User blog comment:Caysie98/Seriously Guys?/@comment-5671588-20130108010046

Wow... what do I have to say?

First, why the brick did you guys start arguing like that over the popularity of Samurai Warriors? I'm a Highland Battler, but I certainly wouldn't describe myself as popular. To me, it seems Ranks on the new Boards aren't as important as on the Old Boards. The topic which is linked to in the blog 100 times seems ludicrous to many of us, because it is. All users are equal, all posts are not.

Another thing: Ranks don't equal Likes. Nor vice versa. I'm a higher Rank than several users who have a LOT more Likes than I do. Sure, Likes help, but they aren't the only thing that allows you to Rank up.

And Jdude: To this: " Ok, the way I see it is this/do this. I give Likes to people I agree with, If I had a choice between a Caveman and a Highland Battler who both said the same thing and I had to give a Like to one I'd give it to the Caveman because the Caveman probably has 5 Likes and the Highland Battler has 500+. Not saying the Highland Battler didn't earn them or deserve them but that it helps out those new users if you agree and/or "like" there post to give it a Like over a high ranker."

Why not just Like both? It doesn't cost you anything. I don't even look at their Ranks if I see a post I enjoy... Likes are free to give, but cost quality posts to receive. :)