LEGO Message Boards Wiki
LEGO Message Boards Wiki

All votes on this page are archives of past requests for rights. Please do not modify them in any way. Older archived requests can be found here and here.

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

Tuvok95

Tuvok95 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Tuvok95|Special:Editcount/Tuvok95 edits, Special:Editcount/Tuvok95/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hello, I am Tuvok, with this account I have been here for over two months, I had an old account, but I lost the password. I've always been mature in chat and I have knowledge of the regulations. We could always use more Chat Mods as chat is quite active. I have plenty of time to be a CM as well --Live long and prosper (talk) 13:05, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

Support

  1. Haven't seen anything too bad from him, so I don't see why not (cut down on the dabs though). ~Vera (Message me)
  2. Yes. We need more people like Tuvok in charge. Dumbledore115

Neutral

  1. Don't know you well enough and haven't paid attention to you enough Tongue Smiley-1 Lilac Neko (talk) 16:14, March 7, 2017 (UTC)
  2. I think you could be a pretty good CM in time, and you are on chat quite a lot. But I think you should've waited a little bit to get to know the community better. ~LegoWebby101
  3. Don't know you enough yet so can't really make an informed decision either way so neutral. ~ Roddy
  4. You're the type of person I would trust as a CM, but I'm not sure you've been active/in chat long enough. Maybe you should just wait a little longer. If you ran again in two months (and haven't drastically changed since then), I'd definitely support. By the way, what were your previous accounts? -Sam
  5. You certainly seem like a pretty nice guy, but I don't think Chat Moderator is something you need just yet. Give it a few more weeks/a month and try again and we'll see then. Otherwise, you're a good community member and you understand the rules and where you belong, so I could see you as a future Chat Moderator, just keep it up. ~Mizutsune
  6. You'd be a good chat mod, but I honestly think you should gain some more experience first. ~Bubsey
  7. I really don't care. ~ Marsh

Oppose

  1. I still don't think you have the experience to be a mod. I'm open to changing my mind once I see you in chat more. Brick425 (talk) 17:53, March 7, 2017 (UTC)
  2. I think you're a great person, and would make a great CM, but get to know the community a bit better first. ~maj
  3. You seem like a nice chap, but I really don't think two months of activity is enough for the position; I'd prefer more time to ensure that you have the qualities needed for it. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 20:55, March 7, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Can't help but agree with the above. I believe you could make a really good moderator, but I agree 2 months isnt enough time. --rom
  5. Neither you or chat is active enough for another CM. I don't believe you're required. --Navy Bravey with some Gravey (talk) 23:15, March 7, 2017 (UTC)
  6. I don't think I've ever seen you on chat, so... QuantumHedgehog Message MeContributions
  7. I think you need more experience and time on chat and the wiki before you acquire these rights. Keep at it though. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån

Comments

  • What exactly does "Get to know the community better" mean? It seems rather vague and could be taken several different ways, in my opinion. ~Vera (Message me)
  • Per Vera, I'm not sure I realy get what you guys mean. @Sam I'll post links on my Profile.Live long and prosper (talk) 21:38, March 7, 2017 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

QuantumHedgehog

QuantumHedgehog (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/QuantumHedgehog|Special:Editcount/QuantumHedgehog edits, Special:Editcount/QuantumHedgehog/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hello. My name is QuantumHedgehog (previously known as SkySSundee) and I am running for Chat Moderator.

Recently I've been noticing that Chat has a lack of Moderators late at night/early in the morning, with some nights being completely moderator-less. I know that there are plenty of Moderators, but very little stay up until 2 AM to moderate chat. Basically what I'm saying is that if anything bad happened on chat late at night/early in the morning, there's a good chance no-one will be there to stop it.

This is where I come in. If I was a Chat Moderator, I'd be able to stop anything bad happening at night. I'm only on at night/early in the morning, which means I'd have no problem moderating chat. I'm mature, I know what I'm doing, and I don't think I've ever done anything bad recently so I'd be totally capable of being a CM.

I'd love it if you all supported, but I highly doubt that will happen. So if you choose to oppose, give me constructive criticism and tell me ways that I could improve. And please don't oppose saying "you're a noob you have not been here long enough to be a CM". I've been here (inconsistently) since May 2014, so I know what I'm doing. Tongue Smiley-1

Thank you for your time.

QuantumHedgehog Message MeContributions 00:43, January 29, 2017 (UTC)

Support

  1. Tbh we don't have a defecit of chat mods but I know how incredibly annoying it is to not get a support because "we have enough," not to mention that could change at any time. And while I do stay up later than any other mods that could also change, and quantum fills a time frame that has the highest chances of having no mods on. All in all I'm going to support because having another mod will hurt nothing. ~Vera (Message me)
  2. I think Tad has the qualities that can make a good Mod. -Sam
  3. Per Sam. -Tuvok
  4. Per Sam. ~maj
  5. I think he would be a good moderator, and even though we have a large amount of them, I don't think it would hurt to have another. Kingwja3(My Wall) 19:13, January 30, 2017 (UTC)
  6. Per Sam. -Verrack
  7. Per all ~ EOE
  8. *AHEM* YESYESYESYESYES! hes super mature obviously and hes super famos - FT
  9. Yep, I think I'll go support. Friendly, light-hearted and chill, and never problematic. I haven't seen anything special that makes me particularly think you'd make a great mod, but I haven't seen anything either that would make me oppose. In general I think you'd be good and getting mod certainly wouldn't harm anything. You're right too, we only have a handful of mods who are regularly active for night chat. ...Though we typically don't have problems then anyway. I'd be glad to welcome you to the team. ❀´¯`*•.¸¸✿ βυรץÇίтץĢίгl ✿´¯`*•.¸¸❀
  10. I think he could be a good mod and I'm sure night chat could use more mods. LegoWebby101

Neutral

  1. Uh, I have seen absolutely nothing from him in that context. No clue right now. Marcel77799 (talk) 14:27, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Neutral for now. ~ Roddy
  3. Unsure for the time being. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 15:19, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Undecided.~Ally
  5. Haven't seen you on chat enough to give a fair assessment. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  6. No one needs to be on chat at 2AM, sleep is important 𝕃𝕆ℕ𝔼𝕐 𝕄𝕔𝕃𝕆ℕ𝔼𝔽𝔸ℂ𝔼

Oppose

  1. I don't think you're especially mature nor do I find your judgement to be quite up to par. The Bubble of Impossibility (wallcontribs) 07:19,
  2. I'm with Bubbles ~Bubsey January 29, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

Roddy15

Roddy15 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Roddy15|Special:Editcount/Roddy15 edits, Special:Editcount/Roddy15/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Okay I accidently lost my last "brief paragraph" so this is actually my second take.

Briefly, if you don't know me I'm Roddy15, joined in 2011, popped in every 6-12 months until last summer when I decided to stay. Rest is history.

Why support me now? Well, lots of new users are joining so we need more people. Do I have experience? Yeah, about five years of it. Be it on MLNTeam or other smaller LEGO forums. My moderation style on some of those sites as you can imagine was pretty strict but some were pretty slack so I don't really have a particular style overall. I'll let people post specific questions rather than boring you about my experience, though.

Hope people will consider me and if you have questions or comments put them in the comments (obviously). And yes I broke this rfr. - Roddy

Support

  1. Roddy's a mature, experienced user who would make a great Mod. Support. -Sam
  2. Per Sam. ~Vera (Message me)
  3. You're active and mature so I think you'll be a good CM. LegoWebby101
  4. Per your reasons, basically. Brick425 (talk) 00:27, January 6, 2017 (UTC)
  5. per everyone -slice
  6. I've been watching Roddy, and I've seen him handle situations on chat well. He is also one of the most mature and experienced users around. I think he'd be a great Chat Moderator. QuantumHedgehog Message MeContributions
  7. per above ~Ally
  8. I've seen Roddy demonstrate level-headedness and maturity for a long while now, and with the increased userbase, he's someone trustworthy with the rights. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  9. hell ya, per above ~le skule
  10. Roddy's always come across as one of the more level headed and mature users on the wiki, more so than many of the current CMs frankly, per above. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 16:38, January 7, 2017 (UTC)
  11. A thoroughly nice ol' chap with a fair and reasonable mind. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 22:43, January 7, 2017 (UTC)
  12. Per all of the above. Roddy would make a capable CM, and he's been on chat almost everytime I've checked. ~Mizutsune
  13. i guess per --LEGƠ Мεsş Рr□đuĸtions© (Talk) 21:54, January 13, 2017 (UTC)
  14. Is pretty active, and seems quite responsible. Mel 00:34, January 14, 2017 (UTC)
  15. Agreeing with reasons stated above Marcel77799 (talk) 23:18, January 14, 2017 (UTC)
  16. I've had good experiences with him even elsewhere. - EED (Jan. 16th, 14:15 UTC)
  17. Per all of the above. Kingwja3(My Wall) 20:44, January 17, 2017 (UTC)
  18. level headed, holds mature discussions and is relatively active. Also on during "European hours" which is always a plus. -MC
  19. Per above ~ EOE
  20. I do agree with all of the above comments and believe you to be a suitable candidate for the position of moderator ▐_ 21:52, January 20, 2017 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Er, I saw this out of nowhere. I need some time Romaniandude12 (talk) 00:11, January 6, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ehh, I'm going neutral for now, sort of leaning toward oppose. I have seen things from Roddy in the past that make me a little uneasy about modding him. I've known him to comfortably say some rude things and have a low respect level for rules and other user's ideas. I've had to give warnings for things in chat as well, which I would hope to never have had to do for someone qualified for mod. On the other hand, I have seen some helpful things come from Roddy as well. Especially recently I feel like his character has improved and the other day he even did speak up and helped in a minor chat situation. Also though, I feel like we're rushing things a tad. I think we're pretty well off for number of mods. A couple more maybe wouldn't hurt, but I can think of other users I'd rather mod first, before resorting to my second or third choices like Roddy. Roddy is cool, and been here a while to be familiar with how things work and all, but I'm not sure about mod... So I'm not settled on oppose, but not ready to support. ❀´¯`*•.¸¸✿ βυรץÇίтץĢίгl ✿´¯`*•.¸¸❀
  3. Per rom LCF (talk!) 01:32, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • BCG could we maybe talk specifics at some point? I honestly don't recall these things so to be reminded of them can allow me to clear things up a bit. You can put them wherever suits, through PM when we're both on chat or here if it suits. Would be a bit unfair not to do this no? - Roddy
    • Oh sure, yeah that would probably be a good idea. I can recall some specifics, but it would take some effort to like find links. But yeah, I'd be happy to go over what I mentioned. Glad you'd be open to explaining things or improving where possible. ❀´¯`*•.¸¸✿ βυรץÇίтץĢίгl ✿´¯`*•.¸¸❀
  • Thanks for all the support everyone. Given how many eligible voters seem to refuse or don't care enough to vote it's unlikely now we'll get a conclusion either way but if the place picks up again when the LMBs close I'll run again.
    • The second RFR to go down the drain in a week because of the refusal to vote, I think that's actually a new record LCF (talk!) 21:41, January 13, 2017 (UTC)
  • Okay look everyone, as you can see 19 supports now. Thanks everyone for making this drag on long enough to get to this point but can we wrap this up now? :P
    • #NotMyCM 21:08, January 20, 2017 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

Kiff9Probably

Kiff9Probably (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Kiff9Probably|Special:Editcount/Kiff9Probably edits, Special:Editcount/Kiff9Probably/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Always wanted to and I like power.

But ofc, I do have legitimate reasons for wanting to be a CM. Tongue Smiley-1 I'm one of the older surviving members of the early-mid days of the wiki, and although I have been inactive for a number of months, I still check in very often to see what's going on around here. For the past few months, I have popped up on chat multiple times a month, and for the last year I constantly check the blogs and even edit history of the wiki to see what big changes (and small changes) are going on. My knowledge of the wiki and its workings is a great asset, and I've had both experience being a CM on wikia and on other forums, chat groups, and websites to understand what it takes. I'm the effective ace in your sleeve you want for the janitorial work that is removing spammy dupes, destructive users, and poor discussion ethics. While my personality does often revolve around humor on this wiki and the chat, I'm no-nonsense when it comes to rule-breaking or squabbles of any sort.

For the users who believe me to be a new user, I can assure you I'm not. Check me out on the wiki's history under any of these names: Kiff9, KifferTheGreat, or Doctor Flux

Kiff9Probably (talk) 22:24, January 7, 2017 (UTC)

Support

  1. I've known Kiff for a long time, he's a very mature user and knows how things work around here. LCF (talk!) 22:24, January 7, 2017 (UTC)
  2. what a legend and per lcf Cay (talk) 22:26, January 7, 2017 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. I echo opinions of both those above and below; thus, I will be voting neutral. ~Vera (Message me)
  2. Don't know you enough to vote either way. - Roddy

Oppose

  1. Sorry, you need to be active in the community for a while before you'll gain my vote. - Rus
  2. I concur with Rus. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 22:28, January 7, 2017 (UTC)
  3. You aren't really active but if you stay active and try again in a few months I may change my mind. LegoWebby101
  4. Nope nope nope, has to be more active. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 22:43, January 7, 2017 (UTC)
  5. While I concur with the supporting votes, CMs should be here long enough to know the policy well. If Kiff had been here consistently since, what, 2014, I'd support in a heartbeat. 23:30, January 7, 2017 (UTC) user is currently banned for 1 month
  6. Sorry, but you haven't been active. QuantumHedgehog Message MeContributions
  7. Be active again first and get to know the community. Marcel77799 (talk) 15:01, January 8, 2017 (UTC)
  8. Um, per above The Bubble of Impossibility (wallcontribs) 17:28, January 8, 2017 (UTC)
  9. i can't say much for his character primarily because he's not active enough Romaniandude12 (talk) 19:42, January 8, 2017 (UTC)
  10. That's strange I say that since I'm not really active either but just by looking at your editcount (which are only the RfR edits...) proves you need to be more active right now on this new account. In one or two months I'd probably support if you do another RfR, but now it's probably too early. Yada Dark http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/picsou/fr/images/d/db/Emoticon_Picsou.gif 20?cb=20160826204149 21:14, January 8, 2017 (UTC)
  11. I know Kiff and he's a good guy but unfortunately I haven't seen him on chat enough as of late to warrant the validity of holding CM rights. If he's active here for a few more months, I think I'd consider support. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

TheShadowAssassin

TheShadowAssassin (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/TheShadowAssassin|Special:Editcount/TheShadowAssassin edits, Special:Editcount/TheShadowAssassin/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hey guys, I'm TheShadowAssassin (previously known as Apple123350). I've been on the wiki for a few years now (since late 2012) and have experience in the areas of editing and chat moderating (I was a chat moderator for 3 years before I resigned on January 5th of.. last year, so 2016), as well as in the community.

I'm running for chat moderator because lately I've felt as if the current differences among most chat moderators make it difficult to find a middle ground in many situations. As someone who is neither completely lenient and liberal nor completely strict and conservative, but rather more fair and independent, I believe that I would be a solid way to begin bridging the gap between our current staff of chat moderators. Too often do I see situations where either the chat moderators on chat are too lenient that they let a punishable act go unpunished or they are too strict that the punishment that they deliver was too harsh, and I'm looking to change that.

I'm also running because I would like to make this another positive step in my becoming a better community member and improving my standing on the wiki. A few months ago, my behavior was less than acceptable, and after having realized that, I have tried and will continue to try my best to further improve myself. I believe that this is a good way to. Holding yourself accountable is one of the most necessary things for improvement, and I believe being put in a position of authority and accountability is extremely beneficial.

Also, I have plans for the wiki that I would love to discuss with the other chat moderators and administrators about. One plan involves a program that I would be more than happy to lead where we, the staff, will personally train up-and-coming discussion and content moderators, chat moderators, and administrators. I really believe that this would be a good way to not only encourage more users to get involved in the wiki, but to also increase productivity among the staff and help establish a better relationship between the staff and community. Details are still sketchy, but I do plan on discussing this with other staff members to come to an official conclusion.

Finally, if you choose to oppose, I encourage you to be honest and give me ways in which I should improve. Like I said, I'm trying to change and become a better community member not just for myself, but for all of you as well. I embrace all forms of criticism with open arms and look forward to seeing what you have to say.

