Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-30683785-20161020152524

Well, since the vote to make CVs only for policy modifications passed, we're going to have to come to a mutal agreement through discussion (gasp). Now, generally speaking, modding goes rather smoothly. However in some situations like this there are issues. We also have the huge problem of pretty much every ban having to be screened by an admin which is kinda ridiculous at times, because it kinda prevents we non-admins from actually doing our job. I personally think we should have a bit more independence in moderating (i.e. If one mod bans someone and then decides it's a little too long they should be able to correct that themselves instead of waiting for an admin vote.) I think admin votes in terms of bans should only be used in either severe cases or when the popular opinion is against that of the banning mod. This would help promkte efficiency and keep the messes like the above link down, though I'd like to hear your thoughts on the matter as well. 