Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5052737-20141215182537/@comment-5625448-20141216205216

Benboy755 wrote: Alemas2005 wrote: Benboy755 wrote: Alemas2005 wrote: Drew1200 wrote: I'm going to give a strong no. As in, continue using Candidates for Deletion. I've seen multiple candidates for deletion that in some way met the criteria. A lot of times, a user will have had a high enough rank on the old LMBs to have a page here, but wasn't very active after the update. Candidates for Deletion takes a couple extra days before a page can be deleted, but it does help filter through some candidates that shouldn't necessarily be deleted. I'm far more comfortable having multiple people look at candidates than one admin making the decision, even if it's a slight headache. "User must be Rank 5 or higher, unless he/she is known from the old MBs (look for high post count and a "Ye [rank] of Olde" badge).".

As I said, we'd be careful with that. We'd just have to check the badges a user has. Nothing too difficult. Make it Masterbuilder for the old rank, the current sentence is vague. I smell a possible vote on that. IMO we should have Craftsman for old rank and Minotaur for new, but I know everyone would whine so I don't even suggest it

But keep the current articles that are at least rank 5 or 150 posts grandfathered in I think Craftsman and Roman Soldier.