Thread:Alemas2005/@comment-25235928-20160812013307/@comment-25235928-20160813031605

TheShadowAssassin wrote: The behavior that is currently being displayed by "the admins" is, in itself, ludicrous, and I am seeing an incredible amount of double standards.

There are trolls (not naming names, but you know damn well who I'm referring to. If you don't, then you are not active enough to be making any decisions on any bans or blocks) who are going unpunished for the exact behavior that you just criticized Wolf for ["stating  that they know the rules but find them stupid and therefore elect to ignore them "], and that is unacceptable.

The only thing that you have that you could even remotely consider "reason enough" to keep Wolf banned for 6 months is his ban history, and even then, have you even looked at the details? Or did you simply see a long list of jargon and say "reason enough!!" to further fuel your biased agenda and use that to lengthen his ban? Prior to this, Wolf has only been banned once in almost an entire year, and for only a minor infraction. Previous ban history =/= warrant 6 months.

"Poor reaction to your most recent ban"

Yes, I will agree, Wolf's reaction to his current ban was certainly uncalled for, and he definitely could have managed it better. But be honest with yourselves. Does that truly warrant 6 whole months? If you said yes, you should not be an administrator. Thank you ^

Ale and Ava, I'm trying very desperately to remain respectful here, the least you can do is as least attempt the same with me. I'm not a piece of trash you can just throw out.