Yeah. Title says it all. Please vote at the tone of the beep.
BEEEEEEEEP!!!
A: Yes 21 Votes
B: No 0 Votes
C: Neutral 0 Votes
Consensus
Yes
5,988
pages
ALL POSTS
0
Marshal6000 wrote:
Romaniandude12 wrote:
I'll go with A as long as it's before, but I have one comment to make. What if the link is full of swears and thats almost all it is? Certain songs would fall under this category. Would common sense say that's overboard? Or would this vote make it so any link whatsoever with swearing is okay with a warning? Just curious what I'm voting for.
I'll go with A as long as it's before, but I have one comment to make. What if the link is full of swears and thats almost all it is? Certain songs would fall under this category. Would common sense say that's overboard? Or would this vote make it so any link whatsoever with swearing is okay with a warning? Just curious what I'm voting for.
I would presume any swearing no matter how much or little since the person who clicks the link is clicking it at their own risk when given the warning.
I would say there should be a limit to the amount of swearing. How it could be implemented is beyond me.
(Edited by Rapmilo)
Keplers wrote:
Pretty sure it's already official.
Pretty sure it's already official.
I also stand by Loney, but I think common sense should be employed -- if I linked an obscenity without realizing a swear was in the video (either because I hadn't seen it all or it had been so long since I last watched that I forgot), I should be able to warn as soon as it becomes apparent.
Why would you link a video if you haven't seen it?
(Edited by Legoanimals750)
Keplers wrote:
Pretty sure it's already official.
Pretty sure it's already official.
I also stand by Loney, but I think common sense should be employed -- if I linked an obscenity without realizing a swear was in the video (either because I hadn't seen it all or it had been so long since I last watched that I forgot), I should be able to warn as soon as it becomes apparent.
As the one posting the link, you're responsible for the content. If you link a random YT video without watching and it's full of language, that's your fault.
(Edited by Michaelyoda)
0
Legoanimals750 wrote:
Keplers wrote:
Pretty sure it's already official.
Pretty sure it's already official.
I also stand by Loney, but I think common sense should be employed -- if I linked an obscenity without realizing a swear was in the video (either because I hadn't seen it all or it had been so long since I last watched that I forgot), I should be able to warn as soon as it becomes apparent.
Why would you link a video if you haven't seen it?
I said hadn't seen the entirety. Imagine it was, say, a CollegeHumor skit that seemed appropriate, but someone goes and says an expletive at the end. I found it funny just halfway through and linked it without actually having seen the end yet.
(Edited by Keplers)
0
Michaelyoda wrote:
Keplers wrote:
Pretty sure it's already official.
Pretty sure it's already official.
I also stand by Loney, but I think common sense should be employed -- if I linked an obscenity without realizing a swear was in the video (either because I hadn't seen it all or it had been so long since I last watched that I forgot), I should be able to warn as soon as it becomes apparent.
As the one posting the link, you're responsible for the content. If you link a random YT video without watching and it's full of language, that's your fault.
See the above. I never said I wasn't responsible.
(Edited by Keplers)
Keplers wrote:
I said hadn't seen the entirety. Imagine it was, say, a CollegeHumor skit that seemed appropriate, but someone goes and says an expletive at the end. I found it funny just halfway through and linked it without actually having seen the end yet.
Legoanimals750 wrote:
Keplers wrote:
Pretty sure it's already official.
Why would you link a video if you haven't seen it?
Pretty sure it's already official.
I also stand by Loney, but I think common sense should be employed -- if I linked an obscenity without realizing a swear was in the video (either because I hadn't seen it all or it had been so long since I last watched that I forgot), I should be able to warn as soon as it becomes apparent.
You said "Because I haven't seen it at all."
(Edited by Legoanimals750)
0
Legoanimals750 wrote:
Keplers wrote:
I said hadn't seen the entirety. Imagine it was, say, a CollegeHumor skit that seemed appropriate, but someone goes and says an expletive at the end. I found it funny just halfway through and linked it without actually having seen the end yet.
Legoanimals750 wrote:
Keplers wrote:
Pretty sure it's already official.
Why would you link a video if you haven't seen it?
Pretty sure it's already official.
I also stand by Loney, but I think common sense should be employed -- if I linked an obscenity without realizing a swear was in the video (either because I hadn't seen it all or it had been so long since I last watched that I forgot), I should be able to warn as soon as it becomes apparent.
You said "Because I haven't seen it at all."
I recommend you read it again. That's quite clearly not what it says.
(Edited by Keplers)
Keplers wrote:
I recommend you read it again. That's quite clearly not what it says.
Legoanimals750 wrote:
Keplers wrote:
I said hadn't seen the entirety. Imagine it was, say, a CollegeHumor skit that seemed appropriate, but someone goes and says an expletive at the end. I found it funny just halfway through and linked it without actually having seen the end yet.
You said "Because I haven't seen it at all."Legoanimals750 wrote:
Keplers wrote:
Pretty sure it's already official.
Why would you link a video if you haven't seen it? Pretty sure it's already official.
I also stand by Loney, but I think common sense should be employed -- if I linked an obscenity without realizing a swear was in the video (either because I hadn't seen it all or it had been so long since I last watched that I forgot), I should be able to warn as soon as it becomes apparent.
Oh, nvm.
(Edited by Legoanimals750)
tyes.
(Edited by Skully Of House Lannister)
(Edited by KnightoftheLight)