All posts by Jdude420

Impossibubbles wrote:

Jdude420 wrote: Could I have a green star with a weed sign in the middle?

<noscript></noscript>

I'm not certain how you think that something so small-scale could even display that xDD

I'm a dreamer :{P

Could I have a green star with a weed sign in the middle?

B, I still don't understand how this will be enforced in any sort of way that makes sense?

B, per Ale.

B, just unblock everything pretty much, lol.

It's way too much of a pain to enforce any sort of standard, just leave it be. IMO.

LordWeirdo wrote:

Jdude420 wrote:

LordWeirdo wrote:

Jdude420 wrote: BBAA

I mean, obviously the Admins and Buro who are not very active, but once were, they got to their positions for a reason, they know the community and their input from often times years of being here should really count for something.

I think you misunderstand...this vote is to prevent all inactive users from voting on RFRs, and each type of RFR is being voted on separately. Not to prevent inactive users from particular rights groups from voting on RFRs.

I know this. :P Re-read what I wrote, slowly, I was saying why we shouldn't disallow 'inactive' users from voting.

Still sounds like you're approaching this from the way I thought at forst, but I won't argue over this.

I realize you're not targeting a specific rights group, I was simply pointing out one of the specific rights groups that will be effected, amongst others.

I know this. :P Re-read what I wrote, slowly, I was saying why we shouldn't disallow 'inactive' users from voting.

A, A, B, B. Nothing like another way for people on chat to know who is an Admin, lol.

The community changes, as will the rules, it may be a singular trend, or it may jump back and forth, only time will tell. 

BBAA

I mean, obviously the Admins and Buro who are not very active, but once were, they got to their positions for a reason, they know the community and their input from often times years of being here should really count for something.

B)

A)