Thread:TheShadowAssassin/@comment-26067066-20161030005240/@comment-24718406-20161030044252

AmazingPythor wrote: Slicer Vorzakh wrote:

AmazingPythor wrote:

Benboy755 wrote: AmazingPythor wrote: Benboy755 wrote: AmazingPythor wrote: TheShadowAssassin wrote: AmazingPythor wrote: Having looked through her recent thread edits, these are the only ones I've found involving any sort of conflict at all:

http://legomessageboards.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:284898

http://legomessageboards.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:284576

http://legomessageboards.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:284956

She handled these quite professionally I'd argue, I fail to see anything that qualifies as condescending. I did notice some teasing of certain users on a few blogs, but these were users with whom she generally knew somewhat well, and it was obviously just playfulness (and the users involved took it as such).

I will freely admit that Bubbles has struggled with rude behavior in the past, but from the looks of it she has successfully moved past it. If you don't even see a hint of a self-righteous (and therefore unprofessional) attitude then I don't know what else to say Look, I know Bubbles well; to an extent I can see why someone would take a few of these remarks as "self-righteous" if you were looking hard for it, but frankly I think you're seeing things that aren't there. She has been trying to appear more professional in her remarks lately, I suppose at times to the point of it almost unnatural, but I assure you sarcasm is hardly the intention here. " Also, frankly, keep in mind that the personal attack policy is not based on  intent, but  whether or not the user takes offense ." No one actually "took offense" in these scenarios, it was merely the case of a few users misconstruing something said to someone else (i.e. if Hype had found these condescending it would have been an issue, with the "stalking" remark, for example). No one took offense? What? You think NG and I actually enjoy being insulted weekly? That was in regard to Bubbles' "professional" comments that apparently were misconstrued, which I assumed you were referring to, I will not defend the insults directed at you in any way (though from my experience those ceased on her behalf a while ago). I fail to see how its fair to dismiss those as "ceased a while ago" when people get blocked for things they did a year ago Er, can I have an example of this? i don't recall such an occurrence, at least not recently. wolf fort ben kep brick