unblock all. i want to use "ayy lmao" in some contexts

<div class="quote"> <p>TheShadowAssassin wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote: <p>May I just say that "wth" is still a thing?? Guys, we're talking about unblocking the F word. The only way that this would be an acceptable use is if it's phrased as such like "wtfrick" or something along those lines. We can't open up "wtf" to this wiki. The people here aren't mature enough to handle it. And if someone here can honestly say with a good conscience that the F word is not vulgar then I give up. Sure it can be argued that it's just an abbreviation and not the actual word, but come on guys. We ALL know what it stands for. That's just an excuse to use the F word on a wiki that's freakin designed for 13 y/o's. Unblocking it makes no sense except for the fact that there are people here don't know how to not swear. </p> </div> <p>"<span style="font-style:italic;font-weight:normal;">on a wiki that's freakin designed for 13 y/o's</span>" </p><p>And you're saying that 13 year olds aren't mature enough to handle the F word? Or even an abbreviation of such? Or even any of the other words that you opposed the unblocking of? PG-13 movies allow the usage of most swear words, especially words like "ass", and one (and in rare cases, 2) usage of the F word. I would propose that if the F word ever did get unblocked that the only condition should be that it can only be used non-excessively.  </p><p><span style="font-weight:normal;">"<i>T</i></span><span style="font-style:italic;font-weight:normal;">here are people here don't know how to not swear.</span>" </p><p>Clearly we know how to not swear, otherwise we would be, correct? And we're not swearing, right? So stop saying this, guys. </p> </div> <p>Look, I can handle the F word. It's not a matter of that. I know users younger than me can "handle it". I'm saying that it's vulgar language. We should not need to handle it. A sheltered teenager should never have to make a jump from the mbs to a site that allows vulgar language. That's preposterous. And that's what most of the mbs are--homeschoolers who are looking for safe fun. As mentioned before, the mods couldnt possibly allow all PG-13-okay stuff. There can be literal sex scenes and nudity in PG-13's. It's more like "PG-13, but with a lot of common sense." And common sense says that there's no need for an form of the F word to become unblocked. Especially not when the reason is because someone doesn't like the other options. </p><p>Also, I'm saying that because most of the supporters who want these unblocked are people who swear a lot IRL. Obviously anyone can not swear, but we can' trust the F word to a wiki where that isn't their natural mode. </p>

<p>Absolutely not. BBB. I do not like the company of people who say such things irl, and I most certainly do not want to see them acceptable here. I'm sure we can be smart enough to handle finding better, more respectable and proper ways to communicate without these such terms. </p><p>Also per Harold. This vote is a bit messy. </p>

