to banned if they dont stop....there's no point in this vote. So, I'm going to vote against it still. The moderaters already have all the power they need to deal with these situations. The problem is that there are users who keep pushing the envelope. Unless explicitly stated in the rules, they will continue doing it. A blanket block would make things infinitely easier to deal with.

This is to stop people from being "edgy" with subjects such as Nazism and hate symbols.