I'm sorry for not having a "brief" paragraph, but I think it's better to be thorough than to be lazy. Thanks for reading. ~Mizutsune (Talk)

Support

  1. Yes please. You've gone from having those poor streaks of behavior a while back to being the Apple I've always known and appreciated, and that Apple has been sorely missed as CM. Sometimes I'll see you're on chat and remember that you aren't a CM anymore, even after a year. I'd love to have you back in action to contribute all of your ideas and abilities to the wiki. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  2. Over the past few months I have seen immense behavioral improvement, and even before then I feel Shadow has been a mature user most of the time. A(nother) neutral outlook would be very much needed for the CM team. Not to mention we've recently lost several CMs so having another consistently active one would be appreciated. Full support. ~Vera (Message me)
  3. per above ~Kira
  4. yes apple would be a good mod to balance things out, I miss him as an old mod -slice
  5. Per the above. -Sam
  6. Per all. ~ EOE
  7. Everyone else already stated my reasoning for supporting, so KatJuriHanTalk
  8. Per above. Brick425 (talk) 00:12, January 3, 2017 (UTC)
  9. Per above. QuantumHedgehog Message MeContributions
  10. it's a yeet from me, also per everyone ▐_ 21:28, January 3, 2017 (UTC)
  11. I've mulled this over a bit and I do believe that Apple would be a good chat moderator now that his behavior has improved again, per Rio. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 00:32, January 4, 2017 (UTC)
  12. He was a good moderator in the past, and it looks like he will make a good one again based on his statement, behavior in chat recently, and the supports of others. ~ Obi the LEGO Fan (Talk) (Edit Count) 00:41, January 4, 2017 (UTC)
  13. Totally agreeing with Obi in this case. Marcel77799 (talk) 15:17, January 4, 2017 (UTC)
  14. Agreed with all above. - Roddy
  15. Per ^ ~Ally
  16. Yeah you're good Cay (talk) 18:46, January 5, 2017 (UTC)
  17. Per Rio and Obi. Apple made an excellent mod before and can do so again. I keep forgetting he doesn't already have a star. With an expected influx of users around here too, I think another experienced mod will come in handy. :) ❀´¯`*•.¸¸✿ βυรץÇίтץĢίгl ✿´¯`*•.¸¸❀
  18. Since we have so many new users coming on I think we could use more mods. LegoWebby101
  19. Apple has been an excellent, responsible moderator in the past and will certainly do a wonderful job at it again. - Rus
  20. Yes yes yes, agreed with everyone else. Tongue Smiley-1 Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 21:28, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Honestly I haven't paid enough attention to you to decide right now so I'm going neutral but leaning to support. LegoWebby101 Switched to support
  2. per^ Romaniandude12 (talk) 03:53, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • Ah, yes, regarding your support, Hype, I forgot to mention in my original post that I will be putting forth a stronger effort towards becoming more active. With a job, school, relationship, and other responsibilities, it's a bit of a challenge sometimes, but I'm confident in my ability to maintain a consistent activity. ~Mizutsune
    • Also on the topic of activity, I have heard a couple users express concern with the fact that I have seemingly only been active recently, but that's not actually the case. If we're judging by my contributions, you can see that I have been pretty consistently active since June 2016. Yes, there were many times where I'd go without making a contribution for 3 and sometimes even 4 days, but I would hardly consider that inactivity. Contributions aside, I always check into the wiki at least twice a day to make sure that I'm not missing out on anything. In fact, I don't think a single day has gone by where I didn't check in to the wiki. Anyway, I just wanted to leave this out here since I know that there are a few users who aren't entirely convinced regarding my activity. Again, if you have any concerns or constructive criticisms that you might have about me, please don't hesitate to leave your concerns and/or criticisms in a comment or vote.. that way I won't have to hunt them down in chat logs Tongue Smiley-1 ~Mizutsune
  • Someone who knows what "conservative" and "liberal" actually mean, nice. Too bad I can't vote. 00:57, January 3, 2017 (UTC)
  • "Too often do I see situations where either the chat moderators on chat are too lenient that they let a punishable act go unpunished or they are too strict that the punishment that they deliver was too harsh, and I'm looking to change that." Frankly, I enjoy polar opposites. Gives a little spice to the site. Chase McCain (talk) 12:09, January 3, 2017 (UTC)
  • Hello again, guys. With the recent news of the MBs closing, and as demonstrated already, I think it's safe to assume that we will be having a rather large(r than expected) influx of new users over the course of the next several months. With that being said, I encourage you to vote if you still haven't voted already. I would be more than happy in taking on the task of making the wiki a welcoming place for all new users, as well as assisting staff when and where needed. I think it would be a bit of an understatement to say that perhaps we're a bit shorthanded at the moment, so please consider my request carefully. Thanks for reading. ~Mizutsune


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was unsuccessful

Brick425

Brick425 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Brick425|Special:Editcount/Brick425 edits, Special:Editcount/Brick425/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

There have been several situations in chat in which the mods have done little to nothing when a user deserves to be kicked or even banned. I've always been fair in arguments, giving credit where credit is due, and I believe this will help me if this vote passes. My old ban record is long, I will admit. However, I'm sure all of you can see that I have made a change for the better. I've been here since 2012 and I have much experience with the people here, and seeing what modding is like. Thank you for any constructive criticism. Brick425 (talk) 01:56, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. Good sense of justice, takes critque very well, has been trying to improve behaviour in recent time, all around cool dude -bnr
  2. Seeing Brick handling a situation in chat fairly recently when no Mods were around showed to me that he definitely has the qualities to be a good CM. Has also improved a lot. -Sam
  3. The wiki needs another level-headed oldie who has seen the highs and the lows of the wiki and chat and knows how to handle situations appropriately. I also think brick is at the point in his presence here where he has no reason or desire to exhibit any unfavorable behavior, so I do not foresee any problems arising from his gaining CM status. -Leinad~
  4. I love this man for the reasons above. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.

Neutral

  1. Well, I've thought about it and I don't think I'm ready to support yet. You have definitely improved from when I first met you here, but I think you still have a little ways to go. Next time around I might support, but right now I don't feel like opposing. ~Hype (Message me) 04:15, September 9, 2016 (UTC)
  2. seen him be very levelheaded when other users' (mods) behavior was awful. Also seen him do some stuff that I don't really agree with, can be disruptive. Considering, leaning towards support. -Div
  3. You're a vastly more mature person than you were the past few years, and you've demonstrated that on chat more and more lately. I still wanna see you in different confrontations and situations before I decide. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  4. You're pretty mature. I wanna see what you would do in different situations before I choose. Other than that, leaning towards support. Peudy
  5. Don't know much about you and thus, can't vote "yes" or "no". - T-007Bond aka Rebooted.

Oppose

  1. You're too much of a loose cannon. I don't dislike you, but you can be both disruptive and disrespectful. The Bubble of Impossibility (wallcontribs) 01:58, September 7, 2016 (UTC)
  2. You're a bro, but this RFR was created in a moment of emotion rather than reason. I concur with Bubbles -Harry
  3. I have to admit I've seen him make some questionable comments lately. Nothing too terrible, but I feel he could use some more time to mature more. He also tends to be too harsh in cases when the mods can't really do anything according to the rules besides warning. Also as Bubbles said, he is slightly too reckless. Maybe in a month or two he would be mature enough, but not quite yet. I agree he has helped the mods do their job at times, but I still think he needs some more time. He seems to be a great guy who is willing to help, but sorry. ~~a wild rom
  4. I'm sure you could be a good CM at some point becuase i have seen you call out people who did wrong. But on the other hand you can be fairly disruptive and disrespectful. So, sorry. LegoWebby101
  5. Per Rom ~maj
  6. Per bubbles and other oppose votes - Roddy
  7. I've certainly seen some behavioral improvement from you as of late, but I'm not confident in your ability to mod properly at this point in time, perhaps run in a few months if you have continued to develop maturity-wise. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 18:56, September 7, 2016 (UTC)
  8. per the above -SoE
  9. I have difficulty trusting you in a CM position, as per the above. -/\/\Y (talk)
  10. in accordance with the above guac

Comments

  • Harry (Since IDK /when/ you're on chat :P ), I wasn't really creating this out of my emotions at the time. I was just using it as another example of why I should run, and chose to.
    • Fair enough, I'll believe that. I will think about switching to Neutral but I still agree mostly with what Bubbles stated. I'll sleep on it :P -Harry
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was successful

Romaniandude12 (2)

Romaniandude12 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12|Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12 edits, Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

There has been a major lack of moderators lately with only a handful of active ones being on chat. I think I would make a good CM because I know the rules and pay attention to main enough to be able to notice any problems or inappropriate behavior. I don't easily get angry and keep mature when I need to be. I also have been on here long enough to be able to know the people and signs of a troll or dupe. Thank you for voicing whatever opinions you have on the matter. ~~Romaniandude12 (talk) 01:16, August 31, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. Behaves fairly well on chat, is on often, and is mature... support for me ~maj
  2. Per Maj. ~ Gandy the Derpy Derp
  3. He's matured tremendously, and would do a great job as mod. Also, per Maj. ~Sam
  4. Rom is a great guy, and though he's shown some immaturity at times, I think he should be given the chance and would be perfectly capable of modding. Also he's on when usually only AP and slice are on he could help relieve some pressure then. ~kEd
  5. We need another chat moderator, and having talked to Rome I deem him mature enough to handle the position. ~ Monocle Man
  6. While I wouldn't view Rom as CM material on par with Ireithien and AP, we honestly need everyone we can get. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  7. Per all the above - Det
  8. Mature user, will be a good Chat Mod. Yada Dark http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/picsou/fr/images/d/db/Emoticon_Picsou.gif 11:03, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  9. Per Maj. Kingwja3(Da King's Wall) 16:24, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  10. Can I just say per everyone above? :P Purplebrick333 (talk) 19:38, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  11. Per everyone else above me. ~EtherealSpirit(AKA Varn)
  12. Per Above - Div
  13. We need more CMs, he's a good guy, I say why not? -Johny
  14. Would love to see him as a CM. - Rebooted
  15. Per maj -Aura :)
  16. Per bnr and ked. ~JMW
  17. Per the above -SoE
  18. I gave it some thought and decided to switch. Per the above. LegoWebby101
  19. I support him. He is good person and is on quite a bit, Sao it would be appropriate for him to have rights. Equality for all. It's time we have equal rights for everyone. But in all srsness, I support him. - Your Freindly Neighborhood phisher, Game Wolf
  20. He's a great dude and would be an equally great mod! Active and cool. —Trenz
  21. Per Keps, with more people being inactive (including myself), we do need more active staff. -Rus
  22. Per the above. - Peud
  23. He's active and doesn't cause trouble It's not what you got its what you do with it...... That makes you a hero (talk)
  24. I've been watching rom and I think he's level-headed enough to do a good job, and besides, he's on later, which is a plus The Bubble of Impossibility (wallcontribs) 03:12, September 6, 2016 (UTC)
  25. He's a groovy dude and he'd do a good job I think. ~Jah
  26. I think he's improved plenty since last time and he'll do a good job as CM. ~Hype (Message me) 00:22, September 7, 2016 (UTC)
  27. Moving to support because, like I said, young blood and I trust Izzy's judgement - and I can't really find a reason to not support don't make me regret this now 𝕃𝕆ℕ𝔼𝕐 𝕄𝕔𝕃𝕆ℕ𝔼𝔽𝔸ℂ𝔼

Neutral

  1. I'd have to pay more attention. I don't see you on main much. xD The Bubble of Impossibility (wallcontribs) 01:42, August 31, 2016 (UTC) Switched to support
  2. Are we seriously doing this agian? - Marshal6000
  3. I'd like to add some young blood the the CM team, I'm a bit tired of electing new CMs and then having them leave not long after. I haven't paid much attention to how you tend to react in different situations though, so I'll stay neutral for now 𝕃𝕆ℕ𝔼𝕐 𝕄𝕔𝕃𝕆ℕ𝔼𝔽𝔸ℂ𝔼 Switched to support
  4. Rome and I have known each other for a while but I haven't quite seen him active enough here. Neutral for now. -NXTein1996
  5. I'm still really on the fence here. So I could go either way. LegoWebby101 Switched to support
  6. I'll have to think about this one, but I think you could make a good CM. Just let me mull it over first. ~Hype (Message me) 18:44, August 31, 2016 (UTC) Moving to support
  7. Per Izzy; in your previous RFRs I saw no reason to promote you, in this one I haven't seen enough of you to decide. » Grandpa Weirdo™ » (wall) » 20:03, August 31, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Wouldn't be bad as a mod, but you've barely been on here a year. Also, I don't think he'd be able to handle the position of mod because of the way (Not bad, mind you) he acts in chat. Brick425 (talk) 01:18, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  2. per brick Slicer Vorzakh (talk) 01:37, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Don't you enough to trust you, my experiences with you have been unpleasant, so yeah, oppose. ~Skull
  4. i don't see many CM qualities in you yEt. Sorry . MC
  5. I don't believe that a lack of mods should require us to just give somebody the rights. From what I've seen the last day and a half that I've been active, I have to vote no. [Insert Simon Cowell quote here] -Packachoo
  6. Can't say I've seen you exemplify modlike qualities. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  7. as with most others in this section, i don't think i've seen behaviour from you that would prove you're qualified guac
  8. Never seen him as CM material, don't see him as such today. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 21:42, September 4, 2016 (UTC)
  9. Per the above. NG (talk) 00:46, September 5, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

  • You know that cool bit of editing where you strike a comment with a line through that? Well, I've got no idea in heck how to do that and would appreciate someone striking my oppose and adding me under support. I don't think Roman would destroy chat with these rights. He'd probably even help. - Pack
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was successful

Legoanimals750

Legoanimals750 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Legoanimals750|Special:Editcount/Legoanimals750 edits, Special:Editcount/Legoanimals750/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hi, I’m Legoanimals750. I’m a Patroller and I’ve been on this wiki for well over a year now. I’ve gotten to know most people fairly well and the last few months I’ve been joking about running for CM. But now I finally got around to doing it. I can handle situations calmly and in a mature fashion. I’ve been pretty active on chat lately and I’m normally on in the morning, late afternoons and evenings. Also I’ve notice in the past week or 2 there’s pretty much been only been AFK or no CMs between 7-8 PM EST. I’ll do my best to follow the rules and keep chat a great place for everyone. I hope you’ll accept me and it would be great to serve in this Wiki community as a CM. LegoWebby101 08:43, August 31, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. Webby has shown to be and excellent user here, and is both active and knowledgable towards the rules. He'd make a great CM! -Sam
  2. Mature enough too, will make an excellent chat mod. Yada Dark http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/picsou/fr/images/d/db/Emoticon_Picsou.gif 11:05, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Webby would make a great CM. - Peud
  4. i think Web is one of the users who would excell being a CM...imo a real team player. MC
  5. Per all above. ~maj
  6. Per Maj, because she summed it up so well. :P -Det
  7. I think he'd do well as a CM, and he edits well too. Also per MC and Sam. Kingwja3(Da King's Wall) 16:30, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  8. Per Sam. Purplebrick333 (talk) 19:45, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  9. Per above. ~EtherealSpirit(AKA Varn)
  10. Per Sam. IT'S WEBBY! :P ~JMW
  11. I'm with Sam here. - Rebooted
  12. Per the above. Webby is mature and he'd be a great CM. -Flyinggirl4
  13. Per Sam. -Aura :)
  14. He'd make a far better CM than some of the people running rn, so yes. :P -Skully
  15. Webbe will make the LMBW great again >_> Per above. ~ Gandy the Derpy Derp
  16. per the above -SoE
  17. Webby's been on both the LMB and the LMBW since I can remember. He's smart and chill, and to be honest, I'm surprised he's not a mod already -- he'd be great! —Trenz
  18. per above -div
  19. per all of the above. ~~a wild rom
  20. Webby will be fine. He's pretty levelheaded and calm in chat. He should be a fairly good mod. -NXTein

Neutral

  1. I'm really going to have to think about this one. You're a really friendly guy, Web, but I'm not sure if you're cut out for CM. Sometimes you say some things that make me question your level-headedness, but you could still be a good choice. Again, I'll think about it Tongue Smiley-1 ~Hype (Message me) 18:46, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Haven't seen you in enough situations to pull me either direction; have no objections but no reason to support either. » Grandpa Weirdo™ » (wall) » 20:13, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  3. I originally planned to support, but considering how well Bubbles' RfR is doing I'm not sure you running is necessary anymore. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 23:43, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  4. I really don't care. - Marshal6000
  5. Per Weirdo. -SoE Switched to support
  6. Won't oppose, but I don't think we need any more mods. And I haven't seen a lot of you. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  7. Unsure. May vote on either support or oppose later. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 21:42, September 4, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I think you're very nice, and a great part of this community, but, I don't quite see the maturity needed in you just yet. Perhaps in a few months. The Bubble of Impossibility (wallcontribs) 09:03, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Per Bubbles. Brick425 (talk) 13:20, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  3. The above. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was successful

