Thread:TheShadowAssassin/@comment-26067066-20161030005240/@comment-26067066-20161030203551

"First of all, I specifically stated that I never once went out of my way already, so stop saying that.

''Secondly, my comments were removed because Bubbles found them "rude and sarcastic" because, and only because, I was calling her out on something completely legitimate, and she knew that. The removal of the comment on the original thread was not so much her being offended as it was her trying to cover it up, otherwise, why is my comment about her period still up and not removed with the rest? That is why I restated them on her wall. I knew what she was doing and why, and I wanted to make sure that I was clear. I wasn't harassing her. I wasn't "going out of my way". I wasn't doing it to intentionally provoke her or be mean; I was calling her out on her actions. I shouldn't have to contact another staff member, period. Also, I think you're "misconstruing" my message on her wall; it wasn't an attack, it was a direct message notifying her that I find her comments rude, self-righteous, condescending, and offensive (and I'm not alone)!!!"''

I'm confused as to why you deny that you "went out of your way," you seemed to think reposting a removed comment on her message wall was necessary, which satisfies the definition of this phrase, but that's beside the point.

That is incorrect. Having looked at the history of the thread, the "period" comment appears to be removed, but your second message remains (only because Slice restored it). Although we have been over this, I shall reiterate once again that if you have a problem with a staff member's moderation practices, then please express it in a civilized manner. Considering that I was the one who actually saw her reaction to these comments as they happened, I can attest to the fact that she did indeed find these offensive, likely due to the rather snarky manner of the remark. And, again, if a DM removes a post for being " Rude and sarcastic," then it can be logically deduced that restating it on her message wall will be considered against policy as well. You are allowed to have a negative opinion on a staff member's moderation practices, and you are allowed to express that opinion, but only if you do so in a civil manner, and if your comments are removed for being rude, then reposting them will only produce a more severe result, as it expresses complete lack of respect for policy.

''So you admit that her (multiple [as opposed to my two lol]) comments to Ben and NG were out of line, yet.. no warning?"''

Once more, the comments directed at Ben and NG were rude, yes, and certainly against policy. However, they were made before she had CM/DM rights, and since (to my knowledge, anyway) she no longer insults these users on main, I deem them irrelevant to this specific situation. If she still made remarks like these, then yes a demotion warning would be in order, but she does not, and ergo no warning is needed.

"I have found several comments that I, personally, found self-righteous, condescending, hypocritical, and generally unprofessional:

 'I don’t answer to you, and I don’t need to bring my ideas before you.' 

'' 'And I will end this by saying, I’m not sure why you have some sort of fixation with me, and constantly bring up every little thing I do with staff, even completely legitimate things. But I would like you to stop, because it borders on stalking, thanks!' ''

'' 'If you wish to insult me, by all means, but please do so publicly and don't leave me to find out about all the jabs you make second hand. Thank you.' ''

'' 'I would also appreciate if you wouldn't use that emote when responding to me. I take what I'm saying very seriously, and I don't think you're being very serious at all. And  that  is unprofessional.' ''

 'In order for us to get along I expect two things[...]'" 

 These comments were made in response to constant and random attempts at undermining her authority. On multiple occasions, I have received PMs involving complaints of Bubbles' actions, which, in almost every situation, were either ludicrously minor or something that was not a breach of power in any way (there were a few legitimate ones of course, but they were resolved quickly and were not consistently problematic). These comments were not "self-righteous" or "condescending," but an attempt to get the point across that this continual striving towards getting her demoted for the most trivial of reasons was unacceptable, and that in order for the staff team to function properly, there has to be a better system of communication than the current one (though I will agree the fourth remark you listed raised an eyebrow of mine, but I think her "attitude" here is being blown out of proportion immensely).

 Also, per Loney on everything he said.