Thread:Eagleeyedan/@comment-25995065-20150308032351

I have some issues with some things you've said in chat today but failed to elaborate upon or explain when asked. The chat conversation follows:

 [02:48]  I didn't know you were still active here, EED. :P [02:48]  I'm not lol I just checked in cuz of the new scandal over admin chat [02:49]  Scandal? :P [02:49]  yeah, the one meiko started [02:49]  I'm not sure if I want to know. :P [02:49]  yeah, it's annoying -_- [02:52]  yeah, that was meiko [02:52]  Wow... :P [02:53]  /burgeoisie [02:53]  he's on chat right now actually [02:53]  Please tell me that was supposed to be a joke :P [02:53]  just mia [02:53]  no, he's been a problem a lot lately [02:53]  and is stirring up trouble [02:53]  Really? [02:53] <Eagleeyedan> and I super want to ban him [02:53] <Bourgeoisie> I'm right here [02:53] <Eagleeyedan> yep I know :P [02:53] <AmazingPythor> Hi :P [02:53] <MeltE2> bear in mind he's also done a ton to help out the wiki [02:54] <AmazingPythor> That is true [02:54] <Bourgeoisie> Fairly certain I haven't stirred up any trouble [02:54] <Luke McSwagger99> I've noticed him causing some disruption lately on here [02:54] <Luke McSwagger99> but not that much. [02:54] <Luke McSwagger99> :P [02:54] <AmazingPythor> Even if he did, it's not nearly as bad as what Div and Klint do every day :P [02:56] <Bourgeoisie> I also haven't caused any disruption


 * Later ***

[02:58] <Bourgeoisie> Eagleeyedan: I'm trying to figure out where that conversation you were having about me came from

After no response on your part, I private messaged you and got no response. This isn't very accountable of you, and I still fail to see where those remarks would have come from. Seeing as I had been AFK in chat and hadn't edited in several hours on the wiki, It does seem a bit random for you to bring these claims up, and I see no constructive or meaningful reason why you would. If I am indeed causing disruption or stirring up trouble, is it not your responsibility as an administrator to provide adequate warnings and blocks? Degrading a person's efforts to improve the community&mdash;through Special:Forum, a feature made available to the community for this very purpose&mdash;which many users (including administrators) agree with, is not something I'd consider a warning, or even any form of solution to an issue you have with me or my contributions for that matter. So if you could please elaborate on how and why you think I've caused disruption and stirred up trouble, that would be very good.<ac_metadata title="Regard"> </ac_metadata>