=

Impossibubbles

Impossibubbles (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Impossibubbles|Special:Editcount/Impossibubbles edits, Special:Editcount/Impossibubbles/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

So, recently there has been a shortage of CMs, either due to people leaving or school. But, it’s gotten to the point where chat is being left completely unattended several times a day, and especially at night. We need CMs, and I feel I could handle the job responsibly, maturely, and fairly. I’ve strived to be a friendly and mature member of the community, and I hope you will give me your consideration. Thank you. c: - The Bubble of Impossibility (wallcontribs) 07:03, August 31, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. Being on an unmodded chat rn, I see the need for more mods. Also, her level of maturity that I have seen is very high, and I believe she could handle conflicts well. ~maj
  2. Bubs since Her return has shown maturity and a calm head , and she's on when we have a lack of mods so yea :p MC
  3. Bubs is a mature editor and overall user, and I think she modt definitely has the character, knowledge and experience to be an etfective CM. -Sam
  4. Per above. LegoWebby101
  5. okay -spy Invalid support reason.
  6. Yes! You always seemed to have enough experience and maturity for Chat Mod (and even admin tbh). Yada Dark http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/picsou/fr/images/d/db/Emoticon_Picsou.gif 11:04, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  7. Sure. - Peud Invalid support reason.
  8. Per maj and Yada. -Det
  9. per above ~kEd
  10. Per MC And she's usually on at a good time for mods to be on. Not to mention she logs chat. Joking Kingwja3(Da King's Wall) 16:26, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  11. I love her maturity, wit, and ability to handle situations without turning them into dramastorms. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  12. This was a tough one, but I decided to support due to your activity and the fact that you are very active still. I think you'll make a pretty good CM. ~Hype (Message me) 18:46, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  13. Per Above, she'll do a fine job (assuming she can mod better than she edits, ofc). Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 18:59, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  14. Per Mc :P Purplebrick333 (talk) 19:41, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  15. Per all the above. -Sir Guurahk
  16. You've always been one of those users I've had to remind myself isn't a CM. Derp Per Keps. » Grandpa Weirdo™ » (wall) » 20:08, August 31, 2016 (UTC)
  17. IDK why she isn't a mod in the first place! - Marshal6000
  18. Bubbles is definitely one of the most levelheaded folks here until she gets...bubbly, I suppose? I jest, I jest. She'll be an excellent CM. -NXTein1996
  19. Has all the qualities required to make a good CM - Roddy
  20. Wow, I predict a landslide victory. Per above. ~EtherealSpirit(AKA Varn)
  21. Per Roddy and NX. ~JMW
  22. she has the skills and she's active. And per all above. It's not what you got its what you do with it...... That makes you a hero (talk) bio
  23. She's the 3rd most responsible person I know, because I have no friends Tongue Smiley-1 Just Kidding, ignore the second part ~Bubs(eyBrick)
  24. Per all of the above. - Rebooted
  25. Per Maj. -Aura :)
  26. She is an excellent member of the community who is responsible and reasonable. Absolutely yes. - Rus
  27. Huge improvement recently. I think she'd be a great asset. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån

Neutral

Oppose

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was unsuccessful

=

Romaniandude12

Romaniandude12 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12|Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12 edits, Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

I have been on the Wiki for over a year and a half. When I first joined, I was nothing short of a spammer and a bit of a troll. I regret those times, and I have matured greatly since then. When I'm online most, there are only one or two CMs. A lot of times one or both of them are afk and it can be hard to ping them if there's an incident. I would like to have moderator rights so that I could be of use in these situations instead of not being able to do anything with the problem. I really would respect the rights. Thank you for your time. Romaniandude12 (talk) 00:24, July 21, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. He's been here for a while, has a good understanding of the rules, and has legitimate reasons to support him (other than the fact that I'm always there [jk]). I think he'd make a fine CM. ~Hype (Message me) 00:28, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Per Hype. Rom could actually do the job well. EtherealSpirit(AKA Varn)
  3. per the others, and I've known him since before the wiki. He's def mature enough to handle something like this. ~Mishie da Fishie =l~
  4. <insert what Hype said> He has my full support. (Not that it MEANS anything to anyone...XD) ~Gandy~
  5. Even if I wasn't sure about his maturity and reasons, he has explained me excellent reasons (which I won't quote here), making him enough mature and probably a great CM. Yada Dark http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/picsou/fr/images/d/db/Emoticon_Picsou.gif 17:00, July 21, 2016 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Seems rather immature and isn't online consistently enough for the position. - Monocle Man
  2. Per AP. NG (talk) 00:34, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
  3. While I see him online consistently, he's not mature and I've seen nothing that actually shows he's capable of modding.—May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  4. Too on-and-off, still has some maturity issues. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 14:40, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
  5. I'm not sure that you'd be a good Chat Mod after reading the oppose reasons and not sure to really know you about your maturity and capacities to moderate a chat. However, this oppose vote can be switched. Yada Dark http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/picsou/fr/images/d/db/Emoticon_Picsou.gif 15:42, July 21, 2016 (UTC) Switching to support
  6. never seen enough in you to give you CM rights tbh... MC1
  7. nununu (per above) ~kEd
  8. Lacks maturity, breaks rules for fun even when he knows it can get him in trouble. -Div
  9. he used a dupe in chat today -Slice
  10. After seeing him make a dupe in chat for fun, I feel he lacks maturity and per above. LegoWebby101

Comments

  • I'd like to point out to some that Rom is on every day for extended periods of time. More so than even some of our other CMs. ~Hype (Message me)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was successful

=

HyperFlash Studios (2)

HyperFlash Studios (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/HyperFlash Studios|Special:Editcount/HyperFlash Studios edits, Special:Editcount/HyperFlash Studios/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Before you say anything about the time between my RfRs, Ava and Alemas gave me permission to put up another Request early because my last RfR was such a close call, and lately there has been problems caused in night chat, all of which could have easily been avoided had I been a Chat Moderator. I feel that I have improved since that last RfR, I've been using Common Sense, and I've tried to be more mature. I'm also incredibly acitve, and I'm on chat when there are no CMs on or they are all away and a troll is causing trouble. I hope that I can help all of you as you have all helped me improve myself. HyperFlash Studios (talk) 18:33, June 18, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. Hyper would make a wonderful mod, as he has shown the past few weeks. He knows how to accept criticism and I am surprised at how much he changed between the time of his last RfR and now. He is on at times when we are in dire need of Chat Mods and Hyper is an exlampary candidate. Avalair Talk Wall
  2. I still have the same opinion as the last RfR: Hyper is a very friendly and active user, and would be a good mod to deal with trolls. Yada Dark 18:52, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
  3. deserved to be promoted last time had it not be for exerting technicalities to favour some.....regardless, I don't feel I need to explain myself, I did so in the previous one and stand by my comments and more importantly Hyper. -mc
  4. He's on all the time, and there's a need of another mod or two.  I don't see anything that causes me to oppose. -/\/\Y (talk)
  5. Given how night chat's ending up, a guy like Hyper, with his attitude, is exactly the sort of antidote to its degradation. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 19:48, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
  6. He'd make a good mod, I think. I haven't much else to say. ~GandalftheWizard
  7. See Ale's. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  8. This is a light support and I was originally considering a neutral vote. I do think that Hyper has what it takes to be a mod. He has his flaws sure (you know, taking rules very literally and not getting a feel for what the users in chat want) but everyone has a few flaws and I believe he will be able to better work through said flaws easier if he were a moderator, and we are actually kind of in need of moderators at the moment, also Hyper is a good guy so Derp :P Swipe -- Swipe chat
  9. With some guidance I'm sure he'll get the hang of it rather quickly. Frankly, Slice and I need consistent backup at night desperately. -AP
  10. Per Ale yes. -SoE
  11. Yes yes yes. I believe he is needed and will do better than having no CM on at all. I feel like he has improved, and at least is willing to improve, so I now support with less hesitance than before. Thus says kƎd
  12. Per above. -BlizardBrick
  13. I've seen enough from hyper to see that he'd be a decent CM. Mature and level-headed, I've never seen him resort to personal attacks even when harassed. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 05:21, June 19, 2016 (UTC)
  14. I'm voting yes as I feel you'll make a good mod, not a great one though. As you've said so yourself, you're trying ot change for the better and be a bit more mature which I really appreciate. ThumbsUp But sometimes I feel that you take serious matters lightly and light matters seriously. (I don't have any hard proof of this so please son't target me for making such a statement, it's what I feel.) Also, when using your "common sense" please try to imagine/think about how the other person might react/feel. Just saying as sometimes you don't know how volatile peeps are. (for Ex: Me.) Anyways, since you're pretty active here, know a lot of us and also since you've fit in here pretty well (which I haven't managed to accomplish yet, sadly...) I think you'll make a pretty good mod. :D Just please try to understand how the other person might react and DON'T jump into potential arguments please. It's better to avoid them for some peace. EtherealSpirit(AKA Varn)
  15. All my interactions with him have been very positive and he seems like a fellow of good character who would make a good chat mod. -EED
  16. Colonel Roy Mustang said it perfectly. HyperFlashStudios has been more than just a patroller on the wiki; he has been a friend and a helper. I completely support him for Chat Moderator, as I believe that he has the common sense to tell when people are spamming VS some others. Hyper always says hello or does a "o/" when someone new joins, even if he isn't chatting at the time. He also always says goodbye and is kind to everyone, which are great CM characteristics. I believe he has the qualities to become a great chat moderator. -JMW
  17. We could use more CMs and I think he'll do fine. LegoWebby101
  18. I think Hyper can learn to be a good mod, especially at night. Give him a chance. -Biofanone
  19. He should've earned this on the last RfR so I'm going to support him because of that. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  20. I support for many of the reasons mentioned above. -NXTein
  21. Support. While he may be considered by some of the really old users as "too new", Hype has a good understanding of the rules, follows them, and is overall a kind, responsible person. He cares about the wiki, contributing to articles daily. While he is pretty serious about the rules, I find this to be a good thing, as myself and several other users have gotton out of hand recently. I'm typically on at the same time every night, and AP is usually the only Mod. He could use some help, and Hype would be a great choice. -Sam
  22. Per Above. Lunaicus (talk) 16:18, June 22, 2016 (UTC)
  23. Per Varnika, You'd be a good CM, but sometimes you're too serious about little things. But overall, this is a support. ThumbsUp Kingwja3(Da King's Wall) 17:10, June 22, 2016 (UTC)
  24. Per Swipe, and because I know that Hyper is diligent and actually wants to be a mod for good reason 𝕃𝕆ℕ𝔼𝕐 𝕄𝕔𝕃𝕆ℕ𝔼𝔽𝔸ℂ𝔼 22:52, June 23, 2016 (UTC)
  25. PER THE ABOVE. Hype's a super helpful guy -- plus he has a solid understanding of the rules and would enforce them wisely, much unlike many of the current mods (who aren't even online that often). -Trenz
  26. Okay, after learning that the problem Hype could have prevented was an actual problem, and talking to him about stuff, I feel like he'd make a good candidate so I'm going to let that 2 week thing slide and vote yes -Johny
  27. Per the above. I think he'd make a good CM. -Flyinggirl4
  28. Although he can be a bit too strict with the rules, we really need another Mod and Hype is the best candidate IMO. - UltraToaFury
  29. Good work, he does. He has potential to become the hypest mod around. -Pacman87
  30. He seems like he might make a decent mod. He certainly has the passion for it. -~π~ (talk) 00:36, June 26, 2016
  31. Deided to change my vote (previous vote was neutral) after being on chat with him present. Hmm, sure, he may be a moderator. -T-007Bond Invalid support reason.
  32. This is now a valid support reason. I have interacted with him many times now, and think he is capable. He is also commonly online, and we need a competent CM. Happy, now, Alemas? -Dr. Satl, M.D.
  33. Per Ethy, if that works-Auroramay
  34. He's very active, and while I'm not on a whole lot to see him, he doesn't seem like the type of person to abuse his powers. Mel

Neutral

Oppose

  1. From my last one: "Nope. Hype is a person that takes the rules very literally and doesn't pay much attention to common sense. He isn't the most mature person and doesn't seem matue enough to handle it. He isn't very tolerant of other views, example being his reaction to my saying I'd oppose him in chat. Slicer Vorzakh"
  2. Sorry man, gotta agree with Slice. -Rus
  3. While I supported last time, his recent behaviour has made me decide against supporting. He overreacts to everything, isn't flexible whatsoever, and shows no use of common sense. He freaks out even when people aren't breaking the rules, which isn't a good quality for a CM. Per the above. -Skul
  4. Immaturity deserves no rewards. You didn't seem up to the task before, and pretty sure that hasn't changed in only a few weeks. The Double Devil (talk) 20:58, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
  5. Per everyone above. He also seems really desperate to have CM which seems odd. Edit: and to everyone who says he's changed a lot since his last vote two weeks isn't enough imo, unsure of why he gets special treatment tbh Derp FrodoLovesBacon Talk HS Derp
  6. He hasn't been here very long, i question his understandings of chat rules, and he lacks common sense. -Kira
  7. agreed with above -benboy
  8. Per Slice and Skul. Besides, you pretty much act like a mod anyways. When we were having a conversation a few nights ago that you were offended by, you told us to go to a different wiki. Also, it's been two weeks since your last vote. You've only changed for the worse. Spoiler alert: You don't have CM yet. Stop acting like it and be more open and tolerating to the usual night chat conversations and I may change my mind. Brick425 (talk) 02:53, June 19, 2016 (UTC)
  9. Hyper can be really damn immature a lot of the time and there's a big lack of using common sense. Wolfasa
  10. I basically have nothing to add from the above comments, I agree with everything that has been said on this issue. I dislike his over senstiveity and don't think the LMBW needs anymore of it since it has too much of it to begin with~nya2468/Wolf nya of House Stark
  11. per the above NG (talk) 00:52, June 26, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

  • I know this sounds stupid, but you know the best way to get rid of a mini-mod? Give them a star. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  • Could you maybe elaborate on that, Skul? HyperFlash Studios (talk) 20:19, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
  • Alemas, if there are multiple admins that are fine with and are a part of the "night chat" I don't think this mean it's degraded so badly. -the guy who no body can take a joke from
  • Uhh... Is Izzy even allowed to vote? She left the wiki and hasnt been on chat since Hyper's last RfR meaning she wouldnt even know if Hyper has changed at all. Avalair Talk Wall
  • "Immaturity deserves no rewards." Said the person who came back just to hold back someone with whom she held a grudge. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
    • Aw sweeties. I'm sorry that my opinion is different than yours. c: But uh oh! Guess who's got two eyes and can read chat logs? This girl! The Double Devil (talk) 21:16, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
      • Yes, because this was definitely solely because you held a different opinion from me. My sincerest and most profuse apologies, madam, for offending your infallible taste. Indeed, thine eyes dost read and the logs thou seest. I humble myself before you, O greatest highness, that never again shall I question your perfect choices. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
      • Too bad you don't seem to have those two eyes and the ability to read when it comes to night chat logs... Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 21:20, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
      • Don't accuse me for me for being biased, when you came to the place you supposedly hate just to oppose someone. If you're "retired" why do you even care who has Chat Mod or not?? And don't say you've been reading chat logs either because if you have you would know that we are in dire need of chat mods during times when Hyper is online. Also, I would feel the same way if you supported because a retired user should have no say in what goes on in chat if they will not be there. Avalair  Talk  Wall
      • Alemas, I think you're my new favorite admin. Your heat is insane. Your fire > all sass. You're the man. Brick425 (talk) 02:57, June 19, 2016 (UTC)
      • Ignoring all the riposte and incivility in this comment chain that is not befitting of Wikia users, Izzy technically still has a right to vote on RFRs if she so chooses. Whether or not she should is a question I personally have no business answering. But for me personally, I'm not voting because of my inactivity;I feel it wouldn't be fair to anyone voting here.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  • I sure hope I don't regret this, Hype. -~π~ (talk) 00:36, June 26, 2016 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

=

HyperFlash Studios

HyperFlash Studios (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/HyperFlash Studios|Special:Editcount/HyperFlash Studios edits, Special:Editcount/HyperFlash Studios/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

