"We admins are right so either stay with crappy old policy or trust us' does not sound very community centered like everyone wants.
I vote A, but only if i get to see what im throwing out first.
<noscript></noscript>Why the heck would I vote to redo a policy I've never even seen before? that's like saying "the community runs the wiki but doesn't get to see what they're actually voting for"
Anyway, I just came to say to you guys that linking topless female pictures is against the ToU, and could lead to you getting globally banned. Anything that shows nudity is not allowed on Wikia, and is punishable by lego destruction. ref: w:c:homepage:Terms of Use.
Thank you.
<noscript></noscript>I was trying to prove it was merely a illlogical argument but just posted the argument not the illogic about it.
Anyways thank you again.
I know my theory sounds illogical but I need someone other than me to make a statement true against it other than me since I'd fail trying.
<noscript></noscript>Skul you can ask Kira about her retirement on her wall or in chat, but lets keep this thread mostly on topic.
Because we all know, this is a very important thread.
<noscript></noscript>But yeah. Also makes it easier for people who want to read through the posts to get a good explanation to why it should/n't be blocked.
I vote B.
What happens when you turn the letter "B" to the right once?
<noscript></noscript>B.
Perhaps voters can at least take away a good glimpse of how LSB would be as a CM from these past few weeks that he's been one. Not to mention the maturity he's shown in doing the right thing here and openly pointing all this out.
Nothing to be sorry about. it was never my intention to keep these rights, it was just a matter of how long I till I didn't keep them.
Condom.
<noscript></noscript>1. A
2. B
I don't see any postive conversations with that word in it like I do with rape.
Of course. I just thought that another week or two with the rights before they get striped would not be selfish, seeing is how the community would get a glimpse of what I'd be like as a mod. And since I already have the rights it wouldn't be unfair since it's not like I went through something to get them temporary. Although I understand the viewpoint of doing the proper procedure, but I will anyways in a week or two after the "trial". I mean, unless you already took my rights away, I still have them, and can go in chat with them. Heck I've already had a short trial with them. But another week would let more people get a chance to judge me.
Although I do understand that I've only been active recently, and if I have changed it takes time to show it. Although I was never once kicked or banned from chat before I went inactive, I was never the right person to become CM, hence the oppositions in my RfRs. I bet you most of the people here would like to see me on chat for another month before they'd even vote for me on an RfR.
I would like the community's input on this position, but my blog is rather inactive it seems.
Like I said though, I'm open to whatever. one way might be harder or easier, but in the end your gifts/abilities towards handling certain situations on chat will be shown.
Madkatmaximus wrote: and again you only just recently became active again
I don't see how that plays into the fact that people can evaluate me for two weeks to discern whether or not I deserve the rights permanently, as long as I'm caught up with today's standards on here, which I feel I already am.
I don't see why you would justify not accepting that option because of fairness. This whole thing isn't fair, what wikia did was not fair. It's not like this happens all the time. (more like, once) So to justify saying "we shouldn't take option A" because then everyone wanting CM would want option A when those people aren't in this situation is irrational to me.
I don't see how a two week trial would hurt, and as soon as it's over I can put up an RfR. I mean, the trial could have started already since I've become active the previous few days.
But I'm willing to do whatever the community wants to.
And I sense bias here. People are mostly opposing the inactive admins, but Obi (who's officially retired, remember) gets full support. Something's not right.
+ 1. I support them all as well.
GIves me plenty of time to make a ten page Forum mod bio.
<noscript></noscript>Cya man, and stay safe on your trip.
B, D