Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-10112739-20160215054833/@comment-5052737-20160215170705

B). Three reasons.

1) As Spider said, if this goes through, it basically undermines the system we built on CVs, community involvement, and admin involvement. The community got so worried with the admin team "backstabbing" them with possible vetoes, that they voted to abolish them. But now look, they want to do kind of the same thing against us, and our own policy. Not cool.

2) As Spider sort of said, this could set a dangerous precedent for any future admin decisions. No real need to explain this, if a vote on explicitly breaking the rules goes through, then what is there to stop more of the same?

3) Don't you think shortening the block to 8 months, considering what he did, is a decent compromise? Some of you wanted at least an admin revote on the matter, and that's the result you got.