User blog comment:LegoI3rickI3uilder/Quick Poll/@comment-25625534-20150401044814/@comment-25625534-20150401052504

"LMBW needs a new main leader who is true to the foundation of the LMBW it was built on. Making articles is LMBW aim. I respect your comment again. Though to be honest, there are more community chatters than community editors. Also if LMBW aim is just articles, then it's aim is a bit short of the bigger target."

lmbw doesn't need a leader. let alone one who's going to take focus off the community and focus on the mbs. for the last few months we've been working towards involving the community with wiki politics more than ever, and you want to implement a "leader"? what's the purpose? what will they do? is there a reason to have a leader?

and just because it was founded for that purpose doesn't mean we need to go all militant and force everyone into article-writing servitude (hyperbole.) it's the closest thing we have to an aim, not the only thing we should care about. yeah we have more community chatters than editors, but is that a problem? we don't need more, the ones we have do a fine job as is, and new users often edit articles every now and then. our "aim" isn't to be a completely mb-centric wiki, our aim is to accurately document the mbs and its users. which is being accomplished.

"Sorry, I'm used to talking like that. If you'd prefer I'll say it not as an anology so often, if you'd like. So what I mean is, there's no point in giving you the plain flat out reason, if you don't understand the story behind the reason. It's better if you see it yourself, than if I told you."

great, more nonsense. i'm not even going to respond.