   Hey! I'm HyperFlash Studios, and I've been on the wiki for a while now. I've gotten to know a lot of the users here and I think I can help out more as a Chat Moderator. I'm very active in chat, usually on most of the day every day, and I'm also on late at night, which means I can assist with night modding as well. I try to follow the rules as best I can and most of the time try to avoid causing trouble. I hope I can use these tools to better help out this wiki's users.  HyperFlash Studios (talk) 21:20, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. Another night mod would be very helpful, and Hype seems mature enough for the job. -AP
  2. Changing vote. Per AP. -SOE
  3. Support. Hype would be good at keeping the chat rules, and definitely has the maturity for the spot - Bee
  4. Hype is oftentimes one of the few people online, if not the only person. Night mods are, as always, in deficit, and another would be wonderful (watch as he goes inactive a month after promotion). —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  5. Hype would be a great CM. He's kind, respectful, and takes the rules seriously. -Sam
  6. Hype probably deserve it, is mature, and can be present in the good moments to kick/ban the eventual trolls/vandals/spammers who can get on there, though it's quiet with that users on there. Anyway, I support. Yada Dark 18:11, May 25, 2016 (UTC)
  7. Hyper would be a great mod as he is on, as others have stated, during times where our moderator count is at a low. I'd also like to say that its totally okay to oppose someone, but how about we be a little less hostile....? I'm not going to call anyone out, but overexaggerating just to be mean really isnt necessary when opposing. I understand if you feel strongly about a user having rights, but lets try to think about how much courage the user requesting rights had to build up just to post a request, hoping that they have enough friends to win the faulty popularity contest that is the RfR system. And what do you do? Tear every last bit of their courage and hopes to shreds. I mean, isnt it bad enough to see a few more opposes when checking on your RfR? Do you not think about how the person would feel when you say "nobody likes you because of X"? Like I said before, there's nothing wrong with opposing, but can we please try to be a little more empathetic? I'm not just talking about this RfR either, its very common for these types of negative personal attacks to appear in oppose reasons. So just think more about what you say before you say it... Just sayin. Avalair Talk Wall 
  8. I think Hyper can learn to be a good mod, especially at night. Give him a chance. It's not what you got its what you do with it...... That makes you a hero (talk)
  9. Sure. Why not? He's on chat a lot and I personally haven't ever seen Hype do anything wrong, and he said he would try and fix the "issues" some people have. And hey, why wasn't this highlighted? :S -Johny
  10. Defnitely voting for him. Hype's a really good listener and always does his best and helps people out. Having him on your team is having the best on your side. :) Hype's got a weird sense of humour and a unique personality. He totally deserves a chance. ^_^ ~EtherealSpirit(AKA Varn)
  11. This wasn't an easy decision to make at first, but my friend AmazingPythor really, really needs help moderating chat at night. Hype might not be my first choice if I had to choose someone right now, but he has an honest, eager desire to serve. After I made AP swear he would guide Hype and be equally accountable for any incidents Hype might cause in the first few months...yes, I've decided to switch my vote to support. Now don't make me regret it. :)00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  12. He's a friendly, mature guy, who I think can handle the job. - GandalftheWizard
  13. Sure, why not? I think Hype's nice, friendly, and mature. Definitely voting for him. ~Flyinggirl4
  14. Aaaaaand one mod is better than no mod. Although he isn't 'perfect', he'll do the job and and actually do it, I hope. Thus says kƎd
  15. Per the above. -Bliz
  16. Per almost everything above. He also would be a good night mod IMO. ThumbsUp Kingwja3(Da King's Wall) 18:45, May 31, 2016 (UTC)
  17. Hype's a good guy. Very friendly. I think he'd do good. :3 ~Jahchildren
  18. Well, might as well make my vote count. :P I think we need another active CM for those times where the others are sleeping or AFK and he's on and active a lot. LegoWebby101
  19. Will demod if he misuses the rights, but same goes for all of the other mods. Would be helpful - Pack.
  20. Flash is a great and active user who respects both the written and the unspoken rules -- he'd be an excellent mod!! -Trenzy
  21. He is available at a time when no mods (or few mods with questionable activity). He seems to know th ruels well too, think he would do well enough especially with the incresed traffic we get in the coming months - MC
  22. I still have concerns about his mini modding, but night chat desperately needs another CM and Hype can provide that. I have no doubts that he will improve as time goes on. -Derp 
  23. A lot of times when I've been on lately I've noticed that Hype would be the only active CM online.  We could use an active CM. -/\/\Y (talk)
  24. He's almost always on, and I always feel as if he has some air of authority while still being a good friend. He seems perfect! -Auroramay
  25. Because he wouldn't do an awful job and we need more CMs that time of day. (And I wouldn't be able to deal with the post-RFR depression he'd feel if he loses. :P) -Skullywully

Neutral

  1. I'm not 100% sure either way. Shows some potential but also lacks some maturity so...I'll sit on the fence, might sway. -Skully
  2. Indecisive as of now. I think Hype would make a fine CM, but on the other hand we have enough capable CMs. -SOE
  3. Some of what Slice's oppose rings true in my mind, but not all of it. I need some time to consider; I feel that Hype definitely has maturity that even several of the CMs lack, but his tolerance and reactions to things that other users say gives me pause. I don't think I'll oppose, though.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits! Moving to support
  4. Eh... IDK tbh... I should look at you a bit more before supporting, but consider this neutral vote as a support vote, I'm just not sure for the moment, I'll probably switch later. Yada Dark 17:46, May 25, 2016 (UTC) Moving to support.
  5. Great guy for sure, but I really don't know much about his judgement or how he handles difficult situations. He'll definitely be a good choice in time, but I don't think yet. -NXTein
  6. I'm with Skully. I don't think he would be a waste of CM rights, considering he is on a lot when there are few if any active mods on, and there have been some times when a mod was needed and there were no active one(s). However, echoing many others, I believe he does need some work on his.. maturity, I guess is the best way to put it. Though I think he could learn and improve on his attitude/maturity/whatever from being a CM and learning from his mistakes (which should honestly be rare for a CM), he may have better luck working on that before becoming a CM. Thus says kƎd

Oppose

  1. Nope. Hype is a person that takes the rules very literally and doesn't pay much attention to common sense. He isn't the most mature person and doesn't seem matue enough to handle it. He isn't very tolerant of other views, example being his reaction to my saying I'd oppose him in chat. Also ftr, I don't see how a cookie cutter "I can help" paragraph is a whole lot better than no paragraph. Slicer Vorzakh (talk) 21:36, May 24, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Honestly per Slicer, I like him but there's too many problems. -sweet jeff and hella bro
  3. per slicer NG (talk) 00:27, May 25, 2016 (UTC)
  4. First, you been here how long? 5 minutes? Second, you freak out about everything. Following rules is fine and good, not knowing when to cut people slack isn't, and is a sign of immaturity. So in a word, no. The Double Devil (talk) 02:06, May 25, 2016 (UTC)
  5. He seems nice, and he will be a good mod, someday. But right now, he is way to strict with the rules, and I'm someone who prefers the rules to be harshly enforced. Needs to work on using common sense with the rules. -Derp 
  6. I have to oppose for now. While Hyper is very aware of the rules, he can also dip into minimodding. There has to be a balance between legalism and apathy when being an effective CM, always leaning into the common sense policy. I think after being on chat for a more than a few months will he begin to understand the intricacies within, such as being able to constructively process and reply to criticism thrown at him, which every user here has to undergo at one point or another. Go for an RfR in a few more months and I'm sure you'll be fully mature and ready by then. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  7. Definitely not been here long enough to get the community. Aravis (talk)
  8. I was going to go neutral because there are definitely benefits to having you as a mod, but I see my concerns confirmed below in the comments that you are just too defensive and not cool-headed enough to be able to do an effective job of moderating this chat. fancy admin font ҉
  9. Nope. Not mature enough. Too much minimodding and a lack of common sense. - Wolfasa
  10. Quote from Hyper himself in chat (10:56)... "Probably your fingers moving faster than your brain. Happens to me all the time"... Nope, definitely wouldn't want a CM with that characteristic. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 23:02, May 27, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

-When you people say that you're worried about me not using the common sense policy well, what exactly are you talking about? Me trying to stop emote spamming? Trying to prevent arguments? Because those are things that CMs are supposed to do, to be fair. Now if I can do anything here and now to sway your vote, please let me know. HyperFlash Studios (talk) 02:43, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

-After further inspection of my own actions and those of others, I acknowledge that I have been too strict with the rules and not really following the common sense policy. I've been reviewing how CMs handle situations and I will use that information to improve any modding in the future. HyperFlash Studios (talk) 03:25, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

  • In other words, hype, you're a minimod, and nobody likes a minimod The Double Devil (talk) 09:26, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

-just saying, it's not bad to be a little on the strict side for rules =P-Bee

  • It can be, if someone is down to the word on the rule book and doesn't use their sense on modding. Also sign your comments. Slicer Vorzakh (talk) 00:17, May 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • fair point. But we also need some balance -Bee

-Slice is still salty. Also @SOE, there are times of night where Ape is the only CM on and sometimes when he AFKs there's no one modding, so... -Skully

  • ... I was not aware of this. I will take that into consideration, thank you. Awesome face -SOE

Avalair, would you mind moving the part of your support reason dealing with opposing hostility to the comments section? It's rather large for a support vote, and while the message is fine in and of itself, it doesn't reinforce the actual reasons you support Hyperflash Studios. General comments on how people react to votes inappropriately should usually be located in this section of the page, especially considering that some of the opposers may not feel inclined to read support reasons.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!

I think its perfectly fine where it is. Avalair Talk Wall

Star, quit mini-adminning, it's hugely annoying. Tongue Smiley-1 Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 08:28, June 2, 2016 (UTC)

-Alemas, I was referring to making typos. I would most certainly stop and think before making any modding-related decisions. HyperFlash Studios (talk) 23:06, May 27, 2016 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

Starrocks923 (2)

Starrocks923 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Starrocks923|Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits, Special:Editcount/Starrocks923/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

This wasn't something I expected to run for again for a long time, but a lot has changed in the past year. New users have joined and older users have fled, I'm officially an adult, and this Wiki has gone through heck.

I took a few breaks from chat, but in the past couple months I feel like I've been much more active. I also have watched all of the Administrators and Chat Moderators to see how they handle things, and I've kept track of complaints users have of their performance. In the past year I feel that I've learned the various dynamics of chat and even settled differences with people whom I felt I might have had tensions with.

As for my credentials, I'm a Chat Moderator over on LEGO Minifigures Online Wiki, and you're free to ask anyone there what they thought of my Chat Moderating prowess. (The Wiki became mostly inactive and chat is no longer used except on very rare occasions.) I'm also on chat every day, and I'm willing to become even more active to help the community.

I ask that you grant me the chance to moderate LEGO Message Boards Wiki chat not just for the users who support this RFR, but for the users who oppose as well. I look forward to serving all of you, because I love you all.

(Here's a link to my last RFR: http://legomessageboards.wikia.com/wiki/LEGO_Message_Boards_Wiki:Requests_for_Rights/Chat_Moderator/Archive/Page_2#Starrocks923 )

User:Starrocks923/Signature

Support

  1. Star is a longstanding member of our community, very mature, and is very aware of the rules and careful with them. I can't believe he's not a CM already, to be absolutely honest. xD Anyway, full support to Star. -Skully
  2. Most definitely. Per Skul all the way. -Felldo 16:58, February 27, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Yeah, I think Starr is a very mature user and has basically every quality a chat moderator should have. Not only that, but Starr has helped me, as well as others, get to where we are today and has been a very supportive person. Good luck man. Avalair Talk Wall
  4. Starr rocks. Awesome face He's a longtime member of the community, active, and possesses a lot of good qualities that are strangely lacking among most of the current staff. That being said, I believe he will be a good addition to the team. -/\/\Y (talk)
  5. Per everything Skul said. -Wolfasa
  6. Definite support, Starr is one of the most mature users I know and would be an excellent CM. -AP
  7. For once, I've got a good feeling about this. Mature, nice chap, doesn't get in trouble. Would make a good CM, methinks. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 17:21, February 27, 2016 (UTC)
  8. Star is kind, helpful, and would make a good CM. -Sam
  9. Per all the above. -Derpulse 
  10. Per above. LegoWebby101
  11. I just woke up and was gonna neutral cause, though Star is mature I couldn't think of any instances that screamed "chatmod" to me. But I do recall some times when he would try to change subjects and such when things were going badly and I think he'd be a good addition to the CM team. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 17:33, February 27, 2016 (UTC)
  12. Per Skull. Purplebrick333 (talk) 22:58, February 27, 2016 (UTC)
  13. Per Spidey except I'm about to fall asleep. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  14. Yes! You were a great mod on LMOW and very friendly, very mature. Perfect CM for here. Yada Dark 15:08, February 28, 2016 (UTC)
  15. Yep, per Skul. :D -Johny
  16. Yeah, he would be a great CM. Per all of the above BTW =P. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingwja (talkcontribs)
  17. I'd like to see Star get a star. With Coggsworth being my first choice as the next user to add to the mod team, Star is a very close second. I think he's perfect for it. Got all the right qualities and more. He already demonstrates repeatedly everything I'd look for. He keeps an impressively close eye on current rules and community wishes, he's clear yet kind when settling issues, knows when to take action and when to subtly change subjects, he's openly supportive of fellow users and always in favor of what is right. ...and that's all before even being mod! Besides, he's friendly and easy going. I feel it, and I see others complain about how we have so many mods and it's problematic at times because they're a dysfunctional team and just not doing a good job and all. Well, adding Star is a step in the right direction. He's already the good kind of mod we want. The couple comments about him not displaying effort and whatnot make no sense to me at all. You seriously need to pay attention and get to know Star better. More than just about any other non mod user, I see him put a great deal of effort in and he pulls it off too. :P So anyway yep, I support. :) -BCGirl
  18. I support. Star is a very level-headed guy. He hasn't been the most active but who am I to judge that since I'm only on Chat for like 1-2 hours a day? So I cautiously support. -NXTein
  19. Starrocks is a active member, and helpful to users. Star should also have a star because of his name. -Bioniclefan1
  20. Support. Star is an awesome, mature user, I'm surprised he's not already CM -Bee
  21. Support. He's done it before, And he can do it again. Also Per above. ~Tim-O-Thy
  22. I know I am not that active, but I just noticed this. I'd like to express my support, because he is a level-headed gentleman who is also very polite and friendly. Better than a few CMs I could think of offhand, to be honest, but that's just me. -Dr. Satl, M.D.
  23. Per BCGirl Pixel sword ҂Ḡṍḡԍζϵϛ99҂ Pixel sword2 Wall - Blogs
  24. Star is mature and responsible, another user I wonder why the're not already CM. I do think Slice's oppose reason is not unfounded, however, but while I do not criticize those opposing for that reason, it is not sufficient reason for me to not support. (Aand that came out awkwardly, but I'm sick, I'll humor myself. >_>) get off my lawn » then we'll talk 15:18, March 4, 2016 (UTC)
  25. Star is a kind person so I am in support. -Ninjy
  26. Per above. -BlizardBrick
  27. Star has proved to me that he is a very mature user, and I belive he would be a great chat mod. Support. ~HyperFlash Studios
  28. One thing that disappoints me, Star isn't a CM? :O Well, TBPH he deserves is as I know he'll do a pretty good job and I wouldn't have any regrets voting for him. :) It would be nice to see ya with some responsibilities, Star. ;) ~Varn
  29. Per all the above. Mature, responsibile, and has Chat Moderator experience. I also noticed a lot of people saying that we have too many CMs already. And while I do agree, I feel as if Star would do a better job than most CMs. So with the upcoming revote on CMs, why not remove a few and have Star take their place? Seems to work imo. ~TheShadowAssassin
  30. I think Star would be a capable chat moderator - he's mature and good with dealing with people. Support. Loney 97 learn about me talk to me Scarf r1275394791

Neutral

  1. He's mature and level-headed, but he's not really a night-time user, which is the only place we kinda need new mods, so there isn't really a need for him. I mean, he'd probably be good, but per Slice. Lilac Neko (talk) 19:56, February 27, 2016 (UTC)
  2. We just don't really need anymore mods right now and agreed with Kat and Slicer. Leaning towards support more but I'm not quite sure yet. SMOL
  3. I'm not so sure if he/she is going to be a great moderator. If I say yes, my choice doesn't seem right, but if I say no, I feel like that I'm hurting your feelings. So I'm neutral. - T-007Bond a.k.a LEGOrebootedcp
  4. Per Mad. «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat
  5. switched to neutral. The CM situation may be a bit lighter a times, so potential could get in. No other reason to oppose him though. -mc1

