Hi I'm just here to announce that some users including: Enoch,Karateduo01,MO, and a few others are working on a new message boards, http://ninjagotestforum.freeforums.net/ (link to our new message boards) we have included some new things and some old things, like Lego universe, and reintroducing the force awakens/sequel era for the Star Wars RPs, and gave Jurassic world RP forums and added stories too! Some things are missing (Elves,Friends,Disney) but we have reasons, we don't know much about friends or elves so if we saw a huge interest for them, we would add them but for Disney we were thinking of adding a Kingdom Hearts RP Sub-forum to it, though we did it as at least 25 people to sign to make that happen, otherwise Disney will be more like its Old/Current Offical LEGO Message Boards So here's the link for our Message Boards http://ninjagotestforum.freeforums.net/ (The name is up to be changed as its about all things Lego related than just ninjago) And the Kindgom Hearts RP for The LEGO Disney Forums https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScBL3QOjwDHfaIM04PZH4HW6l6Pm0xnWvjDCRPxXHpRlQzCpg/viewform (We need at least 25 people to sign to make the Kingdom Hearts RP, due to some staff having doubts about it)
Karateduo1 wrote:
Smasherfan88 wrote: Again, we realize this, but kelps had stated to us his was going to be archiving only, and at the beginning to allow conversation, then close it off, while ours is more based on communication, kelps could have changed his mind without us knowing, but we already set ours up before this information got to us (aka we set this up about 2-3 days ago)
Let's calm down, this conversation coming off pretty aggressive, not something we want for either of our communities. Also if you wanted us to join, definitely telling us how inferior ours is to get us to join is the wrong way of going at it. I ain't one of the developers of the site, but I know em, and I also know that you telling them how, "inferior" their site is will not get them to join you, in fact it will probably do the exact opposite. But I can't say, I'm not them.
Anyways, I can't make a decision of our whole group, but I know they are not wanting to go and join you. I can't say I would join you either, but I can also say I think the, "competition" is not a good way of describing the two. I know that my group is full of hot-heads, I know they will not back down, but I also know you won't either.
In light of that, as a whole we are not interested in discussing who's is, "better" or which one is, "gonna get the people". We both started with the same mindset, let us not get off-track from that. This inter-bickering will not serve any purpose other to cause divide in a divided community. We need not speak on these matters unless one side can bring something constructive and/or new to the table.
Agreed in full. I would like to point out that they claimed that our site was less developed, and I was simply pointing out to them that this is not actually the case.
Karateduo1 wrote:
Smasherfan88 wrote: Again, we realize this, but kelps had stated to us his was going to be archiving only, and at the beginning to allow conversation, then close it off, while ours is more based on communication, kelps could have changed his mind without us knowing, but we already set ours up before this information got to us (aka we set this up about 2-3 days ago)
Let's calm down, this conversation coming off pretty aggressive, not something we want for either of our communities. Also if you wanted us to join, definitely telling us how inferior ours is to get us to join is the wrong way of going at it. I ain't one of the developers of the site, but I know em, and I also know that you telling them how, "inferior" their site is will not get them to join you, in fact it will probably do the exact opposite. But I can't say, I'm not them.
Anyways, I can't make a decision of our whole group, but I know they are not wanting to go and join you. I can't say I would join you either, but I can also say I think the, "competition" is not a good way of describing the two. I know that my group is full of hot-heads, I know they will not back down, but I also know you won't either.
In light of that, as a whole we are not interested in discussing who's is, "better" or which one is, "gonna get the people". We both started with the same mindset, let us not get off-track from that. This inter-bickering will not serve any purpose other to cause divide in a divided community. We need not speak on these matters unless one side can bring something constructive and/or new to the table.
We will keep all opinions on both sides to ourselves. Which is better or more developed is not only trivial a few days in development, but also arbitrary. Lest we forget the real MB's are still around? Does it not feel like arguing about such a trivial matter is like arguing about who gets the inheritance in front of your dying grandmother whom you spent much time with?
All cases considered, we don't need to discuss this any further. I'm glad that we can come to an agreement though and can resolve some things like civilized adults.
Keplers wrote:
Karateduo1 wrote:
Smasherfan88 wrote: Again, we realize this, but kelps had stated to us his was going to be archiving only, and at the beginning to allow conversation, then close it off, while ours is more based on communication, kelps could have changed his mind without us knowing, but we already set ours up before this information got to us (aka we set this up about 2-3 days ago)
Let's calm down, this conversation coming off pretty aggressive, not something we want for either of our communities. Also if you wanted us to join, definitely telling us how inferior ours is to get us to join is the wrong way of going at it. I ain't one of the developers of the site, but I know em, and I also know that you telling them how, "inferior" their site is will not get them to join you, in fact it will probably do the exact opposite. But I can't say, I'm not them.
