LEGO Message Boards Wiki
LEGO Message Boards Wiki

All votes on this page are archives of past requests for rights. Please do not modify them in any way.

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

TheShadowAssassin

TheShadowAssassin (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/TheShadowAssassin|Special:Editcount/TheShadowAssassin edits, Special:Editcount/TheShadowAssassin/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hey guys. If you don't already know, I am TheShadowAssassin (previously known as Apple123350). I have been on the wiki for over 5 and a half years, and I have extensive experience in regards to the community, considering that I have been here for so long and that I have been a chat moderator for a total of over 3 years. I also have a fair amount of experience with editing, having over 5,080 edits, 406 of which are in mainspace, and 347 are thread edits.

I'm running for Discussion Moderator because I believe that my experience with the community will make me a capable Discussion Moderator, and allow me to further myself as a productive member of the community. I also understand that we have particularly few Discussion Moderators (well, only one, if we're not counting administrators), and would like to fill the void that currently exists. I have also, in the past, expressed desire to eventually reach administrator (albeit a lengthy time from now), and I think that it is necessary for a user to have experience under most, if not all, positions on the wiki, prior to being promoted to administrator. Thinking of it as a baseball game: you can't go straight to home base without first hitting all the other bases. Being promoted to Discussion Moderator is yet another base that is necessary for me to reach before I will even consider running for admin.

As I've said before in previous RfRs, if you choose to oppose or, in some cases, go neutral, I appreciate any and all criticisms and opinions, so please bring your concerns to me here, in your vote or in the comments, and be honest and give me ways in which I can and should improve. Should you support, I thank you in advance.

Thank you for reading, I encourage you to consider my request carefully. ~Aloy

Support

  1. Has been a competent CM as of late, would probably do well in this position. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 20:09, April 11, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Per AP. -Sam
  3. I think you could be a good DM, also per above. LegoWebby101
  4. Per above ~ Roddy

Neutral

  1. need some time to think it through Romaniandude12 (talk) 17:49, April 11, 2017 (UTC)
  2. I was going to support but then I went back and read through some of the discussions you've been involved in over the past year and now I'm not so sure. We'll see fancy admin font ҉
  3. Not so sure yet. You seem nice enough, but I haven't seen enough of you to give a valid yes or no. ~ Coson
  4. what everyone else said QuantumHedgehog Message MeContributions

Oppose

  1. You even admit that you see this position as little more than a stepping stone to administrator. I don't believe you have the necessary skills to be an effective DM, let alone admin. 19:09, April 11, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Per above. A clear attempt at a power grab because Rom just got admin, whether you admitted it or not.Brick425 (talk) 19:17, April 11, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Per Brick. Live long and prosper (talk) 23:54, April 11, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Still minding of what happened with Vera. Also, per Brick. Yada Dark http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/picsou/fr/images/d/db/Emoticon_Picsou.gif 20?cb=20160826204149 18:04, April 16, 2017 (UTC)
  5. pretty much what has been said and I echo the feelings of Yada - MC

