<p>Under this policy, the administration would be in charge of all fields by administrative vote, from emoticon uploading to adding new regulation. The Community Vote system would be abolished, though petitions may remain as a semi-official way for the community to inform the administration of their woes. The administration would be in charge of promoting new Moderators and Administrators, and the Request for Rights system would be abolished.
</p><p>Under this system the chaotic and inefficient mode of squabbling over democratic decisions would end and users would again learn to appreciate what their administration has to offer. The current administration was -- inefficiently -- brought to office by the people, and thus the people shall trust their judgement.
</p>
<hr><p>A) Support: 4 Votes
</p><p>B) Oppose: 15 Votes
</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Consensus">Consensus</span></h2>
<p>The Wiki political system shall remain the same.
</p>
<div class="quote">Game Wolf wrote: B. The state of the wiki amuses me very much. Keep it up gays. We just might beat the admins this time.</div>
<p>Can't tell if "gays" was a typo of "guys" or it was legit.
</p>
<div class="quote">Brick425 wrote: <div class="quote">Michaelyoda wrote: Support.
<p>Democracy sucks.
</p>
</div>Dude, even Ale voted no.
<p>Stop.
</p>
</div>
<p>Not to offend Ale or anything, but I don't care what Ale votes. </p><noscript></noscript>
<p>I guess it's a little bit sad how everyone seems so entirely discontented with anything we do as a community. Every day I come on it seems like there's another community vote - what are we doing wrong? What are you guys looking to get out of this place? I'm Neutral personally because as an admin I don't think this should be my choice to make, but I think everyone here needs to take a step back and think about why they're here and how votes like this benefit them.
</p>