Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-24718406-20161009211000/@comment-26944420-20161014014618

Assassin Swipe wrote:

Slicer Vorzakh wrote:

Assassin Swipe wrote:

Brick425 wrote:

Assassin Swipe wrote:

Brick425 wrote:

Assassin Swipe wrote:

Brick425 wrote:

Assassin Swipe wrote: B) This shouldn't be an issue? Like if people want to swear they can make a vote and if the general community doesn't want them to say whatever word they're saying then move on? Or learn to accept that majority rules?? :P I mean I really don't get why this is even something we're entertaining. That's how it was going until damn and piss were unblocked, but "ass" stayed blocked for some reason. People were fed up with the community's attitude towards mild swears, and rightfully so. Brick, that's just how democracy works. :P Like, this is literally democracy. If the majority of the community doesn't want "ass" unblocked, then it stays blocked. Where did I say if the majority votes to keep it blocked, it should therefore be unblocked? I'm saying some people didn't like the outcome of the vote, then they absolutely have the right to rebel. Look, people are free to make what wikis they want if they don't like LMBW, but there is absolutely NO reason why LMBW should be endorsing such a place that is specifically made to undermine the rules of LMBW. :P How is it made to undermine it? Nobody is saying that NLMBW was made for the purpose of ripping apart what the LMBW is about. That's not what the wiki is for. What is it for then? :P I mean the idea is that our rules aren't free enough and that democracy holds things back, right? That's literally against the wiki. :P youre making it sound like were going to use nlmbw to plan a coupe here are something, the actions are going to be seperate, just endorsed That's really not what I mean? :P I just mean that the whole reason for NLMBW existence is because LMBW doesn't fit a section of the community's needs. Which means that LMBW has its own set of values that you disagree with. So why would we endorse a site that doesn't align with the majority's opinions? I think maybe the word "endorse" is being misused here. I think a better phrase would be "publicly acknowledge". Does that make it more clear? Or do we all have to repeat the same things over and over again?