<div class="quote">
<p>Rapmilo wrote:
I vote A.
</p><p>On a side note, I think the system of this wiki, as far as community votes are concerned, needs to be restructured.
</p><p>I think there needs to be a form of veto but not in the manner that an admin can veto a unanimous vote.
</p><p>I think an admin should be able to classify a certain community vote as candidate for veto and it should then be passed to another political body, like a Congress. This body should be made up of reputable members of the community that are chosen by the ENTIRE community. If 2/3 of the "Congress" votes yes then the vote would be vetoed. If not the vote would be sustained.
</p><p>Just an idea. Maybe someone should make it a Community Vote...eh?
</p>
</div>
<p>yes this 100%
</p><p>let's eliminate athenian democracy and create a parliament instead
</p><p>republicanism shall arise so that all 40 admins and users alike shall be represented
</p>