Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-28939754-20160918035013/@comment-5369341-20160919012216

Brick425 wrote: Michaelyoda wrote: AmazingPythor wrote: Michaelyoda wrote: AmazingPythor wrote: Michaelyoda wrote: AmazingPythor wrote: Michaelyoda wrote: AmazingPythor wrote: Michaelyoda wrote: Impossibubbles wrote:

Michaelyoda wrote: I'd like to point out that one can have the inactive tag and still visit chat every day. This vote is also incredibly vague on what constitutes inactivity.

As such, I vote B for all. Inactivity will be determined by admins using common sense. A user can't just make an edit to remove the tag, they would need to be truly active, as deemed active by other active members of the community. So, mob rule then. I fail to see how two or three admins using common sense to determine activity equates to "mob rule." It was more in response to the second sentence, which seemingly contradicts the first. Well yes I suppose that was rather self-contradictory, but keep in mind that the final say in determining inactivity would be that of the admins. With this community, I highly doubt that. Care to elaborate on that? Here, let me link you to the 177 CVs we have had. http://legomessageboards.wikia.com/wiki/Board:Community_Voting Your point? Regardless of your thoughts on the rationality of the community, the admins will be the ones exclusively in charge of this system. My point being that the moment that the admins decide something contrary to what someone wants, there will be a CV. You seem annoyed by CVs, yet you opposed the vote I created. It's their existence, not their length.