Support all, but wasn't this poll voted against?
I've already voted, count the first comment I did here. I posted that as a means to initiate discussion and explain one part of my vote.
Just gonna say that for the question about edit activity, option "iv" is the only one that actually measures true activity. Anyone (who is already eligible) can easily make an edit and go on chat once to fulfil those requirements, but that does not mean that they are currently active. If a person makes edits for two months in a row, however, it can be easily seen that they are, in fact, consistently active, which is what I think we want in a Buro.
iv; ii
B, C
Yeah, agree.
While I agree with the necessity to ban those circumventing Global blocks or going afoul of COPPA, the jurisdiction for those actions is not ours, but as others have said, Wikia's, unless members violate our own wiki policies. With that said, B and B.
Of course, people who are gblocked tend to have it have happened to them for a reason, and if they exhibit qualities of that reason again, of course they will be banned.
Essentially B, but it should be clear enough that it is firm. At leasts that what I do.
A,B
Yup, agreed