<div class="quote">Johnyjo wrote:
B, and those other words should probably be blocked too cause it's just not a thing that should be being discussed in chat... Like, really? :P Convince me that we "need" this unblocked and maybe I'll change my vote. (er)</div> <p>Convince me we need the word "bazooka" to be a word that is not blocked on the wiki. There's no reason for it to be blocked. Or "antelope". Or any word. There needs to be a good reason for a word to be blocked, and for boob there is not.  </p>

A.

<div class="quote">Jdude420 wrote:
Honestly, having no blocked words would actually be better than what we have now.... so, we just disallow inappropriate usage of any word that way. Because with the current situation there's still, regardless of what some of you say, the mentality that if a word is unblocked it can be used/there is more leniency toward that word being used (not by everyone, no, but it does happen and I have personally seen it) and if we have no blocked words and we just don't allow inappropriate usage we could hopefully crush that mentality since there would be no such thing as a "physically" blocked word. And since damn wasn't wanted to be unblocked by the community, we don't let it be used (except maybe for religious conversations I guess), then of course we would not allow s*** and the f-word. But why don't we just have chat rules that specificity a couple of these words, and the rest are usually pretty obvious if used inappropriately.... IDK, just spit-balling here. <p><span class="JdudeSig" style="text-shadow:0 0 10px black; color: black;"><i><span style="color:green;">«†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†»</span> ^{(<span style="color:green;">Wall</span>)}</i></span> -Retired Bureaucrat </p> </div> <p>honestly per </p>

<div class="quote">Trenzalord11 wrote:
I VOTE A. <p>Don't understand why nudity is taboo. Everyone has man parts or lady parts, and the more we tip-toe around that, the more awkward and "taboo" it becomes. </p><p>So, A. It's a part of life, and there's nothing inappropriate about it, imo. </p> </div> <p>If you walked out of your house stark naked, you'd find out why pretty fast. But you didn't hear it from me. :P </p>

<div class="quote">CptSteveRogers wrote:
I vote B. <p>What happens when you turn the letter "B" to the right once? </p><noscript></noscript> </div> <p>Oh gosh. I'm tempted to change my vote from B to C just because of this. </p>

<p>I'm quite surprised to see 115 posts to this thread tbh :p I'm surprised people don't hear it more often in everyday life :p coz I can assure you, most 13 year olds over in this part of the world know what it means by 13, the age that ppl should be to be part of the wiki :p </p><p>Also.....please don't be stupid and say boobs are genitalia.....guys have boobs which aren't developed as are the pubertal female breasts. Males just have pre-pubertal breasts ,so there shouldn't be a difference between the two with regards to vulgarity or whatever is being thrown out in this discussion. </p>

<p>Ok guys, this is getting kind of hostile... From here on, any rude or offensive comments will be removed.  </p>

<p>This is like a toned-down version of the "n-word" trying to be unblocked based on the fact that it, as a word, does not mean anything racist and we oughtn't cater to parents regarding what their child can and can't see, and in any case if a black person wants to say something about their own race, they should be allowed to describe it how they like. </p><p>Incoming Flugzeugabwerkanone from people who think that what I said is totally different from this vote. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>Keplers wrote: This is like a toned-down version of the "n-word" trying to be unblocked based on the fact that it, as a word, does not mean anything racist and we oughtn't cater to parents regarding what their child can and can't see, and in any case if a black person wants to say something about their own race, they should be allowed to describe it how they like. </p><p>Incoming Flugzeugabwerkanone from people who think that what I said is totally different from this vote. </p> </div> <p>A. a racial slur is hardly comparable to an informal term for a body part B. technically someone could make a vote for that if they wanted but there's no way it'd ever pass. not really sure what you're trying to get at here. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>Keplers wrote: This is like a toned-down version of the "n-word" trying to be unblocked based on the fact that it, as a word, does not mean anything racist and we oughtn't cater to parents regarding what their child can and can't see, and in any case if a black person wants to say something about their own race, they should be allowed to describe it how they like. </p><p>Incoming Flugzeugabwerkanone from people who think that what I said is totally different from this vote. </p> </div> <p>Okay then here's some flugzeugabwerkanone (anti-air craft guns? lol) </p><p>First, this is a really bad analogy as Madkat pointed out. </p><p>Second, your analogy assumes that there is a synonym for "boobs" that is actually inappropriate. There's literally nothing inappropriate about normal human body parts, unless used in a suggestive or explicit context. </p><p>Third, your analogy assumes that there are parents who don't want their children to see the word "boobs" or an equivalent. Quite frankly, that's absurd. </p><p>And finally, racial slurs are in an entirely different category than normal words used to refer to body parts. So on top of everything else, you are making a category error. </p><p>So yeah, on logical grounds your analogy fails to make any legitimate point. :P </p><p>(Also I vote A) </p>