5,988
pages
ALL POSTSUnblocking a few Blocked Words
<p>IDK if we're allowed to say the words so I won't but I'll say something to get the point across.
</p><p>Note: As Mad has said if the words do get unblocked that does not mean you're allowed to use them for personal attacks or derogatory purposes.
</p>
<nav id="toc" class="toc" data-loaded="false"><div id="toctitle"><h2>Contents</h2><span class="toctoggle">[show]</span></div>
(Edited by administrators)
<p>No, no, no, no
</p>
(Edited by Legoanimals750)
<p>Voting more out of respect for some people:
</p><p>1) Neutral
</p><p>2) Keep blocked
</p><p>3) Unblock
</p><p>4) Neutral
</p><p>I doubt 1 and 4 will be used in a responsible manner if they are unblocked
</p>
(Edited by Man.city1)
<p>I don't see a point in using those words, none of them add to conversation. So I vote no for all.
</p>
(Edited by STrangE AdVenT)
<p>I vote no for all of them.
</p>
(Edited by Lilac Neko)
0
<div class="quote">Avalair wrote:
Neutral, No, No, No. C:</div> <p>Changing the neutral to a no. </p>
Neutral, No, No, No. C:</div> <p>Changing the neutral to a no. </p>
(Edited by Avalair)
- EDIT* I support unblocking douche, but no to the rest.
(Edited by Madkatmaximus)
<p>I think people need to look up the actual definition of retard: delay or hold back in terms of progress, development, or accomplishment.
</p><p>How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense.
</p>
(Edited by ZXSpidermanXZ)
<div class="quote">ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:
I think people need to look up the actual definition of retard: delay or hold back in terms of progress, development, or accomplishment. <p>How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense. </p> </div> <p>because idiot society </p>
I think people need to look up the actual definition of retard: delay or hold back in terms of progress, development, or accomplishment. <p>How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense. </p> </div> <p>because idiot society </p>
(Edited by Benboy755)
<div class="quote">ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:
I think people need to look up the actual definition of retard: delay or hold back in terms of progress, development, or accomplishment. <p>How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense. </p> </div> <p>I've been thinking about that, and I'll change my support of unblocking that word to a support for leaving it blocked. So basically no to all. </p><p>=l </p>
I think people need to look up the actual definition of retard: delay or hold back in terms of progress, development, or accomplishment. <p>How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense. </p> </div> <p>I've been thinking about that, and I'll change my support of unblocking that word to a support for leaving it blocked. So basically no to all. </p><p>=l </p>
(Edited by Mishkaiel)
0
<div class="quote">Benboy755 wrote:
<div class="quote">ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:
I think people need to look up the actual definition of retard: delay or hold back in terms of progress, development, or accomplishment. <p>How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense. </p> </div>because idiot society </div> <p>tru </p>
<div class="quote">ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:
I think people need to look up the actual definition of retard: delay or hold back in terms of progress, development, or accomplishment. <p>How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense. </p> </div>because idiot society </div> <p>tru </p>
(Edited by Avalair)