Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-25995065-20150317063943/@comment-24772962-20150317211130

Packachoo wrote: Alemas2005 wrote: This "veto" clause gives me a degree of security. Like a "security blanket".

What if there's a vote for removing certain parts of the general policy?

What if there's a vote for allowing petitions asking for demotions?

What if there's a vote for the removal of the duplicate account guidelines?

If those 3 happen and are successful, then there wouldn't be anything stopping them. The clause is like a safety net, with the admin team operating it. If we remove it, the admin team would be left unemployed and useless in regards to "controlling" the Wiki. If we can't

Therefore, I'm firmly opposed.

(And don't even bother sucking me into yet another debate, I'm sick of them) "admins are meant to use their rights to help the community, not their own interests"

I don't like how you expect that the admins are "controlling" the wiki. The admins are still employed in fighting vandals and spam, and editing. That's why you're an admin, not because you have the most say on a topic, or because your choice matters more than a regular user's.

^this