Thread:TheShadowAssassin/@comment-26067066-20161030005240/@comment-30683785-20161030180203

Sky-Pirate Doubloon wrote: HyperFlash Studios wrote: AmazingPythor wrote: Benboy755 wrote: AmazingPythor wrote: TheShadowAssassin wrote: AmazingPythor wrote: Having looked through her recent thread edits, these are the only ones I've found involving any sort of conflict at all:

http://legomessageboards.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:284898

http://legomessageboards.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:284576

http://legomessageboards.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:284956

She handled these quite professionally I'd argue, I fail to see anything that qualifies as condescending. I did notice some teasing of certain users on a few blogs, but these were users with whom she generally knew somewhat well, and it was obviously just playfulness (and the users involved took it as such).

I will freely admit that Bubbles has struggled with rude behavior in the past, but from the looks of it she has successfully moved past it. If you don't even see a hint of a self-righteous (and therefore unprofessional) attitude then I don't know what else to say Look, I know Bubbles well; to an extent I can see why someone would take a few of these remarks as "self-righteous" if you were looking hard for it, but frankly I think you're seeing things that aren't there. She has been trying to appear more professional in her remarks lately, I suppose at times to the point of it almost unnatural, but I assure you sarcasm is hardly the intention here. " Also, frankly, keep in mind that the personal attack policy is not based on  intent, but  whether or not the user takes offense ." No one actually "took offense" in these scenarios, it was merely the case of a few users misconstruing something said to someone else (i.e. if Hype had found these condescending it would have been an issue, with the "stalking" remark, for example). To be honest I did find these remarks condescending and some offensive but I was so tired of the crap i was getting for actually speaking about it that I just decided to go along. It's so incredibly obvious that there is a huge, huge amount of bias. You defend Ben's block to the point where you won't listen to anyone and consistently waive Bubbles' actions on the pretense of "she's moved past x y etc." I have nothinf against her, but the unfair bias is ridiculous. the fact that another staff member couldnt take this kind of stuff anymore and just gave up and played along with it is a serious issue. another damn staff member could agree that its all biased. it only makes me wonder if other staff members have given up and followed suit The issue is that we can't win Sky, there will always be an admin on "that" side of the argument, and an admin's word is generally the last word, from what I've seen on this wiki, so what's the point?