Thread:LegoI3rickI3uilder/@comment-4964341-20130709205005/@comment-4845243-20130710140647

Keplers wrote: Obi the LEGO Fan wrote:

Keplers wrote:

Obi the LEGO Fan wrote: Keplers, the decision has been made. Appealing to people who helped make it won't help you. I never was really able to discuss it with anyone but you.

So if I don't appeal to the ones who helped make it, whom do I appeal to? Write up your best argument in your defense and I'll make sure the other admins read it and consider. Firstly, is there a log for what's been done? If not, what CM was present? If there were none present, then where is the substantial evidence? If there was one, why did nothing happen earlier?

Secondly, I have technically done nothing against the rules. There is nothing within the rules about saying that a group of people that you belong to is immature deserves a 3-month ban. In fact, in any instance other than the one we faced a week ago, it would not even have been brought up and no one would care.

What we did can and for now will be considered trolling, but I attempted to stay within the boundaries of the rules. Does this mean that I want the ban lifted, because I was an angel and broke no rules? No. I did come to this wiki with two people that have had a large past record of chat offenses and attacked the wiki with them. However, I understand what I did wrong, and this is likely not to happen again. I ask you to reconsider the amount of time on this ban, because I feel that I will have learned the lesson before October 1st. Well, I can bring this up, but... I have a problem with this. Are you denying having done what you did? Because you seem to be denying and accepting the charges in the same post. If you're denying them you can't have learned your lesson, but if you learned your lesson you can't deny them.

Also, you did technically break the rules, and technically we can ban you for as long as we think is prudent, so don't be appealing to technicalities.