Oppose

  1. Nothing personal, but I stick to my believe that we have enough CM's to do the job. If we'd need more, you are the user I'd support, but we simply don't - Plurky
  2. Star is the type of person to try to end apprpriate conversations because he doesn't like them. For that I oppose. -Slice
  3. You're certainly well behaved and mature enough, but I don't really see any actual drive to be a CM, and when you're on chat I just don't really see any chat mod qualities or particular behaviour that indicates being a good CM. Also being honest, I share Slice's concern. I'm not opposed to you being CM some time in the future, but right now I need more convincing that you actually want and would be devoted to the rights. KatJuriHanTalk
  4. Per Slice and Mad. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 19:53, February 27, 2016 (UTC)
  5. in support of Slice's and Mad's points Guac
  6. Slice and Madkat sum it up perfectly. I like talking to you Starr, but as of now I don't really see you as a CM. Perhaps that'll change in the future, but we'll need to be convinced that you really are dedicated to these rights. Also, keep in mind that this isn't some corporate ladder you're climbing, being CM is a job and a responsibility. -~π~ (talk) 21:05, February 27, 2016 (UTC)
  7. Per slice, for sure. The Double Devil (talk) 22:49, February 27, 2016 (UTC)
  8. I have to agree with Mad, and Slice to some extent. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  9. I don't think we need more CMs, and exactly what Slice said. Aravis (talk)
  10. Per the above. Benboy

Comments

  • "I'm not opposed to you being CM some time in the future." I'm just going to take a moment to say how sick I am of that sentence. It has been echoed by numerous people of my RfRs, even after "some time in the future," and I see it cropping up again. Honestly, it really just comes across to me as hurtful, like some throwaway line that effectually means, "I oppose, and I'm going to oppose next time, too, but cheers to next time." I don't know. I just feel my gut twisting in knots to see the words repeated again. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
    • Or maybe it just means "I see potential CM qualities in you, however there are other factors at play which mean I cannot vote for you as of now until other issues are resolved and said CM qualities become more prevalent". KatJuriHanTalk
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

Felldohir

Felldohir (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Felldohir|Special:Editcount/Felldohir edits, Special:Editcount/Felldohir/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Alrighty, there are a four reasons for my request for CM rights. First: I consider myself to be a generally mature and levelheaded person (Tongue Smiley-1), and I wholeheartedly intend to act as befits a CM in matters where one is needed. Second: I have more than enough edits. Derp Third: Most of the time when I'm on chat (usually around the middle of the day EST), there are only 3-5 mods on, and the majority of them are MIA. And Fourth: I'm just a tad curious as to whether or not you folks think I'm mod material. Awesome_face.png -Felldo 05:03, February 15, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. Heck yeah! :'D -Johny Invalid support reason.
  2. You're online a fair amount when users like Jdude are not. You also exhibit qualities I would want in a CM personally. And judging by your LMB activity, I think you're here for the long run.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  3. You're an awesome guy, and I think you'd make a fantastic chat mod! :3. ~Pancakes :D~
  4. Definitely. You are super mature and have a good sense of discernment. My advice is just get a little more active in main. But you have my support! Avalair Talk Wall
  5. Per Ava and Star ~BlizardBrick
  6. Per the above. -KnightoftheLight
  7. I believe you are a very friendly, mature, and calm user, and you don't usually get angry in chat. I think you can be an amazing CM. HyperFlash Studios

Neutral

  1. I literally have no idea who you are The Double Devil (talk) 05:37, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Same. - Coggs
  3. ^^ «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat
  4. I haven't seen you do much to warrant a CM position. Granted, I've not been around much lately, but I've seen you before and either held you in a negative or neutral light. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  5. Seem like a smart and neat guy, not sure about how well you'd CM. -/\/\Y (talk)
  6. As MY said you seem like a good guy but I'm not sure how you'd do as a CM. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 19:49, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  7. Hmm... I don't know. Yada Dark 19:57, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  8. I see nothing that disqualifies you, but not much that qualifies you either.  Not like any of the other users I remotely consider friends are mods either Derp --Grandpa Weirdo (yell at me) 04:06, February 17, 2016 (UTC)
  9. Per above, no reeason to go either way. -Skul
  10. Per above. KatJuriHanTalk
  11. Guac
  12. Per above. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 17:41, February 21, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

RepComCustoms.

RepComCustoms. (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/RepComCustoms.|Special:Editcount/RepComCustoms. edits, Special:Editcount/RepComCustoms./main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Ha okay, everybody. What's up? You all know me, love me (some of you), hate me, etc. Here I am though, applying to become a chat mod because...there's nobody on chat right now, and I have been tasked to keep the peace in the vibrant and ever evolving chat that is LMBW, and because I quality. I have 461 edits all around, including several LMB related edits. I've also been around you weirdos since October of 2012. To chat moderate effectively, I realized I would need one of those shiny stars. Very nice star, and it shows authority, thus making folks more obedient.

Now, I know what you fine people may say to oppose. "Ayy, weren't you gone for like, a really long time?" Yes, observant chat user! I was, but now I am back, much like a surprise STD. You think you got rid of me, but bloop! Here I am! :D Some of you may say that I...bend the rules of the chat, push boundaries, disregard authority, and "stir up strife." I did, but it's something I'm working on. Seriously. Others of you may say that I dont/wouldnt take this seriously, and you'd cite this whole request. While I am a very...light-hearted individual (I love jokes of all kinds from anti-jokes, to 9/11 jokes, to Helen Keller jokes, clean jokes, dirty jokes, puns, and even just cringy jokes), I also hold many IRL responsibilities that I take very seriously, and excel at them. Honestly, I'm pretty friggin' responsible when tasked with something.

I was going to do a third paragraph about why you should support me, but...I honestly cant think of a reason why. I mean, I...nah. Cant think of a reason. That's what you all are for! :D So, please vote, leave comments, oppose, support, and vote neutral (love your neuties! <3)!

Support

Neutral

  1. I honestly don't now you that well. :P Romaniandude12 (talk) 00:21, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  2. I haven't seen enough. You're pretty nice to me and I won't oppose, but this felt like it came out of left field. Sorry.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  3. Haven't seen you enough to judge properly. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 01:31, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  4. I haven't seen much of your stuff on chat, so I don't have a very educated opinion. ~Pancakes :D~ (talk) 02:41, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  5. Per Ava. «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat
  6. Per Star. -Felldo 04:37, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  7. You're a good man, but not a good CM. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  8. Again, not much evidence to push me either direction. --Grandpa Weirdo (yell at me) 04:06, February 17, 2016 (UTC)
  9. IDK, you seem like a nice guy, but I agree with MY's comment in oppose... Writing that isn't really going to help you... :P -KnightoftheLight
  10. let's face it, the vote's over Guac

Oppose

  1. Is this...a joke? xDD No! You're not very polite, imflamitory, and you're certainly not mature enough to be a mod. Try again another time. The Double Devil (talk) 00:12, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Much like my opposition reasons on Wolfasa's RfR, the change is supposed to come before receiving the rights. You are a good user Rep, you do have what it takes to be a good Chat Moderator, just not right now. I'd like to see you showing how mature you are now instead of after you become a CM. Keep working though, maybe in a few months you will be ready. Tongue Smiley-1 Avalair Talk Wall
  3. Per Ava SMOL
  4. Per Ava. You're a good guy but I don't that will equate to being a good CM. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  5. If you say you "love 9/11...dirty jokes" in your RfR, something is wrong. -/\/\Y (talk)
  6. Sorry man. You're a cool guy but you do break policy frequently. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 19:50, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  7. I saw him like, once, so defenitely no. Yada Dark 19:58, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  8. Sorry, per Ava - Rus
  9. Per the above. KatJuriHanTalk
  10. Yeah, I have nothing to say that hasn't been said. I'm afraid not. HyperFlash Studios

Comments

  • I am moderately polite :P
    • You crack me up Awesome face
  • Yes SR, it totally came out of left field on my part. :P Guac made a joke about, "Ayy Rep, keep an eye on everybody since there's no active CM. ha ha ha ha ha." So I said, "Ha! Okay, give me a star, and it shall be so." "I cant give you a star," said Guac. So now, I appeal to those of you who can, the people. :D
  • Your reason for running seems very out of left field as well. Helen Keller jokes are wonderful, but I don't see why comparing yourself to a surprise STD is going to help you become a Chat Moderator on a Wiki that was originally about the LEGO Message Boards. And on that note, why state that you make fun of a blind woman (And 9/11 jokes which you mentioned in the same paragraph) when trying to run for CM? This whole RFR smells fishy, but my neutral vote still stands.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

NXTein1996

NXTein1996 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/NXTein1996|Special:Editcount/NXTein1996 edits, Special:Editcount/NXTein1996/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

I can certainly be active whenever it is required as I am on my computer a lot and have mobile access. I feel like I have a strong enough sense of judgement to act accordingly and rightly in various disputes and issues that arise. Plus I respect all of you as people. I may not be too funny or talkative but I try my best to be genuine and really I think that is a strong quality.

Support

  1. NXT's an alright chap. Mature and level headed. Would make a fine CM. SOEDameron 02:43, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  2. I vote yes! NXT is... pretty much what SOE said =P -Bee
  3. I trust NXT, he'd be a good Mod. -KnightoftheLight
  4. Per Fell, though I will say that I don't see you much. Not that my attention to detail is perfect... Tongue Smiley-1 --Grandpa Weirdo (yell at me) 03:05, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  5. Mature, reasonable, and pretty level-headed, from what I've observed. - Rep
  6. Nxt is a very mature user, and would make a very good mod in my opinion. My advice is just get a little more active in main chat. Tongue Smiley-1 ~Avalair
  7. He acts like a few other CMs whose service to the Wiki has been commendable. His attitude is something that I value in Moderators, and I have not once heard anything that would make me vote otherwise.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  8. Per above. Would make a great CM. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 17:59, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  9. Per above. Yada Dark 18:18, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  10. Smart guy, calm, level-headed, and as Star also said, I haven't heard anything that raises red flags.  -/\/\Y (talk)
  11. EW WHAT GIVING NXT POWER OVER ME WHAT IS THIS MADNESS I OBJECT xD jk nxt is a thoroughly responsible person (mostlyish :DD) and he clearly needs more things to distract him from college. per above stuff. -Tolk

Neutral

  1. ^^ «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat
  2. Same ~Psycho~
  3. Per Izzy. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 03:36, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  4. I have to see more from you on chat, activity and willingness to participate in peacemaking; I don't happen to see much. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  5. ^I don't see anything negative either but still. SMOL
  6. Seen way too little of you to be able to judge properly. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 10:20, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  7. I don't know you too much, so I don't know what you're like, but from the little time talking with you, I'm leaning to supporting you. ~(kingwja)~
  8. pnever saw you command a situation in chat -mc1
  9. Per Rio for the most part - I think you could be one, but I also haven't seen you that active lately. Certainly wouldn't oppose though. KatJuriHanTalk
  10. You seem like a great person, I just don't see you very active in chat. However, I do know that you are busy, so if you were more active, I think you'd make a great mod. HyperFlash Studios

Oppose

  1. I don't see the point in getting more mods. It's nothing against you, it's just that we have enough mods to do the job. - plurky
  2. I don't think you're hungry enough or interested enough to be CM. Haven't seen you be proactive. Pretty much agree with everyone in Neutral, and I considered voting that, but Neutral votes are essentially worthless. Pixel sword ҂Ḡṍḡԍζϵϛ99҂ Pixel sword2 Wall - Blogs
  3. Changing to oppose simply because I haven't seen you on like at all recently. Not enough activity. The Double Devil (talk) 01:00, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  4. insufficient acitivity; other than that, we do not face acurate deficits of staff to justify taking gambles of giving people whose performance I am not positive about rights Guac

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

Coggsworth Motors (2)

Coggsworth Motors (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Coggsworth Motors|Special:Editcount/Coggsworth Motors edits, Special:Editcount/Coggsworth Motors/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

I have been here for years and have had experience getting to know the community. I get along fairly well, and I think people may find me suitable to use these tools and I guess I just kind of agree.

Support

  1. Coggs is a really friendly user, which is, in my opinion, vital for a chat mod. He's also good under pressure, and doesn't get into heated debates. Yes, his activity can be sporadic, but he has also been more active within the past few weeks, so perhaps he will continue being active.

    Legofrodo12

  2. Per Frodo. «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat
  3. I find no fault in the man. One of those users I have to remind myself isn't a mod already. --Grandpa Weirdo (yell at me) 03:05, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Seen Coggs around for quite awhile. Always willing to step in and put everybody where they need to be when a situation arises. - Rep
  5. Coggs has been a mature and experienced user for quite a while now and I think he'd be an effective mod. You have to be more active, though. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  6. Totally a support. Even though I think we have more than enough mods at the moment, I know Coggs has a lot to add and I think we need skills like his. I've been waiting to see a star by that username for years. He's calm under pressure, not afraid to speak up, has a clear sense of right and wrong, yet an open mind, is friendly and sensitive to others, and generally calms an argument instead of dividing it further. A great fit for mod. - BCGirl
  7. Per BCGurl, Coggs is incredibly mature and I'm surprised he isnt a CM yet. ~Avalair
  8. I think he would be a good choice, because (first of all per the above), and second, I have never seen him get into an argument yet. ~(kingwja)~
  9. I haven't seen as much of Coggsworth Motors, but I've seen nothing negative from him at all. He has been kind at the very least to my friends who support him above, and if they think he will make a great Chat Moderator, so do I. And for the record, I don't oppose based on sporadic activity.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  10. I don't think we need to have any more mods for quantity's sake, but I feel this guy would add a lot, and be very useful to have around as a mod. I agree with Frodo and Bcgirl. Pixel sword ҂Ḡṍḡԍζϵϛ99҂ Pixel sword2 Wall - Blogs
  11. Ellie is very good and knows when to do things and such, would not be too strict/quick to act when it is unneeded and issues could be resolved without banning (but would also take required action when necessary) Cay (talk) 07:23, February 15, 2016 (UTC)
  12. He would make a calm, competent Night Chat Mod to complement Gaz. Honestly, this past week I kept forgetting he wasn't a mod as he flawlessly and peacefully reminded us of the rules. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  13. After seeing a bit more of him, I believe he would make a good Mod, he's mature and level-headed. -KnightoftheLight
  14. Per Sam. You are very mature and calm, just not super-active. I would love to see you as a chat mod. HyperFlash Studios

Neutral

  1. Neutral because activity. And yes, I know we can argue "what does it matter?", but we can also argue "what is the point?" x3 The Double Devil (talk) 02:01, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Is a good user, but doesnt really have any mod qualities. -Slice
  3. Basically per Slice. KatJuriHanTalk
  4. Per Izzy ~Psycho~
  5. I don't know him well enough to support or oppose, but from what I can tell he'd be a good CM and I'll change my vote once I see more of him. -KnightoftheLight (moved to support)
  6. Per Slice. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 03:38, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  7. Again, seen way too little of you so far. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 10:20, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  8. He's mature but I'm not sure if he'd be a good CM. Undecided. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 18:00, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  9. Don't really know him. Yada Dark 18:19, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  10. good guy, unsure over Mod potential. -mc1
  11. Seems like a good candidate, and would probably support, I just haven't seen you enough to judge properly. -/\/\Y (talk)
  12. Haven't seen enough to judge properly, but leaning on support. -Skul
  13. Per people above, not sure yet Animal Geek ~ Message Wall
  14. Guac

Oppose

  1. Inactive, and doesn't have a good understanding of what's against the rules and what isn't. Not something I find desirable in a mod. SMOL
  2. Don't see any point in getting more mods: we have enough active ones to do the job. Plurky
  3. Wasnt going to vote but i do agree with the above. Unfortunately, there is some potential in you, but i dont think you are exactly mod material yet. ~KiraNotKirac

Comments

  • First of all, idk if im allowed to vote with a ban that ends in less than a day, even though i might not even vote on these things anymore. And I also feel Coggs would be one of those mods that are like "The word butt is not allowed" and "Dont talk about gayness" or something. Another thing is we have what, 4 new requests for mod now? Why don't we just keep addng mods, right. Hey why don't we just give everyone rights so everyone is equal and nobody can kick each other. And a lot of them are simply "Im active. Im not a bad person." and then the wiki is like "Yes, yes, we agree. You would make nicely." —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Kira26 (talkcontribs)
  • you can vote with a ban -slice
  • Two notes on some of the comments, but first, I am happily surprised of the number of users participating in my RFR, and I respect all of you guys' opinion either way, since they seem to come from a well-informed starting point. Now, for my two comments. If there is at least one opposition, I would have to agree with Von, unfortunately. I definitely need to read up on the rules if I am going to be chat mod. I've sort of been wishy-washy about that. Second comment, and to set the record straight, I haven't ever said "The word butt is not allowed" nor "Don't talk about gayness" :P I would like to see something I actually have said in the past as an example. - Coggs
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

Wolfasa

Wolfasa (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Wolfasa|Special:Editcount/Wolfasa edits, Special:Editcount/Wolfasa/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Yes, I would understand that many of you would want to oppose after the stunt I pulled prior, but please hear me out.

