User blog comment:RePeat/Would you rather. . . - Sports Edition 1/@comment-26929881-20131008215126/@comment-30610591-20131009021857

Can you honestly blame someone for wanting to be the best player? On the one hand, if you are the best player, you have a chance to help your team-mates confidence and such. And maybe the other players aren't that bad, they could just happen to lose a bunch of games. And what if they win 5 games out of 11? Is that really bad for a team?

On the other hand, if you are the worst player, you practically contribute nothing to the team. They don't need you, nor do they want you to play. Some may be nicer about it then others, but you're pretty much dead weight. The only thing you might do is hand out waters and such, but then again...you might just sit on the bench while someone else who volunteered is doing that.

This blog is opinion based. Chosing to be the best player isn't like shooting your team in the foot to get there. In fact, losing inspires people to get better. So honestly, I would like to have fun with the team, playing out on the court with my friends. Who cares if we lose a few games if we have fun?

Choosing to be the best player doesn't show that people on this wiki don't know much about teamwork or sports. It shows that they would rather be the best player of a losing team. Nothing more, nothing less.

P.S. In my case he is right. I don't know much about sports.

Extra P.S. Good job on the polls RePeat.