LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Chat Moderator

This is LMBW's requests for chat moderator page. If you wish to request moderator rights, please read this page first, and make sure you fulfill the requirements listed here. Moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat when they are being disruptive.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 20 supporting votes and 75% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for moderator fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 4 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

.White-Shadows. (3)
(going to try this one last time, probably. ) After some recent incidents on chat where trying to ping the mods didn't work, I think I could use these rights. I was a CM here back in 2011 but lost those rights do to my ultimate immaturity then, but I think I have majorly improved even from the incidents earlier this year. I tend to try to enforce the policy as much as I can without these rights, and I think getting these rights would help my ability to enforce it a lot more. Although I appear AFK a lot, I almost always have whatever I'm doing in windowed mode with chat up in the background. If you have anything else you would like me address, just add a comment and I will try to address that. I thank you for your vote, whether it be a support, neutral, or oppose. :-) (By the way, In case anyone voting didn't know, I am LFY/Deputron. - White Shadows  01:33, July 10, 2014 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Green-kool-aid-man.jpg LCF  (talk! ) Purple-kool-aid-man.jpg 01:35, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Chipika123 - is a broom
 * 3) I believe he'd use his rights well. -Lelouch vi Britannia
 * 4) Definitely Đrake (talk) 01:38, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) i'm opposing because he's stupid 01:39, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * 6) - Twisted
 * 7) Once again supporting. -Ireithien
 * 8) Codyn329 (talk) 02:14, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * 9) I support -Satlmd, who is too lazy to make an appropriate signature.
 * 1) I support -Satlmd, who is too lazy to make an appropriate signature.

Comments

 * ...Klint. Green-kool-aid-man.jpg  LCF  (talk! ) Purple-kool-aid-man.jpg 02:06, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * Let Klint be... Klint. Wait, actually, don't.  - White  Shadows  02:08, July 10, 2014 (UTC)

Netbag
OK, first off, I have been wanting to do this for a while now, I just didn't have the guts to do it. :P That said, I want to be a CM for a few reasons. One, I have been on chat a few times now when we (general chat) ended up talking about sexual innuendo, once with a mod participating. No one was intervening. Two, someone asked me to put in A request, and three, I am (generally) a fair and mature person, and I will consult other CMs before kicking/banning someone. If you decide to put "Oppose" please put how you think I could become a better CM in the future in the comments section. Thanks, Netbag (talk) 19:59, July 8, 2014 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) He might be fairly new but I believe he could be an effective mod.
 * 2) Codyn329 (talk) 20:07, July 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Green-kool-aid-man.jpg LCF  (talk! ) Purple-kool-aid-man.jpg 20:59, July 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) He'd be better then some of the MODs we have now. Support. I know he pretty well also.  L  • S  • B
 * 5) Benboy
 * 22:29, July 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) While he hasn't been here for very long, he meets the requirements and would make a good mod.
 * 2) -Lelouch vi Britannia
 * 3) Another good lad. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 12:33, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Avalair 14:44, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Another good lad. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 12:33, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Avalair 14:44, July 9, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

 * I don't think you are ready to be a mod yet, you haven't even been on the wiki for 3 months...
 * Per Spy.
 * Same as above- Mc1
 * ^ - Twisted
 * ^ -13legoskull
 * I don't know you that well.. but per Spy. Đrake (talk) 00:27, July 10, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Canvassing on chat. MsD  talk 22:21, July 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * It's only canvassing to ask for supports.


 * 1) Doesn't meet recommended requirements, maturity concerns, ect. Comment: (too lazy to put this in comments) @MsD canvassing is allowed and generally encouraged as long as the said user isn't asking/begging for supports. Linking to the page itself is perfectly fine.  22:24, July 8, 2014 (UTC) (moved to support - misread the requirements lol)
 * 2) I don't really know the guy, so I don't feel comfortable making him a moderator (yet). Dinosaur Office RAWR!
 * If you place a vote for this reason, it should typically be under neutral. Opposing someone because you don't know them is traditionally considered a very poor reason. Drewlzoo

Comments

 * I expected someone wouldn't like my reason for opposition. I personally only want moderators who I know I can trust. I don't know I can trust Netbag yet, so I don't want him to become a moderator yet. Dinosaur Office RAWR!


 * To Spy and everyone who argrees, if I wont be a good mod because I am still semi-new, then why does it have 2 mon. under requirements? :P