5,988
pages
ALL POSTSRemoving the 96 Hours Requirement from RfRs
<p>So recently multiple users have complained to me that the 96 hours requirement for Requests for Rights, which prohibits RfRs from being closed until they have been up for four days, is more of a nuisance than an equitable policy. Because the other RfR requirements seem to be effective in making position advancement difficult on their own, and the 96 hours wait seems to serve as nothing besides a redundant roadblock, I suppose it would make sense to remove it.
</p><p>Should we remove the 96 Hours Requirement from Requests for Rights?
</p><p>A: Yes: 9 votes.
</p><p>B: No: 8 votes.
</p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Consensus">Consensus</span></h2>
<p>Yes, remove the 96-hours requirement from RfR.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
<div class="quote">
<p>Riolu777 wrote:
I'm in favor of scrapping this vote and having an entire overhaul of the closure rules. I've had to ask people on chat and get different answers in the past when wanting to find out when to close RfRs.
</p>
</div>
<p>Is that actually allowed? If so, then ditto.
</p>
(Edited by Jerry Seinfeld)
0
<div class="quote">Jerry Seinfeld wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Riolu777 wrote: I'm in favor of scrapping this vote and having an entire overhaul of the closure rules. I've had to ask people on chat and get different answers in the past when wanting to find out when to close RfRs. </p> </div>Is that actually allowed? If so, then ditto. </div> <p>AP could just close this and then we figure out a new system for RfR closures and put forth a vote on it. </p>
<div class="quote"> <p>Riolu777 wrote: I'm in favor of scrapping this vote and having an entire overhaul of the closure rules. I've had to ask people on chat and get different answers in the past when wanting to find out when to close RfRs. </p> </div>Is that actually allowed? If so, then ditto. </div> <p>AP could just close this and then we figure out a new system for RfR closures and put forth a vote on it. </p>
(Edited by Riolu777)
<div class="quote">
<p>Riolu777 wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Jerry Seinfeld wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Riolu777 wrote: I'm in favor of scrapping this vote and having an entire overhaul of the closure rules. I've had to ask people on chat and get different answers in the past when wanting to find out when to close RfRs. </p> </div>Is that actually allowed? If so, then ditto. </div> <p>AP could just close this and then we figure out a new system for RfR closures and put forth a vote on it. </p> </div> <p>Sounds like a good idea, I hope Pythor doesn't mind that we've kinda commandeered his vote.
</p><noscript>
</noscript>
<div class="quote"> <p>Riolu777 wrote: I'm in favor of scrapping this vote and having an entire overhaul of the closure rules. I've had to ask people on chat and get different answers in the past when wanting to find out when to close RfRs. </p> </div>Is that actually allowed? If so, then ditto. </div> <p>AP could just close this and then we figure out a new system for RfR closures and put forth a vote on it. </p> </div> <p>Sounds like a good idea, I hope Pythor doesn't mind that we've kinda commandeered his vote.
</p><noscript></noscript>
(Edited by Jerry Seinfeld)
<p>Mm, I considered A. But in the end, definitely going with B. So, B. </p><noscript>
</noscript> But yeah seems like the policy could use some editing as LCF pointed out.
</p><noscript></noscript> But yeah seems like the policy could use some editing as LCF pointed out.
(Edited by BusyCityGirl)
0
<p>I'm a bit on the neutral side, but I'm going B.
</p>
(Edited by Tadonyx)
<div class="quote">Riolu777 wrote:
<div class="quote">Jerry Seinfeld wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Riolu777 wrote: I'm in favor of scrapping this vote and having an entire overhaul of the closure rules. I've had to ask people on chat and get different answers in the past when wanting to find out when to close RfRs. </p> </div>Is that actually allowed? If so, then ditto.</div>AP could just close this and then we figure out a new system for RfR closures and put forth a vote on it.</div> <p>#ImWithThis </p>
<div class="quote">Jerry Seinfeld wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Riolu777 wrote: I'm in favor of scrapping this vote and having an entire overhaul of the closure rules. I've had to ask people on chat and get different answers in the past when wanting to find out when to close RfRs. </p> </div>Is that actually allowed? If so, then ditto.</div>AP could just close this and then we figure out a new system for RfR closures and put forth a vote on it.</div> <p>#ImWithThis </p>
(Edited by TheShadowAssassin)
0
A
(Edited by Brick425)
(Edited by BraveNewRoyalty)
IDK its 2hard4meh
(Edited by FiretigerIsMLG)
0
<div class="quote">FiretigerIsMLG wrote:
IDK its 2hard4meh</div> <p>just stop </p>
IDK its 2hard4meh</div> <p>just stop </p>
(Edited by Brick425)