<div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>TheShadowAssassin wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote: <p>May I just say that "wth" is still a thing?? Guys, we're talking about unblocking the F word. The only way that this would be an acceptable use is if it's phrased as such like "wtfrick" or something along those lines. We can't open up "wtf" to this wiki. The people here aren't mature enough to handle it. And if someone here can honestly say with a good conscience that the F word is not vulgar then I give up. Sure it can be argued that it's just an abbreviation and not the actual word, but come on guys. We ALL know what it stands for. That's just an excuse to use the F word on a wiki that's freakin designed for 13 y/o's. Unblocking it makes no sense except for the fact that there are people here don't know how to not swear. </p> </div>"<span style="font-style:italic;font-weight:normal;">on a wiki that's freakin designed for 13 y/o's</span>" <p>And you're saying that 13 year olds aren't mature enough to handle the F word? Or even an abbreviation of such? Or even any of the other words that you opposed the unblocking of? PG-13 movies allow the usage of most swear words, especially words like "ass", and one (and in rare cases, 2) usage of the F word. I would propose that if the F word ever did get unblocked that the only condition should be that it can only be used non-excessively.  </p><p><span style="font-weight:normal;">"<i>T</i></span><span style="font-style:italic;font-weight:normal;">here are people here don't know how to not swear.</span>" </p><p>Clearly we know how to not swear, otherwise we would be, correct? And we're not swearing, right? So stop saying this, guys. </p> </div>Look, I can handle the F word. It's not a matter of that. I know users younger than me can "handle it". I'm saying that it's vulgar language. We should not need to handle it. A sheltered teenager should never have to make a jump from the mbs to a site that allows vulgar language. That's preposterous. And that's what most of the mbs are--homeschoolers who are looking for safe fun. As mentioned before, the mods couldnt possibly allow all PG-13-okay stuff. There can be literal sex scenes and nudity in PG-13's. It's more like "PG-13, but with a lot of common sense." And common sense says that there's no need for an form of the F word to become unblocked. Especially not when the reason is because someone doesn't like the other options. <p>Also, I'm saying that because most of the supporters who want these unblocked are people who swear a lot IRL. Obviously anyone can not swear, but we can' trust the F word to a wiki where that isn't their natural mode. </p> </div> <p>All I hear in this reply is stuff about the MBs. </p><p>We are not the MBs. We do not cater to the MBs. Plain and simple. </p> <div class="quote">BusyCityGirl wrote:
I'm sure you can be smart enough to handle finding better, more respectable and proper ways to communicate without these such terms.</div> <p>Stop. Nobody is any more or less "respectable" whether they use swear words or not. Quit pretending that those of you who don't use swear words are. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>TheShadowAssassin wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>TheShadowAssassin wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote: <p>May I just say that "wth" is still a thing?? Guys, we're talking about unblocking the F word. The only way that this would be an acceptable use is if it's phrased as such like "wtfrick" or something along those lines. We can't open up "wtf" to this wiki. The people here aren't mature enough to handle it. And if someone here can honestly say with a good conscience that the F word is not vulgar then I give up. Sure it can be argued that it's just an abbreviation and not the actual word, but come on guys. We ALL know what it stands for. That's just an excuse to use the F word on a wiki that's freakin designed for 13 y/o's. Unblocking it makes no sense except for the fact that there are people here don't know how to not swear. </p> </div>"<span style="font-style:italic;font-weight:normal;">on a wiki that's freakin designed for 13 y/o's</span>" <p>And you're saying that 13 year olds aren't mature enough to handle the F word? Or even an abbreviation of such? Or even any of the other words that you opposed the unblocking of? PG-13 movies allow the usage of most swear words, especially words like "ass", and one (and in rare cases, 2) usage of the F word. I would propose that if the F word ever did get unblocked that the only condition should be that it can only be used non-excessively.  </p><p><span style="font-weight:normal;">"<i>T</i></span><span style="font-style:italic;font-weight:normal;">here are people here don't know how to not swear.</span>" </p><p>Clearly we know how to not swear, otherwise we would be, correct? And we're not swearing, right? So stop saying this, guys. </p> </div>Look, I can handle the F word. It's not a matter of that. I know users younger than me can "handle it". I'm saying that it's vulgar language. We should not need to handle it. A sheltered teenager should never have to make a jump from the mbs to a site that allows vulgar language. That's preposterous. And that's what most of the mbs are--homeschoolers who are looking for safe fun. As mentioned before, the mods couldnt possibly allow all PG-13-okay stuff. There can be literal sex scenes and nudity in PG-13's. It's more like "PG-13, but with a lot of common sense." And common sense says that there's no need for an form of the F word to become unblocked. Especially not when the reason is because someone doesn't like the other options. <p>Also, I'm saying that because most of the supporters who want these unblocked are people who swear a lot IRL. Obviously anyone can not swear, but we can' trust the F word to a wiki where that isn't their natural mode. </p> </div> <p>All I hear in this reply is stuff about the MBs. </p><p>We are not the MBs. We do not cater to the MBs. Plain and simple. </p> </div> <p>Congrats! You realized this is not the MBs. Just now noticed that did ya? You beat the game! Here, have this derp a reward. " </p><noscript></noscript> "