I am saying, from here on out, I will quit doing things such as that. I want to become once again a mature and respected member of the community. Over the years, I have actually been a nice, kind, and helpful user quite often. However, on LMBW, to many that does not seem to fit my desription. I want CM so I can once again be the user that I once was, a person people looked up to and many were good friends with.

From here on out I promise I will stop any "dirty" behavior I may have once condoned, and become the person I once was. I think chat at the moment lacks a good number of helpful, active CMs and Admins. I hope I can affect that by being active and being a good part of the community. I have a lot of experience with most all of you, and I believe I can do that.

If my maturity comes into question, I fully admit that you are right in that regard. And for that, I promise that if you give me a second chance at being a nice user, I will not take it lightly, and if anyone takes offense to my actions, I shall resign.

All I ask is that you give me a second chance, that I can prove to you that I can actually be a mature and kind person. You can adress any concerns you may have to me, and I will do my best to either apologize for whatever I may have done, or tell you how I shall improve.

Thanks, - Wolfy Wolfasa (talk) 02:34, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. I think Wolfy could handle the job fairly well, as an owner in one of the G+ MB communities, I've seen Wolfy be a great Mod. -KnightoftheLight
  2. Wolfasa has made several contributions to the LMB G+ community, as well as doing a great job modding and being helpful in general. This led me to promote him to one of the owners, and I belive he could do a great job as chat mod here if you let him. -HyperFlash Studios Not enough edits.

Neutral

  1. Neutral untill he proves he can be mature most of the time. LSB 02:47, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Frankly, I haven't seen anything that allows my cynical self to trust you as a CM, but I have also not seen anything which would cause me to object should you be approved. --Grandpa Weirdo (yell at me) 03:05, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  3. I'd like to take time to get to know Wolf, and stalk him, before I swing one way or the other - Rep
  4. no opinion either way -mc1
  5. I'm not really in any position to vote yes or no, I don't know Wolf well enough. :P -Johny
  6. I have no opinion on this. Yada Dark 18:17, February 9, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. not typing this out a fourth time -slice Invalid support reason.
  2. I stand by my remarks about your imflamitory nature. Try again in a few months and perhaps that will change. The Double Devil (talk) 02:43, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Far too argumentative and provocative to be a CM, at least right now, not to mention the fact you've said yourself that you're here to troll at least some of the time. If you're really improving your behaviour, then I'd like to see that over time rather than just having you prove it after the fact. KatJuriHanTalk
  4. Per the above ~Psycho~
  5. Per above SOEDameron 02:45, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  6. Per Above. «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat
  7. Per above, I've seen him get into too many heated arguments.Legofrodo12 03:20, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  8. Per above. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 03:40, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  9. Per Kat. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  10. Without knowing the context that the above users do, and without attempting to baselessly agree with them (as I don't know myself), I oppose. Asking for forgiveness is fine, but unfortunately to win mostly anyone over, you'll need to prove that you deserve said forgiveness, and the way that you typed your comment out above makes me feel you haven't proven it yet -- or if you have, you haven't given it enough time first to let everyone calm down. I'd go for neutral but being an opposer should show I'm a bit more serious about it. -MichiRecRoom (talk) 04:22, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  11. Per Kat, if you want to gain support you need to show that you're gonna change. SMOL
  12. The trick here is to first change, then go for a CM RfR, not the other way round. Agreed with the others. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 10:20, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  13. No. Prove you can change first then try again. LegoWebby101
  14. In order for me to support, I'm going to need proof that you are willingly to change. It's kind of hard for me to forget all those times you've come on chat for nothing more than to troll the chat mods, but I'm willing to look for change in you. You'll just have to find a way to change without having CM rights. ~Avalair
  15. Hey Wolfy. I forgive you, and I'm sure everyone else has too, but our opposes aren't based on grudges. When my trust is broken, it's difficult for me to rebuild it. Giving you Rights that could be used to kick or ban is something I'm just not ready to do, and while I hold no ill will towards you, I may never be ready for it.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  16. I do really like you Wolfy, but I think you have a long way to go before you can be a mod. Mods should be users who never break rules and users who aren't biased against other users. I wish I could support you but I can't. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 17:58, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  17. We don't need anymore mods, we've got enough. The fact that you WANT to be one doesn't mean there is any use in making you one.- Plurky
  18. Maturity comes before the promotion, not after. -/\/\Y (talk)
  19. Per the above. -AP
  20. I see potential in Wolfy, but we need to see him behave consistently mature, particularly in topics about politics and religion. I was thinking of going neutral, but for me that's just a non-vote. - Coggs
  21. I almost feel bad adding insult to injury, but yeah, dude. You need to be a bit more mature, maybe less inflammatory? I'm gradually learning that it's also good to be politically quiet, which is something Pythy does way better than you. Take notes. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.

Comments

  • Dear wolf. Please stop with the cancer The Double Devil (talk) 02:36, February 9, 2016 (UTC)
  • Okay yea I hear yall. I'll use this RFR as a template for how I should improve, and hopefully in a few months time I'll have convinced you that I'm sincere. -Wolfy (Im done with this editing crap, as you guys on the chat know all too well at this point)
  • A few months? Just for the record, most people with successful RfR's have proved their worth over multiple years. Pixel sword ҂Ḡṍḡԍζϵϛ99҂ Pixel sword2 Wall - Blogs
  • Per Goggs - Cogg
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

Nehpets7000 (2)

Nehpets7000 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Nehpets7000|Special:Editcount/Nehpets7000 edits, Special:Editcount/Nehpets7000/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Why do I want CM? Well...I care for LMBW. It's a place that means a lot to me. I've spent years of my life here, and I wish to help keep the place fun and safe for everyone else. But what could I add to the current CM team? Yes, it's true. We've got a lot of capable CMs already. Sometimes, the chat has more CMs than regular users. However, at night, when I'm most active, there are generally few CMs, especially active ones (even as I type this, there are none on). I believe I'd be a valuable addition to the CM team. I've got a lot of previous CM experience and I'm very familiar with our policy. I'm also on chat for long periods of time, especially at night where things can get a bit wild. I'm not afraid to use my rights when necessary, and I'm always very ready to help any users who need it. I'm also very willing to take advice from users on how to improve as a CM. And yes, previously, I was demoted from my CM status, this is true. I had used a term that had unfortunately offended a few users. I apologize for the hurt feelings, and I hope you'll be willing to reconsider your feelings for me regarding me being a CM. I try especially hard to get along with everyone now. In conclusion, I wish to be able to help this Wiki be a more calm and civil place. Thanks for considering me! Nehpets7000 (talk) 05:04, October 11, 2015 (UTC)

Support

  1. Point was literally just proven on chat...no CMs on, and I believe that Neh as a CM would be a very positive impact on the community. My Page! ♥ Where you can talk to me! :3 05:25, October 11, 2015 (UTC)
  2. No Night Chat CMs, as my law holds again. Neh has restored his reputation in my eyes and I think he can make a capable and competent CM. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  3. Per above ~Psycho~
  4. He may be quiet, but as long as he watches chat from time to time, he's good enough. I'd rather have a quiet mod who does his job properly than a too-outspoken one who gets himself into trouble. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 10:03, October 11, 2015 (UTC)
      • Do you remember why he was demoted in the first place...?
        • Uh, yes? People change, and I've noticed him keeping himself out of discussions that might cause trouble. Quiet mods aren't any worse than the more talkative ones. If he can keep his views to himself and not affect his decision-making, then why not? Just because he did something wrong in the past doesn't mean he's cursed forever. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 10:34, October 11, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Kep's comment cemented my moved to Support. «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat
  6. Bioniclefanone intended to support but his editor was being funny. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way. Invalid support reason
  7. Per everyone above. Go neh! cx Avalair Talk Wall
  8. per the above -Derpulse-
  9. I haven't seen much of Nehpets since he returned, but he seems quieter and friendlier these days. If he's quieter, he wouldn't have much to say that upsets people, would he...?00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  10. Support. Per Alemas - Neh is quite active at night which is always useful in mods. Also, I believe he's quite a mature and respectable user, capable of moderating well, despite being demoted apparently. I'm fine with him being re-added to our mod team. -Ireithien
  11. Per above. -AP
  12. Strong support.  Neh really was an excellent mod, and I believe that he has learned from the past. A Fuzzy Little Hobbit (talk) 12:39, October 12, 2015 (UTC)
  13. Yup, support. I remember him from when he was a mod before, and he made a good mod then. He'll make a good mod now. ~Mishie da Purple Fishie =l~

Neutral

  1. Hmm, I'm not sure about this. While you do follow policy, I don't feel that you have much of a presence on chat. We already have enough CMs who can handle night chat, and I don't feel strongly enough to support or oppose. -~π~ (talk) 05:13, October 11, 2015 (UTC)
  2. I think it's just too soon slizerguy
  3. I dont pay attention to your behavior in chat soooo ~ KiraNotKirac
  4. Don't really know him. Dark Yada (talk) 07:45, October 11, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Like the others said, I really just don't know you that well.  And per the below. Derp Michaelyoda (talk)
  6. Per slice. -AP Moved to Support
  7. I agree with the Supports, and am leaning that way. And I believe he won't make the same mistakes again, but I desire to mull over this a bit longer. «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat Moved to Support.
  8. I don't know you well enough to say. LegoWebby101
  9. I simply haven't seen you participate in chat whenever I've been on. I can't accurately judge your behavior on chat aside from seeing the comments here, and I won't go off those to oppose, but I also am not inclined to support. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  10. Per above. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 02:55, October 12, 2015 (UTC)
  11. Wouldn't make a bad CM but I don't see a dire need for another one. ~Wolfasa

Oppose

  1. Though I haven't seen any bad behavior since your demotion. I'm just not 100 percent sure if I can trust you still. you have seemed to improved a lot, but I haven't really seen anything from you since my return that makes me want you as a moderator, even though I haven't seen any bad behavior either, and because of the past I am very hesitant. Sorry. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 05:17, October 11, 2015 (UTC)
  2. You were demoted for a reason, and maybe it's my inactivity, but since you came back you've done nothing to show you've changed. You're just quiet now, which isn't a good characteristic for a mod. ~ Fort
  3. Per everyone else, plus he's recently tried too hard to enforce the policy and caused more trouble than necessary. SMOL
  4. No. And not because you were demoted before. Since you've come back to chat, at least what I saw before I left, you have done nothing deserving of rights. In fact, it seemed like you wouldn't say anything in main except for a random comment or a jab at the current mods. So no. The Double Devil (talk) 09:35, October 11, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Oppose. You were demoted for a reason, and even if that weren't the case, Izzy said it best: you don't do anything in chat except remain afk and occasionally insult the current state of the wiki. ~Drace Nines, the trash who still can't figure out how to set a signature~
  6. Strong oppose, you were demoted for good reason and you have not shown any signs that you've improved, in fact you hardly say anything at all on chat. Also, per above. KatJuriHanTalk
  7. EXTREMELY strong oppose. You were demoted for a reason, and to be honest, you dont deserve it (not that you did in the start). It would be quite a joke tbh. - MC1
    • "you dont deserve it (not that you did in the start). It would be quite a joke tbh." Perhaps be a tad more civil in your wording for your voting reasons in the future, M.c. See Mad's Oppose for a "strong oppose" with good reasoning/reasons with no unnecessary remarks. Thanks. :) «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» -'Tired 'Crat
  8. Oppose, as the others said you were demoted for a good reason, you barely say much of anything on chat, much less that has shown that you've changed and are deserving of CM. -Rus
  9. Because I don't think that he would be good at it User:Oreh-Wen
    • Umm, might you elaborate on why you don't think I'd be good at it more? ._. -Nehpets7000
  10. Exactly what everyone else has said. Aravis (talk)
    • Aravis, I know you haven't seen me on chat much recently, and I worry your vote is going off the past more than the present. Might you be on chat sometime in the near future to form more of an opinion? -Nehpets7000
      • I'm rather confident in my vote, but of course, I'll be on chat just as usual and we'll see. Aravis (talk)
  11. I don't think so. You made some serious blunders in the past, and while I haven't seen anything negative from you lately, I haven't seen anything positive either. You don't seem at all ready. If I saw evidence of you coexisting with and respecting everyone equally, my vote might be different. Pixel sword ҂Ḡṍḡԍζϵϛ99҂ Pixel sword2 Wall - Blogs

Comments

  • "You were demoted for a reason and have shown no signs you've improved"/"You hardly say anything on chat." — I was blocked for a total of what, between six to eight months for inappropriate behavior, and banned God knows how many times, but you'd still consider me a better candidate than him? He was demoted for some offensive comments, and so far, I haven't sen him repeat those comments. In fact, he's been pretty quiet, not troublesome at all. I'd say it's a large improvement. To add on to that, I've seen lots of mods who rarely say anything on main. Does this mean they aren't good at their job? They don't display mod-like behavior? Clearly not. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  • "I was blocked for a total of what, between six to eight months for inappropriate behavior, and banned God knows how many times, but you'd still consider me a better candidate than him?" Where was this implied?? And FTR I currently see neither of you as suitable for CM. SMOL
    • Maybe you don't now, but at other times you did, and other people who oppose may still. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
      • I have supported you for CM once, not all the other times. Anyway this is getting off topic, I will not continue with this discussion. SMOL
        • @OP: No one ever said nor implied that. Nor did I or anyone else say he was continuing said offensive behaviour; however he has also not indicated that he has improved upon his actions as he has not said enough in chat to prove so. I'm not saying being quiet is a bad thing, nor is it necessarily bad for mods to be quiet. I'm just saying I'd like to see more activity before I could be convinced he has changed. KatJuriHanTalk
          • I am not sure how it has not proved he has changed. He hasn't said anything, so clearly he is keeing any further offensive comments to himself – or more likely, as I've PMed with him a few times since then – not even considering these comments. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
            • All I'm saying is, I would like to see more activity before I can really be sure. I'm not at all opposed to him being a CM again at some point, but at this current time I can't really say. KatJuriHanTalk
  • BTW I just wanna say the main reason I'm opposing. :P I'm not saying he'll definitely make the comments that got him demoted again, but the thing is, if he spoke the way he did before, I don't think he has much empathy towards the people it was directed at, and he won't be able to moderate well in situations where people are discriminatory towards LGBT* people. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 05:19, October 12, 2015 (UTC)
  • So why is everyone saying that he's changed? Literally every time I've seen him on chat except once, he has not said anything at all. Is going AFK the entire time and not doing anything something that CMs should do? ~Drace Nines~
    • I've seen him active a bit. Usually later at night though. So maybe that's why you haven't seen it. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 17:12, October 12, 2015 (UTC)
      • TBH night chat isn't even that desperately in need of mods, it's always usually dead when I see it. SMOL
        • True. :P I was just saying he does participate in chatting. :P
      • Not sure if our ideas of night chat are the same or not, but the most active I see him is a few sentences per hour late at night when there's like <10 people. ~ Fort
        • Yeah, it's activity but it isn't that much at all. SMOL
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

Psychos-R-Us

Psychos-R-Us (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Psychos-R-Us|Special:Editcount/Psychos-R-Us edits, Special:Editcount/Psychos-R-Us/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

I'm on all the time (way more than I should be). I try to help people out when I can. And I don't like how even though there are so many mods on at once, there is hardly anyone that is actually paying attention to main chat. ~~~~

Support

  1. I'm going to regret this, I'm sure, but support. You've done some...edgy things, I'd say, but I think you know what should and should not be on LMBW. Weirdosig (leave a message) 20:48, September 28, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Psy seems the sensible type, so he's got my support. Felldohir 20:51, September 28, 2015 (UTC)
  3. per the above ~~~~
  4. I think you'd be a good chat mod. Besides, we need more chat mods simply because some are getting kinda lazy IMO Purplebrick333 (talk) 00:46, September 29, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Totallyyyyyyy. I think Psychos is mature, and knows how to handle these types of things. My signature is being annoying again
  6. I mean, I haven't seen Psycho doing anything wrong, and he's generally friendly in chat so sure, I support. :D Johnyjo, 18:20, September 28, 2015 (I hope I got that right :P)
  7. Per the above. KnightoftheLight (talk) 01:38, September 29, 2015 (UTC)
  8. Yes because he's my friend. *thumbs up* Invalid reason
  9. Psycho is a fine guy, and after talking to him, I think he'd do well. -Nehpets7000
  10. We need CMs and Psy is a good friend. He can be a good CM Dark Yada (talk) 09:15, September 29, 2015 (UTC)
  11. Psy is very helpful and just an all around great guy. He knows what should and shouldn't be on the LMBW. Plus, we need more CMs. BlizardBrick (talk) 21:09, September 29, 2015 (UTC)
  12. But yeah so if you Psy you can add my sig to support. I ain't editing at all until I make sure it isn't someone from here or online. ~Batgirl78~
  13. Psy handles situations well, is there when you need to talk, and he is right about the Mods not paying attention. Now, i was almost gonna just become neutral, only because of the fact that at times, he can act immature, but don't we all around here?? Joking - Abbe