Comments

  • @Keplers, I'm not going to argue, but your first sentence very clearly ignores the very first thing that I said: "I'm running for Discussion Moderator because I believe that my experience with the community will make me a capable Discussion Moderator, and allow me to further myself as a productive member of the community." That is the sole reason as to why I'm running. Also, is it not fair to assume that DM is more or less an actual right, as opposed to a "stepping stone" when I am already a Chat Moderator? DM has very little to offer in terms of added abilities, not including CM, so one could argue that DM is more of an "addition" to CM. Also, I asked you to be honest and outline ways that I can improve in. Simply telling me that I "lack skills" leaves a few questions, yet to be answered by you: What skills? Where do you believe I need improvement? Allow me to restate, I value every opinion and criticism, and I take them seriously; I don't do this for myself, I do it for the community... and part of that is listening to what they have to say, and acting responsibly. Finally, I'm not running for admin, I'm running for Discussion Moderator. But, if I'm going to entertain your notion, let me ask you this. You've stated before that you disagree with the current administration, yet you oppose any attempts to influence change in it (properly, mind you). Why's that? ~Aloy
    • I do not ignore that, but I do believe that it's a weak argument. I've actually had more experience with the community than you, and the only potential way you could further yourself as a DM (which is itself an obsolete position) is to use it to later acquire rights. As you personally say, the DM position truly adds little to no power to you, so why bother to accrue it? In fact, if you truly believed it was no more than an "addition" to CM, why would you not make a community vote to grant CMs the DM power by default?
I'll tell you why: because it adds to your resume to say that you got DM and CM.
In one sentence, you claim that DM is clearly a right in itself, and not a stepping stone. In literally the next sentence, you claim that DM has so little power that it's truly just an addition to the CM right. Which is it?
Lastly: Thank you for "entertaining" my notion. You clearly have no intent to change the way the admins work. You used a completely false claim to get a fresh, non-establishment admin demoted and while refusing to acknowledge the claims of the other side became a lapdog of the administration. It's quite clear there is no part of you that truly wishes to exert reform. 20:26, April 11, 2017 (UTC)
    • I did not say that it adds "little to no power", I said it "has little to offer in terms of added abilities". "Power" is not a term that I like to use, and nowhere did I say that it has no added abilities. It does, but very few, in my case. I don't view being promoted to DM as another "stepping stone", so when I made my analogy in my original post, that wasn't my intention.
Now, to address some of your points:
"...why would you not make a community vote to grant CMs the DM power by default?" That's silly. A better solution would be the complete removal of the CM right, given that DM automatically grants CM rights as well anyway. I would be all for this solution.
"I'll tell you why: because it adds to your resume to say that you got DM and CM." Refer to the above.
"In one sentence, you claim that DM is clearly a right in itself, and not a stepping stone. In literally the next sentence, you claim that DM has so little power that it's truly just an addition to the CM right. Which is it?" You're not paying attention to the context.. DM is a right by itself, yes, but in my case, as I am already Chat Moderator, I already have most of the abilities that are granted with DM, therefore making DM more of an "addition" to the rights that I already have. To be completely honest, if a user is already a CM, the idea of going through an entire RfR seems quite trivial to me, and in my opinion, it would be more fair for a CM to simply request, from the admins, the last few abilities that DM has to offer, similar to the relationship between Patrollers and Content Moderators: here.
"Lastly: Thank you for 'entertaining' my notion. You clearly have no intent to change the way the admins work. You used a completely false claim to get a fresh, non-establishment admin demoted and while refusing to acknowledge the claims of the other side became a lapdog of the administration. It's quite clear there is no part of you that truly wishes to exert reform." It wasn't a false claim. After the incident, I spoke with Hype in private, and he admitted to me that he did initially have intentions of leaking the admin site; however, he also added that he had changed his mind a few days later, after the screenshots were taken. I was not wrong in my assessment, so please stop pretending that he never had any intentions to leak the admin site. Also, it's not at all fair to state that I "refused to acknowledge the claims of the other side". I did, and I expressed it all in a comment that I left on AP's blog regarding the demotion. I'm not sure if you read it, but if you did, you would have seen that I was taking into consideration the stories from both sides, and as a result, I formulated the compromise that even Hype promoted. "It's quite clear there is no part of you that truly wishes to exert reform." If that is what you see, fine, but that does not make it true, especially considering the fact that both you and Brick, as evidenced above, continue to see things that aren't there, and you're basing you're entire argument off of them. A "power grab", seriously? You have no idea who I am if you think that I would do something like that, and so, as a result, I encourage you to reconsider your vote, or at least find some other reasons.
Finally, I would appreciate it if you could address the following point: "Simply telling me that I "lack skills" leaves a few questions, yet to be answered by you: What skills? Where do you believe I need improvement?" ~Aloy
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

Legoanimals750

Legoanimals750 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Legoanimals750|Special:Editcount/Legoanimals750 edits, Special:Editcount/Legoanimals750/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

