Thread:Benboy755/@comment-5052737-20161012201704/@comment-30683785-20161013030315

Benboy755 wrote: HyperFlash Studios wrote:

Benboy755 wrote: I openly acknowledge that the morph was in violation of policy, although the fuss about it is rather ridiculous as every picture used could be publicly found on the web. No rights were abused, and I have no clue how that rumor got started as there is an easily accessible deletion log. My issue with this is the total lack of consistency regarding prior "warnings" and behaviors the admins have exhibited towards other blocks and so-called rulebreakers. Several users assumed that rights were being abused after being told it was possible, even after being told there was no proof. I personally think this entire block is ridiculous as you were not even given a fair warning for the same offense and were instead blocked on the pretense of a warning from July. There is also a large discrepancy in the punishments given to other users (see the example from today, I believe Brick and Keplers expressed desire to have me "drawn and quartered" and "cut off my sausage," if that can't be considered an attack I don't know what can be) as compared to those given to me. I was given one warning for a trivial edit summary, and I personally believed I had adhered to said warning, if the admins thought otherwise I was never contacted about it. I believe it's common knowledge that I have a sarcastic sense of humor, and it comes out in my edit summaries. I like to make my edits unique. Following Alemas's little "warning" I made sure I never said anything that could have come over in any way as "hostile." Wow, ok, so you were unfairly blocked then. This really kinda annoys me if this is what the admin team is in charge of.