Board Thread:Community Discussions/@comment-5643582-20160304182106/@comment-5052737-20160307211925

Riolu777 wrote: Jdude420 wrote: Things is, who decides what "case of outright and blatant abuse" is? I think it'd be when an Admin is abusing rights and their behavior cannot be stopped and they are continuing in it and the only way to stop them is to demote them, thus not allowing time for discussion. But some could interpret this policy as, "Admin X abused his rights (exhibited not appropriate for an Admin behavior) in some manner, he's not around or currently abusing his rights, but he was abusive before, so lets demote him now without due process, even though he's not doing anything at the moment, nor has he continued in the ill-behavior." I just don't want that to happen, because that almost happened before in an after-the-fact situation..., and it still worries me.

That's not what I'm calling for at all, due process is of course the norm in every other situation, like an after-the-fact scenario. But in a situation where someone goes rogue, there has to be a precedent that the admins can act immediately and without political impediment.

'crats.

Only 'crats can demote other admins.

...right?