To be fair I was planing on running before I saw Rome's rfr. Hi I’m Legoanimals750, since we lost a few DMs lately and we also have an influx of new users I feel now would be a good time to run. I’ve been a Chat mod for about 6 months now and know the wiki pretty well by now. I’m also a very active editor and check the Recent Wiki Activity often. So, I can get Cvs or rfr highlighted quickly. I feel that getting Discussion Moderator can help me server the community better. If you have any concerns or questions just PM me, thanks for your time. --LegoWebby101 12:12, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Support

  1. inexperienced as hell but better than our other content mods 12:18, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Would probably do well and an extra DM wouldn't hurt. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 16:52, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  3. I feel that your maturity would be an asset in the posistionLive long and prosper (talk) 17:24, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Per above ~ Roddy
  5. Per the above, web is more than suitable for the job Romaniandude12 (talk) 19:01, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  6. i feel web has always done well in whatever role he has been given, so I would support him for this too without any doubt -MC
  7. Per above. -Sam
  8. Thought about it, no real reason not to promote him at this point. Agreed with above (so as not to trigger alemas) ~Vera (Message me)
  9. Yep! La would make a great discussion mod! I like his tactics as chat mod and I think he'd apply them well as DM. Full support. ❀´¯`*•.¸¸✿ βυรץÇίтץĢίгl ✿´¯`*•.¸¸❀
  10. Per the first guy (Kep? Probably.). We need all the help we can get. Brick425 (talk) 00:10, March 2, 2017 (UTC)
  11. sure, is already helpful with editing and modding, per above. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  12. Per above -maj
  13. Per above. :3 ~Shek
  14. Very active, is good for the job. - Nartles
  15. Per above. - Verrack
  16. per above ~ eoe
  17. Active and a good editor I trust, I think he'll be a good content mod User:Lilac Neko
  18. Hes on a lot so he would be an active moderator. As active as this place is now a Days. I support him as dictator of LMBW. - MEMELORD GAME WOLF OF KEKISTAN
  19. Per all of the above. Webby is active, mature, and suitable for the role. -Flyinggirl4
  20. Webkinz has always seemed to be enough mature to me, so he'd make a perfect DM for me. Per above also Yada Dark http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/picsou/fr/images/d/db/Emoticon_Picsou.gif 20?cb=20160826204149 22:47, March 2, 2017 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Web is no doubt one of the best options for this role but I am undecided for the moment. Romaniandude12 (talk) 17:42, March 1, 2017 (UTC)Switching to support
  2. server - benboy

Oppose

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

Romaniandude12 (2)

Romaniandude12 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12|Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12 edits, Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

So I'll make this reasonably brief. I've been on this wiki for over two years now, and I feel I have shown myself to be a good moderator for chat. Considering we have lost 2 of our 3 discussion moderators in the past 3 months, it is reasonable that we promote another. We are also expected to see a major influx of users coming from the MBs now that they have officially closed. I know most of the users here and how they think, and I believe I have the right potential to make a good DM. If you have any questions or concerns please leave a message on my wall, the comment section, or hit me up on chat. Thank you for your time!

--Romaniandude12 (talk) 05:50, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Support

  1. sure why not i trust him more than our other content mods i think lol kek eyedeekay 05:52, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Mature user, experienced mod. I trust him. ~Vera (Message me)
  3. Yes, he's more than capable and he's very mature -Dr. Satl, M.D.
  4. per Satl ~ eoe
  5. rom -slice Invalid support reason
  6. hell yeah, he's an experienced and good minded person. very trustworthy and fit for the job --Navy Bravey with some Gravey (talk) 05:53, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  7. per above - Kira
  8. He's a very competent chat moderator and will do an excellent job at this as well. - Rus
  9. Quite active, much experience. He is capable of this job. - Nartles
  10. sure, per above †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  11. Sure, per above. LegoWebby101
  12. Generally a competent chap, I can imagine him doing well in this position. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 12:10, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  13. Per Sat ~maj
  14. Not much to add except "agreed with everyone else". Derp Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 12:24, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  15. It's good that he's active, has some experience, and has matured since he first joined. Lilac Neko (talk)
  16. Per aboveLive long and prosper (talk) 17:23, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  17. Per above ~ Roddy
  18. Per the above ~Mizutsune
  19. Despite his fluctuating activity, I still believe he has the qualities for the gig. MC
  20. Experienced user and a good CM. A good guy for this job. Marcel77799 (talk) 21:10, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  21. Per everything, no reason to oppose personally ▐_ 21:45, March 1, 2017 (UTC)
  22. Per above. -Sam

