Vote to Limit Amount of Community Votes Per Week

This post is locked.

Luke McSwagger99·7/24/2015 in Community Voting

For the sake of our users who are legitimately irritated by notifications for CV's for the betterment of our community, I propose that we establish a limit on how many community votes can be actively up within a short period of time.

A) No more than 5 active votes are permitted to be created within 120 hours (5 days)

B) No more than 4

C) No more than 3

D) Oppose, there should be no limit on how many CV's can be created within a short period of time.

Current Votes

A: 9 votes

C: 5 votes

D: 18 votes

Consensus

No limit on CVs.

(Edited by administrators)

Luke McSwagger99·7/24/2015

Fort makes a good point. xD Anyway I vote D. (Opposing my own vote, this is gold

</noscript>)

(Edited by Luke McSwagger99)

Person of Info·7/24/2015

D. GG, Luke.

(Edited by Person of Info)

Obi the LEGO Fan·7/24/2015

D...

(Edited by Obi the LEGO Fan)

ShadowOfOblivion7119·7/24/2015

(Edited by ShadowOfOblivion7119)

Aravis Tarkheena·7/25/2015

Remove my vote, actually. I think we should just use common sense about this, which means not overloading everyone with a flood of notifications like we have right now, but also placing no restrictions that may hamper emergencies.

(Edited by Aravis Tarkheena)

FortressOfNight·7/25/2015

Aravis Tarkheena wrote: Remove my vote, actually. I think we should just use common sense about this, which means not overloading everyone with a flood of notifications like we have right now, but also placing no restrictions that may hamper emergencies.

Certainly not all votes should be highlighted. Maybe just the list of community votes thread.

(Edited by FortressOfNight)

Riolu777·7/25/2015

Alemas2005 wrote:

Riolu777 wrote:
D. I love how you guys wanted all of these democratic processes but now that they're being pumped out, suddenly there's a proposition to stifle them.

I don't think you quite realise how much a pain it is to check 10 simultaneous votes...

That's more worthwhile than the silly user voting thing you hassle all the other admins about...

(Edited by Riolu777)

Luke McSwagger99·7/25/2015

Riolu777 wrote:

Alemas2005 wrote:

Riolu777 wrote:
D. I love how you guys wanted all of these democratic processes but now that they're being pumped out, suddenly there's a proposition to stifle them.

I don't think you quite realise how much a pain it is to check 10 simultaneous votes...

That's more worthwhile than the silly user voting thing you hassle all the other admins about...

Lol so true Rio

(Edited by Luke McSwagger99)

Harold89·7/25/2015

D).

(Edited by Harold89)

Nightfall395·7/25/2015

(Edited by Nightfall395)