Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-28939754-20160918035013/@comment-26944420-20160919015100

Harold89 wrote: B, B, B, and B. This vote is too unclear in what determines activity and inactivity. Moreover, I do not like the idea of having no physcial/written rules on who is and is not eligible to vote. Instead, if this vote passes, we would simply be allowing the admins to determine activity as they please, with no grounded rule to restrict their decisions. The "common sense" thing is, believe it or not, used a ton in real life. I don't see why it's such a bad idea. I think most of us can agree who is active and who isn't, since our definitions of "active" are more or less the same.