User blog comment:LegoI3rickI3uilder/Debate:Amount of Admins/@comment-4845243-20130709154148/@comment-1693968-20130709171429

No, it is based off of facts. Logic is not based solely off of numbers. It is compatible with other things, too. Just because I do not have an approximate number does not mean my argument is immediately invalidated.

I never changed the definition at all. That was simply a misunderstanding on your part, due to unclear communication on my part. I communicated it as soon as I was aware you didn't understand, which is actually quite the opposite of a fallacy.

You're causing me to have to repeat myself several times. In case you weren't aware, that's a very weak and ineffective form of argument. There is no absence of factual examples. I gave you the example of were I lost my reputation as a debator, and I told you there were many others. There is no direct link I can just give you to prove this. That does not render my argument invalid, though. The only thing that effects is you're decision of whether to believe me or not. I believe I have a good amount of credibility, so I would imagine, that if you were to follow logic, that you would believe me.