Neutral

  1. I have no stong feelings either way, He is experienced but I don't personally know him- Koren8000

Oppose

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Unsuccessful

Romaniandude12

Romaniandude12 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12|Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12 edits, Special:Editcount/Romaniandude12/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hey everyone! We recently lost one of our discussion moderators, and due to the small size of our staff I believe we should replace him. Because of my lengthy history in this community, I have grown to know those here and how thing opperate. I have been a chat moderator for a while now, and I believe that I have the potential to be a good discussion moderator. Please let me know, either via PM or comments, any thoughts. Thank you for reading this, have a nice day! Romaniandude12 (talk) 23:43, January 3, 2017 (UTC)

Support

  1. I've seen Rome moderate chat and I believe that he does a fairly good job at it. I also believe that he would be capable of using these extra rights appropriately and will do a good job with them. Plus, we could always use a new Discussions Moderator and Rome is one of the few consistently active staff members that I feel good about. ~Mizutsune
  2. Active, levelheaded, doesn't cause problems. I like him ~ EOE
  3. I don't see why you wouldn't be a good one, also per above. LegoWebby101
  4. Per Webby. Brick425 (talk) 00:23, January 4, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Solid mod, per above. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 00:30, January 4, 2017 (UTC)
  6. So if you look way back in like wherever the old achives of these election thingies are and see my reason for voting for rome to be chat mod, that same reason is my reason for this one. Chances are it was "Per above." Probably. Maybe not. Either way, #ROMEFORDM - Gandy
  7. Basically what TSA said. Marcel77799 (talk) 15:14, January 4, 2017 (UTC)
  8. Whatever, he's good at his job. 15:31, January 4, 2017 (UTC) User is not eligible to vote
  9. Per all of the above. Kingwja3(My Wall) 18:44, January 4, 2017 (UTC)
  10. Per all. - Roddy
  11. Per above. - Verrack
  12. Yep, per Apple. Rom would make a fine DM and it's a posistion that we really could use filled at the moment. ❀´¯`*•.¸¸✿ βυรץÇίтץĢίгl ✿´¯`*•.¸¸❀
  13. With the impending influx of new users (and the ones who have joined already) I am inclined to support. ~Vera (Message me)
  14. This is a supportive comment. ~Jah
  15. Per the above. KnightoftheLight (talk)
  16. He's respectable and responsible. Support -Dr. Satl, M.D.
  17. I don't really care, I just think that CMs should be phased out for DMs LCF (talk!) 00:26, January 10, 2017 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Eh... Got a bit of a mixed view about Rom, so I'm going neutral. QuantumHedgehog Message MeContributions
  2. I echo what Quantum said for now. ~Vera (Message me) 00:11, January 4, 2017 (UTC) switching to support
  3. The Bubble of Impossibility (wallcontribs) 06:39, January 4, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Idk, per Quantum ~Ally

