Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-25995065-20150402182631/@comment-4845243-20150402195411

Derpulse wrote: Slicer Vorzakh wrote: Packachoo wrote: Alemas2005 wrote: I'll discuss it with the other admins.

We may offer you a strict timeframe in which you can fix things.

How much time do you think will it take? At the moment, Alemas, you don't really look like you care enough about the wiki to let someone fix it. Just set some conditions for him that are actually good ones. For instance, "You can have as much time as you need because this is quite a problem. However, if you aren't making regular progress with the issue, then your rights will be removed and given to someone else. Please keep giving me updates." But, because the rights will only be needed for a day or two, just give him the rights for the week or until he fixes the issue. You would just give admin rights to a person who just asked for it, especially in a commmunity this large? ^Per There's a huge difference between temporary rights with the purpose of fixing something and permanent rights. To have permanent admin rights he'd have to go through RfA like anyone else. But temporary rights with a single purpose like editing MediaWiki pages and protected templates are a different story altogether. I would happily give people like Bourg or Cody temporary admin rights to fix stuff if necessary.