<div class="quote"> <p>Romaniandude12 wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>TheShadowAssassin wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote: <p>May I just say that "wth" is still a thing?? Guys, we're talking about unblocking the F word. The only way that this would be an acceptable use is if it's phrased as such like "wtfrick" or something along those lines. We can't open up "wtf" to this wiki. The people here aren't mature enough to handle it. And if someone here can honestly say with a good conscience that the F word is not vulgar then I give up. Sure it can be argued that it's just an abbreviation and not the actual word, but come on guys. We ALL know what it stands for. That's just an excuse to use the F word on a wiki that's freakin designed for 13 y/o's. Unblocking it makes no sense except for the fact that there are people here don't know how to not swear. </p> </div> <p>"<span style="font-style:italic;font-weight:normal;">on a wiki that's freakin designed for 13 y/o's</span>" </p><p>And you're saying that 13 year olds aren't mature enough to handle the F word? Or even an abbreviation of such? Or even any of the other words that you opposed the unblocking of? PG-13 movies allow the usage of most swear words, especially words like "ass", and one (and in rare cases, 2) usage of the F word. I would propose that if the F word ever did get unblocked that the only condition should be that it can only be used non-excessively.  </p><p><span style="font-weight:normal;">"<i>T</i></span><span style="font-style:italic;font-weight:normal;">here are people here don't know how to not swear.</span>" </p><p>Clearly we know how to not swear, otherwise we would be, correct? And we're not swearing, right? So stop saying this, guys. </p> </div> <p>Look, I can handle the F word. It's not a matter of that. I know users younger than me can "handle it". I'm saying that it's vulgar language. We should not need to handle it. A sheltered teenager should never have to make a jump from the mbs to a site that allows vulgar language. That's preposterous. And that's what most of the mbs are--homeschoolers who are looking for safe fun. As mentioned before, the mods couldnt possibly allow all PG-13-okay stuff. There can be literal sex scenes and nudity in PG-13's. It's more like "PG-13, but with a lot of common sense." And common sense says that there's no need for an form of the F word to become unblocked. Especially not when the reason is because someone doesn't like the other options. </p><p>Also, I'm saying that because most of the supporters who want these unblocked are people who swear a lot IRL. Obviously anyone can not swear, but we can' trust the F word to a wiki where that isn't their natural mode. </p> </div> <p> >never swears irl </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>Keplers wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Romaniandude12 wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>TheShadowAssassin wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote: <p>May I just say that "wth" is still a thing?? Guys, we're talking about unblocking the F word. The only way that this would be an acceptable use is if it's phrased as such like "wtfrick" or something along those lines. We can't open up "wtf" to this wiki. The people here aren't mature enough to handle it. And if someone here can honestly say with a good conscience that the F word is not vulgar then I give up. Sure it can be argued that it's just an abbreviation and not the actual word, but come on guys. We ALL know what it stands for. That's just an excuse to use the F word on a wiki that's freakin designed for 13 y/o's. Unblocking it makes no sense except for the fact that there are people here don't know how to not swear. </p> </div> <p>"<span style="font-style:italic;font-weight:normal;">on a wiki that's freakin designed for 13 y/o's</span>" </p><p>And you're saying that 13 year olds aren't mature enough to handle the F word? Or even an abbreviation of such? Or even any of the other words that you opposed the unblocking of? PG-13 movies allow the usage of most swear words, especially words like "ass", and one (and in rare cases, 2) usage of the F word. I would propose that if the F word ever did get unblocked that the only condition should be that it can only be used non-excessively.  </p><p><span style="font-weight:normal;">"<i>T</i></span><span style="font-style:italic;font-weight:normal;">here are people here don't know how to not swear.</span>" </p><p>Clearly we know how to not swear, otherwise we would be, correct? And we're not swearing, right? So stop saying this, guys. </p> </div> <p>Look, I can handle the F word. It's not a matter of that. I know users younger than me can "handle it". I'm saying that it's vulgar language. We should not need to handle it. A sheltered teenager should never have to make a jump from the mbs to a site that allows vulgar language. That's preposterous. And that's what most of the mbs are--homeschoolers who are looking for safe fun. As mentioned before, the mods couldnt possibly allow all PG-13-okay stuff. There can be literal sex scenes and nudity in PG-13's. It's more like "PG-13, but with a lot of common sense." And common sense says that there's no need for an form of the F word to become unblocked. Especially not when the reason is because someone doesn't like the other options. </p><p>Also, I'm saying that because most of the supporters who want these unblocked are people who swear a lot IRL. Obviously anyone can not swear, but we can' trust the F word to a wiki where that isn't their natural mode. </p> </div> >never swears irl </div> >keps obviously has dyslexia considered I said "most"</div>

<div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote: <p>Congrats! You realized this is not the MBs. Just now noticed that did ya? You beat the game! Here, have this derp a reward. " </p><noscript></noscript> " </div> <p>Go away. If you have nothing constructive to add to your argument, I suggest that you just quit, because behaving like this is not helping your case at all. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>TheShadowAssassin wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote: <p>Congrats! You realized this is not the MBs. Just now noticed that did ya? You beat the game! Here, have this derp a reward. " </p><noscript></noscript> " </div> <p>Go away. If you have nothing constructive to add to your argument, I suggest that you just quit, because behaving like this is not helping your case at all. </p> </div> <p>Perhaps you need to take note that I mentioned the MBs in only one statement. Also, 96% of the people in this wiki came from the MBs with only certain exceptions so it seems reasonable that where people come from deserves a mention, am I correct? </p>

<div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>TheShadowAssassin wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Romaniandude12 wrote: <p>Congrats! You realized this is not the MBs. Just now noticed that did ya? You beat the game! Here, have this derp a reward. " </p><noscript></noscript> " </div>Go away. If you have nothing constructive to add to your argument, I suggest that you just quit, because behaving like this is not helping your case at all. </div>Perhaps you need to take note that I mentioned the MBs in only one statement. Also, 96% of the people in this wiki came from the MBs with only certain exceptions so it seems reasonable that where people come from deserves a mention, am I correct? </div> <p>Your entire argument is literally based on the MBs. Whether or not you mentioned the MBs in more than one statement is irrelevant. </p><p>Yes, that is correct, but we are <i>not</i> the MBs. Simply because we came from there does not mean that we <i>are</i> the MBs. We are not. </p>