All posts by Kingwja
B. There's an easy way like loney mentioned, but I usually do the tildes anyways.
While I fundamentally disagree with letting an online community have a say in every little tiny thing that happens I'm not sure after some recent events I trust the admins with more autonomy (yes I'm deliberately vague so don't bother asking me to be specific). B until I find something that sways me but right now I'm not convinced.
B
My understanding as well.
TBH, I think this wiki needs democracy.
While it's not going the way we /all/ want it to go, it would still be nice to have some freedom of choice.
If we get rid of our democracy, the LMBWans will have no say in what goes on here. (Aside from simply asking Admins. But seriously, they're not going to do everything we want.)
Also, am I the only one that finds it funny that a bunch of users on a tiny corner of the internet are fighting about the politics of a wiki like it's going to have a serious impact on the world? 
</noscript>
I also want to clarify here:
While I do believe this wiki needs democracy, the number of rediculous CVs has become quite ludicrous.
In my previous post, I was responding to certain ideas that have come forth about giving the admins complete control over everything on the wiki.
For my previous reasons about the number of CVs that we don't need, I am going to vote A on the vote for making CVs only for policy changes.
Say what you will, I am just stating my opinions.
TBH, I think this wiki needs democracy.
While it's not going the way we /all/ want it to go, it would still be nice to have some freedom of choice.
If we get rid of our democracy, the LMBWans will have no say in what goes on here. (Aside from simply asking Admins. But seriously, they're not going to do everything we want.)
Also, am I the only one that finds it funny that a bunch of users on a tiny corner of the internet are fighting about the politics of a wiki like it's going to have a serious impact on the world?
</noscript>
Roddy15 wrote:
Keep all honestly, I don't see any harm in keeping them, it's part of our history and all that. If they come back and cause a ruckus, we can demote them then.
It doesn't matter though what they did previously if they aren't here to perform admin duties they aren't doing their job. It's the exact same argument for the CMs, DMs, etc. You can be the King of Nigeria for all I care but if you aren't turning up to duty you aren't doing your job so why should you keep it?
Voting to keep inactive admins is like keeping that terrible chef who long ago used to be good but for one reason or another is not turning up and their food isn't up to standard. Do you keep them because "Oh but they cooked good years ago!"?
If these admins care about this place then where are they?
"If these admins care about this place then where are they?"
They actually have a life.
</noscript>
AAABAABABB
Assuming the same as Satl because this is much easier.
</noscript>
</noscript>
@MY: Yes, I am the king of jawas
</noscript>
@Robo: Actually, I was temporarily banned from chat once, but only because my browser was glitching and giving off spam in chat. :P
@Hype: Yea, my editing could definitely improve. xD
@Sam: Well thank you, you are too.
</noscript>
@Sanic: Apparently so do a lot of other users. xD
@Maj: Yesh, I am very kingy, thankee. xD
@Purps: SO ARE YOU, TWIN. ;3
@Peud: You think I'm pretty? 
You seem like a cool dude, but I hardly know you, so
</noscript>
I had no idea what this was until I scrolled down a bit.
</noscript>
The glitch thing is still here and it covered up the "Forum > 'What do you think of me? board" thing.
</noscript>