Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-10112739-20160102070335/@comment-5311834-20160104005522

Alemas2005 said: 20 of "passive-aggressive behaviour" which led to multiple blocks, might I add. So the comparison isn't really valid here. And as I've already said, that sort of behaviour accumulates itself over time, and at some point enough's enough.

Fort says,

"ftr. I specified 20 months because that's the amount of time it's been since my last block, or it was a month ago. So no, none of that behavior lead to any blocks, and as Ale straight-up reinforces with "I don't even recall warning Fort at all, actually," it's basically a clarification that there were no warnings nor punishment for my behavior leading up to the perm, despite there apparently being enough time for an admin discussion amount said perm. May I question how admin discussions work when apparently you skip over warnings and finite blocks and straight to the harshest punishment one can dole out?"