Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5311834-20140803180129/@comment-4855766-20140803222825

Edward Nigma wrote: .White-Shadows. wrote: Alemas2005 wrote: Madkatmaximus wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

Madkatmaximus wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

Madkatmaximus wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote: To whom should they be given?

And don't you think that I, Spy, and you are active enough? Yes, but it's still good rights, because we can't be around all the time. I'll ask again, to whom should we give these rights? LFY, Benboy, and A5. Those are the three that immediately come to mind So basically, Patrollers? A better idea would be to merge these rights with patroller, actually. But then the difference between admin and patroller would be minimal.

I vote against. As Samed said, one can simply leave a message on an admin's Wall. There's a lot of things patrollers wouldn't be able to do, most notably kick/ban/block and edit MediaWiki pages. Or other's personal JavaScript or CSS pages.

Like Samed said, someone can just leave a message. We already have a couple dozen of moderators anyways to kick and ban, and we already have admins too that are active that can block. Editing someone else's JS and CSS pages haven't happened in a long time. That pretty much only needs to happen is if someone is dumb enough to put a code like " " or " ".