Today I began editing the wiki because I felt I could contribute my time to improve articles. I noticed that some articles use improper English or excessively use abbreviations that aren't in an encyclopedic format. Alemas2005 has since started undoing these changes as they deem them unnecessary and claims I'm edit spamming. I don't appreciate this as I'm trying to improve the wiki like any editor would do, and then to have claims that I'm spamming. I told Alemas to start a forum if they had a problem with it, however they continued to revert all of my changes regardless of what the rest of the community said. Therefore if the community does vote to change it to "also known as", Alemas has wasted my time I've spent already today, and their own time reverting my changes, and it will all have to be done over again (whether by bot or manually).

Users in chat have been saying "why bother" and that these changes are "unnecessary". Just because they aren't a major problem doesn't mean it can't be improved. Just because they think nobody cares about the wiki articles doesn't mean the articles can't have minor improvements made to them. You don't see wikis like Wikipedia using "AKA" in their articles, so why can't I make some minor edits to improve the same type of encyclopedic content that way? Just because it's a common abbreviation doesn't mean it's a proper way to write an informational article...

Current Votes

A) "AKA": 5 votes

B) "also known as": 19 votes

C) Don't change anything: 1 vote

Consensus

"also known as."