B) I don't see any reason to remove it.
This highly bothers me from the fact that all insults can be hurtful. Just because you block a few of the ones you personally find more hurtful doesn't change the fact that we will never be able to block every insult. It's unreasonable and unrealistic. Yes we all want to get along as a mature community. But with most of it being young teens 13+ up; you honestly can't tell me we won't have problems now and then. If you are offended by a certain statement or remark directed at you let them know how it made you feel or if they give you a hard time about it, tell the CMs/Admins. Or simply just ignore them. Personally I have never used douche in my life. It just looks very awkward in my vocabulary so I have personally never used it. Still it doesn't change the fact that I believe blocking as many insults as we can is quite irrelevant. Yes it will keep people from being offended but....you have to wonder. If it's being used at others why is it happening in the first place? I believe we need to concentrate on what will prevent certain situations like that from happening instead of blocking words. So yes my answer to this is no.
Agent Spy wrote:
~Batgirl78~ wrote:
Agent Spy wrote:
~Batgirl78~ wrote: Okay seriously....I'm at my wits end with the same occurring problems on LMBW. For one I haven't really seen much of a positive reaction toward the new recommendations for rights system. Before you could have the ability to recommend if you wanted to. Not have all this popularity voting going on. I feel like most of the voting is unfair because only the users who are well known in the community get positive results VS in the old RFR it didn't have much of that. People picked who they thought PERSONALLY would fit the role of that right. Not because they are the most extremely friendly, modest, or popular user on chat. But because they are liked by that one user alone as a person they trust.
Really? I haven't seen it being used that much.
The policy just made it sound like we weren't ever going to use that since we have the new RFR.
Agent Spy wrote:
~Batgirl78~ wrote: Okay seriously....I'm at my wits end with the same occurring problems on LMBW. For one I haven't really seen much of a positive reaction toward the new recommendations for rights system. Before you could have the ability to recommend if you wanted to. Not have all this popularity voting going on. I feel like most of the voting is unfair because only the users who are well known in the community get positive results VS in the old RFR it didn't have much of that. People picked who they thought PERSONALLY would fit the role of that right. Not because they are the most extremely friendly, modest, or popular user on chat. But because they are liked by that one user alone as a person they trust.
Really? I haven't seen it being used that much.
Okay seriously....I'm at my wits end with the same occurring problems on LMBW. For one I haven't really seen much of a positive reaction toward the new recommendations for rights system. Before you could have the ability to recommend if you wanted to. Not have all this popularity voting going on. I feel like most of the voting is unfair because only the users who are well known in the community get positive results VS in the old RFR it didn't have much of that. People picked who they thought PERSONALLY would fit the role of that right. Not because they are the most extremely friendly, modest, or popular user on chat. But because they are liked by that one user alone as a person they trust.
I don't personally feel revoting is needed. Like Samed I also would prefer my rights not to be taken away without my consent. =P While I may not edit very much or isn't very strict most of the time. I prefer to have fun while moderating and having good interactions with those in chat. While I know many disagree with my moderating techniques; I'm still ready to be serious if the need arises. I feel like what we need more is to look over the CMs we have and let the admins ask each one of our current active on how they personally feel about their moderating abilities and let them have the option of deciding if they don't wish to continue moderating or not. As for the inactive I would contact the ones who you've talked to the most recently and for the ones you haven't talked with in more than a year, unmod them. That way everyone is getting a fair say.
They are very irrelevant to the wiki but...like anything is related to the LMB anyway. =P So I'll go with no.
I agree; I think it should be disabled.
GuacamoleCCXR wrote:
No, to be honest, the real problem is people being offended by swear words that aren't even said, just implied. Seriously?
I'm not offended in the slightest. But I know there are users who are but don't speak up about it.
Alemas2005 wrote:
Are you going to vote?
Yes Ale xD
I'll go with B) because even though the word itself isn't bad it could have the potential to cause an uproar later on. Plus if anyone has a terrible autocorrect like myself. Then it may also not end up very well either.