Board Thread:Demotions/@comment-4964341-20160906204217/@comment-4964341-20160907180151

Alemas2005 wrote: Brick425 wrote: Originally your thing about calling AP the Polandball of editing looked agreeable to me since it didn't really cause any problems but then I remembered how many blogs you made with the title "X shouldn't be trusted with Y matters", which basically publicly made fun of someone for not knowing something stupid. I bet you didn't ask them, did you?

You know how corrupt the second to last bullet point makes you look? Just wanted to highlight that one.

Also, you can't just say "That was my prankster side" when you did something that was completely stupid. If the community says no, don't do it. But we all know your attitute towards voting on the LMBW so I guess this is just a waste of time for me to type this.

I don't see how those blogs are related to anything here. They aren't personal attacks, it's just poking fun at people, it's very different. Again, I don't get it.

I don't see how allowing yourself a couple more freedoms after promotion is in any way "corrupt". It's just the truth. It happens to the majority of admins and CMs here. Once they get promoted, they tend to do things they probably wouldn't have done when they were running for CM/admin. It isn't just me.

"If the community says no, don't do it.": That would miss the point of a prank entirely, don't you think? Community or no community, a prank's a prank, and has to be respected as such. if she says no, don't do it

but that was just my molester side and a joke's a joke