All posts by TwistedAlpha

<p>Ale: good </p><p>Mad: 2gud5me ily mad <3 <3 </p><p>Spy: good </p><p>Ire: good </p>

<p>Well, yeah, it's outdated, so update it. Support </p>

i don't even know what you're talking about

<div class="quote"> <p>LordRascus wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>SkySSundee wrote: </p> <div class="quote">LordRascus wrote:
<div class="quote">SkySSundee wrote:
<div class="quote">LordRascus wrote:
<div class="quote">SkySSundee wrote:
I don't. I might get it on the orange box doe. <span style="background-color: Lime; border:4px outset blue;-moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em; border-radius: 1em;">SkySSundee</span> - <span style="background-color: Lime; border:4px outset blue;-moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em; border-radius: 1em;">Knight Of The Wind...</span></div>You better </div>Why? I'm happy playing minecraft at the minute. xD <p><span style="background-color: Red; border:4px outset Red;-moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em; border-radius: 1em;">SkySSundee</span><span style="background-color: Yellow; border:4px outset yellow;-moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em; border-radius: 1em;">Knight Of The Wind...</span><span style="background-color: Green; border:4px outset green;-moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em; border-radius: 1em;">Live and Learn!</span><span style="background-color: Blue; border:4px outset Blue;-moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em; border-radius: 1em;">His World!</span> </p> </div>I bought minecraft years ago, never played it once. c: </div> <p>Thats just weird. You should play it. </p><noscript></noscript> <p><span style="background-color: Red; border:4px outset Red;-moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em; border-radius: 1em;">SkySSundee</span><span style="background-color: Yellow; border:4px outset yellow;-moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em; border-radius: 1em;">Knight Of The Wind...</span><span style="background-color: Green; border:4px outset green;-moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em; border-radius: 1em;">Live and Learn!</span><span style="background-color: Blue; border:4px outset Blue;-moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em; border-radius: 1em;">His World!</span>  </p> </div> <p>Seems to technical. :P </p> </div> <p>Minecraft is a really simple game. The tricky part is remembering the recipes. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>GuacamoleCCXR wrote: got like 1900 hours on it, even played UGC HL and ETF2L 6s for one season each, but I kinda quit three months ago because my internet was giving me random 1500 pings to a point where multiplayer gaming was not enjoyable anymore :c </p> </div> <p>I have about the same hours with a pretty good internet but the competitive scene in AU is not the best for people just starting off. There are next to no lobbies where I can get <200 ping, so I just pub and play Spy and usually getrekt by unusual-toting Demos. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>LegoSuperBowser wrote: </p> <div class="quote">TwistedAlpha wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>LegoSuperBowser wrote: </p> <div class="quote">TwistedAlpha wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>LegoSuperBowser wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">TwistedAlpha wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>LegoSuperBowser wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">Madkatmaximus wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Loney 97 wrote: </p><p>
</p><p>
</p> <div class="quote"> <p>Madkatmaximus wrote: How about we unblock all the words and dish out punishment for people that abuse them! :D </p> </div>I would say that myself, but then what happens when we have a CM who thinks someone should be kicked for saying Hell and one who doesn't? Same goes for any of the words. We need a list of words that are punishable for in order for things to be fair, and having blocked words is the best way we have to do that.</div>Common sense applies here. Every CM(and user for that matter) should know what is and isn't allowed.</div>How do we know that if all the policy reads: "All bad language is unacceptable", with all the different moral people here, and the not moral ones? Both sides, They're "understanding" is going to be tweaked to a level.</div>What is your concept of immorality? People who use words you don't like?</div>Well, the Christians here will morals towards bad words, and I'm not saying non-Christians don't, but tend to not care towards bad words/words. If you look up the word moral, you'll know that it's human character, what is right, and isn't. So for us Christians, you'll have people who get in the Bible that it's wrong use some words. But for a non-Christian, they're only concept of morality is that of the culture. And as everyone knows, some cultures are different from others. So non-believers won't have and shouldn't have as highest morals as that of a believer, because a believer get's his/her's from the Bible, and the culture, though some have biblical principles, most are getting fewer and fewer. <p>So to answer your question, it's words that the Bible doesn't want us to like, and thus makes it words I don't like. And that should be every Christian's perspective. </p><p>But then again, I could say the same to you, and ask what your concept of immorality is, and whatever your answer, you can use that as a counter weight towards ours/mine, and make it seem so high a stranded, that it's laughable. </p><noscript></noscript> <p>Also, I hope we don't go off-topic anymore then we have to, as I needed to say all that for the question, but that doesn't mean I want to start a debate. If you want to, you can message me. </p><noscript></noscript> </div>Well, if you use the Bible as a moral compass, you should be disgusted with the modern day world. Women in positions of power? Women talking in churches? Rape is illegal? Domestic violence is illegal? Violent public executions are illegal? What a terrible world.</div>So BM, did you just realize that? You're right, it is terrible. </div>Holy crap. <i>HOLY CRAP.</i> Are you okay? Or did you misread my message? You just told me that rape being illegal is terrible, that domestic violence being illegal is terrible, that women in positions of power is terrible. </div> <p>Oops, sorry misread you post. </p><noscript></noscript> You're right about the first two, (to a degree) but in the Bible, it is clear that the people who committed those sins, (rape, unnecessary violence) God should His wrath towards, and judged them. And if you want to strike up a debate, then keep doing what you're doing. But really, if you want to, do it on me message wall. Not here. </div> <p>God himself has, on many occasions, ordered those who serve him to kill and pillage countless cities, commit borderline genocide, and rape. That's not the greatest moral compass. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>LegoSuperBowser wrote: </p> <div class="quote">TwistedAlpha wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>LegoSuperBowser wrote: </p> <div class="quote">TwistedAlpha wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>LegoSuperBowser wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote">Madkatmaximus wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Loney 97 wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote"> <p>Madkatmaximus wrote: How about we unblock all the words and dish out punishment for people that abuse them! :D </p> </div>I would say that myself, but then what happens when we have a CM who thinks someone should be kicked for saying Hell and one who doesn't? Same goes for any of the words. We need a list of words that are punishable for in order for things to be fair, and having blocked words is the best way we have to do that.</div>Common sense applies here. Every CM(and user for that matter) should know what is and isn't allowed.</div>How do we know that if all the policy reads: "All bad language is unacceptable", with all the different moral people here, and the not moral ones? Both sides, They're "understanding" is going to be tweaked to a level.</div>What is your concept of immorality? People who use words you don't like?