Thread:Drew1200/@comment-25282327-20141003043643/@comment-26929881-20141004205214

Nehpets7000 wrote: Vonness11` wrote:

Nehpets7000 wrote: Yeah, honestly, I'd vote for it being used in reference to the place, but I hate how everybody spams "WTH"... We don't "Spam" it, and we used WTH before. I'm not referring to you when I say that, yknow.

Anyway, where IS the line drawn? Supposedly, we're supposed to be okay for children, but we allow hell in all contexts? If we're gonna do that, why not unblock all minor curse words? I can't even understand the logic around here. "This wiki should be suitable for all ages". It doesn't say: "This wiki should be suitable for all ages, with the exception of chat". You have to have an account to chat, and you have to be *cough* 13. (lol who goes by dat ) So "all ages" is assumably for just the people who look at content, and not someone who's going to be chatting, as then it wouldn't be logical, really. So to allow or unblock a word/s, you have to make sure whatever word you allow to be used, (i.e maybe hell) that you know the wiki with it's content in itself, will have younger people look at it, and not chat. What I'm saying is this; make sure whatever word you re-allow or don't allow on chat should be taken differently on the matter of using it on the wiki as a whole. If you allow hell to be used in all contexts on chat, would you want it on the wiki also, or would you tell people you can only use it on chat? Then again, are you worried about people looking at blog comments, threads, etc.

You can draw the line somewhere for chat, but what about that line not on chat?

 L • S  • B