5,988
pages
ALL POSTSCleaning out the CMs
<p>So currently there are 27 CMs, excluding bots, of which there are at most 5 that are actually active. I know this vote has failed several times before, but I'm hoping that with this much of an imbalance, people will see that if we do vote on who are and aren't deemed active and quality CMs, that it will refine CMs as a group and improve the authority and such.
</p><p>Should we hold a vote to determine which CMs should be kept, and demote those who are voted to be demoted?
</p><p>A) Yes 19 votes
</p><p>B) No 1 vote
</p><p>C) Neutral 2 votes
</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Concensus">Concensus</span></h2>
<p>Yes, hold a vote on CMs to determine who should be kept/demoted
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
C.
(Edited by T-007Bond)
Why not just have a policy that you're demoted after a certain period of inactivity?
(Edited by Michaelyoda)
0
<div class="quote">
<p>Michaelyoda wrote:
Why not just have a policy that you're demoted after a certain period of inactivity?
</p>
</div>
<p>I'd much prefer this
</p>
(Edited by Veralann)
<div class="quote">
<p>HyperFlash Studios wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>Michaelyoda wrote:
Why not just have a policy that you're demoted after a certain period of inactivity?
</p>
</div>
<p>I'd much prefer this
</p>
</div>
<p>It does seem more reasonable.
</p>
(Edited by Impossibubbles)
0
<p>I'm assuming these votes would be held like any other community vote, yes?
</p><p>Still gonna vote A, just wondering tho.
</p>
(Edited by Harold89)
0
<div class="quote">
<p>Harold89 wrote:
I'm assuming these votes would be held like any other community vote, yes?
</p><p>Still gonna vote A, just wondering tho.
</p>
</div>
<p>I believe so.
</p>
(Edited by Veralann)
<div class="quote">
<p>Harold89 wrote:
I'm assuming these votes would be held like any other community vote, yes?
</p><p>Still gonna vote A, just wondering tho.
</p>
</div>
<p>I was going to make it a blog just so tallying votes would be simpler, but yes
</p>
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
0
<div class="quote">Slicer Vorzakh wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Harold89 wrote: I'm assuming these votes would be held like any other community vote, yes? </p><p>Still gonna vote A, just wondering tho. </p> </div>I was going to make it a blog just so tallying votes would be simpler, but yes </div> <p>Got it. And would a valid reason need to be stated for each "keep" and "demote" vote (like an RFR)? Or would simply saying "keep" or "demote" suffice? </p><p>(Hopefully the former!) </p>
<div class="quote"> <p>Harold89 wrote: I'm assuming these votes would be held like any other community vote, yes? </p><p>Still gonna vote A, just wondering tho. </p> </div>I was going to make it a blog just so tallying votes would be simpler, but yes </div> <p>Got it. And would a valid reason need to be stated for each "keep" and "demote" vote (like an RFR)? Or would simply saying "keep" or "demote" suffice? </p><p>(Hopefully the former!) </p>
(Edited by Harold89)
<div class="quote">
<p>Harold89 wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Slicer Vorzakh wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Harold89 wrote: I'm assuming these votes would be held like any other community vote, yes? </p><p>Still gonna vote A, just wondering tho. </p> </div>I was going to make it a blog just so tallying votes would be simpler, but yes </div> <p>Got it. And would a valid reason need to be stated for each "keep" and "demote" vote (like an RFR)? Or would simply saying "keep" or "demote" suffice? </p><p>(Hopefully the former!) </p> </div> <p>I'd say there needs to be a reason </p>
<div class="quote"> <p>Harold89 wrote: I'm assuming these votes would be held like any other community vote, yes? </p><p>Still gonna vote A, just wondering tho. </p> </div>I was going to make it a blog just so tallying votes would be simpler, but yes </div> <p>Got it. And would a valid reason need to be stated for each "keep" and "demote" vote (like an RFR)? Or would simply saying "keep" or "demote" suffice? </p><p>(Hopefully the former!) </p> </div> <p>I'd say there needs to be a reason </p>
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
<div class="quote">
<p>Impossibubbles wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>HyperFlash Studios wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>Michaelyoda wrote:
Why not just have a policy that you're demoted after a certain period of inactivity?
</p>
</div>
<p>I'd much prefer this
</p>
</div>
<p>It does seem more reasonable.
</p>
</div>
<p><font face="Courier New">^ Would support.</font>
</p>
(Edited by LordWeirdo)