Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-26908198-20150727013747/@comment-5369341-20150730151338

ShadowOfOblivion7119 wrote: Michaelyoda wrote: ShadowOfOblivion7119 wrote: Michaelyoda wrote: I have to agree with what others have already said. I like the idea, but there is no good or effiecient way to pull the vote. It'll just end up being too much of a hastle for what it's worth.

However, I do have a suggestion. If someone's CM abilities are in question, report your concerns to an admin. From there, a team of admins or other trusted staff could "shadow" the CM on chat and evaluate how he/she is going. This would be much more effiecient and would cut down any bias we might have in a vote.

THAT IS WHAT I SAID!!!! Two things.

1. I didn't even read your comment so don't say I was copying you.

2. After reading it, I'd like to note the differences. A)The admins pick the "shadower," not the community. B)There are 3 "shadowers," not 1. C) The "shadowers" then report their findings to the admins, not the community. D)The admins make the final decision, not a community vote. (C and D were more implicit than actually said.)

Relax, I'm not trying to steal your thunder. 1. Perhaps

2. I see. A) I agree completely B) I suggested Three? C) I agree D) That would negate the purpose, the Community should have an imput

Everyone seems to be doing SOMETHING, I apologize.

I know the feeling. Don't worry about it.