User blog comment:Alemas2005/Crackdown on Innuendo/@comment-7847159-20150222225519/@comment-25625534-20150223002943

"Removing the emote was really only the start of "cracking down" on innuendo altogether."

If that kind of pointlessly conflict-inciting action is just the beginning, I'm scared to see what comes next.

"If the CMs can't punish for the use of innuendo then there really wasn't any point in removing it."

But they can punish it. Not saying that they should, but they can. And there is still no point in removing (ss).

"So yes, if something causes people both joy and a laugh, but has a negative effect on some people, then it should be considered removed"

This exact logic was applied when Drew decided, on his own, without discussing it with any of the admins, to ban buck, directly contradicting two community votes, and disallowed anyone from discussing the decision.

"And you can clearly see that a bunch of users here don't care for innuendo, including myself."

Unless it's a sizable majority, then I don't see why innuendo should be outright banned and emotes that could be used with it removed.