Oppose

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

Impossibubbles

Impossibubbles (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/Impossibubbles|Special:Editcount/Impossibubbles edits, Special:Editcount/Impossibubbles/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hello there. So, I'm making this RfR because I've been encouraged to from more than one source. I know I'm a fairly new mod, but I've been around the block, and I feel like I know how things work pretty well. I'm around at all hours, so completing any DM duties and such would be no problem. Not to mention I'm always editing, so it's pretty convenient for me to keep an eye on recent activity. xD Anywho, thanks for your consideration. The Bubble of Impossibility (wallcontribs) 03:01, October 5, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. Proven CM, generally great person, occasionally makes passable edits, more than worthy of the position. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 03:02, October 5, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Make her admin already, per reasons listed in her paragraph —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  3. I support because I constantly see you editing mainspace articles and notice that you are generally very active on the wiki. You have proven that you have the dedication and knowledge to benefit the wiki by appropriately using the tools that come with being a moderator.Rapmilo (talk)Rapmilo
  4. Yes! You have proven that you have every requirements for any local role on LMBW, to me. Yada Dark http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/picsou/fr/images/d/db/Emoticon_Picsou.gif 14:56, October 5, 2016 (UTC)
  5. I see a future admin in her. Mature, nice but still firm at the necessary times, active, edits... What more do you want? Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 15:12, October 5, 2016 (UTC)
  6. She makes a good CM so why wouldn't she make a good DM? Hell, why not just make her Admin already! - Marsh
  7. Per Ale (though "nice" may not be the best word...Derp). » Grandpa Weirdo™ » (wall) » 16:21, October 5, 2016 (UTC)
  8. Per above. We wouldn't need anymore DMs after you. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån
  9. Per the above, and Ale especially.  No reservations.  -/\/\Y (talk)
  10. Per... Everyone. Purplebrick333 (talk) 20:24, October 6, 2016 (UTC)
  11. Per the above. Also, I've seen a lot of maturity since I first met you - I think you'd do well. ~ Kingwja
  12. Per everyone. ~JMW
  13. per all the above (also point ape...ale...you are slacking xD :{p ) -//\\//\\Č
  14. I don't want to vote for Bubbles...but I don't want AP to hunt me down and kill me like he said he would if I didn't vote for her...it's blackmail, I know...but...AP doesn't seem to care...he wants his girlfriend to be in this position of power. So...per above...but not really. ~ Gandy (In reality tho, AP is not blackmailing me - I vote for her of my own free will XD And in all seriousness, per above (In case you were confuzzled))
  15. I haven't put much thought into it, but I suppose Bubbles would be a good DM. -Sam
  16. Have some reservations still but overall you'd be a good DM. - Roddy
  17. Per all the above. -NXTein
  18. While I echo what Roddy says I feel you can improve on the job (I did) ~Hype (Message me) 17:15, October 9, 2016 (UTC)
  19. She's a good mod so she can do this.It's not what you got its what you do with it...... That makes you a hero (talk) Bio
  20. I thought about it some more and I don't really have a reason not to support you and also per above. LegoWebby101

Neutral

  1. I'm going to think about this before voting either way. While you are very active, I can't say I've been completely impressed by your behavior as a CM lately, and I don't think it will carry over well onto forums and walls. ~Hype (Message me) 03:13, October 5, 2016 (UTC) Changed to Support
  2. I don't really see much need for another DM at this moment in time. Also per hype ~~me
  3. I am not 100% sure if Bubbles is fit for the title of "Discussion Moderator". From what I've seen in and out of chat, she does not have all the qualities needed to be a DM. But as I said, I am not 100% sure. I'll have to think more before I make my final decision. Edit: I still have a mixed opinion, so I'm staying neutral. QuantumHedgehog
  4. Per Hype, I just need to think a bit and such. ~maj
  5. I don't have anything against you, and I do think you would fulfill this position really well, but I honestly do not see the need for another Discussion Moderator. -Det
  6. You're a good CM and a decent person overall, but I don't really feel the need for another DM right now. LegoWebby101 Changed to Support
  7. Per Tad and Hype. You've been a little unkind, but just a little bit. - Verrack
  8. Neutral for now - Roddy Changed to Support

Oppose

  1. I'm going to have to go opposed for now. Sorry Bubbles, I just don't feel like I know you well enough yet to vote support, and I have seen a bit of an argumentative side and ...other things that I don't think DM is fully fitting just yet. I'd like to see the qualities of relaxed, calming peace keeping, and open to two sides of an argument without pushing one side, developed and displayed more before I vote support. =) -BusyCityGirl

