Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-10112739-20160102070335/@comment-5311834-20160102170323

Alemas2005 wrote: Ah, ok, so what I said above refers to Meiko. Which means that the following statement, "you [...] have as of yet done nothing about another formerly permablocked user being here", is untrue, as I have informed the admins about his presence. I'm just waiting for them to give their opinions. And, FYI, the admins voted on letting T-007 back. So I'm not quite sure what you're complaining about. I'm aware of that thread - you're still letting a permablocked user roam free while you decide.

Alemas, I'm aware you voted on it. That was my original point. Reread if you must.

Alemas2005 wrote: Might I suggest, then, that he reads through my posts in this thread? And remember that you are also part of the admin team. When you announced your "retirement", I asked whether you wanted your rights removed or your admin chat account suspended, and you said no to both, so you're still "part" of the admin team. Indeed, seeing you say "you" instead of "us" hurts a bit. I'm allowed to criticise the other parts of the admin team. I had nothing to do with this, so why would I say "we", or in any way imply that I had a part in this.

Alemas2005 wrote: ...sorry, what? Your contributions at the time say the opposite. Fort was blocked on November 28, and you announced your retirement on November 25, but you continued being active after that. Indeed, you became inactive just a few hours before Fort got blocked. At around that time (November 25-28) I must have asked you whether you still wanted access to admin chat, and you said yes. So you could have mentioned your concerns at the time. And in any case, you must have already voted on the issue before that, as we always wait until every admin casts their vote. So you must have definitely known about Fort's block. ...So because I was active on the wiki means I was for sure active on admin chat and most definitely saw that vote. Alright! Thanks for telling me what I did.