<p>Yeah, horrible name I know. I want to make a vote to ban people who are clearly dupes but we don't have rock solid, titanium solid proof. It's clear they are trolling/ a dupe, but we don't have them saying "Hey, I am [Insert_User_Here]" so we can't ban them. Please Vote
</p><p>
</p><p>A. Yes (1)
</p><p>B. No (like, 23)
</p><p>C. Neutral
</p><p>D. Other (please specify)
</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Consensus">Consensus</span></h2>
<p>No.
</p>
5,988
pages
ALL POSTS
<p>Well, if you don't have solid proof, we could be mistaking a legitimate user for a dupe.
</p><p>Unless someone can provide a good argument for it, I'm voting No.
</p>
(Edited by Person of Info)
<p>We don't need them to say "I am [Insert_User_Here]" for them to be a dupe.
</p>
(Edited by ShadowOfOblivion7119)
<p>I'm going to vote no, because there have been several instances of users who seemed dupe like when they first joined, but turned out to be legit
</p>
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
no
(Edited by Vonness11`)
No
(Edited by Legoanimals750)
can you guys explain? Because just saying No doesn't really help :S
(Edited by ShadowOfOblivion7119)
<p>B, per slice.
</p>
(Edited by AmazingPythor)