<p>Alright, despite my little bout of immaturity, because, who could resist, I do have a real CV to make. xD
</p><p>The joke/troll CVs are out of hand. This is little kid humor it wasn't funny the first time, and it wasn't the 5th time either. And you can claim these CVs aren't jokes. In the case of the vote to delete the wiki, if you claim that is no joke, then how dare you. You know, some of us actually really like this place, myself included. I like chatting with people and I like editing, as pointless as it is. For the sake of your own selfish motives, or some stupid joke, you're willing to go so far as to take away something people actually like. So how dare you.
</p><p>Vote to end these ridiculous CVs.
</p><p>Yes: 21 Votes
</p><p>No: 6 Votes
</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Consensus">Consensus</span></h2>
<p>Yes
</p>
<p>B.
</p><p>If a joke vote such as "Vote to delete the wiki" were to pass, I'd say that the community would be so far gone that it would likely be wise to delete the wiki.
</p>
<div class="quote">TheShadowAssassin wrote: B.
<p>If a joke vote such as "Vote to delete the wiki" were to pass, I'd say that the community would be so far gone that it would likely be wise to delete the wiki.
</p>
</div>
<p>you voted for deleting the wiki...?
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>Riolu777 wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">TheShadowAssassin wrote: B.
<p>If a joke vote such as "Vote to delete the wiki" were to pass, I'd say that the community would be so far gone that it would likely be wise to delete the wiki.
</p>
</div>
<p>you voted for deleting the wiki...?
</p>
</div>
<p>Perhaps his point is he's part of the problem?
</p>
<p>I vote A.
</p><p>On a side note, I think the system of this wiki, as far as community votes are concerned, needs to be restructured.
</p><p>I think there needs to be a form of veto but not in the manner that an admin can veto a unanimous vote.
</p><p>I think an admin should be able to classify a certain community vote as candidate for veto and it should then be passed to another political body, like a Congress. This body should be made up of reputable members of the community that are chosen by the ENTIRE community. If 2/3 of the "Congress" votes yes then the vote would be vetoed. If not the vote would be sustained.
</p><p>Just an idea. Maybe someone should make it a Community Vote...eh?
</p>