</p><noscript>
</noscript>
<p>Consider this as a poll of sorts, 'cause if no-one uses them, why even bother having them? </p><noscript>
</noscript>
5,988
pages
ALL POSTSChat Skins 
<p>So Hyper pointed out to me that the links in MediaWiki:ChatSkins.js (the page responsible for chat skins) are semi-broken; "lmbtest" has to be changed to "legombwikitest". This is why chat skins have been "broken" for months.
</p><p>I know it's a simple fix, but I would still like to know...
</p><p>Will you ever, ever use those chat skins? </p><noscript></noscript>
<p>Consider this as a poll of sorts, 'cause if no-one uses them, why even bother having them? </p><noscript></noscript>
</p><noscript></noscript>
<p>Consider this as a poll of sorts, 'cause if no-one uses them, why even bother having them? </p><noscript></noscript>
(Edited by Alemas2005)
0
<p>Just throwing in my personal vote, I'd use 'em 
</p>
</p>
(Edited by Veralann)
sure why not
(Edited by Son of Elrond)
0
<div class="quote">Son of Elrond wrote:
sure why not</div> <p>So you would use them?</p><noscript></noscript>
sure why not</div> <p>So you would use them?
</p><noscript></noscript>
(Edited by Alemas2005)
<p>nobody has been using them because they can't use them. if they were added in the first place, then people actually wanted them
</p>
(Edited by D8D5D3496EFD8E59A)
If something has been broken for months you generally fix it. :P Admins looking for the lazy way out.
(Edited by Anonymous 67a8f391a32fb7.13434178)
0
<div class="quote">Roddy15 wrote:
If something has been broken for months you generally fix it. :P Admins looking for the lazy way out.</div> <p>WE'RE NOT. </p><p>Look, if you'll actually use it, I can fix it in a second, no problem.</p><noscript></noscript>
<p>I just want to know whether it's actually worth having chat skins in the first place. </p><noscript></noscript>
If something has been broken for months you generally fix it. :P Admins looking for the lazy way out.</div> <p>WE'RE NOT. </p><p>Look, if you'll actually use it, I can fix it in a second, no problem.
</p><noscript></noscript>
<p>I just want to know whether it's actually worth having chat skins in the first place. </p><noscript></noscript>
(Edited by Alemas2005)
0
<div class="quote">
<p>Alemas2005 wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Roddy15 wrote:
If something has been broken for months you generally fix it. :P Admins looking for the lazy way out.</div> <p>WE'RE NOT. </p><p>Look, if you'll actually use it, I can fix it in a second, no problem.</p><noscript></noscript>
<p>I just want to know whether it's actually worth having chat skins in the first place. </p><noscript></noscript>
</div>
<p>(I'm not arguing, just throwing my point of view out here)
I personally think it would be a little different if chat skins were something yet to be coded, and we were debating on whether or not someone should make them. But seeing as they're already made, I see no reason not to utilize them. </p>
If something has been broken for months you generally fix it. :P Admins looking for the lazy way out.</div> <p>WE'RE NOT. </p><p>Look, if you'll actually use it, I can fix it in a second, no problem.
</p><noscript></noscript>
<p>I just want to know whether it's actually worth having chat skins in the first place. </p><noscript></noscript>
</div>
<p>(I'm not arguing, just throwing my point of view out here)
I personally think it would be a little different if chat skins were something yet to be coded, and we were debating on whether or not someone should make them. But seeing as they're already made, I see no reason not to utilize them. </p>
(Edited by Veralann)
<p>I mean, I wouldn't use them, but there's no harm in having them. xD
</p>
(Edited by Impossibubbles)