5,988
pages
ALL POSTSCM Requirements
<p>So as shown in LEGO Message Boards Wiki:Requests for Rights, the current requirement to run for chat moderator is 2 months on the wiki and 75 edits. Some say that the 75 edits requirements is unnessecary . This thread will be used to provide and discuss possible alternatives.
</p>
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
<div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p> <div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">Slicer Vorzakh wrote:
<div class="quote">Legofrodo12 wrote:
I think that the edits show that they care about the wiki, besides chatting. Honestly, it just shows to me a greater commitment to the wiki than no edits.
</div>There are quite a few people that are "commited" that don't edit.</div>Your point being what, exactly? Frodo's point is that it shows a greater commitment, not that a lack of edits shows no commitment. The information that there are a few people that don't edit yet are "commited" is rather irrelevant.</div>There's no need to impose an unnecessary and problematic requirement to CM RFRs if those applying are already perfectly capable of dealing with the position.</div>
And again, what does any of this have to do with the original train of thought? </div>Everything. However you seem adamant to ignore any connections. </div> <p>Then connect all the dots, rather than drawing a single line when there's obviously more to it.
</p>
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p> <div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">Slicer Vorzakh wrote:
<div class="quote">Legofrodo12 wrote:
I think that the edits show that they care about the wiki, besides chatting. Honestly, it just shows to me a greater commitment to the wiki than no edits.
</div>There are quite a few people that are "commited" that don't edit.</div>Your point being what, exactly? Frodo's point is that it shows a greater commitment, not that a lack of edits shows no commitment. The information that there are a few people that don't edit yet are "commited" is rather irrelevant.</div>There's no need to impose an unnecessary and problematic requirement to CM RFRs if those applying are already perfectly capable of dealing with the position.</div>And again, what does any of this have to do with the original train of thought? </div>Everything. However you seem adamant to ignore any connections. </div> <p>Then connect all the dots, rather than drawing a single line when there's obviously more to it.
</p>
(Edited by Michaelyoda)
I'll be notifying and admin at this point since no one seems to want to listen to me.
(Edited by ZXSpidermanXZ)
<p>Note that Spider is a forum moderator now so take what he says seriously, guys.
</p>
(Edited by Luke McSwagger99)
<div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p> <div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">Slicer Vorzakh wrote:
<div class="quote">Legofrodo12 wrote:
I think that the edits show that they care about the wiki, besides chatting. Honestly, it just shows to me a greater commitment to the wiki than no edits.</div>There are quite a few people that are "commited" that don't edit.</div>Your point being what, exactly? Frodo's point is that it shows a greater commitment, not that a lack of edits shows no commitment. The information that there are a few people that don't edit yet are "commited" is rather irrelevant.</div>There's no need to impose an unnecessary and problematic requirement to CM RFRs if those applying are already perfectly capable of dealing with the position.</div>
And again, what does any of this have to do with the original train of thought?</div>Everything. However you seem adamant to ignore any connections.</div>Then connect all the dots, rather than drawing a single line when there's obviously more to it.
</div>What are you, a toddler? Can't you do it yourself? Do I have to hold your hand? </div> <p>No.
</p><p>I just happen to understand how to get my intended point across the first time. I interpret things in their given context. I do not give the punch line without giving the joke. I do not assume someone will understand the connection I'm trying to make between bananas and carrots without explaining. I do not go on about somepeople being capable CMs when someone was talking about greater commitment, without building my case. </p>
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p> <div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">Slicer Vorzakh wrote:
<div class="quote">Legofrodo12 wrote:
I think that the edits show that they care about the wiki, besides chatting. Honestly, it just shows to me a greater commitment to the wiki than no edits.
</div>There are quite a few people that are "commited" that don't edit.</div>Your point being what, exactly? Frodo's point is that it shows a greater commitment, not that a lack of edits shows no commitment. The information that there are a few people that don't edit yet are "commited" is rather irrelevant.</div>There's no need to impose an unnecessary and problematic requirement to CM RFRs if those applying are already perfectly capable of dealing with the position.</div>And again, what does any of this have to do with the original train of thought?</div>Everything. However you seem adamant to ignore any connections.</div>Then connect all the dots, rather than drawing a single line when there's obviously more to it.
</div>What are you, a toddler? Can't you do it yourself? Do I have to hold your hand? </div> <p>No.
</p><p>I just happen to understand how to get my intended point across the first time. I interpret things in their given context. I do not give the punch line without giving the joke. I do not assume someone will understand the connection I'm trying to make between bananas and carrots without explaining. I do not go on about somepeople being capable CMs when someone was talking about greater commitment, without building my case. </p>
(Edited by Michaelyoda)
<div class="quote">ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:
I'll be notifying and admin at this point since no one seems to want to listen to me.</div> <p>I'm rather disappointed that none seem to have noticed this already. Is it too much to check the forums now and then? </p><p>The over-saturation of Chat Moderators seems to really be negatively impacting the community. It's not that the CMs are in any way bad-By all accounts, I voted several of them in-but my hypothesis is that people aren't taking the star in chat seriously anymore. </p>
I'll be notifying and admin at this point since no one seems to want to listen to me.</div> <p>I'm rather disappointed that none seem to have noticed this already. Is it too much to check the forums now and then? </p><p>The over-saturation of Chat Moderators seems to really be negatively impacting the community. It's not that the CMs are in any way bad-By all accounts, I voted several of them in-but my hypothesis is that people aren't taking the star in chat seriously anymore. </p>
(Edited by Starrocks923)
0
<p>Please, keep it nice and civil, m'kay.
