User blog comment:Alemas2005/Administrator Performance Ratings - Dupe-proof Edition/@comment-4257955-20140919174905

1:

A. Spy is eager, gregarious, sometimes naive, overall an efficient, excellent mix of chat admin and everything else admin. :P 5. B. Alemas is savvy, he gets things done (even if doing so means going too far), retains a relatively amicable chat atmosphere when things get cooking, but can be a bit trigger-happy as well snappy. :P 4. C. Drew is usually inactive, but when active he's usually up to some wiki-related venture and/or announces some new-fangled thing. He's easygoing and knowledgable. Far more inactive than Ire ever is on chat, people. :P 4. D. Ire is fun, relatable, steps in chat situations, edits sometimes, and I'm going to assume he isn't as horrific as I was at keeping up with admin-y things. :P Sure he has swaths of inactivity, but no worse than Drew or Jdude. Stop using that as your reason to degrade his performance. 4. E. Jdude is woefully inactive, at least through what I've seen. He reaches quantum-Drew levels. :P But he's a sharp chat admin nonetheless, and he gets things done when he's not sequestered by the inky deaths of his convoluted mind. :| 4. F. Oh Mad. He's a dandy chap, he is. He can sink into pits of suggestiveness but otherwise he's relatively clean. Not like most of the mod base isn't any worse. He's probably the closest to the community out of all the admins, as well as extremely active. But again, he can get rowdy and highly anti-establishment. The case could be made everyone gets that way but he should consider lessening that a wee bit to appease both admins and users. :P 4.

Oh look none less than 4. Maybe that has to do with my bias in knowing how demanding it is to be an admin for you people or because THE ADMINS AREN'T AS BAD AS IS COMMONLY POSTULATED. :P

2: A. Solely because he accomplishes his duties at a more efficient rate than anyone else.

3: B.

4: B.

5: A. One more would be ideal.