Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-4964341-20150411120424/@comment-25995065-20150411180252

Jdude420 wrote: Bourgeoisie wrote:

Jdude420 wrote:

Bourgeoisie wrote: I didn't say it isn't Brickimedia, but I used it for reference that even without redx-ing words, there's nothing there encouraging people to use those words you don't like. Redx or not, I doubt there will people other than trolls using them.

And I also never said I supported unblocking all the redxs, so there's no need to get that defensive. I believe you mean "I didn't say this is Bricki"? :P

Whether or not the word(s) would be commonly used is beside the point, it would still be an allowed word - and if it's allowed on chat it's allowed on the Wiki. Which anyone can see, including prospective MBers who may wish to join.

The initial paragraph wasn't aimed at you, but rather was a general statement. I apologize if I sounded overly defensive. Well technically if you had no redxs, that doesn't really mean it's allowed. You can always ask people not to use certain words (and obviously you're never going to be able to make everything that could be offensive into a redx filter (and if you try to add every possible offensive statement to the filter, that'll be the last day I'm a user here)). Valid point. Oh, yes I agree - trying to block every possible offensive word would be rather silly, but words that are commonly found offensive (especially by Christians [more specifically Christian homeschoolers]) like the f-word, s-word, or other words should obviously not be allowed, IMO.

I won't disagree with the two examples you listed but what does christian homeschoolers have to do with it