If you could change one thing on this wiki what would it be? Try not to post things like "Demote all the current administrators". And yes, even though it says one thing you can post more.
<noscript></noscript>If you could change one thing on this wiki what would it be? Try not to post things like "Demote all the current administrators". And yes, even though it says one thing you can post more.
<noscript></noscript>LegoSuperBowser wrote:
"Try not to say things like 'Demote all the current administrators.'"
LegoSuperBowser wrote:
.White-Shadows. wrote:
LegoSuperBowser wrote:
+1 :P
17.Take all that you've read from my post and put some salt on some of it.
<noscript></noscript>LegoSuperBowser wrote:
I surely forgot that. But is BCG and Malc. corrent?
<noscript></noscript> Malc is retired.LFY, you agree with #3, so demoting all the inacitve Admins would be the same.
<noscript></noscript>LSB, I'd really appreciate if you would quit bringing up my RfA. Not only is it somewhat offensive to me but Drew, I and a few others have already discussed why it was valid. Secondly, even if we did start over, there's a good chance it would be the same anyway, if not somewhat better.
That's fine. I was joking anyways. As you can see, most of the post was humor.
<noscript></noscript>LegoSuperBowser wrote: LFY, you agree with #3, so demoting all the inacitve Admins would be the same.
<noscript></noscript>There's a difference. Malc. isn't that inactive and BCG still checks the admin site.
<noscript></noscript>LegoSuperBowser wrote:
LegoSuperBowser wrote:
I surely forgot that. But is BCG and Malc. corrent?
<noscript></noscript> Malc is retired.....I didn't understand a word this post said.