Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-24718406-20160307023910/@comment-26080047-20160312170951

Skully Of House Lannister wrote: Keplers wrote:

Skully Of House Lannister wrote:

Johnyjo wrote: Yeah, I'm gonna say no. If there's a problem with one CM in particular, deal with that, but voting on everybody doesn't seem fair unless they're ALL doing something wrong, which I don't think they are. but unless theyre doing something wrong theres no reason why they wont do fine xD There is the spirit of the thing. Taking them all into a possible demotion vote almost conveys that we don't trust any of the CMs and we feel the need to call them into question. Johnyjo sort of has a point: if you want a CM removed... bring it up individually.

Nothing is mechanically wrong with this vote, and that's not what Johnyjo was saying. It's the spirit of the process. The only reason we're vting on all is because to exclude mds is unfair. Its like a performance review. Skul I'm sure there are pleanty of people who just dislike some of the CMs for no reason at all, or becaue they have an unjust grudge... If you want a preformance review, put up a pole about it and ask people how the CMs are doing, don't put the CMs in a position where they can get demoted based on unfair voting. Someone might be doing the right thing, but other people may not like that and want that person demoted. Is that fair? Shouldn't we just have things brought up idividually so that people actually have to have some real reason for demoting CMs, and not just voting blindly about it?