User blog comment:LegoI3rickI3uilder/Debate:Amount of Admins/@comment-7855039-20130708153502

Ah, debates. Let's get started.

I think the number of admins right now is just enough. I personally believe that we should have leaders: the admins. I think it is good that we have not just one admin. That's called a monarchy, when you have just one. Having multiple is great, the decisions made are more fair because there is more representation. So why not have many admins? Because we need a strong group of leaders. The admins right now are responsible and mature, and usually make the right decisions. If we had too many, it would be harder to make decisions. Different opinions, more democratic. I like democracies, but I believe there should be a democracy within the group of admins. I don't want our group of admins to turn into a bunch of debating, un-agreeing monkeys. :P I don't want admins to turn into what debates are like that involve the whole community: A mess. Too little admins would be hard also because of the workload: The admins would have to do a lot! Too many would be a mess, even a couple more would cause disagreements withing the admins. You might be thinking, "Well, even now the admins don't agree all the time, right?" That is true, most of the time, not all the admins are on the same page. The problem, as stated before, is even MORE disagreements are harmful to the tight group of admins, and the community overall. We want a srong group of leaders that stand together, even if they disagree with a final decision. More admins would increase the probability of havoc within the group.

So, in conclusion:

The number of admins is just right. If one said it is too big, I would disagree. Less admins would make it more of a monarchy. If one said it is too small, I would also disagree. More admins means more disagreements, and more workload.

Ask questions if you don't understand my agrument.

So.. yeah. Your turn. :P