Hyperflash Studios is running for admin. Vote for him here.
5,988
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by Slicer Vorzakh
Slicer Vorzakh wrote: BBB sixth try's a charm
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
Alemas2005 wrote:
Loney 97 wrote:
We're just trying to set a middle-ground here.
...maybe just using common sense, anyone...? 
</noscript>
Yeah let's just have all the mods use common sense that'll turn out well
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
Loney 97 wrote: B) Implementation of this would be a nightmare as others have said, and I personally trust our CMs and admin's situation-by-situation digression in this type of thing - this is why we have real people moderating and not just a bot.
i quite literally got banned for saying i like men, i dont trust them at all anymore
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
Romaniandude12 wrote:
Impossibubbles wrote:
</noscript> Don't even know what it means, or how offensive it can be.
</noscript>
It's a male prostitute, or a male paid by an older woman for companionship.
Alemas2005 wrote:
I swear I haven't heard this term IRL, ever.
</noscript> Don't even know what it means, or how offensive it can be.
So for this time, C).
</noscript>
considered derogatory
where? i have never heard it in my entire life, and lots if people here havent either
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
oppose, I trust all the semi-and-above-active admins to rep us well
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
Slicer Vorzakh is running for admin. Vote for him here.
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
yeah I'd be fine with removing common sense from mainspace editing, it just causes issues
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
BusyCityGirl wrote:
Slicer Vorzakh wrote:
BusyCityGirl wrote:
Bleh popularity contests. :|
Bleh popularity contests. :|
(P.s. seriously sooo many votes now that are allowed to pass even though they are against policy... O.o)
K K K K K D K D K
how are they against policy
Well Slice, there have been a number of them now, three maybe? Four? That have directly violated policy. Once again, this vote does the same. "A community vote cannot be used to directly demote rights from a user, however, a petition to the Admins can be made that a user be demoted"
well yes this technically is a petition, but the admins woild be pretty scummy to turn it down especially with this big a majority for most of them.
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
BusyCityGirl wrote:
Bleh popularity contests. :|
Bleh popularity contests. :|
(P.s. seriously sooo many votes now that are allowed to pass even though they are against policy... O.o)
K K K K K D K D K
how are they against policy
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
Assassin Swipe wrote:
Brick425 wrote:
Assassin Swipe wrote:
Look, people are free to make what wikis they want if they don't like LMBW, but there is absolutely NO reason why LMBW should be endorsing such a place that is specifically made to undermine the rules of LMBW. :P
How is it made to undermine it? Nobody is saying that NLMBW was made for the purpose of ripping apart what the LMBW is about. That's not what the wiki is for.
Brick425 wrote:
Assassin Swipe wrote:
Brick, that's just how democracy works. :P Like, this is literally democracy. If the majority of the community doesn't want "ass" unblocked, then it stays blocked.
Where did I say if the majority votes to keep it blocked, it should therefore be unblocked? I'm saying some people didn't like the outcome of the vote, then they absolutely have the right to rebel.Brick425 wrote:
Assassin Swipe wrote:
B) This shouldn't be an issue? Like if people want to swear they can make a vote and if the general community doesn't want them to say whatever word they're saying then move on? Or learn to accept that majority rules?? :P I mean I really don't get why this is even something we're entertaining.
That's how it was going until damn and piss were unblocked, but "ass" stayed blocked for some reason. People were fed up with the community's attitude towards mild swears, and rightfully so.B) This shouldn't be an issue? Like if people want to swear they can make a vote and if the general community doesn't want them to say whatever word they're saying then move on? Or learn to accept that majority rules?? :P I mean I really don't get why this is even something we're entertaining.
What is it for then? :P I mean the idea is that our rules aren't free enough and that democracy holds things back, right? That's literally against the wiki. :P
youre making it sound like were going to use nlmbw to plan a coupe here are something, the actions are going to be seperate, just endorsed
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)
Rapmilo wrote:
Slicer Vorzakh wrote:
BubseyBrick wrote:
HyperFlash Studios wrote:
By saying duh you are assuming your reasoning is obvious, and yet as you haven't stated your reasoning it is not obvious, so would you care to elaborate?
Why would we endorse a wiki against our wiki's values? Seems counter-intuitive.
BubseyBrick wrote: B (duh)
How so? If anything, it would strengthen the values on this wiki.
No it won't strengthen it, nor will it weaken it. The only thing this will do is redirect a portion of the community from here to the other wiki.
Yes, those who would oppose the wiki's current values, and therefore strengthen them.
(Edited by Slicer Vorzakh)