User blog comment:Alemas2005/Administrator Performance Ratings - Two Years-2 months Later (with non-RfA Admins)/@comment-5111283-20160220053006

I'm going to try and be as honest and up-front as possible here.

A) Alemas2005: Really..., you're a five in intentions, a four in execution. :P

I think Ale always has the best of intentions in mind, really, and I think he tries his best to help the wiki out but sometimes it comes off sort of..., wrong. I think the biggest area would be to try and read people a bit better in situations, and think a bit more personal and less legalistic. This is a balance though, you need the legalistic side of enforcing guidelines on closing things, unblock/blocking words, ect.

B) Eagleeyedan: No rating because of lack of Wiki activity.

Not really active here, gives input on the Admin site - appreciated.

C) Goggles99: Brutally honest..., two.

I honestly get the feeling Gogs has a lot of potential (and he's a great guy if you get to know him - we've know each other since 2012 and I count him as a great friend), there was a situation on the Admin Site a while back and I was honestly impressed by his (although slow :P) response. I've not seen a sort of semi-retirement blog or anything from him (which, FYI, guys - I made one so I can be excused for any inactivity I may have :P), and his activity on here appears almost non-existent. I know there's potential, but I want to see it put to use for the betterment of the wiki. Or, if he's not going to be active, perhaps inform us of this?

E) Loney 97: Four.

I feel like you participate, but sometimes it almost feels like you don't..., IDK, speak your peace enough on stuff? I'm not really sure if this is a fault though. I've never seen behavior from you that was undesirable - and you're easy-going and great to talk to, which is an awesome and essential quality in an Admin.

F) Madkatmaximus: Two, but I'd lean on a one almost...

Really, there's been a lot of ups-and-downs with Mad's Admining skills. At one point I'd rate her as a five, at other times a one. Of late it's been...., meh. There was a situation involving her and three other Admins which makes me seriously mistrust her judgement. There's been a issue with her and refusing to communicate with another Buro/Admin. She seems to be active as far as checking the Admin Site...., yet she doesn't participate much. Seems almost lackadaisical in that regard. Closing votes or unblocking words without due process or regard for proper procedure. Sometimes her response to some people seems...., unfitting. I don't know, just seems like a lot of issues that need to be improved on and worked out.

G) MeltE2: Four.

Same as Loney.

H) Riolu777: Five.

I've always respected Rio as a friend, he's an awesome guy, and I've known this since I met him back in '12. He's great at analyzing situations, and being non-partisan. Although I don't agree with him on some ting I respect his opinion and his judgement quite a bit. He's also easy-going and easy to talk with. I'm also ecstatic that he has Buro now. :P

I) ZXSpidermanXZ: Five.

To be honest I was skeptical when he got Admin (this was during a wee inactivity spree on my part) - and I still was unsure for a while. Then there was a situation which made be greatly doubt his good judgement, but, to be honest I think of late he has improved immensely and is a great help around the Wiki and on the Admin Site. Kudos to such great improvement.

2)

Toss-up between Alemas, Riolu, and Spider - each has strengths and weaknesses.

In summary no one's perfect, we're all imperfect - every one of us has our faults - some more obvious than others, some that need addressing more than others. But, with proper feedback it's much easier to improve.

Please, people, be candid about me. If there's something you think I need to be improved upon, speak your mind. (Minus activity though, you all know why I has spurts of inactivity and why I don't get on chat much. College, job, farm life, social life, ect.)

{{Jd/Sig))