5,988
pages
ALL POSTSCleaning out the CMs
<p>So currently there are 27 CMs, excluding bots, of which there are at most 5 that are actually active. I know this vote has failed several times before, but I'm hoping that with this much of an imbalance, people will see that if we do vote on who are and aren't deemed active and quality CMs, that it will refine CMs as a group and improve the authority and such.
</p><p>Should we hold a vote to determine which CMs should be kept, and demote those who are voted to be demoted?
</p><p>A) Yes 19 votes
</p><p>B) No 1 vote
</p><p>C) Neutral 2 votes
</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Concensus">Concensus</span></h2>
<p>Yes, hold a vote on CMs to determine who should be kept/demoted
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
<div class="quote">Brick425 wrote:
<div class="quote">KnightoftheLight wrote:
B, for the sole reason that having inactive CMs does nothing, and if they want to return they'll still have their rights.</div>I'm pretty sure if they left they don't care about whether they have rights or not. Besides, if they return, they can always get them back. </div> <p>Let's be real. Who of us would actually vote for an inactive CM who wanted his star back only a day after returning?
</p>
<div class="quote">KnightoftheLight wrote:
B, for the sole reason that having inactive CMs does nothing, and if they want to return they'll still have their rights.</div>I'm pretty sure if they left they don't care about whether they have rights or not. Besides, if they return, they can always get them back. </div> <p>Let's be real. Who of us would actually vote for an inactive CM who wanted his star back only a day after returning?
</p>
(Edited by Michaelyoda)
0
<div class="quote">Michaelyoda wrote:
<div class="quote">Brick425 wrote:
<div class="quote">KnightoftheLight wrote:
B, for the sole reason that having inactive CMs does nothing, and if they want to return they'll still have their rights.</div>I'm pretty sure if they left they don't care about whether they have rights or not. Besides, if they return, they can always get them back.</div>Let's be real. Who of us would actually vote for an inactive CM who wanted his star back only a day after returning?
</div> <p>If 1, they weren't leaving forever, and 2, they were a good mod to begin with, I probably would. But a day after returning is really soon. Why do you feel the need to jump to such a time after they return? I never said anything about that. </p>
<div class="quote">Brick425 wrote:
<div class="quote">KnightoftheLight wrote:
B, for the sole reason that having inactive CMs does nothing, and if they want to return they'll still have their rights.</div>I'm pretty sure if they left they don't care about whether they have rights or not. Besides, if they return, they can always get them back.</div>Let's be real. Who of us would actually vote for an inactive CM who wanted his star back only a day after returning?
</div> <p>If 1, they weren't leaving forever, and 2, they were a good mod to begin with, I probably would. But a day after returning is really soon. Why do you feel the need to jump to such a time after they return? I never said anything about that. </p>
(Edited by Brick425)
(Edited by ZXSpidermanXZ)
<p>Cleaning up UserRights is needed arround tbh. A.
</p><p><span style="color:#DF0101;">Yada</span> <small><span style="color:black;">Dark</span></small> <span title="This user is an administrator of Picsou Wiki.">
</span> 08:53, August 4, 2016 (UTC)
</p>
</span> 08:53, August 4, 2016 (UTC)
</p>
(Edited by Dark Yada)
<p>A
</p><p>Not because I think cleaning up the inactive CMs is a good idea, but votes are nice. It's good to at least hear fresh criticism, I'd say.
</p>
(Edited by Starrocks923)
<div class="quote">
<p>Starrocks923 wrote:
A
</p><p>Not because I think cleaning up the inactive CMs is a good idea, but votes are nice. It's good to at least hear fresh criticism, I'd say.
</p>
</div>
<p>fresh criticism of dead people, yeah :P
</p>
(Edited by Aravis Tarkheena)
0
C
(Edited by Ked830)
<div style="font-family:courier new;">
<p>A. I doubt we'll get anywhere, but it's definitely worth a shot.
</p>
</div>
(Edited by LordWeirdo)
C.
(Edited by T-007Bond)
Why not just have a policy that you're demoted after a certain period of inactivity?
(Edited by Michaelyoda)