5,988
pages
ALL POSTSAdmin revote
<p>Here is where you will revote on admins not created through Request for Rights. This will function exactly like any other community vote. Majority vote. 51 percent or more support will mean the user keeps their rights, 49 percent or less means they will be demoted. If the user is a bureaucrat, opposing will also be supporting removal of those rights. You may choose to demote an admin to a chatmod if you wish.
</p><p>Jdude420
</p><p>Support: 33
</p><p>Oppose: 3
</p><p>Change to CM: 1
</p><p>Neutral: 3
</p><p>Legoguy1866
</p><p>Support: 24
</p><p>Oppose: 6
</p><p>Change to CM: 4
</p><p>Neutral: 6
</p><p>LBK10
</p><p>Support: 23
</p><p>Oppose: 6
</p><p>Change to CM: 4
</p><p>Neutral: 7
</p><p>Eagleeyedan
</p><p>Support: 29
</p><p>Oppose: 3
</p><p>Change to CM: 2
</p><p>Neutral: 6
</p><p>DanielBoone6702
</p><p>Support: 25
</p><p>Oppose: 7
</p><p>Change to CM: 4
</p><p>Neutral: 4
</p><p>Nxtstep101
</p><p>Support: 27
</p><p>Oppose: 5
</p><p>Change to CM: 4
</p><p>Neutral: 4
</p><p>BusyCityGuy
</p><p>Support: 22
</p><p>Oppose: 10
</p><p>Change to CM: 4
</p><p>Neutral: 4
</p><p>Assassin Swipe
</p><p>Support: 25
</p><p>Oppose: 7
</p><p>Change to CM: 4
</p><p>Neutral: 4
</p><p>Drew1200
</p><p>Support: 26
</p><p>Oppose: 5
</p><p>Change to CM: 2
</p><p>Neutral: 7
</p><p>Obi the LEGO Fan
</p><p>Support: 37
</p><p>Oppose: 1
</p><p>Change to CM: 1
</p><p>Neutral: 1
</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Consensus">Consensus</span></h2>
<p>Support for all admins.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
0
<div class="quote">Person of Info wrote:
<div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote:
support for all. if there was a reason they had been voted admin before, no reason not be admins now.</div>I thought this vote was for admins who were promoted without a voting process. </div> <p>Correct. </p>
<div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote:
support for all. if there was a reason they had been voted admin before, no reason not be admins now.</div>I thought this vote was for admins who were promoted without a voting process. </div> <p>Correct. </p>
(Edited by Avalair)
This may be a dumb question but can legoguy even be demoted
(Edited by AmazingPythor)
<div class="quote">AmazingPythor wrote:
This may be a dumb question but can legoguy even be demoted</div> <p>Wikia Staff, perhaps? </p>
This may be a dumb question but can legoguy even be demoted</div> <p>Wikia Staff, perhaps? </p>
(Edited by Alemas2005)
<p>Changing vote, opposing BCG and Drew, support the rest.
</p>
(Edited by Madkatmaximus)
<div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Drew1200 wrote: Wow, this is stupid. What a change from three or four years ago. :/ </p> </div>the objectively correct way to deal with things you disagree with: admin/buro edition </div> <p>well he's not wrong, it's just not the best phrasing </p>
<div class="quote"> <p>Drew1200 wrote: Wow, this is stupid. What a change from three or four years ago. :/ </p> </div>the objectively correct way to deal with things you disagree with: admin/buro edition </div> <p>well he's not wrong, it's just not the best phrasing </p>
(Edited by GuacamoleCCXR)
<div class="quote">Alemas2005 wrote:
<div class="quote">AmazingPythor wrote:
This may be a dumb question but can legoguy even be demoted</div>Wikia Staff, perhaps? </div> <p>Ah, that makes sense. </p>
<div class="quote">AmazingPythor wrote:
This may be a dumb question but can legoguy even be demoted</div>Wikia Staff, perhaps? </div> <p>Ah, that makes sense. </p>
(Edited by AmazingPythor)
0
<p>Oppose for BCG, support for everyone else
</p><p>i still think this is the wrong platform to deal with user rights but whatever
</p>
(Edited by Harold89)
0
<p>Support for JD, EED, NXT, BCG, Drew, and Obi. Oppose on all else.
</p>
(Edited by Keplers)
<p><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;line-height:normal;">I support Jdude and Obi. Change the rest to CM. They certainly ought to be appreciated for their contributions to the early advancement and development of this wiki so I'm not in favor of entirely demoting any of them. If they wish to become fully active admins once again, then they as CM's can put up an admin RfR and the community will vote them back in if they feel the need for more administrators. </span>
</p>
(Edited by Luke McSwagger99)
0
<div class="quote">
<p>Vonness11` wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">FortressOfNight wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Drew1200 wrote: Wow, this is stupid. What a change from three or four years ago. :/ </p> </div>the objectively correct way to deal with things you disagree with: admin/buro edition </div> <p>making comments like that is a reason I opposed him
</p><noscript>
</noscript>
</div>
<p>Hmm... I actually see what you mean. I guess that's fair, I'm sorry about all of that. Honestly, I'm not at all upset about the idea of losing my rights, although that would certainly be disappointing. It's more just that it hurts to see how much this community has changed from what I considered ideal. But it's definitely a subjective thing... even though I may consider this type of community "stupid", you guys might find it more enjoyable than the type that I tried to set up. So I'll try not to be so outspoken anymore.
</p>
<div class="quote"> <p>Drew1200 wrote: Wow, this is stupid. What a change from three or four years ago. :/ </p> </div>the objectively correct way to deal with things you disagree with: admin/buro edition </div> <p>making comments like that is a reason I opposed him
</p><noscript></noscript>
</div>
<p>Hmm... I actually see what you mean. I guess that's fair, I'm sorry about all of that. Honestly, I'm not at all upset about the idea of losing my rights, although that would certainly be disappointing. It's more just that it hurts to see how much this community has changed from what I considered ideal. But it's definitely a subjective thing... even though I may consider this type of community "stupid", you guys might find it more enjoyable than the type that I tried to set up. So I'll try not to be so outspoken anymore.
</p>
(Edited by Drew1200)