5,988
pages
ALL POSTSCommunity-wide revote on all active mods.
<p>I was thinking we should have a vote on ALL active mods to see who and who isn't doing a well-enough job according to everyone here. Now, I'm aware that bias could take place, but I'm thinking we have enough people for that to not be a major factor. If we weed out the mods who aren't doing their jobs as well as they could, we would no longer need to rob the inactive mods of their rights in the name of "too many mods." And then the mods who get booted from this method can work their way back up to being a mod again through another vote in three (or fewer) months.
</p><p>Sounds harsh, but this is an effective way to ensure a sharp mod team as well as keep the inactive mods you guys are prone to lop off. :P
</p><p>Admins?
</p>
(Edited by Riolu777)
<p>I do see that as a legimate problem... I supported this because I had faith that the community would make wise decisions, but I've seen that that hasn't worked all too well with the request for rights system, so maybe I shouldn't support this...
</p><p>I'm still not changing my vote, mainly because I see this as an opportunity to downsize our current moderation team to a more elite one, but I understand what you guys are saying.
</p>
(Edited by Ihaveawiixboxds)
<div class="quote">
<p>~Batgirl78~ wrote:
Okay seriously....I'm at my wits end with the same occurring problems on LMBW. For one I haven't really seen much of a positive reaction toward the new recommendations for rights system. Before you could have the ability to recommend if you wanted to. Not have all this popularity voting going on. I feel like most of the voting is unfair because only the users who are well known in the community get positive results VS in the old RFR it didn't have much of that. People picked who they thought PERSONALLY would fit the role of that right. Not because they are the most extremely friendly, modest, or popular user on chat. But because they are liked by that one user alone as a person they trust.
</p>
</div>
<p>^
</p>
(Edited by TwistedAlpha)
<div class="quote">
<p>~Batgirl78~ wrote:
Okay seriously....I'm at my wits end with the same occurring problems on LMBW. For one I haven't really seen much of a positive reaction toward the new recommendations for rights system. Before you could have the ability to recommend if you wanted to. Not have all this popularity voting going on. I feel like most of the voting is unfair because only the users who are well known in the community get positive results VS in the old RFR it didn't have much of that. People picked who they thought PERSONALLY would fit the role of that right. Not because they are the most extremely friendly, modest, or popular user on chat. But because they are liked by that one user alone as a person they trust.
</p>
</div>We still have the old RfR system, we use both.
(Edited by Agent Spy)
<div class="quote">
<p>Agent Spy wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>~Batgirl78~ wrote:
Okay seriously....I'm at my wits end with the same occurring problems on LMBW. For one I haven't really seen much of a positive reaction toward the new recommendations for rights system. Before you could have the ability to recommend if you wanted to. Not have all this popularity voting going on. I feel like most of the voting is unfair because only the users who are well known in the community get positive results VS in the old RFR it didn't have much of that. People picked who they thought PERSONALLY would fit the role of that right. Not because they are the most extremely friendly, modest, or popular user on chat. But because they are liked by that one user alone as a person they trust.
</p>
</div>We still have the old RfR system, we use both.
</div>
<p>Really? I haven't seen it being used that much.
</p>
(Edited by ~Batgirl78~)
<div class="quote">
<p>~Batgirl78~ wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>Agent Spy wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>~Batgirl78~ wrote:
Okay seriously....I'm at my wits end with the same occurring problems on LMBW. For one I haven't really seen much of a positive reaction toward the new recommendations for rights system. Before you could have the ability to recommend if you wanted to. Not have all this popularity voting going on. I feel like most of the voting is unfair because only the users who are well known in the community get positive results VS in the old RFR it didn't have much of that. People picked who they thought PERSONALLY would fit the role of that right. Not because they are the most extremely friendly, modest, or popular user on chat. But because they are liked by that one user alone as a person they trust.
</p>
</div>We still have the old RfR system, we use both.
</div>
<p>Really? I haven't seen it being used that much.
</p>
</div>Barely anyone uses it, but we still have it.
