Rid the policy of the Viewpure rule.

0

Three-19-14·3/30/2015

Support.

(Edited by Three-19-14)

0

Vonness11`·3/30/2015

Support.

(Edited by Vonness11`)

0

Harold89·3/30/2015

Neutral.

(Edited by Harold89)

0

Benboy755·3/30/2015

MeltE2 wrote:
"All YouTube links or videos from other hosting services must be approved by a moderator before being posted publicly in chat. Optionally, you can use ViewPure to bypass this policy. However, you are still held responsible if the content of the video is inappropriate. "

It's not actually a policy, but yeah, I'll support the removing of the requirement that it has to be approved first, so long as the user who posted it is still responsible if the video is bad.

per this

(Edited by Benboy755)

0

Jdude420·3/31/2015

Benboy755 wrote:

MeltE2 wrote:
"All YouTube links or videos from other hosting services must be approved by a moderator before being posted publicly in chat. Optionally, you can use ViewPure to bypass this policy. However, you are still held responsible if the content of the video is inappropriate. "

It's not actually a policy, but yeah, I'll support the removing of the requirement that it has to be approved first, so long as the user who posted it is still responsible if the video is bad.

per this

Technically this petition is just asking for the removal of the VP exception (although it is implied that the author wants the whole policy irradiated), not the entire video-linking policy.

Perhaps he misunderstood the policy as saying all video links must go through VP, when VP is just a way of bypassing Moderator permission for posting a video link.

Now that I have thought it over I think it should just be modified to state that the video must be approved by a Moderator (video-wise, the comments should be irrelevant) and that if a Moderator gives permission for a video that video can be linked in the future without approval from anyone as long as the user posting it states something like "Alemas approved this video previously:". Since VP/YTC are irrelevant if we don't care about suggested videos and comments. Anyhow, just a thought.

(Edited by Jdude420)

0

ZXSpidermanXZ·3/31/2015

Jdude420 wrote:

Benboy755 wrote:

MeltE2 wrote:
"All YouTube links or videos from other hosting services must be approved by a moderator before being posted publicly in chat. Optionally, you can use ViewPure to bypass this policy. However, you are still held responsible if the content of the video is inappropriate. "

It's not actually a policy, but yeah, I'll support the removing of the requirement that it has to be approved first, so long as the user who posted it is still responsible if the video is bad.

per this

Technically this petition is just asking for the removal of the VP exception (although it is implied that the author wants the whole policy irradiated), not the entire video-linking policy.

Perhaps he misunderstood the policy as saying all video links must go through VP, when VP is just a way of bypassing Moderator permission for posting a video link.

Now that I have thought it over I think it should just be modified to state that the video must be approved by a Moderator (video-wise, the comments should be irrelevant) and that if a Moderator gives permission for a video that video can be linked in the future without approval from anyone as long as the user posting it states something like "Alemas approved this video previously:". Since VP/YTC are irrelevant if we don't care about suggested videos and comments. Anyhow, just a thought.

Read the original post. :p basically that's exactly what this petition calls for, getting rid of people being responsible for comments, suggested videos, and ads. Basically the video is the only aspect being moderated.

(Edited by ZXSpidermanXZ)

0

Slicer Vorzakh·3/31/2015

Neutral for now, gonna change one way or another after watching these discussions

(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)

0

FortressOfNight·3/31/2015

support.

doesn't make much sense to have to convert it to viewpure. it takes me like 5 seconds tops and i do it every time, (ie url ends in "dQw4w9WgXcQ", copy it, type http://viewpure.com/, hit ctrl+v, magic http://viewpure.com/dQw4w9WgXcQ) but it's still unnecessary.

(Edited by FortressOfNight)

0

Legofrodo12·3/31/2015

Neutral.

(Edited by Legofrodo12)

0

Jdude420·3/31/2015

ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:

Jdude420 wrote:

Benboy755 wrote:

MeltE2 wrote:
"All YouTube links or videos from other hosting services must be approved by a moderator before being posted publicly in chat. Optionally, you can use ViewPure to bypass this policy. However, you are still held responsible if the content of the video is inappropriate. "

It's not actually a policy, but yeah, I'll support the removing of the requirement that it has to be approved first, so long as the user who posted it is still responsible if the video is bad.

per this

Technically this petition is just asking for the removal of the VP exception (although it is implied that the author wants the whole policy irradiated), not the entire video-linking policy.

Perhaps he misunderstood the policy as saying all video links must go through VP, when VP is just a way of bypassing Moderator permission for posting a video link.

Now that I have thought it over I think it should just be modified to state that the video must be approved by a Moderator (video-wise, the comments should be irrelevant) and that if a Moderator gives permission for a video that video can be linked in the future without approval from anyone as long as the user posting it states something like "Alemas approved this video previously:". Since VP/YTC are irrelevant if we don't care about suggested videos and comments. Anyhow, just a thought.

Read the original post. :p basically that's exactly what this petition calls for, getting rid of people being responsible for comments, suggested videos, and ads. Basically the video is the only aspect being moderated.

Ah, Support then.

(Edited by Jdude420)

Consensus