Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5311834-20140705000532/@comment-26929881-20140712010647

Keplers wrote:

LegoSuperBowser wrote:

Keplers wrote:

LegoSuperBowser wrote:

Keplers wrote:

LegoSuperBowser wrote:

Madkatmaximus wrote:

Drew1200 wrote: I dislike that idea, as there's really no good context that those words could be used in. There's two contexts they're used in - religion and profanity. We don't allow either of those, so there's really no reason to allow the words.

While Rio makes an excellent point about how easy it is to get around the filter, I also think we're discussing much more than just the filter. The filter defines which words we do and don't allow. If a word isn't in the filter, then it's unreasonable to take any action unless the word is used to violate another policy. So it's not really just the easily bypassable emote letter we're talking about, it's what we consider to be appropriate and inappropriate. Except damn and hell aren't exactly considered profanity any more. I mean to some people they are, but they're so inoffensive I still like Ed's idea. If my mom knew that those words where being throwed out there on chat, I wouldn't be chatting anymore. Same, but just because they aren't illegal doesn't mean we'd use them. Oh....... It isn't illegal to walk down the road with an assault rifle strapped to your back. How many people do it? Dude, this is the internet. No police ready to kill you for doing something you want to do. My point is that just because you can do it doesn't mean you always will. I wouldn't do it, I'm just saying others will.