5,988
pages
ALL POSTSAllow active CMs to decide bans in chat
<p>So recently there have been issues with users and ban lengths and administrators who haven't taken action. The moderators in chat on these occasions came to a different decision from the admin but were unable to put it into effect as a single admin basically overruled us.
What this vote would allow is all active CMs on chat to come to a unanimous decision on the banning of users. This would <i>not</i> overrule admin votes, but it would take multiple administrators to overturn a CM decision. For this to be put into effect it requires at least three active CMs in chat and all active CMs to reach the same decision.
</p><p>Should we allow CMs to come to a unanimous decision on ban time in chat?
</p><p>A) Yes: 24 Votes
</p><p>B) No:
</p><p>C) Neutral: 1 Vote
</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Concensus">Concensus</span></h2>
<p>Yes, allow Chat Moderators to come to an agreement on chat bans.
</p>
(Edited by Veralann)
<p>Lol, they're mods, of course we should allow them. A.
</p><p><span style="color:#DF0101;">Yada</span> <small><span style="color:black;">Dark</span></small> <span title="This user is an administrator of Picsou Wiki.">
</span> 08:52, August 4, 2016 (UTC)
</p>
</span> 08:52, August 4, 2016 (UTC)
</p>
(Edited by Dark Yada)
<p>I disagree with multiple admins being required to overturn the decisions so I'm not voting A.
</p><p>I'm going with C on this one.
</p>
(Edited by Anonymous 67a8f391a32fb7.13434178)
A.
(Edited by Marcel77799)
(Edited by GandalftheWizard)
<p>A, of course.
</p>
(Edited by Dr. Satl, M.D.)
A.
(Edited by Sir Guurahk)
0
A
(Edited by Ked830)
<div style="font-family:courier new;">
<p>A. This is what mods are for. And requiring unanimity was a good way to go with this.
</p>
</div>
(Edited by LordWeirdo)
A. It's their job.
(Edited by T-007Bond)
A
(Edited by JMW wolfpack)