Comments

  • For those merely arguing that there is no need for another DM, I'd like to point out that there are considerable gaps of time when no admins or DMs are keeping an eye on wiki activity, many of them occurrences when Bubbles is online. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 00:10, October 7, 2016 (UTC)
    • While I agree with you, as I found it personally not to be a reason that I would even argue for, it is possible they still do not feel the need for DMs even then. And, to be honest, rarely does something happen that requires a DM or admin's presence on Wiki Activity/RC. ~Hype (Message me)
    • Yes it's rare, but another DM would be rather helpful in order to further tighten security, I'm just arguing that the claim that "we already have enough DMs" is hardly a logical one to base your position off of alone. Monocle Man (wallcontribs) 01:39, October 7, 2016 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

HyperFlash Studios

HyperFlash Studios (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/HyperFlash Studios|Special:Editcount/HyperFlash Studios edits, Special:Editcount/HyperFlash Studios/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hey, I'm HyperFla- well, you all know me by this point. Derp I'm running for Discussion Moderator because at the moment we only have one, and there have been some instances of problems happening on walls and in blog comments with no one available to handle it. I think I can preform DM tasks alongside my current CM duties, as they aren't much more than I have to do now (things like helping out with votes, moderating threads, etc). Thanks for considering me! ~Hype (Message me) 23:17, July 19, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. Yepyep. Supporting for the reasons he mentioned. -SoE
  2. Of course I support Hype! And it's for the reasons I mentioned last time I voted for Hype on something like this, which you can find if you search long enough. ~Gandy
  3. We need another one, and Hype would be very good for the job. Derp - Ultra
  4. I was pleasantly surprised by Hype's modding skills as of late, and we need another discussions moderator, so this is a smashing idea. -Monocle Man
  5. YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES (sorry). More seriously, Hyper has proven that he has all the qualities needed to manage a wiki as a Chat & Content Moderator and would suit perfectly for Discussions Moderator. I'll add that we need some Discussions Mods, since Slice is the only one and can't do everything alone. Yada Dark http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/picsou/fr/images/d/db/Emoticon_Picsou.gif 08:36, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
  6. We could use another one and I think you'll do a good job. LegoWebby101
  7. Per the above. -Flyinggirl4
  8. As another DM is needed, I think you'd do well. Also per Yada. Kingwja3(Da King's Wall) 17:36, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
  9. All the way baby! Hype tarin coming through! (Also we do need another DM and I think hyper would do very well at it) GET 2 DA CHOPPA!!!-Arnold
  10. Per the above. --A person
  11. Responsible guy. To counter one neutral, why does earning one right recently mean he shouldn't be eligible for a second? This isn't a right that depends on him being CM for an amount of time... in fact, most people get DM first. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  12. I trust this guy, I'd say he use the tools well in his hands. SamanthaNguyen1116 (talk) 02:09, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
  13. I'm totally going for this guy. He's been on for a long time (or at least longer than me (derp)) and I think he'll be perfect for the job! ~~Leeeeeeeena
  14. Agreed with the above ('cause I'm too lazy to write my own reason). Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 18:45, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
  15. pbasically agreed with all the above. IMO, he could run for admin RN and Id happily support - mc1
  16. We need another one, and that's you. Peud
  17. (totally don't love you or anything). Hype is an active derp, a capable derp, and a nice derp. He'll do lovely. ~kEd
  18. He already has CM.. so why not-Biofan1
  19. Per everyone Purplebrick333 (talk) 19:11, July 22, 2016 (UTC)
  20. Hype does seem to do a good job and is online often. And per the above. :P ~Sir Guurahk
  21. I've mulled it over, I think Hype's done rather well with his CM rights and don't see how this will pan out differently. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån

