OK, so let's be honest, I'm not even gonna write a big long paragraph in this. /Biases will still play into votes regardless of this rule./ It's unnecessary and disqualifies perfectly valid votes. Should we rid it?
A: Yes: 0
B: No: 22
C Neutral: 2
D: Yes, but reasons that show obvious bias, no reason, or a reason such as "I was forced to vote" still are invalid.: 3
B.
Valid reasons exist.
For a reason.
Keplers wrote: B.
Valid reasons exist.
For a reason.
But is it a valid reason? 
I never vote on something unless I understand it and have a good reason, so B
B, but only if there was no reason, or "I was forced to vote". I don't see a problem with people voting "Sure, whatever." or "Sure, why not?"
Starrocks923 wrote: B, but only if there was no reason, or "I was forced to vote". I don't see a problem with people voting "Sure, whatever." or "Sure, why not?"
I added another option and I'm switching to D.
I may switch to D shortly, give me some time to think it over. 
</noscript>
B, this is ludicrous, D is effectively the same as B. i can't even comprehend what kind of logic except laziness or maybe nihilism would lead you to the conclusion that anyone should be able to oppose or support for literally no reason.
I will be Neutral ont his, but lets face it, if for example user A dislikes user B, then User A probably will oppose for no other reason than "i hate you", but instead of saying this as his actual reason, he will lie and say "Per E".
Switching to D if possible. :)
