I haven’t been on here in ages, but I just remembered it exists and now I'm having to cringe at everything 15-year-old me wrote lol
Get creative
What do you think would make sense for me???
Figure that out
and make it
please
thanks XD
BraveNewRoyalty wrote: sex
he does speak truth
stasi
i think stasi
and trenchcoats
plus nazis
Loney 97 wrote:
TheShadowAssassin wrote: AAA.
You guys are going to struggle in life if you can't handle these, let alone the actual words that make up these abbreviations. I really don't want to come across as rude, but it is true. I understand that we aren't responsible for exposing the real world to you, but we shouldn't have to cater to you either.
That being said I'm going to vote ABB because seeing people say wtb is awful.
Well, this IS a wiki for 13yos, specifically, as it has often been phrased, a PG-13 wiki. The game rating "T" is the equivelent of "PG-13" (and there have been many debates on THAT on the MBs), and in some T-rated games, they do they "wtf". So...just throwing that out there.
B - "lmao" should be unblocked as well
Bloody hell no
DEATH TO THE ADMINS!!! LONG LIVE DEMOCRACY!!!
No, you cannot - he is CLEARLY meaning to say: "jesus christ why the bloody hell does this wiki exist???"
Thus, it is a "Yes" vote
^^^^^^^^
Mine was serious
B - this is logically incoherent. You commit the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization and Fallacy of Unsupported Deduction in assuming without valid evidence or reliable source that "these users have become hopelessly addicted to this wiki to the point they wish to see it deleted to finally free them from their suffering." Not only is that a mere guess based merely on the sole testimony of the users themselves, which may not accurately reflect the true feelings, due to the expression being made singularly in text, thus lacking the adequate emotional content that would allow for such a deduction in the first place. Furthermore, the possibility of their answers being spoken in jest is not taken into account. Thus, to believe the cause for the behavior of those that voted to delete this Wiki is caused by a singular source is fallicious. Even furthermore, whether or not they are addicted and wish to be spared their pain, it is not for others to determine whether or not they are actually deprived of the source of their addiction, but for them to give permission to others to do. To strip them of the origin of their supposed addiction would place them in withdrawl unwillingly, and deprive them of their rights.
Thus, I firmly oppose this resolution.
Damn...the accuracy of the statement is somewhat unnerving. >_>
Change my vote to A - now "Support" has a majority...>_>
OF COURSE!!! DELETE THIS ABOMINATION OF THE INTERNET!!! SUPPORT!!! SUPPPPPOOOOORRRRRTTTTTT!!!
What the bloody hell am I saying??? XD
Of course I'm against this, unless this is a joke, in which case, read the top line again - that's my vote in that case. XD
B to all.
THIS IS AN UNACCEPTABLE BREACH OF DEMOCRACY!!! YOU'RE TRYING TO TURN US INTO BLOODY COMMUNISTS!!! I WILL NOT STAND FOR THIS!!!
Jk, most of my reasons have already been stated, so...per above. :P