Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5643582-20150917225713/@comment-24675554-20150919141313

Jdude420 wrote: Also, #1 contradicts #3. As #1 says "if more than half the community wants an emoticon it should be added", but that wording would imply that there are no prerequisites for the number of supports, and yet on #3 it talks about changing the required supports to 10, even though given the wording of #1 that is not wanted. This makes the vote rather confusing and contradictory, starting the vote over with better worded and defined votes would perhaps be a good idea.

Additionally, given how there's already around 20 votes on this - people really need to read what they're voting on more thoroughly...

I see #3 as more of a "In case #1 doesnt pass" kind of thing.