Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-24675554-20160813195520/@comment-5369341-20160814221135

Avalair wrote: Michaelyoda wrote: Avalair wrote: GuacamoleCCXR wrote: Avalair wrote: Michaelyoda wrote: Alemas2005 wrote:

BusyCityGirl wrote: Currently isn't this vote against policy? "A community vote cannot be used to directly demote rights from a user, however, a petition to the Admins can be made that a user be demoted." Apparently no-one remembered that when this vote passed... Then shouldn't this be corrected? What do you mean by corrected? policy applies retroactively as well. if this vote has passed but turns out to be against the policy, admins should still invalidate it. However, the community voted to go against the policy, as we have done in the past numerous times. Then why do we have policies, if they mean nothing? Policies are meant to be followed, however if the community holds a vote to either change or go against policy, whatever the majority (which in this case was 19/20) decides is what is to be followed. We have done this numerous times in the past (see here, here, and here.) so I'm unsure why this is any different. You, the community, voted for this and the majority was overwhelming. I'd like to bring up the fact that no one brought up the fact that this goes against policy in any of these examples (unless I missed something, which I'm known for doing). And for the record, I opposed all the demotion votes, and supported all admins in the admin revote.

And per Guac all the way. It's simply chaos.