Neutral

  1. I mean, I haven't been on chat for a while but from when I saw a few months ago, Psy is mature enough to handle it, BUT he has to learn to control his perviness and act like a grown-up xD Though idk this could all have changed in the time I've been inactive. But meh at this point I'm neutral -Tolk
  2. I can visualize Psy getting to the point where he's ready for cm eventually, though from what I've seen I'm not sure if he's mature enough yet. -AP
  3. Not quite ready for CM, for reasons already stated. But you're close. Keep at it, Psy. Michaelyoda (talk)
  4. Haven't seen you in any 'sticky' situations, so I can't make a firm decision either way. «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» -'Tired 'Crat
  5. I canot with good conscience call you a good mod or a bad mod. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  6. ~ Fort
  7. I haven't been on chat for while so i can't say. LegoWebby101
  8. IDK if you are ready for this now. Marcel77799 (talk) 20:53, September 29, 2015 (UTC)
  9. I don't believe Psy has the experience necessary for these rights. Mel
  10. I've been gone awhile, so it wouldn't be fair to judge based on my past experiences with Psycho, but my past experiences also don't cause me to lean toward support. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån

Oppose

  1. Immature at times, doesnt allways follow requests, haven't seen him in tough situations yet. In short, you aren't ready. slizerguy
  2. From what I've seen of you on chat, I'd reluctantly half agree with Slice. Sorry, dude... -Nehpets7000 Changed to support.
  3. Though I think in certain situations you'd be a good CM, I've seen you participate in too much inappropriate behavior to trust you as a CM currently. You do have potential but I'd like to see your start following the policy at all times before I entrust you with these rights. Sorry. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 21:00, September 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. What the above said, I don't think you're ready yet. KatJuriHanTalk
  5. ^^ SMOL
  6. Per the above. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 22:32, September 28, 2015 (UTC)
  7. This is nothing personal, I think you're a nice guy. But I think you get kind of emotional it times, and that affects anyone's judgement. I just don't think you're ready to be a CM. The Double Devil (talk) 23:04, September 28, 2015 (UTC)
  8. Mature, yes, probably able to handle it, but still too emotional. Quick to judge, which isn't a good quality when one is a CM. ~Mishie da Fishie =l~
  9. Ok so you've been better, and you're pretty good at being on chat constantly. You would be a good candidate, but I feel like maybe you don't need this extra responsiblility? I don't think you're totally ready yet. Lilac Neko (talk)
  10. A nice guy, but I feel I must agree with Izzy and Marr in this case. Aravis (talk)
  11. I must confess, I've reflected and I must per the above, I feel you're too provocative and prone to arguments than I had thought, and I question your judgment. --Skully Of House Lannister (talk) 19:18, September 29, 2015 (UTC)
  12. Psy's a great friend and all, but he can be overly crazy, and I don't exactly have 100% confidence in his judgement. -NXTein1996

Comments

  • Is this RfR going to be archived or will it stay here forever? -~π~ (talk) 05:42, October 11, 2015 (UTC)
  • I hope it will. -Nehpets7000
  • Yeah, it's been two weeks since this RfR was up and no admin bothered to archive it yet. -~π~ (talk) 05:55, October 11, 2015 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

Loney97

Loney 97 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Loney 97|Special:Editcount/Loney 97 edits, Special:Editcount/Loney 97/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

I miss it. Lone Lionheart 01:11, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Support

  1. would be fabulous -Ava
  2. If he can be a great admin, he can certainly be a good chat mod. Rus
  3. Responsible, mature and experienced, Loney would make a fantabulous chat mod. -~π~ (talk) 01:14, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Already was. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  5. Per Pi. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 17:32, September 14, 2015 (UTC)
  6. Definitely. Was a great Admin, so I have absolutely no problem withgiving him back a fraction of his old rights! KnightoftheLight (talk)
  7. Of course you can have it back. LegoWebby101 -Invalid support reason.
  8. Per above. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 02:21, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
  9. *tries to think of acceptable support reason for five solid minutes* Well, you've done it before, you had better be able to can do it again. Weirdosig (leave a message) 02:29, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
  10. Over qualified! Already was a great Admin. «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat
  11. IM SUPPORTING BECAUSE I THINK LONEY IS A GOOD ADMIN AND CRAP SO JUST SAY MY VOTE IS VALID ALREADY. ~ KiraNotKirac
  12. Per above Lunaicus (talk) 06:00, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
  13. I don't know him, but from what I've seen, per above, I guess. ~Psycho~
  14. Uh... he was an admin who simply demoted himself for his own reasons. So, seriously, why not? Derp Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 11:17, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
  15. Pretty much per everyone else.  Great admin, and there's no reason I can think of why he shouldn't have CM again. A Fuzzy Little Hobbit (talk) 12:25, September 11, 2015 (UTC)
  16. Loney was a good chat moderator before, it stand to reason he'll be good again. -spy
  17. Get back to work, you lazy bum. GrumpyFacenobody said you could retire ~Zaney -Invalid support reason.
  18. He was before, is still qualified, so no reason why not. Aravis (talk)
  19. I'd make a comment about being admin before, but that's been done. So per the above. Michaelyoda (talk)
  20. Per above. -AP
  21. Per Aravis. Purplebrick333 (talk) 01:53, September 12, 2015 (UTC)
  22. Per, like, everyone. Ireithien
  23. this user is very competent. this user understands the mindset behind online moderation. this user has the experience of previously being a mod on this wiki. this user has a clear understanding of the community on this wiki. this user can and will apply this knowledge and understanding of the community appropriately as he has done in the past. support. -Harold89 (talk)
  24. Per all the pers that per the ppl. And I put my name here if I want him to be CM, rite? - Testerz -Invalid support.
  25. ...But why was it taken from you in the first place?00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits! -Invalid support reason.

Neutral

  • Yeah, I've seen him as an admin, but I haven't really seen him do much and I'm not sure how good a chat mod he would be. ~Psycho~

Oppose

  1. Just to be that person, because Sammy said no one would. Awesome face And yeah yeah yeah, invalid reason. Look, see? I'll cross it out myself. GrumpyFace - Izzy Invalid oppose reason.

Comments

  • Who said it was an invail support reason? That is literally nuts. He really likes Loney, so why does he need a reason? LSB
  • Personally I think the whole "needs a valid reason." is unnecessary and doesn't keep biases out at all, but "yes" isn't considered a "valid" reason unfortunately, I plan on making a vote on getting rid of that rule in the future though. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 05:39, September 11, 2015 (UTC)



The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

Lunaicus(2)

Lunaicus (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Lunaicus|Special:Editcount/Lunaicus edits, Special:Editcount/Lunaicus/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

I just want to help you people and have a purpose. I sometimes do have emotional problems that I will tell chat about, sure, but I can tuck those away in a serious situation. I may not always be the best with words, but I do believe that I wouldn't be horrible at this and that I have decent judgment, so please just give me a chance.

Lunaicus (talk) 06:14, July 20, 2015 (UTC)

Support

  1. inb4 people still complain about when luna supposedly spam edited her way to the (extremely stupid) edit requirement and oppose (also, actual reason for supporting is that i don't see why you shouldn't be cm) -и!₢☨ɟÅ↕↕ (Жξ~~Å₢ξ ɯÅ↕↕ - Жч β↕◯₢) 06:19, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. I support. She's mature, reasponsible and rather friendly. While she may have her faults(hey, all of us do), she's capable of being serious and fun. I think she'd be a good Cm. Not to mention she's active a lot. And the rest of the support below and above this support.I am The Eternal One. You cannot ever stop me. (talk) 06:23, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Per the above, and come on this needs to happen already. ~Psycho~
  4. She's good. - me
  5. Just...what everyone else said. And she's on usually most of the time. SMOL
  6. I do hope that you are aware of what you are getting yourself into. You stated that you sometimes have emotional problems, and this could be an issue, but I am willing to put my faith in you in that you will set those emotional problems aside when dealing with a situation. If you can do that, then I am more than sure that you are ready for Chat Moderator. ~Flippy The Bear
  7. Definitely support. You're level-headed and mature. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 06:40, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  8. far too kind ~ Fort
  9. Per all the above. I have nothing more to add. -~π~ (talk) 07:58, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  10. You got dis, girl. xD You'll be fabulous. ~Tolkkkk
  11. Yesss plz. (Per the above.) SwipeIsEpic User:Derpulse
  12. I think she'd do well, she's mature and responsible. A Fuzzy Little Hobbit (talk) 14:14, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  13. I'll support. She is nice, and it'd be nice for her to be productive. Satoshi2 (talk) 16:41, July 20, 2015 (UTC)Satoshi2
  14. She's on chat a majority of the time, and, as far as I have seen, is responsible and level-headed. I think she would be a dependable and firm CM who could stand her ground. ThumbsUp Lilac Neko (talk)
  15. per above --DA WEIRDO (leave a message) 23:13, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  16. Often online, attentive, would make an effective CM. Guac
  17. I support dis :3 -KiraNotKirac
  18. Per the above, would make a good CM. -FireMasterKai
  19. Per everyone above. slizerguy
  20. Of course! She would make a great addition to the team. Not only is she on when mods usually are afk, but she has a good sense of judgement. >---Avalair---> (Talk to meh) 01:29, July 21, 2015 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. I like you, but you're pretty quiet yet seem to get agitated rather quickly. I know you're better about it now that before, but I don't think I can support right now. Maybe I'll move after thinking about it further. Aravis (talk)
  2. Per exactly what Ara said. Also, I personally don't think we need any more CM's, and never support unless I find significant reason for having that user in position of a chat moderator. But I'll think about it. Luke McSwagger 16:13, July 20, 2015 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I read the paragraph and it seems like you want to do good and be nice but something is just making me think I shouldn't support. You were sort of rude to me when I first came which I didn't really like because if you're going to moderate you should try to keep calm like some of the other dudes here. I was thinkin about it some more and some stuff has made me think she shouldn't have this even more. She seems like she gets really emotional quicky over certain things and that could go really bad quick if they were a moderator. Sorry, but I don't think you should really have this yet. Thanks fam /Cash
  2. I do not believe you have the neccessary skills to become a chat moderator. I would reconsider my vote if you became a little more in-touch with the community and improved upon the way you communicate with users when there are problems going on in chat.  -Harold89 (talk)
  3. Moving my vote to oppose now, per what Harold said. I don't really see you right now as capable of discerning certain instances in chat without letting emotions get in the way. As one example, I feel that you as a CM would pressure users to stop discussions pertaining to political and religious matters too soon, rather than allowing them up to a certain extent. I'd consider supporting you for CM in the future for the same reasons Harry listed, if the need for another CM does arise. Also, note that acquiring the position of chat moderator isn't necessary for "having a purpose" around here. Each one of us can be a contributive, friendly member of our community here regardless of whether they have a star in chat or not. =) Luke McSwagger 23:53, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  4. She lets her emotions control her actions way to frequently. Strong opposition.-Klint
  5. looks suspicious from these reasons . juses48 Invalid
    1. Hows it invalid??

Comments

  • I would also like to point out that if a user wants to run for the chat moderator position, a user must have have 75 edits. Before making her last request, this user spam-edited much of her 75 edits within a very short time period so that she could fufill that requirement. This can be seen in the following three threads: [1[2[3]. This is not the bevhavior I would like to see in a chat moderator. -Harold89 (talk)
    • Look I was having actual conversations even if they look spammy to you. I did have the conversations to be able to get the requirement yes but I was told if I had conversations on my wall that was ok, so that is what I did and I don't think it needs to be brought up again. Lunaicus (talk) 23:32, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
      • Much of the edits you made were definitely not actual conversations. You spammed single letters, question marks, and posts that only are a couple of characters (all of this can be seen in the threads I linked above). You're allowed to post this content on your wall, yes, though these "conversations" are very spammy. They are allowed, sure; what I am saying is that this is not the behavior I would like to see in a chat moderator, as chat moderators should be stopping spam, not creating it. I think your actions most definitely needed to be brought up again, as it greatly impacted my opposing vote – I think other users should be aware of your actions as well. -Harold89 (talk)
        • Harold, people are aware of her actions and don't really care. Just let it go please, she made the edits because of a requirement that shouldn't really even exist for chat rights. SMOL
          • Not everyone is aware of her actions, so I brought them up again so that more people would know of them. I would not like to let this go, as it was a major reason that I oppose Luna as a mod. Also, the requirement should exist, in my opinion, as it helps chat mod requestees get expeirence with the community in a medium other than chat (which ultimately helps them in their decision-making on chat). However, this is getting off-topic. -Harold89 (talk)
            • Harold, do you realize how long ago the old RFR was? Just...stop. What she did that long ago wasn't remotely related to chat (You do not get any rights whatsoever off chat by getting chat moderator. Nothing off chat is going to effect the user any more than things on chat, thus why the requirement has no reason whatsoever to exist.), wasn't intended to be spammy, and happened way too long ago to be relevant anymore. I would also like to call this to attention:
            • 5:30 Lunaicus i find talking in chat so much easier then talking outside of it
            • 5:30 Lunaicus i find talking outside of it just a recipe for getting myself stabbed in the side
            • 5:31 TolkienNerds psh you're my friend Luna 
            • 5:31 Lunaicus I'm just not comfortable outside of chat
            • 5:31 FireMasterKai SHADOW is getting married now? 
            • 5:31 Lunaicus doesn't mean i don't pay any attention
            • So you are opposing because a user feels more comfortable talking inside chat than outside of chat, essentially; if I felt so uncomfortable talking outside of chat and never edited, then wanted CM, I would just speed my way to 75 and forget about everything I did too. And you are opposing a user getting CHAT moderator rights for that reason. I sincerely hope you at least change your vote to neutral after this, because that's honestly a ridiculous oppose reason. Mandatory Signature: Mandatory Userpage Link-Mandatory blog link-Mandatory wall link-not-so-mandatory logout link 00:27, July 21, 2015 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.

FortressOfNight (3)

FortressOfNight (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/FortressOfNight|Special:Editcount/FortressOfNight edits, Special:Editcount/FortressOfNight/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Since my RfR about nine months ago, I've been working on myself and how I act and react during discussions and high-pressure situations, and in the last couple weeks I think I've reached a point where I'm comfortable keeping myself in check during these situations, and with myself in general. While that's comforting for me with or without rights, my main motivation for submitting this RFR is that, as of late, we've had an extreme shortage of night mods - often nobody but Marc, who's usually asleep. This has been a problem recently due to people like Shaw and Mixel. If there are other users joining chat late at night to cause trouble, currently it's unlikely there will be any mods online to put a stop to it. Others can attest the frustration of trying to deal with Shaw and Mixel while there were no mods on... I'd like to be able to deal with these situations appropriately in future. ~ Fort 12:38, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Support

  1. Has improved behaviour alot and there is an EXTREME lack of mods when he is on. MC1

Neutral

  1. I'll waite a bit till I decide, but I'm sort of leaning towards supporting, idk. ~Mishie da Fishie~ =l
  2. Not quite sure yet. There is an extreme lack of CMs for night chat though. We must fix that. Marcel77799 (talk) 16:08, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Per Marcel. -AmazingPythor
  4. Undecided but leaning towards support. SMOL
  5. Not sure yet. Aravis (talk)
  6. I agree we need more. But I'm going to stay neutral for now.LegoWebby101
  7. Per Marcel. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 15:32, July 18, 2015 (UTC)
  8. Per Von and Marc. --Monsieur Weirdeaux (leave a message) 22:52, July 19, 2015 (UTC)
  9. Per marcel, and I'm on the fence about the maturity level. ~Psycho~

Oppose

  1. Although there certainly is a lack of CMs at night chat, I do not think you are the best fit for the job. Primarily, there is the issue of maturity and your emotions getting in the way of reason. -~π~ (talk) 12:46, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Per the above. Derpulse (talk) 17:23, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Don't see the kind of maturity in you that a CM needs. I've also seen you refusing to adhere to reasonable requests to stop annoying other users on multiple occasions, so it becomes difficult to expect you to responsibly monitor the behavior of other users in the position of CM. I do see in you a desire to improve the community though, so I'd consider supporting you in the future if you prove yourself qualified for the position over time. Luke McSwagger 20:39, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
  4. You still spam "нет", can be condescending, and are overall too tolerant of some actions, mostly your own. Per Luke, I do see some desire to improve us, if you weren't so darned...acting to the contrary. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. EXTERMINATE!
  5. Per the above.I am The Eternal One. You cannot ever stop me. (talk) 00:39, July 19, 2015 (UTC)
  6. per info -и!₢☨ɟÅ↕↕ (Жξ~~Å₢ξ ɯÅ↕↕ - Жч β↕◯₢) 06:21, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  7. I concur with the above statements, particularly 3.14 and Luke. ~Flippy The Bear

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

Slicer Vorzakh (3)

Slicer Vorzakh (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Slicer Vorzakh|Special:Editcount/Slicer Vorzakh edits, Special:Editcount/Slicer Vorzakh/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

On look, this weirdo is running for CM again! I believe I would be a good CM because I believe I keep a calm head in most situations and try to see both sides of any situation. I'm also on at night and don't get too sleep drunk. (Besides my typing, but I don't think that would affect me modding skills). I am also an admin on two wikis and a CM on another.

