Board Thread:Demotions/@comment-4964341-20160906204217/@comment-24718406-20160907003133

Harold89 wrote: Slicer Vorzakh wrote: But you'll just ignore every thing else they did to warrant demotion? You mean like other incidents committed by users with powers? I don't think we should ignore those other times, but my advice would be that this isn't exactly the best time, place, or medium to demote a user who one thinks is worthy of demotion. In my opinion, the points you brought up in your post would fare better in its own original demotion thread, not in this awkward hodge-podge of users like you (who are using this incident to add to a list of others incidents to use as evidence for voting demotion) and other users (who are simply using this thread to remove an admin due to this one single incident).

I guess it's easier if I just use names. :P – If you think Alemas should be gone, what I would advise is wait until this vote concerning a single incident is settled with. Then, start a new vote focusing on Ale's behavior and actions as an administrator (like you did in your post) rather than using this vote to further your opinion. Y ou're completely allowed to use this vote to futher your opions on Ale, but in my opinion, that's not as efficient. You're  using this vote concerning one incident to further your ideas concerning a whole lot of other incidents on top of this one. No, drop this crap of threads not being legit enough for a proper vote. Voting to demote ale hete where there have already been plenty of votes will make no difference then voting on another thread. Just because the original author used an example in the vote doesn't mean that's the only reason are voting to demote him. If any one person would vote to demote Ale just for that their vote should be invalidated, but this incident was sort of a case of a final straw and thats why it's popping up.