Thread:RePeat/@comment-5111283-20150217235959/@comment-4257955-20150218210949

Harold89 wrote: @Rio: Hm. Well, in that case, whatever account which was not considered her "main" should have been banned.

Oh, and her account is still breaking the current rules. " There.
 * "Duplicate accounts are not permitted unless they are clearly connected to the main account. It must be stated on the user page to which account it is connected."

And yes, I think Peat should have a chance to respond. But only because people seem to be very much so on her side, despite her breaking the rules - with admin knowledge. So yes, I think she should be given a chance. Fair enough. We'll see what happens from there.

And yes, I know this is not a dire error or instance of oversight. But the point is, she broke the rules with administrator knowledge and no actions were taken. And again, it doesn't matter /when/ it happened. It happened. The admins involved did not take action. And no one can deny that. It's not because we're "very much so on her side" that I want her to be able to come on and state that TME is under her jurisdiction before it gets the block that you so obviously crave. It's because it's only reasonable to allow her to do that so no unneeded and over-the-top action has to be taken on this relatively trivial matter.

Do you know what's also quite undeniable? That the admins are humans. And humans make mistakes, blunders, or decisions that others do not appreciate. If that was the case, then they made a mistake with not carrying out the policy. And guess what? No harm has come of that. No harm except for this big justice tirade you're beginning to go on, Harold. Some things need to be adequately handled and processed, and I'm not sure this is one of those things. That is all I have to say on this matter.