IDK if we're allowed to say the words so I won't but I'll say something to get the point across.
Note: As Mad has said if the words do get unblocked that does not mean you're allowed to use them for personal attacks or derogatory purposes.
Yes: 20
Neutral: 8
No: 21
Yes: 3
Neutral: 3
No: 45
Yes: 14
Neutral: 7
No: 30
Yes: 22
Neutral: 9
No: 25
Div added his own when he made the vote, they were: Yes, Yes, Yes, No.
No to all.
I think people need to look up the actual definition of retard: delay or hold back in terms of progress, development, or accomplishment.
How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense.
How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense.
because idiot society
How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense.
I've been thinking about that, and I'll change my support of unblocking that word to a support for leaving it blocked. So basically no to all.
=l
How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense.
tru
Mishkaiel wrote:
How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense.
I've been thinking about that, and I'll change my support of unblocking that word to a support for leaving it blocked. So basically no to all.
=l
You do realize that was an argument on why he word should be UNblocked.....
Mishkaiel wrote:
How is that in itself offensive? The word is also used to define a medical condition, but that is not it's original meaning. Obviously we aren't going to allow someone to say "You're a retard." as that's meant as a personal attack and is also an attack on mentally retarded people. But why can we not use a perfectly normal word that is not even a cuss word? It makes no sense.
=l
I know, and I still want it blocked. I /can/ read.
=l
1 Yes
2 No
3 Yes
4 Yes
Assuming that "yes" means unblocking and "no" means keeping it blocked...
...No to all of them. 
</noscript>
Don't care
naw
naw
sure
no
no
no
yes