Anyways, I can't make a decision of our whole group, but I know they are not wanting to go and join you. I can't say I would join you either, but I can also say I think the, "competition" is not a good way of describing the two. I know that my group is full of hot-heads, I know they will not back down, but I also know you won't either.
In light of that, as a whole we are not interested in discussing who's is, "better" or which one is, "gonna get the people". We both started with the same mindset, let us not get off-track from that. This inter-bickering will not serve any purpose other to cause divide in a divided community. We need not speak on these matters unless one side can bring something constructive and/or new to the table.
Agreed in full. I would like to point out that they claimed that our site was less developed, and I was simply pointing out to them that this is not actually the case.
at the time you didn't have any logos or the blue Lego brick background when I wrote that remark
Keplers wrote:
Karateduo1 wrote:
Smasherfan88 wrote: Again, we realize this, but kelps had stated to us his was going to be archiving only, and at the beginning to allow conversation, then close it off, while ours is more based on communication, kelps could have changed his mind without us knowing, but we already set ours up before this information got to us (aka we set this up about 2-3 days ago)
Let's calm down, this conversation coming off pretty aggressive, not something we want for either of our communities. Also if you wanted us to join, definitely telling us how inferior ours is to get us to join is the wrong way of going at it. I ain't one of the developers of the site, but I know em, and I also know that you telling them how, "inferior" their site is will not get them to join you, in fact it will probably do the exact opposite. But I can't say, I'm not them.
Anyways, I can't make a decision of our whole group, but I know they are not wanting to go and join you. I can't say I would join you either, but I can also say I think the, "competition" is not a good way of describing the two. I know that my group is full of hot-heads, I know they will not back down, but I also know you won't either.
In light of that, as a whole we are not interested in discussing who's is, "better" or which one is, "gonna get the people". We both started with the same mindset, let us not get off-track from that. This inter-bickering will not serve any purpose other to cause divide in a divided community. We need not speak on these matters unless one side can bring something constructive and/or new to the table.
I said we end the conversation final
Smasherfan88 wrote:
Keplers wrote:
Karateduo1 wrote:
Smasherfan88 wrote: Again, we realize this, but kelps had stated to us his was going to be archiving only, and at the beginning to allow conversation, then close it off, while ours is more based on communication, kelps could have changed his mind without us knowing, but we already set ours up before this information got to us (aka we set this up about 2-3 days ago)
Let's calm down, this conversation coming off pretty aggressive, not something we want for either of our communities. Also if you wanted us to join, definitely telling us how inferior ours is to get us to join is the wrong way of going at it. I ain't one of the developers of the site, but I know em, and I also know that you telling them how, "inferior" their site is will not get them to join you, in fact it will probably do the exact opposite. But I can't say, I'm not them.
Anyways, I can't make a decision of our whole group, but I know they are not wanting to go and join you. I can't say I would join you either, but I can also say I think the, "competition" is not a good way of describing the two. I know that my group is full of hot-heads, I know they will not back down, but I also know you won't either.
In light of that, as a whole we are not interested in discussing who's is, "better" or which one is, "gonna get the people". We both started with the same mindset, let us not get off-track from that. This inter-bickering will not serve any purpose other to cause divide in a divided community. We need not speak on these matters unless one side can bring something constructive and/or new to the table.
Agreed in full. I would like to point out that they claimed that our site was less developed, and I was simply pointing out to them that this is not actually the case.
at the time you didn't have any logos or the blue Lego brick background when I wrote that remark
I know KD said to end the conversation, but we had everything except the background and logo, including customized ranks, emotes, full forums, etc. You had... just a background and logo. 
</noscript>
Regardless of what my opinions are on which one is better, I think it's important that both boards either combine or are strongly linked together in some way, as they appear to be the two biggest "new MBs" and it's important that the community stays together as much as possible.
On the more developed one however, can you add a Ninjago stories subforum?
Allya373 wrote: On the more developed one however, can you add a Ninjago stories subforum?
Maybe once we have Ninjago stories to put there. Remember, the story subforums were only made once the stories were starting to outnumber main topics. Since we barely have any Ninjago users at all, that may not be necessary yet.
Keplers wrote:
Allya373 wrote: On the more developed one however, can you add a Ninjago stories subforum?
Maybe once we have Ninjago stories to put there. Remember, the story subforums were only made once the stories were starting to outnumber main topics. Since we barely have any Ninjago users at all, that may not be necessary yet.
Too late. Someone already added one. :P
KnightoftheLight wrote:
Keplers wrote:
Allya373 wrote: On the more developed one however, can you add a Ninjago stories subforum?
Maybe once we have Ninjago stories to put there. Remember, the story subforums were only made once the stories were starting to outnumber main topics. Since we barely have any Ninjago users at all, that may not be necessary yet.
Too late. Someone already added one. :P
Yep. Turns out I wasn't told about it. XP