</div>Well, the Christians here will morals towards bad words, and I'm not saying non-Christians don't, but tend to not care towards bad words/words. If you look up the word moral, you'll know that it's human character, what is right, and isn't. So for us Christians, you'll have people who get in the Bible that it's wrong use some words. But for a non-Christian, they're only concept of morality is that of the culture. And as everyone knows, some cultures are different from others. So non-believers won't have and shouldn't have as highest morals as that of a believer, because a believer get's his/her's from the Bible, and the culture, though some have biblical principles, most are getting fewer and fewer. <p>So to answer your question, it's words that the Bible doesn't want us to like, and thus makes it words I don't like. And that should be every Christian's perspective. </p><p>But then again, I could say the same to you, and ask what your concept of immorality is, and whatever your answer, you can use that as a counter weight towards ours/mine, and make it seem so high a stranded, that it's laughable. </p><noscript></noscript> <p>Also, I hope we don't go off-topic anymore then we have to, as I needed to say all that for the question, but that doesn't mean I want to start a debate. If you want to, you can message me. </p><noscript></noscript> </div>Well, if you use the Bible as a moral compass, you should be disgusted with the modern day world. Women in positions of power? Women talking in churches? Rape is illegal? Domestic violence is illegal? Violent public executions are illegal? What a terrible world. </div> <p>So BM, did you just realize that? </p><noscript></noscript> You're right, it is terrible. </div> <p>Holy crap. <i>HOLY CRAP.</i> Are you okay? Or did you misread my message? You just told me that rape being illegal is terrible, that domestic violence being illegal is terrible, that women in positions of power is terrible. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>LegoSuperBowser wrote: </p> <div class="quote">TwistedAlpha wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>LegoSuperBowser wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Madkatmaximus wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Loney 97 wrote: </p><p>
</p> <div class="quote"> <p>Madkatmaximus wrote: How about we unblock all the words and dish out punishment for people that abuse them! :D </p> </div>I would say that myself, but then what happens when we have a CM who thinks someone should be kicked for saying Hell and one who doesn't? Same goes for any of the words. We need a list of words that are punishable for in order for things to be fair, and having blocked words is the best way we have to do that.</div>Common sense applies here. Every CM(and user for that matter) should know what is and isn't allowed.</div>How do we know that if all the policy reads: "All bad language is unacceptable", with all the different moral people here, and the not moral ones? Both sides, They're "understanding" is going to be tweaked to a level. </div>What is your concept of immorality? People who use words you don't like? </div> <p>Well, the Christians here will morals towards bad words, and I'm not saying non-Christians don't, but tend to not care towards bad words/words. If you look up the word moral, you'll know that it's human character, what is right, and isn't. So for us Christians, you'll have people who get in the Bible that it's wrong use some words. But for a non-Christian, they're only concept of morality is that of the culture. And as everyone knows, some cultures are different from others. So non-believers won't have and shouldn't have as highest morals as that of a believer, because a believer get's his/her's from the Bible, and the culture, though some have biblical principles, most are getting fewer and fewer. </p><p>So to answer your question, it's words that the Bible doesn't want us to like, and thus makes it words I don't like. And that should be every Christian's perspective. </p><p>But then again, I could say the same to you, and ask what your concept of immorality is, and whatever your answer, you can use that as a counter weight towards ours/mine, and make it seem so high a stranded, that it's laughable. </p><noscript></noscript> <p>Also, I hope we don't go off-topic anymore then we have to, as I needed to say all that for the question, but that doesn't mean I want to start a debate. If you want to, you can message me. </p><noscript></noscript> </div> <p>Well, if you use the Bible as a moral compasss, you should be disgusted with the modern day world. Women in positions of power? Women talking in churches? Rape is illegal? Domestic violence is illegal? Violent public executions are illegal? What a terrible world. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>LegoSuperBowser wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Madkatmaximus wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Loney 97 wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Madkatmaximus wrote: How about we unblock all the words and dish out punishment for people that abuse them! :D </p> </div>I would say that myself, but then what happens when we have a CM who thinks someone should be kicked for saying Hell and one who doesn't? Same goes for any of the words. We need a list of words that are punishable for in order for things to be fair, and having blocked words is the best way we have to do that. </div>Common sense applies here. Every CM(and user for that matter) should know what is and isn't allowed. </div> <p>How do we know that if all the policy reads: "All bad language is unacceptable", with all the different moral people here, and the not moral ones? Both sides, They're "understanding" is going to be tweaked to a level. </p> </div> <p>What is your concept of immorality? People who use words you don't like? </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>Loney 97 wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Madkatmaximus wrote: How about we unblock all the words and dish out punishment for people that abuse them! :D </p> </div> <p>I would say that myself, but then what happens when we have a CM who thinks someone should be kicked for saying Hell and one who doesn't? Same goes for any of the words. We need a list of words that are punishable for in order for things to be fair, and having blocked words is the best way we have to do that. </p> </div> <p>Except half the words on there are literally never said here at all, and at least 10% aren't punishable if you have a quarter of a brain </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>Madkatmaximus wrote: How about we unblock all the words and dish out punishment for people that abuse them! :D </p> </div> <p>Can I vote this </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>Madkatmaximus wrote: I still really don't see the need for it to be blocked, if someone's abusing it, kick them. </p> </div> <p>And this is the solution. If someone uses a word in a bad way, kick/ban them as necessary. The wiki could function perfectly fine without any blocked words at all. Blocking more words is only going to limit us, not help. </p><p>I vote no. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>Alemas2005 wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Agent Spy wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>Alemas2005 wrote: Just discovered a wonderful website: Straw Poll. Completely anonymous, and prevents dupes with the same IP from voting. Only allows for 4 options, though. </p><noscript></noscript> </div>It allows for more then 4 options... </div> <p>Oh, um, yeah. </p><p>Perfect for us, then! </p><noscript></noscript> </div> <p>Up to thirty options. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>~Batgirl78~ wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Agent Spy wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>~Batgirl78~ wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Agent Spy wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>~Batgirl78~ wrote: Okay seriously....I'm at my wits end with the same occurring problems on LMBW. For one I haven't really seen much of a positive reaction toward the new recommendations for rights system. Before you could have the ability to recommend if you wanted to. Not have all this popularity voting going on. I feel like most of the voting is unfair because only the users who are well known in the community get positive results VS in the old RFR it didn't have much of that. People picked who they thought PERSONALLY would fit the role of that right. Not because they are the most extremely friendly, modest, or popular user on chat. But because they are liked by that one user alone as a person they trust. </p> </div>We still have the old RfR system, we use both. </div> <p>Really? I haven't seen it being used that much. </p> </div>Barely anyone uses it, but we still have it. </div> <p>The policy just made it sound like we weren't ever going to use that since we have the new RFR. </p> </div> <p>This. The policy seemed to imply that Request for Rights was replacing Recommendation for Rights. </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>~Batgirl78~ wrote: Okay seriously....I'm at my wits end with the same occurring problems on LMBW. For one I haven't really seen much of a positive reaction toward the new recommendations for rights system. Before you could have the ability to recommend if you wanted to. Not have all this popularity voting going on. I feel like most of the voting is unfair because only the users who are well known in the community get positive results VS in the old RFR it didn't have much of that. People picked who they thought PERSONALLY would fit the role of that right. Not because they are the most extremely friendly, modest, or popular user on chat. But because they are liked by that one user alone as a person they trust. </p> </div> <p>^ </p>