Neutral

  1. Meh, you just got CM recently, so I'm not quite sure why you need these rights so soon. IDK might change later. Avalair Talk Wall
  2. Need to think about it, would like to see how you handle your CM rights a bit longer before I decide on supporting you for DM. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 16:32, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Per Spider. NG (talk) 17:00, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
  4. I don't really know where my vote lies per se, so I'll just stick to being neutral. Sometimes I feel that you're a bit too nosy and yeah.. I remember we had an issue related to this about a month ago... No need to bring it back. I mightchange my vote in the future. EtherealSpirit(AKA Varn)
  5. I'd like to think it over a bit...., but I'm leaning toward Support, I see good things in you for LMBW. «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat
  6. I agree with Ava here. - Rebooted
  7. Agree with Colonel Roy here. -JMW
  8. Per Ava. But I'm leaning on support a lot more than previous votes.My PageMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  9. Per Ava except for the last sentence.

Oppose

  1. too new of a mod -slice

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The request was Successful

AmazingPythor

AmazingPythor (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ([[Special:Editcount/AmazingPythor|Special:Editcount/AmazingPythor edits, Special:Editcount/AmazingPythor/main mainspace]]) - (Back to user rights requests)

Salutations. I am AmazingPythor, an active and experienced chat moderator on this wiki. I am posting an RfR concurrently with Hype due to the lack of active DMs and administrators, and believe that the promotion of both or one of us to discussions moderator would make wiki activity a far more secure place. I have been a chat mod for almost half a year, and the majority of the wiki considers me the best on the team, so I have plenty of experience for the position. For these reasons, I believe that promoting me would help tighten security around here. Thank you for your time. ~ Monocle Man

Support

  1. For sure! You have been an excellent, mature and active chat moderator. You are probably one of the best user who would suit for Discussions mod rights. Unclets Yada Dark http://static1.wikia.nocookie.net/picsou/fr/images/d/db/Emoticon_Picsou.gif 16:21, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Full support, AP has all the qualities needed to be a DM. ~Hype (Message me) 16:23, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Absolutely. I know AP is one of the highest qualified user for this, full support. LegoWebby101
  4. One of our best CMs, would make a great DM. Colonel Roy Mustang (talk) 16:31, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
  5. per webbeh - Ultra
  6. Per above. -SoE
  7. Per the above. NG (talk) 17:00, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
  8. AP is easily one of, if not our best, Chat Mod and certainly deserves these rights. Avalair Talk Wall
  9. Good CM, could be admin if he tried. —May the Force be with you, and may Darkness follow you. Oh. I'm the Doctor, by the way.
  10. I have no reasons why you shouldn't be a DM. So yeah, you've got my vote. ~EtherealSpirit(AKA Varn)
  11. Proven CM, ready for these rights 100%. «†J•cI•u•cI•e•420†» (Wall) -Retired Bureaucrat
  12. AP has talenet, per all of above. -Pacman87
  13. Per above SamanthaNguyen1116 (talk) 04:17, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
  14. Per, like, everyone above me. XD ~Gandy~
  15. Per the above. -Flyinggirl4
  16. Agreed with the above ('cause I'm too lazy to write my own reason). Alemas2005: Mostly Harmless(Talk to me) 18:45, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
  17. Same as what I said for hypers Above really. Ape is also the best CM around -Mc1
  18. *nods violently* (and per the above just to make it 'legit') ~kƎd
  19. Sure. :P - Rebooted
  20. Experienced and qualified. Nothing more to say. -JMW
  21. Might be terrible of me, but per everyone again. Purplebrick333 (talk) 19:13, July 22, 2016 (UTC)
  22. Does a great job and is online often. Per all the above again. :P ~Sir Guurahk
  23. Per all the above, and unlike Rom, I just ate Chick-Fil-A. Mmm, waffle fries. This guy has qualities in him that I'd recommend for Admin, and making him a Discussion Moderator is fine by me. My PageMessage Wall!My Blog! • I have Special:Editcount/Starrocks923 edits!
  24. Absolutely, he's one of our strongest moderators and this position will only continue to reflect that. †hę Djøkøvïϛ Fån

Neutral

  1. I'm eating tortilla chips. ~~rom

Oppose

Comments