Board Thread:Community Voting/@comment-5052737-20160202174112/@comment-25101892-20160204154756

ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:

Vonness11` wrote:

Skully Of House Lannister wrote: Vonness11` wrote: Skully Of House Lannister wrote: ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:

GuacamoleCCXR wrote:

ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:

KnightoftheLight wrote: I vote yes for rape, as that can be used in a mature context, but a HUGE no for condum. No, just no... How can that be used maturely? IMO their use shouldn't be encouraged. It can be used quite maturely. :P But it will always have an inappropriate context not suitable for the wiki which is the problem. The use of condoms should be discouraged? Because like, STDs are the best thing since smallpox right I meant the use of the word on this wiki should be discouraged. I don't see any way it can have an appropriate context. :P Now if we were to lighten our rules on sexual conversations and innuendo. Then we certainly could have appropriate conversations with the word, but with our current rules we can't. We don't have all sexual words blocked, blockigng random ones makes no sense. don't we have like just one blocked because trolls are more likely to spam it

like "sex" was unblocked and i don't see people use it in immature or inappropriate ways (usually) one was blocked because trolls spam it

but like, honestly, at this point whats the point of blocking any words? you can hover over it anyway, everyone knows the words, they get banned either way if they use the word in a negative/inappropriate way, its kind of pointless

but im k with having some words blocked, just not these two exactly, censorship like that is completely pointless and i kind of wish "unblock" didn't mean "allow usage" to a lot of the community

^^^Per Whether its censored or not, if you used it you get banned, and as (I believe Von) said above, the only time words are ever really used are in PM, and no one there cares. Unblocking doesn't mean allow usage, it just means we don't have an emote face over it.