LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Chat Moderator

This is LMBW's requests for chat moderator page. If you wish to request moderator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here. Moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat when they are being disruptive.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 20 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Users voting on a request must give a valid reason for their support or oppose. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for moderator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 4 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

MeltE2
Hello there. I'm asking for these rights because the wiki doesn't seem to have many CMs active during early evenings and nights. I've been on the wiki for quite some time and have seen my share of situations on chat and I think I can help handle any future ones. If you do oppose, I'd like to know what ways I can improve. Thanks, Mel.

Support

 * 1) I honestly can't find a reason not to support, is definitely mature and capable from what I've seen.
 * 2) Melt has been here for quite awhile, always mature, and following the rules. It would be nice if activity were a bit better, but I think CM rights will help with that. -Nehpets7000
 * 3) Would likely be better than me at modding, I'm sure.  Loney Said This 15:39, October 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Melt is a mature user who would do well with these rights. Sam (talk)
 * 5) Capable. Mature, i believe would be a good Moderator. And per the rest of the Support
 * 6) You've always been very highly respected in my book, and also others I assume from the past as well. Even if you aren't on late at night, when we're low on CMs, I'd still vote for you. Very good judgement, and a all around great user. Activity isn't a major problem, as long as you are still on from time to time.  L  • S  • B
 * 7) I have never seen Melt break any rules, be involved in iffy situations, etc. Of course I support, just more activity and involvement would be lovely. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån

Neutral

 * Why is the meaning of life 42? - LazerzSoH
 * I haven't seen too much from you, but I don't want to oppose. Green-kool-aid-man.jpg LCF  (talk! ) Purple-kool-aid-man.jpg 21:04, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * Per Ed
 * I see you on chat but I'm not sure I can see you as a mod... I definitely have no reason to oppose, but I'm not sure about supporting just yet.
 * Same as others; no reason to oppose but I haven't seen enough of you to support.--Skully Of House Lannister (talk) 00:59, October 24, 2014 (UTC)