Thread:TheShadowAssassin/@comment-26067066-20161030005240/@comment-5381241-20161030215906

AmazingPythor wrote:  I'm confused as to why you deny that you "went out of your way," you seemed to think reposting a removed comment on her message wall was necessary, which satisfies the definition of this phrase, but that's beside the point.

That is incorrect. Having looked at the history of the thread, the "period" comment appears to be removed, but your second message remains (only because Slice restored it). Although we have been over this, I shall reiterate once again that if you have a problem with a staff member's moderation practices, then please express it in a civilized manner. Considering that I was the one who actually saw her reaction to these comments as they happened, I can attest to the fact that she did indeed find these offensive, likely due to the rather snarky manner of the remark. And, again, if a DM removes a post for being " Rude and sarcastic," then it can be logically deduced that restating it on her message wall will be considered against policy as well. You are allowed to have a negative opinion on a staff member's moderation practices, and you are allowed to express that opinion, but only if you do so in a civil manner, and if your comments are removed for being rude, then reposting them will only produce a more severe result, as it expresses complete lack of respect for policy.

Once more, the comments directed at Ben and NG were rude, yes, and certainly against policy. However, they were made before she had CM/DM rights, and since (to my knowledge, anyway) she no longer insults these users on main, I deem them irrelevant to this specific situation. If she still made remarks like these, then yes a demotion warning would be in order, but she does not, and ergo no warning is needed.

 These comments were made in response to constant and random attempts at undermining her authority. On multiple occasions, I have received PMs involving complaints of Bubbles' actions, which, in almost every situation, were either ludicrously minor or something that was not a breach of power in any way (there were a few legitimate ones of course, but they were resolved quickly and were not consistently problematic). These comments were not "self-righteous" or "condescending," but an attempt to get the point across that this continual striving towards getting her demoted for the most trivial of reasons was unacceptable, and that in order for the staff team to function properly, there has to be a better system of communication than the current one (though I will agree the fourth remark you listed raised an eyebrow of mine, but I think her "attitude" here is being blown out of proportion immensely).

 Also, per Loney on everything he said.

The period comment was removed long after the second comment was removed (by Bubbles, interestingly enough, which I believe further proves my point). And I'm sorry, I didn't know that "don't hurt Bubbles's feelings" was anywhere in the policy. Oh, it's not? You're right, it all comes down to the personal attack policy, which we've mentioned before.. intent vs. result. Which brings me to my next point..

" were either ludicrously minor or something that was not a breach of power in any way "

" (though I will agree the fourth remark you listed raised an eyebrow of mine, but I think her "attitude" here is being blown out of proportion immensely) "

That is not for you to judge. What may seem like a minor insult to one may be extremely insulting to another, therefore this isn't relevant. Yeah, of course you think it was blown out of proportion. You think.

Here's the issue: You're constructing your argument based on your own thoughts and experiences rather than from a neutral standpoint. Simply because you don't find something that she said to be offensive, condescending, self-righteous, or whatever else, does not mean that other people don't either. They do, clearly, yet you refuse to acknowledge that and continue to spew crap about how she should be excused for whatever reason. It's getting incredibly annoying (as well as whatever this eloquent, and again, moderately condescending tone) and just furthers the idea that there is simply no winning with you, because you seem to refuse to see things from a neutral standpoint.

I never had a grudge with Bubbles. In fact, I tried to remain kind and positive to her (http://legomessageboards.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:275065#8), however, I found some of her behavior to be incredibly off-putting and was rather alarmed. Then it continued. So yeah, I did leave a message that could have been found as potentially rude and/or sexist. She followed that up with a statement that I found to be incredibly hypocritical, given her recent behavior (note: that I found hypocritical), and called her out on it. She didn't care, nobody did, and she removed it without actually acknowledging the fact that I did indeed have a problem with her behavior. She essentially excused herself from an issue that I was having with her and basically just pretended that what I had to say didn't matter and was just another form of attack. That's not true, I was legitimately trying to bring something to her attention in the exact same way that she did to me in the same thread. So, I left another message on her wall, completely unaware that I was actually infringing on any policies, in an attempt to say "Hey, don't ignore me, seriously, fix your crap". Theeeen that got removed and now here we are, 72 messages later. And yet I haven't gotten anywhere because you just refuse to listen.

I had no negative intentions (save for the period post, which I WILL COMPLETELY ADMIT WAS WRONG. Happy?), but seeing this display of behavior from you has really frustrated me that I can't get a shred of equal justice because of you.

I'm burnt out and tired of trying to fight this since I apparently won't win, and I have to head off to work, so if you don't mind:

Get off of my wall, please.