Ahem... Not at all. For real.

Yada Dark 14:09, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

I find it weird how this place just turned to politics lol

I thought this wiki was a nice place to chill and all that. If an admin is really butthurt, yeah I think he or she should get demoted. You promote an admin for a reason, not let him or her to get demoted because of a disagreement, come on.

If you promote, you placed all of your trust in them, and you want him or her to get demoted? Well, that's just a backstab

I don't see how those blogs are related to anything here. They aren't personal attacks, it's just poking fun at people, it's very different. Again, I don't get it.

I don't see how allowing yourself a couple more freedoms after promotion is in any way "corrupt". It's just the truth. It happens to the majority of admins and CMs here. Once they get promoted, they tend to do things they probably wouldn't have done when they were running for CM/admin. It isn't just me.

"If the community says no, don't do it.": That would miss the point of a prank entirely, don't you think? Community or no community, a prank's a prank, and has to be respected as such.

alemas is a good admin, voting to keep

Keep for all. Don't know why AP is in the vote when people just voted for him, seems kind of bipolar if you ask me. As for Ale I do honestly think some of you are taking things maybe just a little too much to heart. Everyone is human, you can't expect admins to make decisions and do things all the time that you will agree with. I personally don't see abuse of power, poor judgements (in my opinion) of course now and again but nothing I would have demoted someone for on forums I was admin on.

If he was even promoted democratically your point might even make sense

Alemas2005 wrote:

Brick425 wrote:
Originally your thing about calling AP the Polandball of editing looked agreeable to me since it didn't really cause any problems but then I remembered how many blogs you made with the title "X shouldn't be trusted with Y matters", which basically publicly made fun of someone for not knowing something stupid. I bet you didn't ask them, did you?

You know how corrupt the second to last bullet point makes you look? Just wanted to highlight that one.

Also, you can't just say "That was my prankster side" when you did something that was completely stupid. If the community says no, don't do it. But we all know your attitute towards voting on the LMBW so I guess this is just a waste of time for me to type this.

I don't see how those blogs are related to anything here. They aren't personal attacks, it's just poking fun at people, it's very different. Again, I don't get it.

I don't see how allowing yourself a couple more freedoms after promotion is in any way "corrupt". It's just the truth. It happens to the majority of admins and CMs here. Once they get promoted, they tend to do things they probably wouldn't have done when they were running for CM/admin. It isn't just me.

<noscript></noscript>

"If the community says no, don't do it.": That would miss the point of a prank entirely, don't you think? Community or no community, a prank's a prank, and has to be respected as such.

if she says no, don't do it

but that was just my molester side and a joke's a joke

I got admin via RfR, I got 'crat via the admins, before RfR for 'crat was a thing.

Then I do not see a point of you getting demoted, Democratically then.