Thread:Drew1200/@comment-25282327-20141019033227/@comment-26929881-20141020230738

LondonDauntlessCorvair963 wrote: LegoSuperBowser wrote: LondonDauntlessCorvair963 wrote: Drew1200 wrote: 1. I never said you were in agreement with Mad.
 * 1) I think I made it pretty clear in my post that I was not in agreement with Mad.
 * 2) When a word is blocked, it's blocked. Did I have to say that? There's nothing in our policy, or anything official on the entire wiki that would indicate that you were okay using the word as a reference to the "word" rather than the thing. Our policy says if a word's blocked, don't use it, and that was especially clear with the warning you should have received before posting the word.
 * 3) I don't understand how you blame it on the mods when a user breaks the policy, gets warned/kicked/banned, and then hardly anyone accepts the punishment, and it causes drama. You're right - if we just allowed users to act however they'd like, then there'd probably be a lot less drama. The site would also be far less enjoyable for those who care about the policy.
 * 4) Actually, none of this was about you. Neh created the topic wanting to know my opinion on his actions. But aside from that, I didn't drag Mad into it, I would believe that Mad brought himself into it. He was the one who got involved, and my responding to what I view as a neglect to follow our policy on his part cannot be claimed as my dragging Mad into this.
 * 5) Are you claiming that the quote "I want to slap you so hard right now, Neph", is inaccurate? I will remind you that Neh just posted an entire log a couple posts about here, and the log lines up perfectly with what Mad logged using the logging script. In your response, you neglected to address what I had claimed as the personal attack. Again, I will remind you we have a personal attack policy here which clearly states what is and isn't a personal attack. I mean no offense, but "your book" doesn't count for a whole lot when you're going against an official policy.
 * 6) Mad doesn't have to obey it, it was simply some advice which I've found to be very wise. Being an administrator isn't exactly a super easy black and white job, so when we have helpful advice, it's beneficial to share it.

2. Fair point.

3. That's the thing. Almost nobody cares about the policy besides the people holding power, for example, admins or mods.

4. Uh, your opinion on the actions that were taken AGAINST ME. So yeah, it kind of does involve me. Also, Mad didn't drag himself into it. We was simply stating that he shared my opinions. Almost nobody on chat at that time wasn't involved.

5. Again, I'm not the only one who thinks that the personal attack thing was complete bullcrap.

6. Then why are you sharing it with me and not Mad? Besides, it seems to me like you're criticizing Mad for going against your advice, even before you made the statment containing said advice. I beg to differ on number 3, LDC. "ALMOST nobody"

Argument invalid.

I'd reply with the "I don't remember asking you..." .gif from Pulp Fiction, but it has a swear in it. So just imagine it here. Like I said, I beg to differ.