5,988
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by Randomized
<div class="quote">
<p>ZXSpidermanXZ wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>Randomized wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>Vonness11` wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Randomized wrote:
May I highlight that some of these "fun" accounts have been used for disruption and flooding in the past 24 hours which has resulted in more chaos than fun.</div> <p>those were dupes evading bans, if the wiki threads and stuff have been right.
</p><p>also, banning them isn't going to make trolls quit disrupting chat with dupes, it's just going to prevent others from having a bit of fun. </p> </div> <p>The first 3 that were banned were not evading. They came on first and spammed the nyan cat emoticon, then a few of them went on mains and did the same. </p> </div> <p>Regardless, banning the people who obey the rules from using them is not going to stop the rule-breakers from using them. </p> </div> <p>I'm just saying, 99% of them have been used for disruption and not actually "humour". </p>
May I highlight that some of these "fun" accounts have been used for disruption and flooding in the past 24 hours which has resulted in more chaos than fun.</div> <p>those were dupes evading bans, if the wiki threads and stuff have been right.
</p><p>also, banning them isn't going to make trolls quit disrupting chat with dupes, it's just going to prevent others from having a bit of fun. </p> </div> <p>The first 3 that were banned were not evading. They came on first and spammed the nyan cat emoticon, then a few of them went on mains and did the same. </p> </div> <p>Regardless, banning the people who obey the rules from using them is not going to stop the rule-breakers from using them. </p> </div> <p>I'm just saying, 99% of them have been used for disruption and not actually "humour". </p>
(Edited by Randomized)
<div class="quote">
<p>Vonness11` wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Randomized wrote:
May I highlight that some of these "fun" accounts have been used for disruption and flooding in the past 24 hours which has resulted in more chaos than fun.</div> <p>those were dupes evading bans, if the wiki threads and stuff have been right.
</p><p>also, banning them isn't going to make trolls quit disrupting chat with dupes, it's just going to prevent others from having a bit of fun. </p> </div> <p>The first 3 that were banned were not evading. They came on first and spammed the nyan cat emoticon, then a few of them went on mains and did the same. </p>
May I highlight that some of these "fun" accounts have been used for disruption and flooding in the past 24 hours which has resulted in more chaos than fun.</div> <p>those were dupes evading bans, if the wiki threads and stuff have been right.
</p><p>also, banning them isn't going to make trolls quit disrupting chat with dupes, it's just going to prevent others from having a bit of fun. </p> </div> <p>The first 3 that were banned were not evading. They came on first and spammed the nyan cat emoticon, then a few of them went on mains and did the same. </p>
(Edited by Randomized)
May I highlight that some of these "fun" accounts have been used for disruption and flooding in the past 24 hours which has resulted in more chaos than fun.
(Edited by Randomized)
<p>Completely oppose this. Just demote the inactive CMs, our current ones which are active are perfectly fine.
</p>
(Edited by Randomized)
<p>Couldn't be more happy with Alemas, Spy is fine, and Ire is inactive.
</p><p>I'll post the reasons later but i'm eating bbq atm
</p>
(Edited by Randomized)
<div class="quote">
<p>Keplers wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>Randomized wrote:
Yeah, and funny enough, most of the people that take strong offense to the word "sex" are Christians. You guys should read the Bible. :P
</p>
</div>
<p>There is nothing wrong with the word if used in good context.
</p>
</div>
<p>For once, YES.
</p>
(Edited by Randomized)
<p>Yeah, and funny enough, most of the people that take strong offense to the word "sex" are Christians. You guys should read the Bible. :P
</p>
(Edited by Randomized)
<p>Move damn and hell to yellowx, unblock damm completely (WTH???)
</p>
(Edited by Randomized)
<div class="quote">
<p>Alemas2005 wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">Randomized wrote:
/Stop/ highlighting, Alemas... it's really starting to bug me.</div> <p>Don't you want to be informed about community votes? </p><p>Should we do a vote on that?
</p><noscript>
</noscript> If so, with or without highlighting?
</div>
<p>Why not just make a main thread with links to recent announcements and stuff, and highlight that instead.
</p>
/Stop/ highlighting, Alemas... it's really starting to bug me.</div> <p>Don't you want to be informed about community votes? </p><p>Should we do a vote on that?
</p><noscript></noscript> If so, with or without highlighting?
</div>
<p>Why not just make a main thread with links to recent announcements and stuff, and highlight that instead.
</p>
(Edited by Randomized)
<p>/Stop/ highlighting, Alemas... it's really starting to bug me.
</p>
(Edited by Randomized)