</p><p><span class="JdudeSig" style="text-shadow:0 0 10px black; color: black;"><i><span style="color:green;">«†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†»</span> <sup>(<span style="color:green;">Wall</span>)</sup></i></span> -Retired Bureaucrat
</p>
(Edited by Jdude420)
<div class="quote">Michaelyoda wrote:
<div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">Slicer Vorzakh wrote:
<div class="quote">Legofrodo12 wrote:
I think that the edits show that they care about the wiki, besides chatting. Honestly, it just shows to me a greater commitment to the wiki than no edits.</div>There are quite a few people that are "commited" that don't edit.</div>Your point being what, exactly? Frodo's point is that it shows a greater commitment, not that a lack of edits shows no commitment. The information that there are a few people that don't edit yet are "commited" is rather irrelevant.</div>There's no need to impose an unnecessary and problematic requirement to CM RFRs if those applying are already perfectly capable of dealing with the position.</div>
And again, what does any of this have to do with the original train of thought?</div>Everything. However you seem adamant to ignore any connections.</div>Then connect all the dots, rather than drawing a single line when there's obviously more to it.
</div>What are you, a toddler? Can't you do it yourself? Do I have to hold your hand?</div>No.
<p>I just happen to understand how to get my intended point across the first time. I interpret things in their given context. I do not give the punch line without giving the joke. I do not assume someone will understand the connection I'm trying to make between bananas and carrots without explaining. I do not go on about somepeople being capable CMs when someone was talking about greater commitment, without building my case. </p> </div> <p>You do realize these are all things that you would do right
</p>
<div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Michaelyoda wrote: </p><p>
</p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">Slicer Vorzakh wrote:
<div class="quote">Legofrodo12 wrote:
I think that the edits show that they care about the wiki, besides chatting. Honestly, it just shows to me a greater commitment to the wiki than no edits.
</div>There are quite a few people that are "commited" that don't edit.</div>Your point being what, exactly? Frodo's point is that it shows a greater commitment, not that a lack of edits shows no commitment. The information that there are a few people that don't edit yet are "commited" is rather irrelevant.</div>There's no need to impose an unnecessary and problematic requirement to CM RFRs if those applying are already perfectly capable of dealing with the position.</div>And again, what does any of this have to do with the original train of thought?</div>Everything. However you seem adamant to ignore any connections.</div>Then connect all the dots, rather than drawing a single line when there's obviously more to it.
</div>What are you, a toddler? Can't you do it yourself? Do I have to hold your hand?</div>No.
<p>I just happen to understand how to get my intended point across the first time. I interpret things in their given context. I do not give the punch line without giving the joke. I do not assume someone will understand the connection I'm trying to make between bananas and carrots without explaining. I do not go on about somepeople being capable CMs when someone was talking about greater commitment, without building my case. </p> </div> <p>You do realize these are all things that you would do right
</p>
(Edited by Nightfall395)
<div class="quote">Jdude420 wrote:
Please, keep it nice and civil, m'kay. <p><span class="JdudeSig" style="text-shadow:0 0 10px black; color: black;"><i><span style="color:green;">«†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†»</span> <sup>(<span style="color:green;">Wall</span>)</sup></i></span> -Retired Bureaucrat </p> </div> <p>I had some choice words for your late arrival...until I read the message. :P </p><p>Thanks. </p>
Please, keep it nice and civil, m'kay. <p><span class="JdudeSig" style="text-shadow:0 0 10px black; color: black;"><i><span style="color:green;">«†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†»</span> <sup>(<span style="color:green;">Wall</span>)</sup></i></span> -Retired Bureaucrat </p> </div> <p>I had some choice words for your late arrival...until I read the message. :P </p><p>Thanks. </p>
(Edited by Starrocks923)
0
<div class="quote">Starrocks923 wrote:
<div class="quote">Jdude420 wrote:
Please, keep it nice and civil, m'kay. <p><span class="JdudeSig" style="text-shadow:0 0 10px black; color: black;"><i><span style="color:green;">«†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†»</span> <sup>(<span style="color:green;">Wall</span>)</sup></i></span> -Retired Bureaucrat </p> </div>I had some choice words for your late arrival...until I read the message. :P <p>Thanks. </p> </div> <p>Well, life happens. :P
</p><p>NP. </p>
<div class="quote">Jdude420 wrote:
Please, keep it nice and civil, m'kay. <p><span class="JdudeSig" style="text-shadow:0 0 10px black; color: black;"><i><span style="color:green;">«†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†»</span> <sup>(<span style="color:green;">Wall</span>)</sup></i></span> -Retired Bureaucrat </p> </div>I had some choice words for your late arrival...until I read the message. :P <p>Thanks. </p> </div> <p>Well, life happens. :P
</p><p>NP. </p>
(Edited by Jdude420)
6
<p>Sad to see such toxic discourse (if you can call it that) over a trivial topic. I'm disappointed.
</p>
(Edited by Riolu777)