Up until a year and a half or so ago, the wiki had a policy involving the ability of the administration team to unanimously veto a community vote that had passed. This was deemed undemocratic and was removed sometime in March of last year, but in light of recent events I deem bringing it back to be a logical proposition. Up until recently I had never thought that bringing this back would be necessary, as I assumed the community would for the most part be able to make decisions democratically, but for obvious reasons this is not the case.

Now, keep in mind, this is not a huge increase in bureaucratic power, as the veto would have to be unanimous in order to take effect. As a result, I do not believe that this will be performed often if ever, as admins tend to disagree among themselves over the vast majority of CVs anyways. In fact, a scenario in which all the admins voted against a popular CV seemed so rare to me that I originally found this policy rather useless (that is, until three prank votes which gained a significant following were proposed today). 

Ergo, I believe that reinstalling a unanimous veto system is prudent for maintaining stability and leaves very little room for corruption.

A) Yes: Reinstall a unanimous administrator veto system
B) Nein: Do not reinstall the system

Current Votes

Yes: 21 votes
Nein: 7 votes

Consensus

Yes