Whatever your vote is, please leave a valid reason. If your vote is neutral or oppose, please leave something that I can improve on so I can get your vote next time around. Slicer Vorzakh (talk) 16:56, June 12, 2015 (UTC)

Support

  1. Absolutely. Guys, I dont know how he has gone through 3 RfCM's without getting these rights. Slicer is mature, smart, has clear judgement, and on at times when we desperately need mods. Usually when I am the only mod on, Slicer is on as well. He would make a great addition to the team, and as we have seen, he really wants these rights. Please consider these points while making your decision. Also per everyone who commented after me. >---Avalair---> (Talk to meh) 17:22, June 12, 2015 (UTC)
  2. This again??? Sure, why not. This kid's got skills. 00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  3. ^ -и!₢☨ɟÅ↕↕ (Жξ~~Å₢ξ ɯÅ↕↕ - Жч β↕◯₢) 17:09, June 12, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Full support, I have never once seen him lose his cool, and he keeps his head well while on chat. A Fuzzy Little Hobbit (talk) 17:13, June 12, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Stuck to his guns in terms of helpfulness, attitude and activity since the last request, which is enough to sway my vote towards "support" OuO Guac
  6. Holy crap, how has he gone through this many and not gotten it? Slicer has proven himself to be mature and he keeps a clear head even during heated moments on chat. He's an active member of the community, regularly comments on blogs and edits articles. Heck, he's voted in just about every community vote. Plus he's on at times when most mods tend to be absent from chat. He'd be great for the job. - ToneTyphoon
  7. Per the above. c: SMOL
  8. I'll be honest, I thought he got CM already??? He definitely is mature, and has been trying his hardest to show that he is ready to recieve these rights. Also, he's on during the night, which is (still) a time when we need more mods. He holds his night chat well most of the times and rarely gets up in troublesome antics from what I've seen. Lilac Neko (talk)
  9. Per all above. It defies my understanding that he hasn't gotten these already. ~ Fort
  10. ^^ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Derpulse (talkcontribs)
  11. Per ava. -Big Bade Snakey
  12. He's not a CM yet? What? Nothing to be said that someone else hasn't said already. ~MY
  13. He seems mature, and he's here a lot. About time he got it. User:Psychos-R-Us
  14. Per the above. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 16:14, June 14, 2015 (UTC)
  15. Also per above. Lunaicus (talk) 20:40, June 14, 2015 (UTC)
  16. Support, is always quite mature and uses his head. User:RusMan
  17. Agreed with all of the above, third time's the charm hopefully... -Airport Security
  18. Codyn329 (talk) 05:30, June 15, 2015 (UTC)
  19. I have seen enough to consider him a worthy candidate. βתغъ☺γ 15 Jun 2015 16:56:04
  20. Per other supports. Mel 17:08, June 15, 2015 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Undecided. βתغъ☺γ 12 Jun 2015 17:16:30
  2. Aravis (talk)
  3. Not entirely sure you can handle it tbh. MC1
  4. I'm not undecided. I've decided to mull it over. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 15:04, June 13, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Not quite sure so far. Marcel77799 (talk) 21:53, June 13, 2015 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • "If your vote is neutral or oppose, please leave something that I can improve on so I can get your vote next time around." Just pointing this out for those Neutrals over there who haven't left anything yet. -Airport Security
    • Is not "Undecided" a good neutral reason? Or do I have to say "I haven't been active lately so I haven't been able to observe him as much so I'm refraining from voting."? Tongue Smiley-1 βתغъ☺γ 13 Jun 2015 17:13:22
    • Honestly, I see no reason to put a vote under Neutral unless it is to leave positive criticism for the user requesting rights, particularly if the user requests that you leave some form of positive criticism if you vote Neutral. -Airport Security
    • In my opinion, it shows the user requesting rights that you have acknowledged the request. βתغъ☺γ 14 Jun 2015 00:21:16
    • No point acknowledging it if you aren't going to put any sort of constructive criticism. Tongue Smiley-1 -Airport Security
    • People like to know you've seen it. Tongue Smiley-1 βתغъ☺γ 14 Jun 2015 17:32:27
    • Then at least say that you're undecided because you haven't paid enough attention...00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

ShadowOfOblivion7119 (2)

ShadowOfOblivion7119 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/ShadowOfOblivion7119|Special:Editcount/ShadowOfOblivion7119 edits, Special:Editcount/ShadowOfOblivion7119/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Okay, I honestly feel like the small amount of CMs on chat is horrid. Sure a lot of people HAVE the stars, not a lot are on chat, but the ones that do, only like 2 are active, most of them are AFK. Also, I'm active a lot of times, and you will most likely be able to get me around using pings. I'm very helpful, and I'm fairly like-able if you get to know me, I'm friendly too! Also, I would appreciate it if you would be detailed in your reasons for whatever you choose, as it could and would help me. - ShadowOfOblivion7119

Support

Neutral

  • I don't know you well enough to make a decision as of yet. =Psycho=

Oppose

  1. Causes disruption too frequently, and is not mature enough at all. Saying that the "Small amount of CMs on chat is horrid" doesn't make me want to support either. SMOL
  2. Strong oppose. He has shown his insensivity towards opinions that differ from his and it takes way too much to get him to stop disruptive behavior. He also shows strong bias towards some users. Slicer Vorzakh (talk) 06:47, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Immature, rude, offensive, constantly disrupts chat, ignores reasonable requests from users, moderators and administrators alike. His behavior has only worsened over the last few weeks. His justifications for wanting CM rights are weak at best and differ greatly depending on the situation. ~ Fort
  4. Strong agreement with above Codyn329 (talk) 06:52, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Per above. Lunaicus (talk) 06:55, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
  6. No chance whatsoever in my eyes. Rude, disruptive...well just read above and you get the idea. Other issues also present- Maturity is one....- MC1
  7. If you want my opinion on this just go read Fort's oppose. Derp Also, if I recall correctly he's on his last warning for being rude to users. mama luigi is watching you 11:56, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
    • I believe Frodo said today that if he told another user to die he would be kicked. I'm serious. He was actually telling people (particularly myself) to die. I also recall Ava told him he was on his last warning yesterday. ~ Fort
  8. Way too aggressive and rude and causes way too much disruption. If I recall correctly somebody also told me "he's on his last warning", whatever that is supposed to mean in detail anyway. --LEGƠ Мεsş Рr□đuĸtions© (Talk) 12:04, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
  9. Agreed with everything else that has already been stated. KatJuriHanTalk
  10. I could insert the "NO GOD PLEASE NO" .gif here, but I'm a 'crat, so I'll act mature and just say that I agree with everyone else. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 15:15, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
  11. I'd like to give him a couple years to mature first. I believe time will likely help with the reasons listed above, but right now I don't see him moderating this particular chat efficiently. It also sounds like he has unfinished business with other users here which I fear may result in baggage.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  12. I'd be very uneasy knowing I couldn't kick/ban him if and when the needs arise. Aravis (talk)
  13. Is there anything to say that someone else already hasn't? Sure he can be fun at times, but is generally just disruptive in chat. Not exactly what we need in a CM. ~MY
  14. Well guess there's nothing to really add here but to put my name down and tell you to read the above comments.- ToneTyphoon
  15. wait what when was this even made .-. Certainly opposed, for the same reasons we all have. Luke McSwagger99 (talk) 17:57, June 8, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Besides the obvious fact that you've built up a negative reputation with our community and we don't want you as moderator, we honestly don't need any more CM's, unless they have a specific and significant reason for acquiring the right (i.e. Legofrodo ran for CM because one was needed at the times she is on). - Luke


  • Fort, just about all of that could be applied to you -Shadow
    • Perhaps, but I fail to see how that's relevant. ~ Fort
    • It's because your one to talk 694 -Shadow
    • Even if he is those things, in no way should it invalidate his vote Slicer Vorzakh (talk) 06:57, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
      • Per Slicer. You're making yourself look bad, it simply proves my reasoning. ~ Fort
      • That may be, but I'm still making a point. -Shadow
        • I still fail to see how it's relevant. ~ Fort
        • How you percieve it, is irreleveant, although you ARE entitled to your opinion, and that I will not try to change. -Shadow
          • What are you trying to say and where are you going with this beyond meaningless insults? ~ Fort
          • I'm not quite sure how what I said was an insult. What I'm saying, is that perception is...uh, okay I got nothing anymore, total brain fart :P -Shadow
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

Zaney2522

Zaney2522 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Zaney2522|Special:Editcount/Zaney2522 edits, Special:Editcount/Zaney2522/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

I have been active on this wiki for almost a year now, and I believe I would make a good moderator :3 Btw, you get a free lollypop if you vote for me :3. Zaney2522 (talk) 19:04, December 11, 2015 (UTC)

Support

  1. Yah, you've been on chat enough, and idc wat other people think, you'd make a good mod. ~Mishie da Fishie~ =l

Neutral

I can't vote yea or nay in a matter about which I know [next to] nothing about, but this way I can say I already voted. (derp) ~~Sir Guurahk~~ Now I know more. (derp)


  1. I have not seem CM-esque behavior from you. And, from what I've heard you may not be the most well behaved. We already have quite a few good/great CMs. Maybe give a few reasons why you should be CM (not the 'fluffy' "I've been here X time, I'd be good"). :) If you look at some of the RfRs in the past, a well-written persuasive intro can go along way. It's changed my vote on more than one occasion. Just some friendly advice. «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat

Oppose

  1. Uh... is it a joke... No. He's not friendly with other users, he wont be a good chatmod. Dark Yada (talk) 19:04, December 11, 2015 (UTC)
  2. We don't need another CM on a bascially dying chat. Plus, you said you where gonna rebel against the God-Emperor of Mankind, our Spiritual Liege, Alemas I the great. - Plurky
  3. Where should I begin... Opposing for several reasons. One, treating the whole CM thing very light-heartedly. I mean, two sentences to present yourself as a CM candidate... c'mon. Second, one only has to look at this chat log (06:43) to see that he's only doing it for "overthrowing the admins" or some other silly reason. Third, he nearly scared Luna to death with a Jeff the Killer hidden link (I had to warn him for that). And fourth, his reaction to his opposes has been something along the lines of "you people h8 too much". Totally the wrong mindset. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 19:48, December 11, 2015 (UTC)
  4. I'd elaborate, but the reasons are the same as presented above. :P ~~Sir Guurahk~~ Not enough edits to vote.
  5. I had actually thought about how you should have CM Rights earlier today, but...Jeff the Killer? Ouch. Sorry, I'll consider you for next time. You've definitely matured a lot in the past several months, though.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  6. i would like some other mods so that im not the only mod in from evening-latish night, but no, youve proven yourself as immature and not seriously viewing of the cm position -slicer is too lazy to do his sig on mobile
  7. You don't seem to take the position of Chat Moderator very seriously, and you really haven't provided any reasons as to why you should be promoted to Chat Moderator other than "I believe I would make a good moderator". Also, from what I've heard, your motives seem sketchy, at least to me. Dr. Alphys
  8. Has exhibited rude, trollish, and immature behavior before. I have seen no improvements on this, so yeah, definitely not. And per all the above. SMOL
  9. I don't know what would make anyone think screamer links are a good--or even okay--idea, allowed or not. Also, what Alemas said. Aravis (talk)
  10. Zaney i like you but lets be real here, you would not make a good moderator. I never see you active on chat and the lenny face is your best friend. ~ KiraNotKirac
  11. Absolutely not. Immature, rude, and I feel he would not take his rights seriously. Per everyone above. KatJuriHanTalk

Comments

  • lol Ale @chat log. twas a joke. not everybody is serious. As to the hidden jeff the killer link, he did it to several; Luna was the only one who spoke out about it tho. And I don't think he's done it since, so all's good there. And how can one know if he'll be a good mod or not if you don't give him the chance? ~Mishie~
  • I was unaware that screamer links weren't allowed, and I didnt really think luna would be as mad about it as she was. :P I only meant it as a simple joke.
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

AmazingPythor

AmazingPythor (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/AmazingPythor|Special:Editcount/AmazingPythor edits, Special:Editcount/AmazingPythor/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Over the past five months or so, possibly longer, there's been a period of relative calm on the wiki, and there have been times during the day in which over half of the users on chat were mods or admins. Because of this, I felt that there was no real reason for anyone to run for chat moderator, as for a while there was basically no point in time where there were no CMs online, and there was a relatively long period of inactivity on the wiki. For these reasons, I really never considered running for CM until recently. Personally, I feel like an additional mod would be helpful due to the resurgence of activity that seems to be taking place on chat, especially from around 8-11 EST, a period of time in which I am consistently online. Yes, for the most part there are mods online during this time frame, but over the past few weeks I have witnessed multiple instances of certain users causing trouble on chat (innuendo, some personal attacking, even one instance of chat flooding), who have gotten away with their antics simply because all of the CMs were afk at the time. Because of this, I believe an extra CM would help maintain order during that time frame, and consider myself suitable for the job. Although I have been here for little over a year, I have been pretty consistently active (and thus know the policies of the wiki well) and have matured significantly since joining. For these reasons I believe that I would make a quality chat moderator, and that if I were to fulfill the position I would be able to calm the aforementioned users down in the case of a disruption during night chat. AmazingPythor (talk) 02:03, February 7, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. Total support, Apey is very mature and hasn't been involved in a major incident and is on during times with few mods. -Slice
  2. Ermehgawrd my apeface is running to be a modeh :') Apey is mature and he always keeps lil' skully in line but deep inside we all knwo apey wuvses lil skuly <3 Per Slice on dah rest <3 -Skule
  3. Yeah, never seen him get in trouble or anything so I see him being a great mod. SMOL
  4. AP is someone who I believe would be a great moderator, as well as being someone who can accurately use the Use Common Sense policy which unfortunately isn't used well by much of the moderation. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 03:18, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
  5. MB Mod? No. Tongue Smiley-1 But I find no reason for him to not be a CM. As Slice said, he hasn't been involved in any major incidents, and as Spidey said, he employs common sense (hint to wannabe mods: always a plus to me). --Grandpa Weirdo (yell at me) 03:50, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
  6. We need active mods, and AP is decent enough, so I support. The Double Devil (talk) 04:10, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
  7. AP is a mature and responsible user, and i believe he'll make a great CM, in a time where we most definitely need more. - Wolfasa
  8. mature and calm...good mod potential - mc
  9. Strong support. Has shown significant improvement in virtually every way. I'm not going to per anyone here because I have dozens of other reasons to support him that aren't even mentioned above.00SMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  10. Seems to be mature. He doesn't get in controversial arguments, and handles situations properly. LSB
  11. Pyth has displayed increasing amounts of maturity and level-headedness ever since he joined, and he would be a very viable mod during times when there aren't many others on. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  12. I have a feeling he'll do well. Doesn't cause trouble, is mature... yeah, should be good. Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 20:46, February 7, 2016 (UTC)
  13. Per the above. -~π~ (talk) 00:27, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
  14. Per above. ~EvilMidnightNG~ (talk) 00:55, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
  15. AP is a great guy, definitely capable for the position. User:NXTein1996
  16. All of the above opinions describe AP very well in my opinion. I think he would be great in this position. ~(kingwja)~
  17. Nice and friendly. I think he can be a great mod. Yada Dark 07:47, February 8, 2016 (UTC)
  18. AP will make a great moderator! I want to see him active again and how diligent he'll be. - T-007Bond 6:48PM, February 8, 2016 (UTC +08:00)
  19. Per above LegoWebby101
  20. per above User:Felldohir
  21. Per the above. KatJuriHanTalk
  22. I think AP could be a good Mod, he's mature on this wiki and is an overall nice guy. -KnightoftheLight
  23. Can't think of anything to say so just per Slice. Purplebrick333 (talk) 00:24, February 10, 2016 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Comments