Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-26944420-20160917185711/@comment-1984487-20160922212934

HyperFlash Studios wrote:

Roddy15 wrote:

HyperFlash Studios wrote: I have seen several votes that have happened after a day when only a few people have voted due to people not seeing the vote, whether because it wasn't highlighted or people just didn't get the notif. So, what you are saying isn't entirely true... Are you going to provide examples or just simply get me to believe you? From what I can see from the first page of votes this rule isn't going to somehow lock out tons of people from voting. Even if such an instance does exist, then shouldn't the 48-hour limit also be a problem with b voters? This is what I don't get with the people voting b for the reasons that have been stated. You can't make votes last forever just to let every Tom and Jerry to vote, if the vote wasn't exposed enough that's the fault of whoever was in charge of getting people to see it. When referendums or generals get poor turnouts people don't go "oh we should run the vote for a week!" Since you are obviously set in your decision, I'm not going to waste time finding examples. I don't have a problem with the 48-hour limit because I have paitience, and I don't need every CV to end instantly. But literally, nobody is saying that now are they..... I'm not set in my decision if someone can present a case that isn't just "oh but some many people won't get to vote!", your idea that somehow 24-hours equate to a vote ending "instantly" or people who are basing the vote as if they would only get 24-hours to vote once the vote starts.