<div class="quote"> <p>Alemas2005 wrote: Just discovered a wonderful website: Straw Poll. Completely anonymous, and prevents dupes with the same IP from voting. Only allows for 4 options, though. </p><noscript></noscript> </div> <p>Ale, we had a number of blogs using this very site sometime last year. :P </p>

That seems like a good idea.

Would an admin update the original post to actually have the right vote count?

<p>Undecided. </p><p>MC: <i>"I doubt anyone would be happy to come back after a few months and see themselves demtoed for now reason but being "inactive" and have to go through the whole process again."</i> Then they should post a blog or make some kind of announcement, as clarified: "2. Must not have posted a blog post or thread about being inactive". It doesn't take very long. </p><p>That said, some people can very suddenly lose their access to internet/LMBW and it seems unfair for them to have lost rights while they're gone (ie BCGirl and BCG; LMBW is blocked on their internet). So for now I'm undecided. </p><p>MsD: <i>"What about people who don't do their job </i>correctly<i>?"</i> I agree. What about people who misuse/abuse their rights, or are deemed unfit for use of them by the community/admins? </p>

<p>A) Unblock </p><p>B) Unblock </p><p>C) Yellowx </p><p>D) Yellowx </p><p>E) Unblock </p><p>F) Unblock </p><p>G) Unblock </p>