LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights/Bureaucrat

This is LMBW's requests for bureaucrat page. If you wish to request bureaucrat rights, please read this paragraph first, and make sure you fulfil the requirements listed here.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

replace this with your username
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~

Comments


Requests made on this page made are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 25 supporting votes and 80% support out of the total supports and opposes, then their request will be closed as successful. Users voting on a request must give a valid reason for their support or oppose. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time. At least 96 hours must pass before a request can be closed.

If a user has requested bureaucrat rights before, add  to the end of the topic header. If a request for bureaucrat fails, the user who requested the rights must wait 8 weeks before requesting them again. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Archived requests can be found here.

Riolu777
I've always said I didn't want this position but after talking to some people here, there's an apparent need for a buro, and I feel I'm capable and qualified for the position. I realize it's nothing more than a little footnote on "admin" and I assure you this silly thing won't go to my head. I'm running just to ensure the wiki has a need met, and hope you'll support that effort. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån 05:06, January 12, 2016 (UTC)

Support
Frak yeah! Rio is an awesome guy, he has the ability to see situations from many angles and see beyond his own personal opinions. He has always kept a clear head an an open mind and would make an excellent Bureaucrat. I would welcome him with open arms. Bit over the top? :P IDC! Riof or Buro! Per Alemas too.
 * 1) yes we need another buro ale shouldnt be the only mostly active one (sorry ale) -slice
 * 2) Seems fit for it, fair, and decently active. ~Psycho ~
 * 3) Per above -Fell
 * 4) Per above. -Skuleface
 * 5) Per above. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 05:21, January 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * 6) Per above
 * 7) Absolutely. Rio has every qualification needed—years of admin experience, excellent character; he's by far one of the best (if not the best) admin when it comes to interacting with other users. Bureaucrat rights aren't that big of a deal, but they require complete trust in the user, something I definitely have in Riolu. 05:38, January 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * 8) Per above. ~KiraNotKirac
 * 9) Hell yes, what Obi said basically.
 * 10) Per above. LegoWebby101
 * 11) Per above. ~Ether
 * 12) Per Obi ^_^ - the blaine anderson wannabe
 * 13) One of the few guys I can really trust and depend on, which is indispensable for a 'crat. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 17:10, January 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * 14) Per Obi, Riol is great c; Lone Lionheart 18:27, January 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I support! ~Mishie da Fishie =l~
 * 1) Per everyone else.
 * 2) yes absolutely. -tolk
 * 3) And there was great rejoicing and a sound of many instruments in the heavenly highs. And the LMBWians did sing hallelujahs on the great day in which Rio announced he was running for 'Crat.
 * 1) Rio has proved to be a logical and fair moderator, he'd be a fine Bureaucrat. -AP

Neutral

 * 1) Hmm. I'm not sure. Rio is friendly but I don't know him enough to know if he deserves his bureaucrats rights. Yada   Dark  06:32, January 12, 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) I see no legitimate purpose for granting Bureaucrats to anyone, really. I suppose I won't oppose RFRs for Buro anymore in case the rest of the community really wants them, but...it's just the option to check and uncheck Rights on a User Rights Management page. I don't see why we need more than one or two active Buros? Sorry, you're a wonderful Administrator though.

Comments

 * is it just me or is 25 votes req for passing a bit much given the number of active people that would vote-slice
 * Let's see how it pans out first. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
 * 25 isn't too high in my book. I think the majority of users would support-at the very least, I can't name one user who would actually oppose.