User blog comment:Alemas2005/Administrator Performance Ratings - One Year Later/@comment-5535873-20150421183337

1. A-3 (I'm sure I'd like his performance a bit more if he was active, since he seems like a person who would actually use the admin tools) B-3 (He's alright, but seems opposed to change, and appears to enjoy having power?) C-2 (I really don't see him much, and as far as recent admin promotions go, I don't feel his was warranted) D-2 (Retired now, was a "chat admin" therefore admin was useless to him) E-3 (Also wanted the position as a "chat admin", but has also done a few things to use his tools, could definitely use a bit of improvement in knowledge of the technical side of things) F-5 (Really seems to help the wiki, uses her tools, much improved since getting the position)

2. F

Since recent changes to our general systems of doing things, the purpose of being an admin is now mostly for the tools, and while they use those occasionally, almost none of the admins performance is amazing in my eyes.