<p>It seems rather odd that this is unblocked considering "lmao" is blocked. If that's a blocked word, then this should be too as it's worse.
</p><p>
A) Support: 19 votes
B) Oppose: 12 votes
C) Neutral: 2 votes
</p>
5,988
pages
ALL POSTS
Bee
(Edited by TheShadowAssassin)
0
A
(Edited by Man.city1)
0
<p>Er, A).
</p><p>Seems like a pretty blatant loophole, this. 
</p><noscript>
</noscript>
</p><noscript></noscript>
(Edited by Alemas2005)
0
<p>B lol
</p><p>=l
</p>
(Edited by Mishkaiel)
0
A.
(Edited by Rapmilo)
A.
(Edited by RoboticBrick28)
0
<p>A if the other one's blocked already, although I've never seen anyone use either of these. :P
</p>
(Edited by Johnyjo)
<p>i don't really get the 'unblock everything' train; unblocking words so far has connoted the approval of their use, but i'm reasonably sure that few people actually advocate alleviating sanctions for all swearing in chat.
</p><p>removing the blocking system for words that aren't welcome to be used on chat is just a simple way to keep track of them; people can easily check what words they're not supposed to use, and when they are used, they are flagged as emotes. there point was never to shield anyone's eyes or whatever, at least not since 2013 lol
</p><p>a
</p><p>edits: syntax, removing excess words
</p>
(Edited by GuacamoleCCXR)
0
<div class="quote">
<p>GuacamoleCCXR wrote:
i don't really get the 'unblock everything' train; unblocking words so far has connoted the approval of their use, but i'm reasonably sure that few people actually advocate alleviating sanctions for all swearing in chat.Â
</p><p>removing the blocking system for words that aren't welcome to be used on chat is just a simple way to keep track of them; people can easily check what words they're not supposed to use, and when they are used, they are flagged as emotes. there point was never to shield anyone's eyes or whatever, at least not since 2013 lol
</p><p>a
</p>
</div>
<p>Do you always respond so thoroughly to these community vote things?
</p>
(Edited by Rapmilo)
<div class="quote">Rapmilo wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>GuacamoleCCXR wrote: i don't really get the 'unblock everything' train; unblocking words so far has connoted the approval of their use, but i'm reasonably sure that few people actually advocate alleviating sanctions for all swearing in chat. </p><p>removing the blocking system for words that aren't welcome to be used on chat is just a simple way to keep track of them; people can easily check what words they're not supposed to use, and when they are used, they are flagged as emotes. there point was never to shield anyone's eyes or whatever, at least not since 2013 lol </p><p>a </p> </div>Do you always respond so thoroughly to these community vote things? </div> <p>i like to clarify the reasons behind my votes, yes, for transparency if nothing else. </p>
<div class="quote"> <p>GuacamoleCCXR wrote: i don't really get the 'unblock everything' train; unblocking words so far has connoted the approval of their use, but i'm reasonably sure that few people actually advocate alleviating sanctions for all swearing in chat. </p><p>removing the blocking system for words that aren't welcome to be used on chat is just a simple way to keep track of them; people can easily check what words they're not supposed to use, and when they are used, they are flagged as emotes. there point was never to shield anyone's eyes or whatever, at least not since 2013 lol </p><p>a </p> </div>Do you always respond so thoroughly to these community vote things? </div> <p>i like to clarify the reasons behind my votes, yes, for transparency if nothing else. </p>
(Edited by GuacamoleCCXR)