(Edited by Agent Spy)
<div class="quote">
<p>Alemas2005 wrote:
Just discovered a wonderful website: Straw Poll. Completely anonymous, and prevents dupes with the same IP from voting. Only allows for 4 options, though. 
</p><noscript>
</noscript>
</div>It allows for more then 4 options... 
</p><noscript></noscript>
</div>It allows for more then 4 options...
(Edited by Agent Spy)
<div class="quote">
<p>Agent Spy wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>~Batgirl78~ wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>Agent Spy wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>~Batgirl78~ wrote:
Okay seriously....I'm at my wits end with the same occurring problems on LMBW. For one I haven't really seen much of a positive reaction toward the new recommendations for rights system. Before you could have the ability to recommend if you wanted to. Not have all this popularity voting going on. I feel like most of the voting is unfair because only the users who are well known in the community get positive results VS in the old RFR it didn't have much of that. People picked who they thought PERSONALLY would fit the role of that right. Not because they are the most extremely friendly, modest, or popular user on chat. But because they are liked by that one user alone as a person they trust.
</p>
</div>We still have the old RfR system, we use both.
</div>
<p>Really? I haven't seen it being used that much.
</p>
</div>Barely anyone uses it, but we still have it.
</div>
<p>The policy just made it sound like we weren't ever going to use that since we have the new RFR.
</p>
(Edited by ~Batgirl78~)
<div class="quote">
<p>~Batgirl78~ wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>Agent Spy wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>~Batgirl78~ wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>Agent Spy wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>~Batgirl78~ wrote:
Okay seriously....I'm at my wits end with the same occurring problems on LMBW. For one I haven't really seen much of a positive reaction toward the new recommendations for rights system. Before you could have the ability to recommend if you wanted to. Not have all this popularity voting going on. I feel like most of the voting is unfair because only the users who are well known in the community get positive results VS in the old RFR it didn't have much of that. People picked who they thought PERSONALLY would fit the role of that right. Not because they are the most extremely friendly, modest, or popular user on chat. But because they are liked by that one user alone as a person they trust.
</p>
</div>We still have the old RfR system, we use both.
</div>
<p>Really? I haven't seen it being used that much.
</p>
</div>Barely anyone uses it, but we still have it.
</div>
<p>The policy just made it sound like we weren't ever going to use that since we have the new RFR.
</p>
</div>
<p>This. The policy seemed to imply that Request for Rights was replacing Recommendation for Rights.
</p>
(Edited by TwistedAlpha)
<div class="quote">Agent Spy wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Alemas2005 wrote: Just discovered a wonderful website: Straw Poll. Completely anonymous, and prevents dupes with the same IP from voting. Only allows for 4 options, though.</p><noscript></noscript>
</div>It allows for more then 4 options... </div>
<p>Oh, um, yeah.
</p><p>Perfect for us, then! </p><noscript></noscript>
<div class="quote"> <p>Alemas2005 wrote: Just discovered a wonderful website: Straw Poll. Completely anonymous, and prevents dupes with the same IP from voting. Only allows for 4 options, though.
</p><noscript></noscript>
</div>It allows for more then 4 options... </div>
<p>Oh, um, yeah.
</p><p>Perfect for us, then! </p><noscript></noscript>
(Edited by Alemas2005)
<div class="quote">
<p>Alemas2005 wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Agent Spy wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Alemas2005 wrote: Just discovered a wonderful website: Straw Poll. Completely anonymous, and prevents dupes with the same IP from voting. Only allows for 4 options, though.</p><noscript></noscript>
</div>It allows for more then 4 options... </div>
<p>Oh, um, yeah.
</p><p>Perfect for us, then! </p><noscript></noscript>
</div>
<p>Up to thirty options.
</p>
<div class="quote"> <p>Alemas2005 wrote: Just discovered a wonderful website: Straw Poll. Completely anonymous, and prevents dupes with the same IP from voting. Only allows for 4 options, though.
</p><noscript></noscript>
</div>It allows for more then 4 options... </div>
<p>Oh, um, yeah.
</p><p>Perfect for us, then! </p><noscript></noscript>
</div>
<p>Up to thirty options.
</p>
(Edited by TwistedAlpha)