Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-24718406-20160929032831/@comment-24718406-20160929234318

Eagleeyedan wrote: Slicer Vorzakh wrote: Eagleeyedan wrote: @Kep, no, not al-queda, but high-level trolls like Nigma and Meiko and their associates who would see this place torn apart and torn down much in the same way al-queda would see the middle east torn apart and torn down.

Per your second rebuttal, it is not an excuse but a reason. While yes, things are talked about, it is in a sensitive, censored, moderated manner. Also, usually as announcements by the mods not really detailed discussions about an incident or the specifics of what happened.

To your third comment, what do you mean by "things that pertain to us"? We only talk about users who break the rules and are problematic, ban length time and actions to take if bad behaviour persists, and potentially dangerous situations. We no longer discuss rule adjustments that affect the community there, that was already moved to the community voting system.

▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░Eagleeyedan▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂ "And who's to say "inactive" admins don't check up on the Wiki every now and then? They still have their ways to keep themselves updated on its state." our inactive admins like these should definitely be making important decisions

Eh? I think you meant to quote Ale ▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░Eagleeyedan▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂ That was an ale quote. I'm saying it's scary when we have admins so out of the loop that they think things like that nigma can destroy their site, while these admins can vote to overrule the community on the admin site.