User blog comment:ZXSpidermanXZ/GMOs/@comment-4910132-20130204162943/@comment-4257955-20130205081416

Bird, no offense, but that one of the most blighted, ridiculous comments I've even on any subject for a long while.

This GMO arugument could be presented in different manners as well. Marro made this argument to be one that has to do with the faith-based portion of the GMO debate.

I could make a blog calling out GMOs for their unhealthfulness, their betrayal to the environment, ANYTHING that I thought made the argument relevant to me.

An overweight person will not adopt a lighter person's argument on fast food. And someone against the health aspect of the GMO will not take on the religious implications. And vice versa. Marro thinks that GMOs are wrong for Christians. You can disagree with that stance or not. But saying that the inclusion of religion on any argument showcases the person's featherbrained tendencies is far cry from an intellectual statement.

No offense intended to you at all, but I could not let that comment stand.